Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Section 65B and Electronic Evidence Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act explicitly governs the admissibility of electronic records, including CCTV footage. It stipulates that such records can be admitted as evidence only if they are accompanied by a proper certificate under Section 65B(4), which authenticates the electronic record's origin and integrity. Without this certificate, the evidence is generally considered inadmissible.References:Umer Ali S/o Abdul Hussain Vs State Of Kerala - Kerala, State of Jharkhand VS Ramai Karua - Jharkhand, Akash S/o Raju Ratnakar VS State of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh, SUNIL vs STATE OF HARYANA - Punjab and Haryana, Sunil VS State Of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana, Neeraj Prasad Gond @ Neeraj Kumar Gond VS State of Bihar - Patna
Legal Precedents and Judicial Interpretations Courts have consistently emphasized that CCTV footage without a certificate under Section 65B(4) cannot be admitted as evidence. For instance, in cases like Shafhi Mohd. and others, courts have held that the absence of such a certificate renders the electronic record inadmissible, unless the court is satisfied that the record is authentic through other means.References:Umer Ali S/o Abdul Hussain Vs State Of Kerala - Kerala, State of Jharkhand VS Ramai Karua - Jharkhand, Sunil VS State Of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana
Procedural Requirements for Admission The law requires that the electronic record (such as CCTV footage stored on a pen drive or CD) must be backed by a certificate from a responsible official who managed or operated the device, verifying the record’s authenticity. Failure to produce this certificate leads to rejection of the evidence.References:AJI VS State Of Kerala Represented By Public Prosecutor - Kerala, SUNIL vs STATE OF HARYANA - Punjab and Haryana, Vijay vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh
Implications for Evidence in Court The absence of a Section 65B certificate is a significant procedural defect, often resulting in the footage being deemed inadmissible. Courts have also highlighted that this requirement is mandatory and cannot be bypassed, ensuring the integrity and reliability of electronic evidence.References:Umer Ali S/o Abdul Hussain Vs State Of Kerala - Kerala, Akash S/o Raju Ratnakar VS State of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh, Sunil VS State Of Haryana - Punjab and Haryana
Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act is applicable to CCTV footage and similar electronic records. For such evidence to be admissible in court, it must be accompanied by a certificate under Section 65B(4) from a competent person who managed the device or the record. Without this certificate, the evidence is generally inadmissible, as established by judicial decisions and the statutory framework.
In an era dominated by digital surveillance, CCTV cameras are ubiquitous in public spaces, businesses, and homes. They capture critical moments that can make or break legal cases. But a pressing question arises: Whether Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act is applicable to CCTV footage? This query is increasingly common as courts grapple with the admissibility of electronic evidence.
This blog post explores the legal framework, key judicial interpretations, and practical steps to ensure CCTV footage holds up in court. Note that this is general information based on established precedents and should not be considered specific legal advice. Always consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, is applicable to electronic evidence such as CCTV footage, provided the conditions specified therein—including the requisite certification—are satisfied. Without compliance, particularly the mandatory certificate under Section 65B(4), CCTV footage cannot be admitted as evidence. Anvar P. V. VS P. K. Basheer - 2015 3 Supreme 453
This provision establishes the procedure for admitting electronic records produced by computers or similar devices, explicitly covering CCTV recordings. Courts have repeatedly emphasized that mere production of footage is insufficient; strict adherence to Section 65B is required. Jisal Rasak VS State Of Kerala - 2019 0 Supreme(Ker) 652
Section 65B deals with the admissibility of electronic records. As CCTV footage is stored and generated electronically, it squarely falls under this section. The Act clarifies: The contents of electronic records may be proved in accordance with the provisions of section 65B. Anvar P. V. VS P. K. Basheer - 2015 3 Supreme 453
Further, Any documentary evidence by way of an electronic record under the Evidence Act, in view of Sections 59 and 65A, can be proved only in accordance with the procedure prescribed under Section 65B. Jisal Rasak VS State Of Kerala - 2019 0 Supreme(Ker) 652
High Court rulings reinforce this. For instance, in a case involving ATM footage, the court rejected admissibility due to the absence of a Section 65B(4) certificate, stating that CCTV footage could not be admitted without it. SUNIL vs STATE OF HARYANA - Punjab and Haryana
Similarly, another judgment noted that CCTV footage supplied with a certificate under Section 65B was preserved for evidence, highlighting its necessity. Geeta VS State - 2021 Supreme(Del) 550 - 2021 0 Supreme(Del) 550
To be admissible, electronic records must meet four key conditions under Section 65B(2), culminating in a certificate under Section 65B(4). This certificate must:- Identify the electronic record.- Describe how it was produced.- Provide details of the device used.- Be signed by a person in a responsible official position related to the device's operation. Nimba Ram, S/o. Shri Kushala Ram VS State of Rajasthan, Through Its Public Prosecutor - 2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 213
The Supreme Court has stressed: The very admissibility of such a document, i.e., electronic record which is called as computer output, depends on the satisfaction of the four conditions under Section 65B(2). Anvar P. V. VS P. K. Basheer - 2015 3 Supreme 453
In practice, for CCTV, this means obtaining certification from a technician or official managing the system at the time of recording or seizure. Failure here leads to rejection, as seen in cases where certificates lacked company letterheads or seals. State of Jharkhand VS Ramai Karua - 2023 0 Supreme(Jhk) 732
Judicial precedents are unequivocal:
Additional cases echo this. A petitioner's argument that CCTV without Section 65B certification was inadmissible was upheld. SUNIL vs STATE OF HARYANA - Punjab and Haryana In a jail incident, footage was supplied with a Section 65B certificate to ensure validity. Geeta VS State - 2021 Supreme(Del) 550 - 2021 0 Supreme(Del) 550
Even in revision petitions, courts direct supply of CCTV copies but stress certification for admissibility. CHANDAN KR CHOWDHURY vs STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR - 2023 Supreme(Online)(CAL) 126 - 2023 Supreme(Online)(CAL) 126
Without the certificate, footage is inadmissible. A notable example: The appellant has not produced any certificate in terms of Section 65B in respect of the CDs... Therefore, the same cannot be admitted in evidence. Anvar P. V. VS P. K. Basheer - 2015 3 Supreme 453
This procedural safeguard prevents tampering and ensures reliability, as CCTV data can be self-generated without human intervention—but still requires authentication when produced as secondary evidence. Vaijinath VS State Of Maharashtra - 2019 Supreme(Bom) 1292 - 2019 0 Supreme(Bom) 1292
There are narrow exceptions:- Primary Evidence: If the original CCTV device (e.g., hard drive) is produced under Section 62, Section 65B may not strictly apply. If an electronic record as such is used as primary evidence under Section 62 of the Evidence Act, the same is admissible in evidence, without compliance of the conditions in Section 65B. Anvar P. V. VS P. K. Basheer - 2015 3 Supreme 453- However, secondary copies (e.g., pen drives, CDs) mandate full compliance.
Courts may reference evolving judgments like Shafhi Mohammad for procedural flexibility, but certification remains the norm. Mohd Zakir @ Mohd Zahir VS State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) - 2020 Supreme(Del) 1260 - 2020 0 Supreme(Del) 1260
To maximize admissibility:- Obtain a Section 65B(4) certificate immediately upon seizure from a responsible official. Manoj VS State - 2022 Supreme(Del) 1998 - 2022 0 Supreme(Del) 1998- Preserve the original device or multiple copies in the presence of witnesses. Vaijinath VS State Of Maharashtra - 2019 Supreme(Bom) 1292 - 2019 0 Supreme(Bom) 1292- Ensure certificates include all required details and are on official letterheads.- Request CCTV footage with certification during investigations. D. Santhanam VS State Represented by the Inspector of Police, Chennai - 2021 Supreme(Mad) 1856 - 2021 0 Supreme(Mad) 1856
Businesses and investigators should train staff on these protocols to avoid evidentiary pitfalls.
Section 65B unequivocally applies to CCTV footage in India, making certification under Section 65B(4) a cornerstone of admissibility. Courts consistently reject non-compliant evidence, underscoring the need for meticulous documentation. While exceptions exist for primary evidence, secondary productions demand compliance.
Key Takeaways:- Always secure a proper Section 65B certificate for CCTV evidence.- Understand primary vs. secondary evidence distinctions.- Stay updated on judicial trends for electronic records.
For tailored advice, consult a legal expert. This framework ensures CCTV's evidentiary value in pursuing justice.
is admissible in evidence, without compliance of the conditions in S.65B of the Evidence Act.” ... Those CDs cannot be admitted in evidence since the mandatory requirements of S.65B of the Evidence Act are not satisfied. ... The Evidence Act does not contemplate or permit the proof of an electronic record by oral evidence if requirements under S.65B of the Evidence Act ....
The certificate is as per Section 65B of the Evidence Act. The certificate has been marked as Exhibit-P-2/1/PW2. ... As per the certificate issued u/s 65B of the Evidence Act three persons were involved in transferring the CCTV footage to the pen drive. 14. P.W.10 (Dr. ... The authentication certificate in terms of Section 65B (4) of the Evidence Act has been issued und....
But, admissibility of the CCTV footage produced in pendrive, without certificate under Section 65B of the Evidence Act, can be decided by the learned Special Judge, on merits following the law on the point. ... Hence, the examination of pendrive concerned, which is not accompanied with certificate U/S.65B(4) of the Indian Evidence Act, will not serve any purpose, This point is found against petitioner. 5.....
So far as the question of admissibility of CCTV footage in the evidence is concerned, it is apposite to reproduce here Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, which runs as under: 65B. ... u/s 65B of the Evidence Act, while as per established law, certificate u/s 65B of the Evidence Act can be issued by a responsible official person in relation t....
footage of the ATM without the requisite certificate under Section 65B(4) of the Indian Evidence Act. ... The primary argument of the accused-petitioner which was not accepted by the Court was that in the absence of a certificate under Section 65B(4) of the Indian Evidence Act, the CCTV footage could not be admissible in evidence in light of the ... He also made a legal submission that in the a....
applicable TDS as per the provisions of the income tax act. ... deduct the applicable TDS as per the provisions of the income tax act. ... such electronic record can be in accordance with Section 65B(1), together with the requisite certificate under Section 65B(4). ... ” In the contrary the Respondent filed a CD of CCTV footage of the incident with certificate under sec....
Code of Criminal Procedure on due consideration of the CCTV footage. Code of Criminal Procedure the copy of the said CCTV footage was not supplied to the petitioner. The petitioner moved this Court in revision with a prayer directing the Trial Court to supply the copy of the said CCTV footage.
This leads us to the issue of the admissibility in evidence or the lack thereof, of the CCTV footage of the ATM without the requisite certificate under Section 65B(4) of the Indian Evidence Act. ... He also made a legal submission that in the absence of a certificate issued under Section 65B(4) of the Indian Evidence Act, the contents of the CCTV footage of the ATM concerned could not ha....
The computer generated electronic records in evidence are admissible at a trial if proved in the manner specified by Section 65B of the Evidence Act. ... With the amendment to the Indian Evidence Act in 2000, Sections 65A and 65B were introduced into Chapter V relating to documentary evidence. Section 65A provides that contents of electronic records may be admitted as evidence if the criteria provided in Section ....
No certificate u/S 65B of the Evidence Act was received from competent person who manages computer of CCTV, therefore, CCTV footage is not admissible in evidence. ... SI Kamal Kishore (PW/11) prepared certificate (Ex.P/21 – P/23) u/S 65B of the Evidence Act. ... In relation to the aforementioned, he had prepared certificate u/S 65B of the Evidence Act#HL_EN....
Further, when he was led to the second floor at KKD Complex where the incident had taken place his pointing out memo was prepared alongwith his statement. PW-19 also requested for issue of a certificate under Section 65B Indian Evidence Act regarding the CCTV footage (Ex PW-19/H).
The 2nd respondent admitted that her residence is a flat complex. 8. The learned counsel for the petitioners further submitted that the criminal intimidation remained in words at the most and not followed with any action. At the most, the recordings can show the entry and exit from the flat. The CCTV footage is without any certificate under Section 65B of the Information Technology Act and hence, it is inadmissible.
Hence the CCTV footages of the said cameras are not available. It is stated that the available CCTV footages of the remaining CCTV cameras of Central Jail No.3 have been preserved in a hard -drive and supplied to the Delhi Police with a certificate under Section 65B of the Evidence Act.
So far as the contention in relation to substantiating the admissibility of CCTV footage and the relevance of producing the certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act is concerned, we deem it appropriate to refer to the recent judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court, in the case of Shafhi Mohammad V. The germane portion of the judgment is extracted below: "(7)
However, it is always desirable to obtain at least three copies when material is viewed and heard in presence of panch witnesses and for that the certificate needs to be obtained. The CCTV system is prepared only for one purpose and cost of hard disc or hard drive is not on higher side so it can be collected, seized by the Police. As CCTV footage stored directly on hard drive of computer is self-generated without human intervention there is no necessity to get certificate under Secti....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
