SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(MP) 865

PRANAY VERMA
Javed Shah – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sachin Parmar for petitioner; Kushal Goyal, Deputy Advocate General for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner being aggrieved by the order dated 21.3.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Ujjain externing him for a period of one year with effect from the date of order from the revenue limits of Districts Ujjain and all contiguous Districts in exercise of powers under section 5(a) (b) of M.P. Rajya Suraksha Adhiniyam, 1990 (hereinafter referred as the 'Adhiniyam'). The petitioner has also challenged the order dated 7.7.2025 (Annexure P/3) passed by the Commissioner, Ujjain Division, Ujjain, whereby his appeal preferred against the order dated 21.3.2025 under section 9 of the Adhiniyam has been dismissed.

2. The facts of the case show that on the basis of report of Superintendent of Police, District Ujjain dated 22.9.2023, a show cause notice for externment was issued to the petitioner by the District Magistrate under section 8(1) of the Adhiniyam. The petitioner filed his reply to the said notice after which the District Magistrate passed his order on 21.3.2025 which has been affirmed by the Commissioner by the impugned order.

3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the impu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top