Back
JASJIT SINGH BEDI
Sunil – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Jasjit Singh Bedi, J. -
CRM-6149-2022
This is an application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for preponing the date of hearing in the case i.e. fixed for 30.05.2022.
Notice in the application.
Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State.
For the aforementioned reason, the same is allowed and the date of hearing advanced from 30.05.2022 to that of today and the matter is taken up on board today itself.
CRR-1601-2021
The present revision petition has been filed against the judgment of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Rewari dated 15.11.2021, whereby the appeal of the petitioner against the judgment of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Rewari dated 14/15.01.2019 (P-2) convicting him under Section 420 IPC and sentencing him to one year rigorous imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs.1000/-, has been dismissed.
2. The brief facts giving rise to the present petition are that complainant-Subedar Sadhu Ram Yadav PW-3 moved an online complaint before the Police as well as before SBI General Manager to the effect that he was serving in the Army. On 28.01.2016 at about 18.00 hrs while he was in journey to rejoin his unit he went
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of a certificate under Section 65B(4) of the Indian Evidence Act for the admissibility of electronic evidence, and the principle th....
The certificate under Section 65-B of the Evidence Act must accompany the electronic record when it is produced in evidence, and the prosecution is obligated to supply all documents upon which relian....
The main legal point established is that electronic evidence, particularly call details, must be accompanied by a certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act to be admissible in court.
The authentication certificate required under Section 65B(4) of the Evidence Act must be issued by a person occupying a responsible official position in the company that produced the electronic recor....
The use of inadmissible evidence, particularly confessions made to police officers, is grounds for overturning a conviction under criminal law.
A conviction cannot be sustained on mere suspicion; evidence must establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
The court emphasized that lack of essential documentation and procedural compliance invalidates the prosecution's case, leading to the acquittal of the accused who were convicted of kidnapping for ra....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
