Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Non-filing of FSL report with the chargesheet is generally not considered to render the chargesheet incomplete or invalid under law. Multiple judgments emphasize that the absence of an FSL report at the time of filing does not automatically make the chargesheet incomplete or entitle the accused to default bail ["Hashmat Mohammadi VS State, NCT of Delhi - Delhi"] ["Satish Kumar VS State - Delhi"] ["Sanjay Kumar Pundeer VS State of NCT of Delhi - Delhi"].
The FSL report is viewed as a corroborative and evidentiary document that can be filed subsequently, often via supplementary chargesheet under Section 173(8) of the CrPC. Its absence at the time of initial filing does not violate statutory requirements for the chargesheet ["Hashmat Mohammadi VS State, NCT of Delhi - Delhi"] ["Sanjay Kumar Pundeer VS State of NCT of Delhi - Delhi"].
Courts have consistently held that non-filing of FSL report does not fall within the scope of Section 173(2) of CrPC, which mandates the filing of a complete chargesheet. Therefore, the chargesheet remains valid even if the FSL report is pending or filed later ["Satish Kumar VS State - Delhi"] ["Ramprakash S/o Bhanwar Ram Bishnoi VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan"] ["Rahima VS State GNCT of Delhi - Delhi"].
Several rulings have clarified that the absence of an FSL report does not automatically entitle the accused to statutory bail. The law recognizes that the FSL report, while important, is not a mandatory component for the validity of the chargesheet or for initiating prosecution 2022 SCC OnLine Del 2346 ["Nitin Tiwari VS State Of U. P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home - Allahabad"] ["M/S FMS FR. MAYERS SOHN INDIA PVT. LTD. vs BUILTUBE INDUSTRIES LTD & ANR. - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6387"].
The courts have also noted that investigations are often ongoing, and the filing of a chargesheet without the FSL report, especially when it is awaited or pending, does not mean the investigation is incomplete or that the chargesheet is invalid**. The investigation can be considered complete once all evidence, including scientific reports, are obtained and filed subsequently ["Sanjay Kumar Pundeer VS State of NCT of Delhi - Delhi"] ["M/S FMS FR. MAYERS SOHN INDIA PVT. LTD. vs BUILTUBE INDUSTRIES LTD & ANR. - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6387"].
In conclusion, the legal consensus is that chargesheets filed without FSL reports are not inherently incomplete or invalid, and such reports can be filed later without affecting the validity of the prosecution or entitling the accused to default bail solely on this ground ["Hashmat Mohammadi VS State, NCT of Delhi - Delhi"] ["Satish Kumar VS State - Delhi"] ["Ramprakash S/o Bhanwar Ram Bishnoi VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan"].
References:- ["Hashmat Mohammadi VS State, NCT of Delhi - Delhi"]- ["Satish Kumar VS State - Delhi"]- ["Sanjay Kumar Pundeer VS State of NCT of Delhi - Delhi"]- ["Ramprakash S/o Bhanwar Ram Bishnoi VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan"]- 2022 SCC OnLine Del 2346- ["Nitin Tiwari VS State Of U. P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home - Allahabad"]- ["M/S FMS FR. MAYERS SOHN INDIA PVT. LTD. vs BUILTUBE INDUSTRIES LTD & ANR. - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6387"]- ["BALJEET SINGH @ AMAN Vs STATE - Delhi"]- ["LEISHANGTHEM I LOYANGAMBA vs STATE - Delhi"]- ["Mohammad Tokir vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"]
In criminal investigations, the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report often plays a pivotal role, especially in cases involving substances, chemicals, or forensic evidence. A common query arises: without FSL report, chargesheet not maintainable? This question frequently surfaces in NDPS (Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances) cases, murder trials, and other matters where forensic analysis is crucial. Many accused persons challenge the validity of the chargesheet if the FSL report is absent at filing, hoping to secure default bail or quash proceedings.
This blog post delves into the legal position under Indian law, primarily Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973. We'll examine Supreme Court precedents, integrate insights from various High Court rulings, and highlight practical implications. Note: This is general information based on judicial precedents and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
Generally, the legal requirement for maintaining a chargesheet does not mandatorily depend on the receipt or inclusion of the FSL report at the time of filing. The law permits filing a chargesheet even without the FSL report, provided the investigation is complete and sufficient material exists to proceed. RAM NARESH PRASAD VS STATE OF JHARKHAND - 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 249Gyabiram VS R. Gangadharan - 1996 0 Supreme(SC) 1169
The Supreme Court has clarified that the chemical examiner’s report enjoys special evidentiary status and can be directly received by the court, even if not attached to the initial chargesheet, without invalidating proceedings. Gyabiram VS R. Gangadharan - 1996 0 Supreme(SC) 1169
Section 173 CrPC mandates the police to submit a final report (chargesheet) upon investigation completion. While forensic reports are ideally included, their absence is not a precondition for validity. The process accommodates multi-stage investigations where FSL analysis may lag. RAM NARESH PRASAD VS STATE OF JHARKHAND - 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 249
Courts emphasize that incomplete chargesheets filed prematurely to deny default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC are frowned upon, but a genuine chargesheet without FSL—backed by other evidence—is maintainable. RAM NARESH PRASAD VS STATE OF JHARKHAND - 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 249 The entire foundation of the charge sheet is that there was a hydrocarbon mixture in the seized tanker, which looks precisely like petrol and diesel and smells like petrol and diesel. Along with the charge sheet, the respondent did not produce an expert's report regarding the precise nature of the liquid in the tanker. RAM NARESH PRASAD VS STATE OF JHARKHAND - 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 249
Supreme Court rulings provide robust backing:
High Courts echo this in NDPS contexts:
NDPS matters often hinge on FSL for contraband confirmation, yet courts consistently rule against default bail claims:
Thus, in NDPS, file chargesheet promptly with available evidence; supplement FSL later to avoid bail pitfalls. Sk. Eimat @ Bidhia VS State of Odisha - 2022 Supreme(Ori) 487
While permissible, best practices include:
Exceptions:- Heavy reliance on FSL may invite scrutiny; courts may direct production. RAM NARESH PRASAD VS STATE OF JHARKHAND - 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 249- Incomplete probes (e.g., awaiting FSL/post-mortem) risk default bail if chargesheet premature. MINTURAJ KAMAN AND ANR vs THE STATE OF ASSAM - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 8981- Political interference or undue delay in FSL can support bail pleas, but not invalidate chargesheet per se. Suresh Yadav VS State of U. P. - 2022 Supreme(All) 483
In non-NDPS cases like murder or IPC offences, FSL absence (e.g., CCTV analysis) doesn't bar chargesheet but may aid bail arguments on delay. Vishal Singh @ Pawan VS State (Govt. Nct) - 2022 Supreme(Del) 1307Arun Kumar @ Arun Kumar Malik VS State - 2022 Supreme(Del) 1306
In summary, a chargesheet without FSL report is typically maintainable under CrPC, allowing subsequent submission. Supreme Court precedents RAM NARESH PRASAD VS STATE OF JHARKHAND - 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 249Gyabiram VS R. Gangadharan - 1996 0 Supreme(SC) 1169 and High Court views in NDPS/default bail scenarios Naeem Ahmed (In Jc) VS State Govt. of NCT of Delhi - 2023 Supreme(Del) 6061Sk. Eimat @ Bidhia VS State of Odisha - 2022 Supreme(Ori) 487 affirm procedural flexibility without compromising justice.
Key Takeaways:- No mandatory FSL for chargesheet validity.- Default bail unlikely post-filing, even sans FSL.- Balance evidence strength; supplement timely.- Exceptions for prejudice or incomplete probes.
Stay informed on evolving jurisprudence. For case-specific guidance, seek professional legal counsel.
References:1. RAM NARESH PRASAD VS STATE OF JHARKHAND - 2009 0 Supreme(SC) 2492. Gyabiram VS R. Gangadharan - 1996 0 Supreme(SC) 11693. Naeem Ahmed (In Jc) VS State Govt. of NCT of Delhi - 2023 Supreme(Del) 60614. Sk. Eimat @ Bidhia VS State of Odisha - 2022 Supreme(Ori) 4875. MINTURAJ KAMAN AND ANR vs THE STATE OF ASSAM - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 8981(and others as cited)
#FSLReport, #ChargesheetLaw, #CriminalJustice
The petitioner is seeking statutory bail on the ground that the charge sheet was filed without being accompanied by an FSL report. The charge sheet in the present case was filed on 30.05.21 and later, the supplementary chargesheet was filed on 03.02.2022. ... Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the present case the chargesheet was filed on 30.10.2021 and no FSL report was filed along with the chargesheet. ... Narcotics Control Bu....
It is, thus, clear that bail in the said case was not granted with reference to the question of completeness of chargesheet in accordance with law, if the same is filed without FSL report. ... was incomplete since it did not accompany the FSL Report regarding the nature of the contraband. ... FSL report is incomplete charge sheet. ... chargesheet or that the chargesheet was #HL_S....
Mere non-filing of the FSL Report is not sufficient to conclude that the chargesheet filed in the present case was incomplete. The said report can be filed by way of a supplementary chargesheet. ... Learned counsel for the applicant argued that at the time the main chargesheet was filed in the present case, the FSL report in relation to all the aforesaid material was awaited and therefore, the chargesheet was incom....
State (NCT of Delhi), (2022) 5 HCC (Del) 108: 2022 SCC OnLine Del 2346 had observed that non-filing of FSL report along with the chargesheet does not fall within the ambit of Section 173(2) Cr. ... It is, thus, clear that bail in the said case was not granted with reference to the question of completeness of charge-sheet in accordance with law, if the same is filed without FSL report. ... It is stated that FSL report#HL_EN....
The State (NCT of Delhi), 2022 SCC Online Del 2346, has held that non filing of the FSL Report with the chargesheet would not entitle the accused to grant of statutory bail. Relevant observations are set out below: “14. ... At present, the settled law persists in the view that non filing of FSL Report with the charge sheet does not fall within the realms of Section 173(2) of the Cr.P.C so as to consider it as “incomplete report.” ... Learned Public P....
PP before the learned Sessions Judge on 16.10.2025 it is seen that at the time of passing the order the Court did not receive the FSL reports of four mobiles phones and FSL report on one DVR and the final post mortem report intimating the cause of death of the deceased. ... Such a chargesheet, if filed by an investigating authority without first completing the investigation, would not extinguish the right to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC. 3....
Thus, for the appropriate authority to apply its mind to grant sanction, chargesheet is necessary, as without a chargesheet, the appropriate authority will not be able to apply its mind to the grant of sanction. (iii) In the present case, the FSL report has been received. ... Without a chargesheet, the appropriate authority will not be able to apply its mind for the grant of sanction. ... Thus, the second application filed for exten....
Thus, for the appropriate authority to apply its mind to grant sanction, chargesheet is necessary, as without a chargesheet, the appropriate authority will not be able to apply its mind to the grant of sanction. (iii) In the present case, the FSL report has been received. ... Without a chargesheet, the appropriate authority will not be able to apply its mind for the grant of sanction. ... Thus, the second application filed for exten....
But, it not an authority to say that a chargesheet is no chargesheet in the eye of law without such scientific report and hence, assuming that there is no report in terms of Section 173(5) Cr.P.C. being on record, default bail is to be allowed. ... In Tarlok and Others (supra), the Punjab & Haryana High Court held that since the chargesheet is not accompanied with FSL report, the accused is entitled to be released ....
, but the charge-sheet cannot be held to be incomplete because of the pendency of FSL report over voice sample, as preparation of report on voice sample is not in the hands of 10. ... State of Haryana, CRR-933 of 2022 (O&M) have also inter alia held as under: "The report of the FSL goes to the root of the case and is a material document and as such, filing of challan without the same is not to be treated ... At present, the settled law persists in th....
62. Thus, in view of the discussions as made in the preceding paragraphs, this Court comes to the conclusion that if the special enactment in the form of Information Technology Act contains a special mechanism to deal with the offences falling within the purview of Information Technology Act, then the invocation of an application of the provisions of IPC 1860, being applicable to the same set of facts is totally uncalled for and amounts to an abuse of process. 60. If we go by Section 43 read with Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, then it clearly reveals that the ingredients of th....
It is, therefore, submitted that the charge sheet has been filed without proper investigation and without completing the investigation, charge sheet has been filed to implicate the accused-applicant. 1 of 2020 on 25.12.2019 under Sections 302, 201, 147, 148, 149, 323, 120-B, 216 IPC. This charge sheet does not accompany the FSL report and despite several reminders sent for sending FSL report, the FSL report has not been sent and the same would be filed in the Court along with supplementary charge-sheet. It is also submitted that because of the intervention of political and ....
Thus, from the papers of the chargesheet, it can be said that there is prima facie case against the present applicant. This Court has also perused the panchanama dated 8.12.2019 from which it is revealed that fake currency notes were found from the possession of the applicant and from his residential premises, two printers with green coloured pens, papers for printing fake currency notes and other material were found. FSL report dated 6.1.2022 is also a part of the papers of the chargesheet. The statement of witness Mohammed Haiderbhai Bakaswala is also recorded by the inve....
He submitted that the supplementary chargesheet has not been supplied and the FSL report has not been placed on record yet, even though two years have passed. He also submitted that the trial is not likely to be concluded anytime soon. Therefore, continued incarceration will violate the petitioner's right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The investigation qua accused has been complete, the chargesheet has been filed and there have not been any new developments or further arrests since then.
He submitted that there are over 53 prosecution witnesses and more than 75 documents to be examined and the trial is not likely to be concluded any time soon. He further submitted that the supplementary chargesheet has not been supplied and the FSL report has not been placed on record yet, even though two years have passed. Therefore, continued incarceration will violate the petitioner's right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
