Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
When a woman knowingly marries a man with a living spouse, she is also committing an offence, and such a marriage is legally invalid ["Sushil Kumar Yadav VS Indu Devi - Current Civil Cases"] ["Sushil Kumar Yadav, son of Lakhi Chand Yadav VS Indu Devi, d/o Shyam Bihari Prasad - Jharkhand"].
Offence against the lady:
In cases of live-in relationships where the woman is aware of the man's existing marriage, she is not entitled to maintenance or legal recognition as a wife ["Bhagwandas S/o Tilakdhari Shah VS Panpati Shah W/o Bhagwandas Shah - Crimes"] ["Savitaben Somabhai Bhatiya VS State of Gujarat - Crimes"] ["Bulbul Khatoon vs The State Of Bihar - Patna"].
Offence against the man:
Analysis and Conclusion:- Both the man and the woman can face legal offences if the man is already married and the woman marries him, as such marriage is deemed null and void from inception ["SHARDA VS PURUSHOTTAM - Madhya Pradesh"] ["Sharda VS Purushottam - Madhya Pradesh"].- The primary offence is bigamy against the man, while the woman may also be liable if she knowingly entered into a marriage with a man who has a living spouse.- The law emphasizes the importance of lawful marriage and aims to prevent social injustice and protect the rights of women and children by invalidating such marriages ["Savitaben Somabhai Bhatiya VS State of Gujarat - Rajasthan"].- In cases of live-in relationships or marriages entered into knowingly with a man having a spouse, the woman is generally not entitled to maintenance or legal recognition ["Bhagwandas S/o Tilakdhari Shah VS Panpati Shah W/o Bhagwandas Shah - Crimes"].- Legal consequences include criminal prosecution for bigamy and nullity of the marriage, with the law providing remedies to protect the rights of innocent parties ["SHARDA VS PURUSHOTTAM - Madhya Pradesh"] ["Sharda VS Purushottam - Madhya Pradesh"].
References:- ["SHARDA VS PURUSHOTTAM - Madhya Pradesh"]- ["Sharda VS Purushottam - Madhya Pradesh"]- ["Sushil Kumar Yadav VS Indu Devi - Current Civil Cases"]- ["Sushil Kumar Yadav, son of Lakhi Chand Yadav VS Indu Devi, d/o Shyam Bihari Prasad - Jharkhand"]- ["Savitaben Somabhai Bhatiya VS State of Gujarat - Rajasthan"]- ["Bhagwandas S/o Tilakdhari Shah VS Panpati Shah W/o Bhagwandas Shah - Crimes"]- ["Savitaben Somabhai Bhatiya VS State of Gujarat - Crimes"]- ["Bulbul Khatoon vs The State Of Bihar - Patna"]
In India, marriage is a sacred institution governed by personal laws, but entering into a second marriage while a first spouse is alive can lead to serious legal repercussions. Imagine this scenario: a divorced woman enters into a marriage with a man who still has a living spouse from his previous marriage. What offenses apply to the man and the woman? This common yet critical question arises frequently in family law disputes, often leading to charges of bigamy, nullity declarations, and denial of spousal rights like maintenance. Ramesh Chandra Rampratapji Daga VS Rameshwari Ramesh Chandra Daga - 2005 1 Supreme 155
This article breaks down the legal framework under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (HMA), and the Indian Penal Code (IPC), drawing from key judicial precedents. Note: This is general information based on established case law and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.
The query at hand is: A divorced woman was married by a man having a living spouse. What are the offenses lie against the man and also against the lady? Under Hindu law, which applies to most Hindus in India, Section 5(i) of the HMA stipulates that neither party should have a living spouse at the time of marriage. If violated, the marriage is not just invalid—it's void ab initio (from the beginning). Ramesh Chandra Rampratapji Daga VS Rameshwari Ramesh Chandra Daga - 2005 1 Supreme 155
The man's first marriage subsists, making the second ceremony a nullity under Section 11 and punishable under Section 17 of the HMA, which invokes bigamy provisions of the IPC. Both parties may face liability, depending on knowledge and intent. Kanwal Ram VS H. P. Administration - 1965 0 Supreme(SC) 187Gopal Lal VS State Of Rajasthan - 1979 0 Supreme(SC) 81KAIIWAL RAM VS H. P. Administration - 1965 0 Supreme(SC) 191
A second marriage during the subsistence of a valid first marriage is deemed null and void per Section 17 of the HMA. The Supreme Court in a landmark ruling clarified: a second marriage performed while the first marriage is still subsisting is considered void under Section 17 of the Hindu Marriage Act. Ramesh Chandra Rampratapji Daga VS Rameshwari Ramesh Chandra Daga - 2005 1 Supreme 155
This nullity affects all rights arising from the marriage:- No legitimacy for children in some contexts (though Section 16 provides exceptions for legitimacy).- The woman cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC if the marriage is proven illegal. Yamunabai Anantrao Adhav VS Anantrao Shivram Adhav - 1988 0 Supreme(SC) 75
However, courts may award maintenance under Section 25 HMA if ceremonies were performed and dependency exists, even for void marriages. Ramesh Chandra Rampratapji Daga VS Rameshwari Ramesh Chandra Daga - 2005 1 Supreme 155
In another case, the court emphasized: Marriage with person having living spouse is null and void and not voidable. Personal law determines validity, and a woman in such a union isn't a legally wedded wife for maintenance. Savitaben Somabhai Bhatiya VS State of Gujarat - 2005 Supreme(MP) 360
Similarly, marriage of a woman in accordance with the Hindu rites with a man having a living spouse is a complete nullity in the eye of law. Ravishankar Chourasiya VS Kamini - 2015 Supreme(MP) 286
The man, having a living spouse, primarily faces bigamy charges under Sections 494 and 495 IPC:- Section 494 IPC: Punishes marrying again during the lifetime of a husband or wife, with up to 7 years imprisonment and fine.- Section 495 IPC: Aggravated form if concealment of prior marriage, up to 10 years.
Section 17 HMA explicitly makes this punishable as bigamy. Courts have held: The second marriage performed during the subsistence of a valid first marriage is not legally recognized, and the second spouse may be guilty of the offence of bigamy. Kanwal Ram VS H. P. Administration - 1965 0 Supreme(SC) 187Gopal Lal VS State Of Rajasthan - 1979 0 Supreme(SC) 81KAIIWAL RAM VS H. P. Administration - 1965 0 Supreme(SC) 191
Even if the woman is divorced, the man's act constitutes bigamy since his first marriage endures. Live-in relationships knowing the man's marital status also bar maintenance. Bhagwandas VS Panpati Shah - 2023 Supreme(MP) 99
The divorced woman may also be liable if she knowingly participates:- Bigamy (IPC 494/495): Applies if she abets or enters the marriage aware of the man's status. HARADHAN NATH vs HEMLATA NATH- No direct offense for her invalid marriage alone, but complicity in bigamy can lead to prosecution.
Consequences include:- Loss of maintenance claims: The invalid marriage does not entitle the woman to maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Yamunabai Anantrao Adhav VS Anantrao Shivram Adhav - 1988 0 Supreme(SC) 75- In live-in scenarios post such marriage, no CrPC 125 relief if aware of invalidity. Umesh K. B. S/o. Balachandran VS Sreekala, Puthanpurayil, D/o Sreenivasan - 2020 Supreme(Ker) 475
One case notes: Where a lady is living in live-in-relationship with a man, knowing fully well that either he is already married... she is not entitled for maintenance under section 125 of Cr.P.C. Bhagwandas VS Panpati Shah - 2023 Supreme(MP) 99Bhagwandas vs Panpati Shah - 2023 Supreme(Online)(MP) 6003
Such unions don't confer spousal status. The expression 'wife' in section 125... should be interpreted to mean only a legally wedded wife. Ravishankar Chourasiya VS Kamini - 2015 Supreme(MP) 286
Even interim maintenance is denied: respondent No.1 not legally wedded wife of petitioner -- hence, not entitled to interim maintenance. Ravishankar Chourasiya VS Kamini - 2015 Supreme(MP) 286
Here's a summary of pivotal documents:1. Kanwal Ram VS H. P. Administration - 1965 0 Supreme(SC) 187: Invalid marriage constitutes bigamy.2. Gopal Lal VS State Of Rajasthan - 1979 0 Supreme(SC) 81: Second marriages punishable under IPC.3. Ramesh Chandra Rampratapji Daga VS Rameshwari Ramesh Chandra Daga - 2005 1 Supreme 155: Nullity under HMA, impacts maintenance.4. Yamunabai Anantrao Adhav VS Anantrao Shivram Adhav - 1988 0 Supreme(SC) 75: No CrPC 125 for illegal marriages.5. KAIIWAL RAM VS H. P. Administration - 1965 0 Supreme(SC) 191: Essential ceremonies required.6. Savitaben Somabhai Bhatiya VS State of Gujarat - 2005 Supreme(MP) 360: Null and void, no maintenance.7. Bhagwandas VS Panpati Shah - 2023 Supreme(MP) 99: No relief if aware of marital status.
Key Takeaways:- Marriage is void; bigamy charges apply mainly to the man, potentially both.- No automatic maintenance; case-specific under HMA S.25.- Prevention: Legal checks pre-marriage.
In conclusion, such unions carry heavy penalties—criminal and civil. Awareness of HMA and IPC provisions can prevent lifelong legal battles. For tailored advice, approach a family law expert.
#BigamyIndia, #HinduMarriageAct, #SecondMarriageLaw
... ( 7 ) IN that case neither the applicant nor non-applicant were previously married. Whereas the question of determination in the present case is regarding marriage of a lady with a person who was already having a living spouse. ... It may be observed that for the purpose of extending the benefit of the section to a divorced woman and an illegitimate child the Parliament considered it necessary to include in the section specific provision to that effect, but has not clone so with respect to #HL_START....
In that case neither the applicant nor non-applicant were previously married. Whereas the question of determination in the present case is regarding marriage of a lady with a person who was already having a living spouse. ... 8. ... It may be observed that for the purpose of extending the benefit of the section to a divorced woman and an illegitimate child the Parliament considered it necessary to include in the section specific provision to that effect, but has not done so with respect to #HL_STAR....
On the question of adultery also the facts proved by the petitioner show that the respondent was living with unknown women of questionable character in a flat in premises No. 105 Collin Street. ... without the consent or connivance of that man, such sexual intercourse not amounting to the offence of rape, is guilty of the offence of adultery. " ... ( 8 ) THE definition limits the offence to sexual intercourse committed with a married woman ... witho....
The marriage of a woman in accordance with the Hindu rites with a man having a living spouse is a complete nullity in the eye of law and she is therefore not entitled to the benefit of Section 125 of the Code or the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (in short the Marriage Act). ... Marriage with person having living spouse is null and void and not voidable. However, the attempt to exclude altogether the personal law applicable to the parties from consideration is improper. ... The provision is enacted for social....
The marriage of a woman in accordance with the Hindu rites with a man having a living spouse is a complete nullity in the eye of law and she is therefore not entitled to the benefit of section 125 of the Code or the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (in short the 'Marriage Act'). ... Marriage with person having living spouse is null and void and not voidable. However, the attempt to exclude altogether the personal law applicable to the parties from consideration is improper. ... ... ... The case at hand ac....
It is a voluntary extra marital relationship of a married person with someone other than his spouse. Adultery per se is not an offence, for it to become so, it must be without consent or connivance of the husband of the married woman with whom the person enters into such act. ... This section applies to act of sexual intercourse with a married woman by another man, without the consent or connivance of husband of that woman and where such act does not amount to the offence#HL_....
He also stated that the lady was also a married lady and name of her husband was Sri Rabindra Nath who was still alive and according to ... is already married or even if the man is not married she herself is a married woman and has not obtained a legal living spouse is null and void and not voidable. ... is already married.
Where a lady is living in live-in-relationship with a man, knowing fully well that either he is already married or there is no possibility of marriage, then she is not entitled for maintenance under section 125 of Cr.P.C. ... As per sections 5 and 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, a marriage may be solemnized between any two Hindus if neither party has a spouse living at the time of the marriage, and in case there exists a spouse living at the time....
Where a lady is living in live-in-relationship with a man, knowing fully well that either he is already married or there is no possibility of marriage, then she is not entitled for maintenance under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. ... As per Sections 5 and 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, a marriage may be solemnized between any two Hindus if neither party has a spouse living at the time of the marriage, and in case there exists a spouse living at the time....
Where a lady is living in live-in-relationship with a man, knowing fully well that either he is already married or there is no possibility of marriage, then she is not entitled for and in case there exists a spouse living at the time of the marriage, such a marriage would be null and void. ... The respondent/wife is a married lady and she marry with one Sunil Kumar Gupta in the year, 2006-07 and after lapse of 05-06 years they both were separa....
It was also alleged that the plaintiff respondent had an illicit relationship with a married women of the locality and was living an adulterous life. Learned family court had disbelieved the allegations of adultery alleged by both the husband and the wife against each other but the divorce petition was allowed by the judgment and decree dated 25.3.2017 on the ground that behaviour of wife is not like an ideal lady as she used to live at her parental house and make allegations against her husband without any basis which amounting to cruelty. It was pleaded that on account of....
It is clear from the above that, a lady in a live-in relationship is not entitled to get maintenance. The words emphasized caution that a lady married to a man and living separated from him for some valid cause and a lady married, but later on has been divorced by him or has obtained a divorce from him and not re-married, alone are entitled to get maintenance. The Apex Court in Santosh's case supra has only said that a detailed enquiry on marital status of the parties is not called for in a maintenance case, but, formation of a prima facie opinion based on materials produce....
She submits that the first informant was intentionally induced to sexual intercourse on a false promise of marriage. The accused knew that he himself is a married man having two major children and the first informant was also a married lady having two children. She submits that the indulgence of the accused in sex with the first informant by means of "intentional inducement" after giving "false promise of marriage" squarely falls within the mischief of the offence of cheating, as defined under Section 415 of the Indian Penal Code, which is punishable under Section 417 of th....
Marriage of women with a man already having living spouse as per Hindu rites is a complete nullity; therefore, the wife would not be entitled to maintenance. Savitaben v. State of Gujarat [AIR 2005 SC 1809], the same view was reiterated. The Supreme Court in the case of Yamuna Bai v. Anantrao [1998 (1) SCC 530], has held that expression 'wife' in section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure should be interpreted to mean only a legally wedded wife.
When the conception was of 5 to 6 months, she realised the gravity of her situation and declined her mother to marry with any other person. The accused was a married man having a living wife and 2-3 children.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
