EVERISE HECTARES SDN BHD vs CITIBANK BHD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2010 MarsdenLR 3087

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
EVERISE HECTARES SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
CITIBANK BHD – Respondent

Table of Content
1. application for amendment and appeal process. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. background on loan and auction proceedings. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. issues of res judicata related to amendment application. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. res judicata and finality of judgments. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
5. defining cause of action in relation to res judicata. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
6. application of res judicata in litigation. (Para 25 , 26 , 27)
7. characterization of amendment as abuse of process. (Para 28 , 29 , 30)
8. delay and lack of bona fide in filing application. (Para 31 , 32 , 33)
9. tactical maneuvers in legal proceedings. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
10. locus standi of parties in amendment application. (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48)

Abdul Malik Ishak JCA:

Introduction

[1] The appellant (Everise Hectares Sdn Bhd) applied by way of a summons in chambers dated 5 July 2005 to amend the originating summons to add Fenomena Kualiti Sdn Bhd as the second defendant (hereinafter referred to as the "amendment application") and, at the same time, to prevent the proposed second defendant from taking possession or dealing with the bungalow land at Lot number DIB 21, Kelab Golf Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2010 MarsdenLR 3087

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYAEVERISE HECTARES SDN BHD – AppellantVersusCITIBANK BHD – Respondent

Cases Referred (5)

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
EVERISE HECTARES SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
CITIBANK BHD – Respondent