Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
AP(M)L’s bid was based on a coal procurement ratio of 70% domestic and 30% imported, and relief was granted only for the shortfall in domestic coal, aligning with their initial premise ["Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. VS Adani Power (Mundra) Limited - Supreme Court"].
Legal and Administrative Context:
The Circular dated 3-12-1980 specified that appointments against certain posts must be made from merit lists by competent authorities, and Deputy Director Mallick lacked the authority for certain appointments, rendering some appointments illegal per Supreme Court judgments (e.g., Umadevi case) ["Shakuntala Kumari vs The State Of Bihar - Patna"], ["12411"], ["12413"], ["12408"], ["12409"].
Judicial Principles and Precedents:
References:- Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. VS Adani Power (Mundra) Limited - Supreme Court- Shakuntala Kumari vs The State Of Bihar - Patna, 12411, 12413, 12408, 12409
In the world of Indian legal research, accessing historical judgments can be crucial for lawyers, scholars, and litigants alike. A common query we encounter is: Get me Text of 1980 Supreme(ap) 70. This citation likely refers to a 1980 decision from the Andhra Pradesh High Court (often abbreviated as Supreme(AP) in older notations), case number 70. But what happens when the full text isn't readily available in standard databases or provided references? This post dives deep into the search process, explains the findings, and draws insights from related cases on key legal themes like appointments, jurisdiction, and statutory duties.
We'll explore why this specific case eludes easy access, analyze available documents, and integrate principles from similar judgments. Note: This is general information based on reviewed materials and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
Citations like 1980 Supreme(AP) 70 typically point to judgments from the Andhra Pradesh High Court in 1980, sequenced as the 70th case of the year. Andhra Pradesh High Court decisions from that era often dealt with constitutional writs, service matters, or civil disputes under evolving laws post-Emergency. However, after a thorough review of extensive legal references—including multiple Supreme Court judgments—the specific case citation 1980 Supreme(AP) 70 is not directly present in the supplied references.Jagannath Amin VS Seetharama (dead)Union Of India VS Raj IndustriesSUNDEEP KUMAR BAFNA VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Key points from the review:- References span Supreme Court and High Court cases on procedural law, election law, civil/criminal procedure, and constitutional issues, but none match the exact citation. Anita Kushwaha VS Pushap SudanSom Mittal VS Government of Karnataka- No document excerpts or mentions align with Andhra Pradesh High Court numbering from 1980. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bombay VS Haribhai Estate Private LTD.STATE OF U. P. VS DINKAR SINHA
This absence highlights a common challenge in legal research: older regional cases may not be digitized or indexed in modern databases.
A comprehensive scan of the materials confirms no mention or excerpt from 1980 Supreme(AP) 70. Document IDs cover Supreme Court orders from various years, but diverge in jurisdiction and topics. For instance:- Supreme Court references discuss broad principles but skip this AP-specific case. S. Raghbir Singh Gill VS S. Gurcharan Singh TohraVeerayee Ammal VS Seeni Ammal
The references include various judgments, orders, and legal principles from the Supreme Court and High Courts, but none explicitly mention or correspond to 1980 Supreme(AP) 70.Union Of India: Prithipal Singh: Ram Mehar Raj Kumar: Delhi Cattle Breeding Farms Private LTD. VS Raghubir Singh: Union Of India: Union Of India: Union Of IndiaEbrahim Suleiman Sait VS M. C. Mohammed
Without the text, practitioners can't cite direct ratios. This underscores the need for archival access via official repositories like the Andhra Pradesh High Court website, Manupatra, or SCC Online. Typically, such cases might involve service law or writs, themes echoed in related sources.
While the exact text remains elusive, nearby precedents illuminate potential themes. Several documents reference 1980-era circulars and AP-related rulings, offering context on illegal appointments and public service disputes—possibly akin to what 1980 Supreme(AP) 70 addressed.
Multiple Patna High Court judgments scrutinize Bihar Health Services appointments, citing a Circular dated 3-12-1980:
The exception in respect of appointing authority came with the Circular dated 3-12-1980 which contemplated that suitable candidates be selected as per requirement from common merit list by the competent authorities... Dr Mallick, Deputy Director... was not competent to make appointments against Category III or Category IV.Shakuntala Kumari vs The State of Bihar - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 834Shakuntala Kumari vs The State Of Bihar - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 836Shakuntala Kumari vs The State of Bihar - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 831
These align with Supreme Court precedents like State of Bihar v. Devendra Sharma (2020), emphasizing merit-based selection.
An AP-linked case discusses retiral benefits:
AIR 1990 AP 171 and the decision of the Supreme Court in U. P. State coop...CHANDER BHAN VS DELHI STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED - 2001 Supreme(Del) 367
This may parallel service disputes in 1980 AP cases.
Other sources clarify court powers:- NDPS/Abkari Act: Sessions Court erred; case transferred under CrPC Sections 401/407. The court exercised its powers under S.401 and S.407 of CrPC to transfer the case to the Court of Session.State of Kerala VS Manoharan - 1998 Supreme(Ker) 611- Arbitration: Non-parties bound if intent clear. Normally, arbitration takes place between the persons who have, from the outset, been parties... But, it does occasionally happen...Jitf Water Infrastructure Limited VS Msme Commissionerate - 2020 Supreme(Guj) 524
These principles—jurisdiction limits, procedural adherence—could underpin 1980 Supreme(AP) 70 if it involved writs or transfers.
Recommendations from reviewed materials: To obtain the text of 1980 Supreme(AP) 70, one would need access to legal databases or records that include that specific case.Nature Lovers Movement VS State of KeralaUNION OF INDIA VS INDERJIT BARUA
The quest for 1980 Supreme(AP) 70 reveals the gaps in digital legal archives, but related cases provide valuable proxies. Core lessons:- Illegal appointments confer no rights; follow procedures strictly. Shakuntala Kumari vs The State of Bihar - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 834- Writs enforce statutory duties in service matters. CHANDER BHAN VS DELHI STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED - 2001 Supreme(Del) 367- Courts wield revision/transfer powers for justice. State of Kerala VS Manoharan - 1998 Supreme(Ker) 611
In summary, while the exact text evades our reviewed documents SUNDEEP KUMAR BAFNA VS STATE OF MAHARASHTRAAnita Kushwaha VS Pushap Sudan, diligence in research pays off. Stay informed, verify sources, and seek professional guidance. For more on Indian case law, subscribe to our blog!
Word count: ~1050. General insights only—not advice.
#IndianCaseLaw #LegalResearch #APHighCourt
He submits that though the Standing Linkage Committee (Long-Term) (hereinafter referred to as “SLC (LT)”) has considered AP(M)L’s application for 100% coal of its total capacity, it has granted linkage only for 70% of 1980 MW, i.e. 1386 MW only. ... We are, therefore, of the considered view that no error could be found with the concurrent findings that AP(M)L was entitled to Change in Law relief for 100% of the contracted ....
Freshub contends that the shopping-list feature of Amazon’s accused products, when used, sometimes ends up adding “items” to shopping lists because it translates user speech to text (“add bananas to my shopping list”), extracts a keyword (“bananas”), and ap- pends the word “bananas” to the user’ ... The claim specifies adding an “item corresponding to the text,” not the text itself, to the list. ’153 patent, col. 15....
Freshub contends that the shopping-list feature of Amazon’s accused products, when used, sometimes ends up adding “items” to shopping lists because it translates user speech to text (“add bananas to my shopping list”), extracts a keyword (“bananas”), and ap- pends the word “bananas” to the user’ ... The claim specifies adding an “item corresponding to the text,” not the text itself, to the list. ’153 patent, col. 15....
We consider the record for the different but obviously re- lated question of what Ikan’s counsel believed in 2017 about whether Ikan intentionally abandoned the ’291 ap- plication. Case: 22-1391 Document: 70 Page: 16 Filed: 02/26/2024 16 FRESHUB, INC. v. ... Freshub contends that the shopping-list feature of Amazon’s accused products, when used, sometimes ends up adding “items” to shopping lists because it trans....
The exception in respect of ap- pointing authority came with the Circular dated 3-12-1980 which contemplated that suitable candidates be selected as per requirement from common merit list by the competent authorities of Secretariat and attached ofÏces; District Col- lector and ... Dr Mallick, Deputy Director in the subordinate ofÏces of the Directorate of Health Services was not competent to make ap- pointments against Category III or Cate....
The exception in respect of ap- pointing authority came with the Circular dated 3-12-1980 which contemplated that suitable candidates be selected as per requirement from common merit list by the competent authorities of Secretariat and attached ofÏces; District Col- lector and ... Dr Mallick, Deputy Director in the subordinate ofÏces of the Directorate of Health Services was not competent to make ap- pointments against Category III or Cate....
The exception in respect of ap- pointing authority came with the Circular dated 3-12-1980 which contemplated that suitable candidates be selected as per requirement from common merit list by the competent authorities of Secretariat and attached ofÏces; District Col- lector and ... Dr Mallick, Deputy Director in the subordinate ofÏces of the Directorate of Health Services was not competent to make ap- pointments against Category III or Cate....
The exception in respect of ap- pointing authority came with the Circular dated 3-12-1980 which contemplated that suitable candidates be selected as per requirement from common merit list by the competent authorities of Secretariat and attached ofÏces; District Col- lector and ... Dr Mallick, Deputy Director in the subordinate ofÏces of the Directorate of Health Services was not competent to make ap- pointments against Category III or Cate....
The exception in respect of ap- pointing authority came with the Circular dated 3-12-1980 which contemplated that suitable candidates be selected as per requirement from common merit list by the competent authorities of Secretariat and attached ofÏces; District Col- lector and ... Dr Mallick, Deputy Director in the subordinate ofÏces of the Directorate of Health Services was not competent to make ap- pointments against Category III or Cate....
The exception in respect of ap- pointing authority came with the Circular dated 3-12-1980 which contemplated that suitable candidates be selected as per requirement from common merit list by the competent authorities of Secretariat and attached ofÏces; District Col- lector and ... Dr Mallick, Deputy Director in the subordinate ofÏces of the Directorate of Health Services was not competent to make ap- pointments against Category III or Cate....
(c) I have told him that it is not possible for me to leave my work at Mumbai and shift to Germany but he regularly made conversation with me and he made me believe that I will be free and independent to work even if I wish to after the marriage. (b) He conveyed to me through text messages and mobile that he is doing a fine job in Frankfurt, Germany and earning Rs.70 to 80 lakhs yearly and thereafter only by telling this information he offered me the proposal of marriage. (d)....
Normally, arbitration takes place between the persons who have, from the outset, been parties to both the arbitration agreement as well as the substantive contract underlining (sic underlying) that agreement. (supra), in paragraph 70, the Supreme Court has held as follows which is reproduced for the facility of reference: “70. But, it does occasionally happen that the claim is made against or by someone who is not originally named as a party.
Dr. Ghosh wants us to indicate in our order that in the event of the appeal being filed against the order to the Division Bench, it would be open to the petitioner to agitate this aspect of the matter. " The text of Hon'ble Supreme Court's order dated 28. 11. 1988, as corrected by order dated 10. 03. 1989, is set out below :"the Special leave petition is dismissed. But the learned Judges of the Hon'ble Supreme Court while rejecting the SLP were pleased to record the submissio....
AIR 1990 AP 171 and the decision of the Supreme Court in U. P. State coop.
The Full text of the judgment of the Supreme Court referred to above is not made available to me. and acquitting the accused of the offences punishable under S.279 and 304A of IPC. In view of this, the High Court had no jurisdiction and power to direct the conviction of the appellant under S.89(a) and (b) of the Act." From the extract of the judgment found in the Short Notes it would appear that this Court convicted the accused for the offence punishable under S.89(a) and (b)....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
