SupremeToday Landscape Ad
AI Thinking

AI Thinking...

Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!

Scanned Judgements…!


AI Overview

AI Overview...

Analysis and Conclusion:Based on the provided sources, Article 21 of the Indian Constitution explicitly applies to everyone within Indian jurisdiction, including foreigners. The courts have consistently interpreted this article as offering protection to all persons, not just Indian citizens, thereby extending its scope to foreigners present in India. This broad interpretation ensures that the fundamental right to life and personal liberty is guaranteed universally within Indian territory, regardless of nationality ["Ashwani Sharad Pendese, W/o. Shri Manohar Tej VS Registrar of Hindu Marriage, Nagar Nigam, Ajmer (Raj. ) - 2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 1374"].

References:["Ashwani Sharad Pendese, W/o. Shri Manohar Tej VS Registrar of Hindu Marriage, Nagar Nigam, Ajmer (Raj. ) - 2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 1374"]

Does Article 21 of the Indian Constitution Apply to Everyone, Including Foreigners?

In a diverse nation like India, fundamental rights form the bedrock of justice and equality. A common question arises: Does Article 21 of the Constitution apply to everyone, extending to foreigners? This provision, guaranteeing no person shall be deprived of life or personal liberty except by procedure established by law, is pivotal. While some rights are citizen-exclusive, Article 21's broad language suggests universal protection. This post delves into Supreme Court interpretations, key precedents, and limitations, drawing from judicial documents to clarify its scope.

Note: This article provides general information based on legal precedents and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for specific cases.

Textual Scope of Article 21: Protection for All Persons

Article 21 states: No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. A. K. Gopalan VS State Of Madras - 1950 0 Supreme(SC) 19 This phrasing uses person, not citizen, distinguishing it from provisions like Article 19. As noted, article 19 confers the rights therein specified only on the citizens of India, while article 21 extends the protection of life and personal liberty to all persons citizens and non-citizens alike. A. K. Gopalan VS State Of Madras - 1950 0 Supreme(SC) 19

Similarly, the protection of life and personal liberty under Art. 21... are the fundamental rights which are available to any person irrespective of whether he is a citizen of India or an alien. State Trading Corporation of India LTD. VS Commercial Tax Officers - 2006 0 Supreme(SC) 119 This textual distinction ensures Article 21's inclusivity.

Judicial Confirmation: Article 21 Extends to Foreigners

Indian courts have consistently affirmed Article 21's application to foreigners lawfully present in India. In landmark views, the fundamental right of a foreigner is confined to Article 21 for life and liberty and does not include the right to reside and stay in this country. Sarbananda Sonowal VS Union of India - 2005 5 Supreme 10 (Referencing the Louis De Raedt case).

Multiple rulings reinforce this:- Articles 14, 20 and 21 of the Constitution are available to non-citizens also. Our Constitution commands that foreign nationals coming here shall not be discriminated. They will have to be treated equally before the law, and their right to live will have to be honoured and protected. Sandipkumar Ramdas Prabhu VS State of Gujarat - Crimes (2024)JONATHAN BAUD VS STATE OF KERALA - 2014 0 Supreme(Ker) 753Viral Jayantilal Parikh VS State of Gujarat - 2017 0 Supreme(Guj) 944Phanugorn Poo-IM VS State of Gujarat - 2017 0 Supreme(Guj) 801- Article 21 of the Constitution of India is applicable to a foreigner as well, as long as the foreigner concerned continues to stay in India. Kamil Siedczynski VS Union Of India - 2020 0 Supreme(Cal) 191- Article 21 is person centric: Article 14 directs that no person shall be denied equality before the law. Article 21 directs that no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty. Xiaomi Technology India Private Limited VS Union of India through the Ministry of Finance Government of India - 2023 0 Supreme(Kar) 226

These holdings align with international norms, noting Articles 14, 20, and 21 echo Articles 3, 7, and 9 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Chairman, Railway Board VS Chandrima Das - 2000 1 Supreme 265

Distinction from Citizen-Only Rights

Unlike Articles 15, 16, 19, 29, and 30 (explicitly for citizens), Article 21 uses no person. Freedom under Article 19 applies only to citizens of this country and not to any outsider. Xiaomi Technology India Private Limited VS Union of India through the Ministry of Finance Government of India - 2023 0 Supreme(Kar) 226 Foreigners lack residence rights under Article 19(1)(e) but retain life and liberty safeguards. Sarbananda Sonowal VS Union of India - 2005 5 Supreme 10Chairman, Railway Board VS Chandrima Das - 2000 1 Supreme 265

Articles 14, 20-22 form a protective cluster for all persons, available to non-citizens except possibly enemy aliens. Ashwani Sharad Pendese, W/o. Shri Manohar Tej VS Registrar of Hindu Marriage, Nagar Nigam, Ajmer (Raj. ) - 2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 1374

Exceptions and Limitations

While broad, Article 21 has boundaries:- No right to reside: Foreigners cannot claim indefinite stay; deportation power is absolute, but protections apply during presence. Sarbananda Sonowal VS Union of India - 2005 5 Supreme 10Kamil Siedczynski VS Union Of India - 2020 0 Supreme(Cal) 191- Enemy aliens: May be excluded. Ashwani Sharad Pendese, W/o. Shri Manohar Tej VS Registrar of Hindu Marriage, Nagar Nigam, Ajmer (Raj. ) - 2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 1374- Procedure required: Deprivation must follow procedure established by law, with fairness. Chairman, Railway Board VS Chandrima Das - 2000 1 Supreme 265

Broader Implications from Related Cases

Article 21's reach extends beyond immigration to everyday protections for non-citizens. For instance, in public health crises, courts have invoked it for foreigners violating visa conditions during lockdowns, emphasizing deportation over prolonged detention amid risks. Md Kameual Islam VS State, rep. by the Inspector of Police, Dindigul Town South Police Station, Dindigul - 2020 Supreme(Mad) 387 The court noted, Article 21 of the Constitution surely applies to the petitioners also, facilitating their return.

In custody matters, even majors (including potential non-citizens) cannot be detained against their will without legal authority, underscoring personal liberty. Manju VS State of Rajasthan - 1997 Supreme(Raj) 1490 Article 21 of the Constitution applies to minors as well as to majors.

Environmental rights also invoke Article 21 universally: State and municipal bodies must provide clean water, as it attracts the provisions of Article 21 of the Constitution. Gautam Uzir VS Guwahati Municipal Corporation and Ors. - 1999 Supreme(Gau) 260 This duty binds authorities toward all residents, citizen or not.

Other contexts, like consumer rights, expand Article 21 to include information disclosure for beliefs, applicable to foreigners shopping or residing in India. OZAIRHUSAIN VS UNION OF INDIA - 2002 Supreme(Del) 1697 Preventive detention under Article 22 may limit Article 21 but with safeguards. Sarabjeet Singh Kalsi VS State of Punjab - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 3094

Though tangential, family law cases highlight constitutional interplay; e.g., marriage acts apply across domiciles without nationality bars, indirectly supporting equal treatment. Shashi Leekha VS Sheila Shashi Leekha - 2012 Supreme(Bom) 1328Shashi Leekha S/o. Shubhash Chander Leekha S/o. Shubhash Chander Leekha VS Sheila Shashi Leekha - 2012 Supreme(Bom) 1331

Timeline of Judicial Evolution

Key Takeaways and Recommendations

In summary, Supreme Court precedents confirm: Article 21 of the Constitution of India applies to everyone, including foreigners and non-citizens, protecting their right to life and personal liberty while present in India. This fosters a rights-based framework aligned with global standards.

For tailored advice, especially in immigration or liberty matters, seek professional legal counsel.

References

  1. Sarbananda Sonowal VS Union of India - 2005 5 Supreme 10 – Foreigners' rights limited to Article 21.
  2. A. K. Gopalan VS State Of Madras - 1950 0 Supreme(SC) 19 – Applies to all persons.
  3. Chairman, Railway Board VS Chandrima Das - 2000 1 Supreme 265 – Available to non-citizens.
  4. State Trading Corporation of India LTD. VS Commercial Tax Officers - 2006 0 Supreme(SC) 119 – For any person, including aliens.
  5. Sandipkumar Ramdas Prabhu VS State of Gujarat - Crimes (2024) – Right to live protected.
  6. Ashwani Sharad Pendese, W/o. Shri Manohar Tej VS Registrar of Hindu Marriage, Nagar Nigam, Ajmer (Raj. ) - 2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 1374 – Except enemy aliens.
  7. Xiaomi Technology India Private Limited VS Union of India through the Ministry of Finance Government of India - 2023 0 Supreme(Kar) 226 – Person-centric.
  8. Kamil Siedczynski VS Union Of India - 2020 0 Supreme(Cal) 191 – For foreigners in India.
#Article21, #ForeignersRightsIndia, #IndianConstitution
Chat Download
Chat Print
Chat R ALL
Landmark
Strategy
Argument
Risk
Chat Voice Bottom Icon
Chat Sent Bottom Icon
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top