SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 947

ABHAY S OKA, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Pranav Srinivasan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General Mr. K M Nataraj, A.S.G. Mr. B K Satija, Adv. Ms. Shraddha Deshmukh, Adv. Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Adv. Mr. Sharath Nambiar, Adv. Mr. Chitransh Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sarthak Karol, Adv. Mr. Kritagya Kait, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Rajan Kumar Chourasia, Adv. Mr. Madhav Singhal, Adv. Mrs. Sansrithi Pathak, Adv. Ms. Indira Bhakar, Adv. Mr. Vinayak Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vatsal Joshi, Adv. Mr. Anuj Srinivas Udupa, Adv. Ms. Satvika Thakur, Adv. Ms. Yogya Rajpurohit, Adv. Mr. Aayush Saklani, Adv. Mr. Tanmay Mehta, Adv. Ms. Nikita Capoor, Adv. Mr. Akshay N., Adv. Ms. Sanya Sud, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Akshay N., Adv. Dr. Vinod Kumar Tewari, AOR Mr. Pramod Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Vivek Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Bhoopesh Pandey, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Dubey, Adv.

JUDGMENT

ABHAY S. OKA, J.

1. The issue involved in these cases concerns the grant of Indian citizenship to Pranav Srinivasan, the respondent in the civil appeal and petitioner in the writ petition.

FACTUAL ASPECTS

2. A few factual aspects must be set out to appreciate the factual and legal controversy. The paternal grandparents of Pranav were born in India before independence. Pranav’s father and mother were born in India in 1963 and 1972, respectively. On 19th December 1998, Pranav’s parents adopted citizenship of Singapore. On 1st March 1999, Pranav was born in Singapore as a citizen of Singapore. According to the case of Pranav, on 20th April 2012, his parents renounced their Indian citizenship. On 5th May 2017, when Pranav was eighteen years, two months and four days old, he submitted an application in Form XXV specified under Rule 24 of the Citizenship Rules, 2009, read with sub-section (2) of Section 8 of the Citizenship Act, 1955 (for short, ‘the 1955 Act’) for resumption of his Indian citizenship.

3. Earlier, Pranav filed a writ petition before the High Court of Judicature at Madras as his application in Form XXV was not considered. Ultimately, it was revealed that Pranav had no

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top