Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Power of Attorney Holders and Witness Deposition - A general power of attorney holder can appear, plead, and act on behalf of a party but cannot become a witness on behalf of the party; they can only testify in their own capacity. It is explicitly held that no one can delegate the power to appear in the witness box on behalf of themselves ["2024 0 Supreme(Cal) 1188"] ["2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 686"].
Specific Court Judgments - Courts have consistently ruled that a power of attorney cannot depose as a witness on behalf of the principal or in the capacity of the principal. For example, the Goa Bench of Bombay High Court stated that a power of attorney can file complaints but cannot depose on behalf of the complainant ["2024 0 Supreme(Cal) 1188"]. Similarly, Rajasthan High Court held that a power-of-attorney holder can only appear as a witness in his personal capacity and not on behalf of the party ["2024 0 Supreme(Cal) 1188"].
Exceptions and Special Provisions - Certain provisions, such as Section 120 of the Indian Evidence Act, allow husbands and wives to depose for each other, but this does not extend to general powers of attorney or other relationships ["2023 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 11164"]. Additionally, in civil proceedings, a party may be permitted to appear as a witness after certain procedural steps, but generally, the party must first appear and testify in their own capacity unless the court permits otherwise ["00500054675"], ["2023 0 Supreme(Cal) 830"].
Court Discretion and Practice - Courts have the discretion to allow a party to depose as a witness at a later stage or permit a person authorized by a power of attorney to testify, provided the person has personal knowledge of the facts. However, the evidentiary value depends on the court's assessment ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 40632"], ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 67179"], ["2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 574"].
Summary - Overall, a person holding a general power of attorney cannot depose as a witness on behalf of the principal. They may testify in their personal capacity if they have direct knowledge, but deposing as a representative of the party is generally not permitted. Exceptions exist for specific relationships like spouses, and courts may exercise discretion based on circumstances ["2024 0 Supreme(Cal) 1188"] ["2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 686"].
References:- ["2024 0 Supreme(Cal) 1188"]- ["2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 686"]- ["2023 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 11164"]- ["
Ratnesh Tiwary VS Sheo Kumari Devi - Current Civil Cases
"]- ["00500054675"]- ["2023 0 Supreme(Cal) 830"]- ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 40632"]- ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 67179"]- ["2023 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 27869"]- ["2025 7 Supreme 505"]- ["2023 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 27869"]- ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 41353"]- ["2024 0 Supreme(Pat) 129"]- ["2023 0 Supreme(Pat) 202"]- ["2025 Supreme(Online)(HP) 9663"]- ["2023 0 Supreme(All) 2204"]- ["Mahesh Baburao Dhavale VS State of Maharashtra - Crimes
"]- ["2024 0 Supreme(SC) 280"]
In the high-stakes world of legal proceedings, the rules governing who can provide testimony are strict and pivotal to ensuring justice. A common question arises: Can an accused depose on behalf of his witness? This issue touches on fundamental principles of , particularly the requirement for and the limitations of agents or power-of-attorney holders. Understanding this can prevent procedural missteps that could jeopardize a case.
This article breaks down the legal position, drawing from and judgments, to provide clarity for litigants, lawyers, and the public. Note that this is general information based on established precedents and is not specific legal advice—consult a qualified attorney for your situation.
Generally, an accused cannot depose on behalf of his witness in a legal proceeding. The must come from a person with of the facts, who is —meaning they can understand questions and give rational answers. This competency stems from direct experience, not mere authority or relationship to the party. 2000 0 Supreme(Gau) 113 2022 0 Supreme(MP) 618
Courts emphasize that testimony cannot be delegated like procedural acts. As held by the , the cannot depose in place of the principal. 2022 0 Supreme(MP) 618 This principle applies across civil and criminal contexts, safeguarding the integrity of evidence.
Order III Rules 1 and 2 CPC allow recognized agents, like PoA holders, to appear, apply, and act for parties. However, these are procedural powers and do not extend to giving evidence. Courts clarify: The word ‘acts’ employed therein is confined only to ‘acts’ done by the , in exercise of the power granted... The term ‘acts’, would not include deposing in place and instead of the principal. 2022 0 Supreme(MP) 618
This distinction prevents abuse, ensuring targets the actual knower of facts. In Janki Vashdeo Bhojwani v. Indusind Bank Ltd. (2005), the reinforced: He cannot depose for the principal in respect of the matters, in which only the principal can have a and in respect of which, the principal is entitled to be cross-examined. 2000 0 Supreme(Gau) 113
The explicitly stated the settled proposition: PoA holders cannot depose for principals. This ruling interprets CPC provisions narrowly, confining 'acts' to authorized exercises, excluding testimony. 2022 0 Supreme(MP) 618
This case underscores that PoA evidence on non-personal acts is limited; agents' testimony on principal-exclusive facts is inadmissible as . Echoed in later cases like 2017 0 Supreme(Chh) 594, where it's affirmed: The attorney holder can be witness of the party to the suit, but cannot depose on behalf of a party to the suit. 2017 0 Supreme(Chh) 594
Other decisions align, such as in property disputes where PoA depositions were rejected for lacking . 2016 0 Supreme(Tri) 28 The court noted: The power of attorney holder... can appear as a witness in his personal capacity... but he cannot depose as the witness on behalf of the party. 2016 0 Supreme(Tri) 28
Courts draw a clear line:- Acts by Agent: Testifiable by PoA holder (e.g., transactions they executed).- Principal's Personal Facts: Only the principal can depose, as they alone possess direct knowledge. Evidence otherwise is or unreliable. 2000 0 Supreme(Gau) 113
In eviction cases under rent laws, even family members' '' via PoA is scrutinized, though closely related persons may sometimes suffice if knowledge overlaps logically. 2013 0 Supreme(P&H) 863
While an accused cannot proxy for witnesses, they can depose in their own defense. As a , their testimony is if based on and subject to . Cases like Dehal Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh (2010) affirm: The accused being a , can depose in his defence and his evidence can be considered. 2020 0 Supreme(Tri) 22 2011 2 Supreme 435
This right is distinct from agency; it's personal testimony under oath.
Relatedly, witnesses examined by one party generally cannot depose for the opposing side without court recall under (or equivalent). In cheque dishonor cases, courts quashed orders allowing prosecution witnesses for the accused, stressing: Witnesses examined by one party cannot be allowed to be examined on behalf of opposite party.
This upholds without filling lacunas.
In summary, an accused typically cannot depose on behalf of a witness, as testimony demands unreplaceable by proxies or PoA holders. Supported by authoritative rulings like 2000 0 Supreme(Gau) 113 and 2022 0 Supreme(MP) 618, this ensures reliable evidence and fair .
Key Takeaways:- PoA limited to procedural acts, not testimony. 2022 0 Supreme(MP) 618- is mandatory. 2000 0 Supreme(Gau) 113- Accused can self-testify but not for others. 2006 2 Supreme 71- Consult professionals; laws evolve with case specifics.
Stay informed on evidence rules to strengthen your proceedings. For tailored advice, reach out to a legal expert.
#WitnessTestimony, #LegalRulings, #IndianLaw
State of Rajasthan it was held that a general power-of-attorney holder can appear, plead and act on behalf of the party but he cannot become a witness on behalf of the party. He can only appear in his own capacity. No one can delegate the power to appear in the witness box on behalf of himself. ... Minguel Carlos Dias the Goa Bench of the Bombay High Court held that a power of attorney can file a complaint under Section 138 but cannot depose on behalf of the complaina....
No one can delegate the power to appear in witness box on behalf of himself. To appear in a witness box is altogether a different act. A general power of attorney holder cannot be allowed to appear as a witness on behalf of the plaintiff in the capacity of the plaintiff. ... (supra) observes that the general power of attorney holder can appear, plead and act on behalf of the party but he cannot become a witness on behalf of the party. He can only app....
The above authorities are not on the proposition that the husband cannot depose on behalf of the wife or that power of attorney cannot appear as a witness at all for the plaintiff. ... Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the power of attorney has been prepared during the pendency of the suit and the power of attorney holder cannot depose on behalf of the principal as such he has only to act on behalf of the principal. ... Indusind Bank Ltd. and Ors., reported in AIR ....
The above authorities are not on the proposition that the husband cannot depose on behalf of the wife or that power of attorney cannot appear as a witness at all for the plaintiff. ... Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the power of attorney has been prepared during the pendency of the suit and the power of attorney holder cannot depose on behalf of the principal as such he has only to act on behalf of the principal. ... Indusind Bank Ltd. and Ors., reported in AIR (....
The above authorities are not on the proposition that the husband cannot depose on behalf of the wife or that power of attorney cannot appear as a witness at all for the plaintiff. ... Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the power of attorney has been prepared during the pendency of the suit and the power of attorney holder cannot depose on behalf of the principal as such he has only to act on behalf of the principal. ... Indusind Bank Ltd. and Ors., reported in AIR (....
Further, there are catena of judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, wherein it is held that GPA holder is competent witness to depose on behalf of his principal when he or she has personal knowledge about the facts of the case. ... According to the revision petitioner, the GPA holder is not entitled to appear as witness on behalf of the party in the capacity of that party. A party cannot step back by not entering into witness box and not subject himself to cross-examine. .......
Further, there are catena of judgments of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, wherein it is held that GPA holder is competent witness to depose on behalf of his principal when he or she has personal knowledge about the facts of the case. ... According to the revision petitioner, the GPA holder is not entitled to appear as witness on behalf of the party in the capacity of that party. A party cannot step back by not entering into witness box and not subject himself to cross-examine. .......
Thus, a power of attorney can give evidence on behalf of a party in civil proceedings. However, he cannot depose in place and instead of principal. ... Such a witness is entitled to depose not only the facts within his/her knowledge but also within the knowledge of his/her spouse. ... Order 18 Rule 3-A provides that where a party himself wishes to appear as a witness, he shall so appear before any other witness on his behalf has been examined, unless the Court, for re....
Order XVIII Rule 3A provides that where a party herself wishes to appear as a witness, she shall so appear before any other witness on her behalf is examined, unless the court for reasons to be recorded, permits her to appear as her own witness, at a later stage. ... The learned Court, after contested hearing, rejected the claim of the petitioner on the ground that where a party wished to appear as a witness, he/she must appear before any other witness on his/her behalf#HL_EN....
It is yet to be heard that a witness can depose on both sides. ... examined, and cross examined by the counsel for the accused, cannot be called as a witness on behalf of the defence unless he is recalled by the court on an application moved by either of the parties and has to depose only then on behalf of the party which had produced him or as a court witness. ... PC to summon the witnesses already examined by the complainant to be called as witness....
The law has been restated in the same manner in Dehal Singh versus State of Himachal Pradesh reported in 2010 AIR SCW 5533, as relied by Mr. Lodh, learned counsel. Thus, the accused becomes ready to enter into the witness box, to take oath and to be cross-examined on behalf of the prosecution and/or of the accomplice, if it is so required Tukaram G. Gaokar v. R.N. Shukla & Ors. : AIR 1968 SC 1050 and Dehal Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh : (2010) 9 SCC 85. In such fact-situation, the accused being a competent witness, can depose in his defence and his evidence can be considered ....
The attorney holder can be witness of the party to the suit, but cannot depose on behalf of a party to the suit. It is settled proposition of law that evidence of power of attorney holder is not permissible in place of the plaintiff or the defendant, who is required to depose in person in support of the pleading. (See: Janki Vashdeo Bhojwani and Another v. Indusind Bank Ltd. and Others, (2005) 2 SCC 217).
If the plaintiff is unable to appear in the Court, a Commissioner for recording his evidence may be issued under the relevant provisions of the CPC. The power of attorney holder of a party can appear as a witness in his personal capacity and for whatever knowledge he has about the case but he cannot depose as the witness on behalf of the party or in the capacity of that party. The trial court has recorded the observation, contrary to what the apex court has held and that view is not correct position of law.
The need of the landlady would be well within the personal knowledge of her husband, who had appeared to depose as an attorney. However, the ratio of law laid down in this judgment would not apply to the facts and circumstances of the present case as the need of the respondentlandlady was well within the personal knowledge of her grandson, who had appeared to depose as an attorney. What is held in this case is that attorney cannot be allowed to appear and depose as a witness on behalf of the principal in the matters of his personal knowledge. It is further noticed in this case that....
In such a fact-situation, the accused being a competent witness, can depose in his defence and his evidence can be considered and relied upon while deciding the case. (Vide: Tukaram G. Gaokar v. R.N. Shukla & Ors.,9 AIR 1968 SC 1050; and Dehal Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh, 10(2010) 9 SCC 85).
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
