SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 MarsdenLR 950

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
MUHAMMAD RIDOAN & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Table of Content
1. details of the robbery incident (Para 1 , 4)
2. appellants' guilty plea and sentencing (Para 2 , 3)
3. examination of crime's circumstances (Para 5 , 6 , 8)
4. need for deterrent punishment (Para 7 , 16 , 17)
5. contextual analysis of guilty pleas (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 13)
6. comparison with similar cases (Para 12 , 14 , 15)
Abdul Rahman Sebli J:

[1] The two appellants, both Indonesian nationals, were charged in the Sessions Court at Kajang with armed gang robbery and the charge against them is as follows:

Bahawa kamu bersama-sama dua orang yang masih bebas, pada 27 Julai 2012 jam lebih kurang 0330 hrs, di alamat No 2 Jalan Harmoni 11/3, Taman Harmoni, di dalam Daerah Kajang, di dalam Negeri Selangor Darul Ehsan, telah melakukan samun berkawan dan bersenjata ke atas Hisham Bin Zakaria, No KP: 680106-10-5727 dengan menggunakan sebilah pisau, dan mengambil barang kepunyaannya iaitu satu Unit Komputer Riba jenama HP, tiga unit telefon Bimbit Blackberry dan Nokia, dan wang tunai berjumlah lebih kurang RM1,100. Oleh yang demikian kamu telah melakukan kesalahan yang boleh dihukum di bawah s 395/397 Kanun Keseksaan .

[2] They pleaded guilty to the charge and were sentenced to se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top