Changing lawyers mid-case can feel necessary when things aren't going as planned, but did you know it might require more than just signing a new ? In Indian courts, a simple switch isn't always straightforward. This post dives into the landmark ruling from the in Shafeeque Ahmed Mohammad Sayeed v. Ansari Bilal Mohd. (2016 SCC OnLineBom 14057) [
#AdvocateChange #LegalEthicsIndia #NOCMandatory
Ansari Bilal Mohd, 2016 SCC OnLineBom 14057, '8. Advocateswho have filed a Vakalatnama cannot be discharged at the whim and fancy of a litigant. An application must be made with two clear days' notice to the Advocate. ... State of T.N., (1996) 6 SCC 755 was also pleased to hold that; '1. ... Mahinder Kumar, 1985 SCC OnLine Del 277, wherein the Hon'ble Court was pleased to hold that; '7.
District Board, Bhojpur, (1992) 2 SCC 598], and held that: (N.L. Abhyankar case [N.L. Abhyankar v. Union of India, 1994 SCC OnLineBom 574: (1995) 1 Mah LJ 503], SCC OnLineBom para 22) "22. ... Union of India, 1994 SCC OnLineBom 574: (1995) 1 Mah LJ 503] found approval in Municipal Council, Ahmednagar v. Shah HyderBeig [Municipal Council, Ahmednagar v. Shah HyderBeig, (2000) 2 SCC 48] and Mool Chandra v. Union of India [Mool Chandra v. ... Union of In....
2015 SCC OnLine Del 13169 ; Sterling & Wilson (P) Ltd. v. Union of India, 2017 SCC OnLineBom 6829; P.L. Adke v. Wardha Municipal Corpn./Council , 2021 SCC OnLineBom 13986; TATA Power Co. Ltd. v. Genesis Engineering Co. ... Triumph Reality (P) Ltd., 2024 SCC OnLine Del 7137 observed that judicial inference in such type of matters has to be minimal and recourse to Article 227 of the Constitution of India has to be under exceptional circumstances when it is shown that such order is absol....
Deepa, 2016 SCC OnLineKar 8848 : 2016 Cri LJ 4794 (Kar)] , this Court held that merely because the wife is capable of earning, it would not be a sufficient ground to reduce the maintenance awarded by the Family Court. ... Kalyani Sanjay Kale, 2020 SCC OnLineBom 694] while relying upon the judgment in Sunita Kachwaha [SunitaKachwaha v. Anil Kachwaha, (2014) 16 5 W.P. ... Shahid Khan, (2015) 5 SCC 705 : (2015) 3 SCC (Civ) 274 : (20....
14057/2016 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03/06/2016 in CRLA No. 233/2005 passed by the High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench) ALLAH ZAHUR Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH Respondent(s) CRLMP. 14057/2016 (with ... exemption from surrendering) Date : 05/09/2016 This Crl. ... COURT MASTER Digitally signed by SONALI ....
Deputy Commissioner of In come-Tax &Ors .:2023 SCC OnLineBom 2822, the Bombay High Court reiterated the said view in the following word s: “24 . ... CIT, (2023) 457 ITR 647 (Bom); 2023 SCC OnLineBom 2822; (2023) 154 taxmann .com 159 (Bom) .] , the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court concluded , in substantially similar facts and circum stances, that the amended section 151 and no t the preamended section 151 would apply. ... CIT, (2023) 457 ITR 647 (Bom); 2023 SCC OnLineBom 2822; (....
(C) No. 14057 of 2021 ... (C) No. 6132 of 2016. Issue notice to opposite parties. ... (C) No. 14057 of 2021 And up along with this writ petition. ... (C) No. 6132 of 2016 seeking regularization of service and the matter is subjudice.
Cir. 2016). To be sure, subject-matter jurisdiction must exist when suit is filed. See Cook v. Bennett, 792 F.3d 1294, 1298 (11th Cir. 2015). It does not follow that a defendant’s “later acts” cannot erase that jurisdic- tion. ... USCA11 Case: 22-14057 Document: 51-1 Date Filed: 03/13/2024 Page: 14 of 14 ... 14 Opinion of the Court 22-14057 IV. ... The decision mentioned mootness only to USCA11 Case: 22-14057#HL_END....
NATH ORAL JUDGMENT 7 10-02-2016 No body appears on behalf of the petitioner. ... No. 410 of 2015, the order passed in C.W.J.C No. 14057 of 2013 has been set aside. In the result, this contempt application now has become infructuous and is dismissed as such. ... IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4762 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14057 of 2013 Heard learned counsel for the respondent-State, who Patna High Court MJC No.4762 of 2014 (7) dt.10-02-#HL_STA....
2019, registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14057 ... Patna High Court CWJC No.14057 of 2019 dt ... The Patna High Court CWJC No.14057 of 2019 ... Patna High Court CWJC No.14057 of 2019 dt
(2015) 15 SCC 1 : (2016) 2 SCC (L&S) 149. 39. Before proceeding further, it is important to clarify distinction between “acquiescence” and “delay and laches”. Doctrine of acquiescence is an equitable doctrine which applies when a party having a right stands by and sees another dealing in a manner inconsistent with that right, while the act is in progress and after violation is completed, which conduct reflects his assent or accord. He cannot afterwards complain. [See Prabhakar vs. Sericulture Deptt., Also, see Gobinda Ramanuj Das Mohanta vs. Ram Charan Das, 1925 SCC OnLine ....
4 to 10, 30 & 34 (E) As against the above judgments, the judgment in case of Delhi Development Authority vs. 2015 SCC OnLine Bom 2941 - rel. paras. 3, 13, 16 & 17 (2012) 8 SCC 197 - rel. para. 14 (2016) 10 SCC 46 - rel. paras. While dealing with similar issue as regards High Tension Line Clearance and CRZ Clearance, the Constitutional Courts have not accepted such an argument in the following cases and that therefore, the same logic applies in case of obtainment of Archaeologic Clearance in the present case.
Hsg Soc Ltd & Ors, (2016) 3 MhLJ 761 : 2016 SCC OnLine Bom 100. I cite this because this decision was also under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. On the first proposition that I have noted above, there is the decision of a learned Single Judge of this Court (the Hon'ble Mr Justice KK Tated) in Aditya Developers v Nirmal Anand Co-op.
Hsg Soc Ltd & Ors., (2016) 3 MhLJ 761 : 2016 SCC OnLine Bom 100. On the first proposition that I have noted above, there is the decision of a learned Single Judge of this Court (the Hon'ble Mr Justice KK Tated) in Aditya Developers v Nirmal Anand Co-op. I cite this because this decision was also under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
