SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 3717

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Rahima – Appellant
Versus
State GNCT of Delhi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
BAIL APPLN. 2612 of 2022
Mr.Alamgir, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr.Amit Sahni, APP, for the State with Mr.Ankur, Mr.Gopesh Jindal and Mr.Vaibhav Mishra, Advocates SI Murari Krishan, PS NFC New Delhi.
BAIL APPLN. 2708/2023
Mr.Anshuman Gangesh and Mr.Pradeep Kumar, Advts., for the Petitioner.
Mr.Amit Sahni, APP for the State with Mr.Ankur, Mr.Gopesh Jindal and Mr.Vaibhav Mishra, Advocates SI Inderveer Singh along with ASI Suresh Kumar, WR-1 Section, PS Crime Branch.
CRL.REV.P. 48/2022
Mr.Amjad Khan, Mr.Sumit Kumar and Mr.Mohd.Azimuddin, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr.Amit Sahni, APP for the State with SI Rahul, PS Special Cell/NDR.
CRL.REV.P. 338/2022
Mr.Jatin Rajput, Mr.Rajesh Kumar Jha, Mr.Varun Panwar and Mr.Sandeep Kumar, Mr.Amjad Khan, Mr.Sumit Kumar and Mr.Mohd.Azimuddin, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
Mr.Amit Sahni, APP for the State with SI Dinesh Joshi, PS Special Cell/NDR.
CRL.REV.P. 578/2023
Mr.Ankaj Giri, Advocate, for the Petitioner.
Mr.Amit Sahni, APP for the State with Mr.Ankur, Mr.Gopesh Jindal and Mr.Vaibhav Mishra, Advocates & SI Sanjeev, PS Crime Branch.
CRL.REV.P. 391/2022
Mr.Nishant Sharma, Advocate (through VC), for the Petitioner.
Mr.Hemant Mehla, APP for the state with Mr.Dipanshu Meena, Advocate & SI Yogender.

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.

1. The present bail applications have been proposed to be taken together and disposed of vide this common order as the question involved herein is similar that whether the charge sheet filed without the FSL report is an `incomplete charge sheet' and by virtue of this the petitioners accrued a statutory right to be released on default bail.

2. Learned counsels for the petitioners have argued vehemently that in view of the latest judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Mohd. Arbaz vs. State of NCT of Delhi, SLP (Crl.)8164-8166/2021 dated 09.11.2022, Suleman vs. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.1929/2023, order dated 17.04.2023, Divyas Bardewa vs. Narcotics Control Bureau in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.11628/2022 order dated 01.05.2023 and Arif Khan vs. State in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.8610/2023 order dated 28.07.2023, the Hon'ble Apex Court has extended the benefit of bail to the accused persons and have kept the question relating to the completeness of the charge sheet in accordance with the law if the same is filed without the CFSL report for consideration. Learned counsels for the petitioners

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top