Can Arbitrator Award Damages for False FIR Mental Harassment?

Delhi

Award by the learned arbitratorFindings of the Ld. ... to registration of FIR against the respondent. ... Taking into all these factors, the learned arbitrator has awarded the damages for mental agony and harassment undergone by the respondent. The learned Single Judge has also affirmed the claim on the said count. ... The appellant assailed the award by filing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, laying challenge to Claims A, B and D which were al....

It reads as follows :-" On one occasion the Court refused a motion to set aside an award, on the allegation that a witness had wilfully and corruptly given false evidence before the arbitrator, saying that proceedings might be taken against the witness for perjury, and that it would be setting a ... Arbitration-Extension of award-No minute on record-Oral evidence-Wilfully misleading arbitrator-Civil Procedure Code, s. 691. ... the award had been extended from July 4 to a later ....

2025 Supreme(Online)(Guj) 12213

The investigation commenced following the registration of the FIR, and her dying declaration was recorded by the Executive Magistrate which came to be, placed on record at Exh-31. ... Unfortunately, the prosecution had failed to prove the proximate connection between the demand of dowry and the act of cruelty or harresment and the death of Mangalaben by leading cogent evidence. ... State of M.P. (2006) 10 SCC 313, this Court stated: "While deciding an appeal it has been held that onus was on the prosecution to prove that the chain is complete and the infir....

; (2) that the petitioner, by submitting certain false and fabricated documents in support of his case at the ex parte arbitration proceedings, had " wilfully misled or deceived the arbitrator " within the meaning of section 691(2) (b);   (3) that the institution of the regular ... Colombo, 804/X   Arbitration without intervention of Court--Ex-parte award-Delay in making award- Validity of award-Effect of regular action filed subsequent to reference to arbitration-Bribery of arbitrator#....

Delhi

Also, his plea that an award on account of mental agony may for challenge are constricted.” ... and also led to the registration of an FIR against the respondent. ... The claims of the respondent, the award of the learned arbitrator and the findings of the learned single judge can thus, be summarized as under: Claims by the respondent Award by ... The learned Single Judge also dealt with and rejected the challenge of the appellant to the award#HL_END....

Delhi

Also, his plea that an award on account of mental agony may for challenge are constricted.” ... and also led to the registration of an FIR against the respondent. ... The claims of the respondent, the award of the learned arbitrator and the findings of the learned single judge can thus, be summarized as under: Claims by the respondent Award by ... The learned Single Judge also dealt with and rejected the challenge of the appellant to the award#HL_END....

2022 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 5770

to registration of FIR against the respondent. ... The claims of the respondent, the award of the learned arbitrator and the findings of the learned single judge can thus, be summarized as under: Claims by the respondent Award by the learned arbitrator Findings of ... Taking into all these factors, the learned arbitrator has awarded the damages for mental agony and harassment undergone by the respondent. The learned Single Judge has also affirmed the claim on....

2023 0 Supreme(HP) 51

Because the petitioner has no legal grounds available. to challenge the well reasoned award passed by the Ld. Arbitrator, hence the petitioner is leveling personal allegations both against the Ld. Arbitrator and against the replying respondent which are false and totally incorrect. ... Arbitrator at the time of making of the award. ... Such allegations of the petitioner are baseless, derogatory and false to the knowledge of the petitioner, which are vehemently denied.....

Court of Appeal Putrajaya

The decision in para 4.49 of the Award must be read in relation to the entire Award and a perusal of the Award in its entirety will show that the Arbitrator had in fact considered the documents and material before her coming to her decision and findings. 34. ... From the said para 4.49 (xiii) of the Award, I have thus noted that the Arbitrator had invoked s 21(3)(b) of the a href="./.. ... Such a process of analysis and deliberation should certainly be reasonably expected, and no part....

2024 0 Supreme(Mad) 2597

Now coming to the award impugned herein, which had been thoroughly gone through by me, I could see that the award passed by the Arbitrator also proceeds based on the very same “headings” given by the respondent in the written submissions. ... I had perused the award made by the learned Arbitrator and compared the same in juxtaposition with the written submissions submitted by the respondent. ... The Arbitrator shall proceed to hear the learned counsel appearing on either side and pass ....

2016 0 Supreme(Ori) 404

Whether an unreasoned award passed by the Arbitrator can sustain in the eye of law?

2011 0 Supreme(Cal) 96

In the case of Champsey Bhara (supra) where the Privy Council formulated the principle as follows:- HE also submitted that if the arbitrator takes a plausible view, the award cannot be set aside and the Court cannot also go into the mental process of the arbitrator. "An error in law on the face of the award means,- that you can find in the award or a document actually incorporated thereto, as for instance, a note appended by the arbitrator stating the reasons for his judgment, some legal proposition which is the basis of the award and which you can then say is erroneous.

2007 0 Supreme(Del) 1319

Arbitrators are not Judges, they have not to write judgments as Judges do. If from the award, it can be inferred that the Arbitrator has applied his mind, taken into consideration the relevant material for arriving at the finding the Award cannot be interfered with.

2006 0 Supreme(Cal) 388

If the arbitrator discloses such a false step, then and then only the award can be set aside for error apparent. If the award is good on its face, if the face if fair, frank and open, then that is all that is needed. What is not permitted is a reasoning or a mental link which is forbidden by the law. But if on the basis of a sufficiently well reasoned award no such error is apparent on the face, the Court cannot say that further detailed reasons are necessary, because in such detail, there appears to be a possibility of there having been an application of an erroneous princ....

Madhya Pradesh

Then again the question of granting a ; higher rate for any extra quantity of work executed by the contractor would at all arise only when the contract provides for such escalated rate either expressly or by implication as in the case of S. Harcharan Singh where the competent authority had agreed for the same by correspondence. In the aforesaid case, the Court was examining whether it would be permissible for interfering with an award which was a non-speaking one merely because the arbitrator had awarded the claim at an escalated rate for the excess quantity of work and since the a....