Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Evidence from bank officials, such as the Bank Manager, is crucial to authenticate the memo, and failure to examine or produce such witnesses weakens the case ["S.A.Suresh Kumar, Managing Director, Don Publications Private Ltd. vs Balammal - Madras"], ["M/S SUVARNA JYOTI FINANCE CORPORATION (R) vs MUKESH - Karnataka"], ["Milian Korthalwar vs The State of Telangana - Telangana"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["Tulshi Steel Traders Propritor Pushpendra Kesharwani VS Purva Construction Propritor - Crimes"]- ["Krishnapal VS Hari Singh - 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 180"]- ["Tulshi Steel Traders Propritor vs Purva Construction Propritor - Mitrabhan Sahu - Chhattisgarh"]- ["AMIT AJMANI vs RAJESH SONI - Chhattisgarh"]- ["Durga Singh vs Mohar Singh - Himachal Pradesh"]- ["M/S SUVARNA JYOTI FINANCE CORPORATION (R) vs MUKESH - Karnataka"]- ["S.A.Suresh Kumar, Managing Director, Don Publications Private Ltd. vs Balammal - Madras"]- ["S.A.Suresh Kumar, Managing Director, Don Publications Private Ltd. vs A.Saravana Perumal - Madras"]- ["Sri Balaram Chowdhury vs The State of Tripura and Anr - Tripura"]- ["Sri Balaram Chowdhury vs The State of Tripura and Anr - Tripura"]- ["Coolage Through Proprietor James K. Wargis S/o Late C.J. Wargis vs Anil Refrigeration Work Through Proprietor Suresh Kumar S/o A. Appu Kuttan - Chhattisgarh"]- ["Balaram Chowdhury, S/o Sri Thainga Chowdhury VS State of Tripura - Tripura"]
In the world of cheque transactions, few documents carry as much weight as the cheque return memo (also known as the return memo). When a cheque bounces due to insufficient funds or other reasons, this memo becomes crucial evidence in legal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (NI Act). But a common question arises: Bank manager adhikari ke return memo par signature hona jaruri h ya nhi or bank ki seal? (Is the signature of the bank manager/officer necessary on the return memo, or the bank's seal?)
This query is particularly relevant for payees pursuing cheque bounce cases, as the authenticity of the return memo can make or break their claim. In this post, we explore the legal position, drawing from key judgments and RBI guidelines. Note: This is general information based on precedents and not specific legal advice. Consult a lawyer for your case.
A cheque return memo is issued by the drawer's bank to the payee's bank when a cheque is dishonoured. It states the reason for dishonour, such as insufficient funds or signature mismatch. Under Section 146 of the NI Act, the court presumes the memo's contents are genuine if it bears the official mark or seal of the bank. However, courts have clarified that minor infirmities do not invalidate proceedings entirely.
The signature of the bank officer or manager on the return memo is not strictly mandatory for the document to be valid, provided it is issued by an authorized bank official and follows prescribed guidelines. The court in a key judgment observed that the return memo informs the payee's bank and payee about the dishonour and is more informational than a formal public document. Thus, the absence of an official signature does not automatically invalidate it, as long as it's not fabricated. Krishnapal VS Hari Singh - 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 180
Key points from precedents:- The absence of signature alone does not invalidate the document if the bank's authority to issue it is established. Krishnapal VS Hari Singh - 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 180- Courts have held that even without a signature, if the memo is validly issued by the bank, Section 138 proceedings remain valid. For instance, if the cheque return memo is not bearing any official stamp of the bank, it does not render the cheque return memo as invalid or illegal. AMIT AJMANI vs RAJESH SONI - 2025 Supreme(Online)(CHH) 3583
In another case, the High Court of Delhi opined similarly: if the cheque return memo is not bearing any official stamp of the bank, it does not render the cheque return memo as invalid or illegal. Krishnapal vs Hari Singh - 2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 17660
While a signature may not be essential, the bank's official seal is crucial for establishing authenticity and evidentiary value. Without it, the memo may be seen as an informal document with reduced proof value. RBI guidelines explicitly instruct banks to sign or initial the memo and affix the seal to mention the dishonour reason and prevent fraud. Krishnapal VS Hari Singh - 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 180
Courts emphasize:- A memo lacking the seal or signature, especially against RBI instructions, may be treated as a mere piece of paper with no legal proof value. Krishnapal VS Hari Singh - 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 180- However, infirmities like missing seals do not render the entire trial under Section 138 null. They only affect evidentiary weight, and the presumption under Section 146 can still apply if bank authority is proven. Mohd. Yunus Malik VS State of Uttar Pradesh - 2023 Supreme(All) 1153
From a related ruling: the cheque return memo is not carrying the official seal or mark of the concerned bank and due to this reason, the presumption under section 146 of the NI Act was not adopted. Yet, proceedings were not quashed. GUNEET BHASIN VS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI - 2022 Supreme(Del) 818
The landmark case of Guneet Bhasin clarifies that missing signatures or seals do not invalidate the trial but impact the document's weight. The signature and seal prove issuance by the bank per regulations. Krishnapal VS Hari Singh - 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 180
RBI mandates banks to ensure memos are signed/initialed and sealed to avoid misuse. Violation affects legal standing but doesn't automatically void the document. Krishnapal VS Hari Singh - 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 180
In practice:- For Complainants: A memo without seal may face challenges, but supplementary evidence like bank affidavits or original cheque records can bolster your case. Courts prefer compliant documents to prevent fraud.- For Accused: Argue lack of seal to weaken presumption, but it rarely quashes proceedings outright—trial proceeds on other evidence.- Bank's Role: Always include signature and seal to maintain evidentiary strength.
Exceptions:- Document admissibility depends on proof of genuineness and RBI compliance. Krishnapal VS Hari Singh - 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 180- No seal significantly weakens value, treating it as informal. Krishnapal VS Hari Singh - 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 180
Krishnapal VS Hari Singh - 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 180
In summary, while the bank manager's signature is not strictly mandatory on a cheque return memo, the bank's seal is vital for authenticity under NI Act and RBI rules. Courts consistently hold that such omissions don't invalidate Section 138 cases but diminish proof value—trials proceed, and presumptions may hold with corroboration. Krishnapal VS Hari Singh - 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 180AMIT AJMANI vs RAJESH SONI - 2025 Supreme(Online)(CHH) 3583Mohd. Yunus Malik VS State of Uttar Pradesh - 2023 Supreme(All) 1153
Key Takeaways:- Signature: Not essential if authorized issuance proven.- Seal: Critical; absence weakens but doesn't destroy case.- Always prioritize compliant documents for stronger legal standing.- Infirmities are trial matters, not grounds for quashing. GUNEET BHASIN VS STATE OF NCT OF DELHI - 2022 Supreme(Del) 818
Stay informed on evolving banking laws to safeguard your financial transactions. For personalized guidance, reach out to a legal expert.
#ChequeBounce, #NIA138, #BankingLaw
bear the seal and signature of bank official, as such presumption under Section 138 of N.I. ... Act, 1881 is held to be in favour of complainant, therefore, merely due to no seal and signature of cheque return forwarding memo by the bank, the finding of the trial Court that no presumption regarding dishonor of cheques can be drawn, is misconceived. ... If the cheque return memo is not bearing any official stamp of ....
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that learned trial Court has passed the judgment of acquittal only on the fact that the the cheque return memo filed was without any bank seal and signature of the concerned authority and on that basis dismissed the complaint, whereas on that aspect learned ... High Court of Delhi has opined that if the cheque return memo is not bearing any official stamp of the bank, it does not render the cheque #HL_START....
Act, 1881, therefore, without any such finding merely due to no seal and signature of cheque return forwarding memo by the bank, the finding of the trial Court that the complainant has not proved the case against the accused is misconceived. ... If the cheque return memo is not bearing any official stamp of the bank, it does not render the cheque return memo as invalid or illegal. ... He would further submit that t....
Act, 1881, therefore, without any such finding merely due to no seal and signature of cheque return forwarding memo by the bank, the finding of the trial Court that the complainant has not proved the case against the accused is misconceived. ... If the cheque return memo is not bearing any official stamp of the bank, it does not render the cheque return memo as invalid or illegal. ... He would further submit that t....
He next submitted that alongwith complaint, letter of Bank dated 20.4.2022 has also been annexed having no seal or signature. He firmly submitted that in absence of seal or signature, letter cannot be treated as valid document. ... So far as present case is concerned, bank has informed that cheque was dishonored due to 'Insufficient Funds', but there is no official mark, signature and seal of the Bank in the said letter dated 20.4.2....
be aptly galvanized, upon, the memo evidently carrying thereon, the official mark, and, seal, of the bank concerned. ... Admittedly, the UCO Bank representative is not examined. The Trial Court refused to accept the bank memo issued by that bank. It does not bear the seal of the bank. I agree with the trial Court. The presumption under section 146 of the N.I. Act will not come to his rescue. ... Hari Singh, 2024 SCC OnLine MP 2516, ....
bear the seal and signature of bank official, as such presumption under Section 138 of N.I. ... Act, 1881 is held to be in favour of complainant, therefore, merely due to no seal and signature of cheque return forwarding memo by the bank, the finding of the trial Court that no presumption regarding dishonor of cheques can be drawn, is misconceived. ... If the cheque return memo is not bearing any official stamp of ....
bear the seal and signature of bank official, as such presumption under Section 138 of N.I. ... Act, 1881 is held to be in favour of complainant, therefore, merely due to no seal and signature of cheque return forwarding memo by the bank, the finding of the trial Court that no presumption regarding dishonor of cheques can be drawn, is misconceived. ... If the cheque return memo is not bearing any official stamp of ....
The cheque return memo filed by the respondent no. 2 was without any bank seal and mark which fails the presumption of section 146 of the NI Act. ... After referring the section 146 of the NI Act, it has been observed that the cheque return memo is not carrying the official seal or mark of the concerned bank and due to this reason, the presumption under section 146 of the NI Act was not adopted. ... If the cheque return me....
High Court of Delhi has opined that if the cheque return memo is not bearing any official stamp of the bank, it does not render the cheque return memo as invalid or illegal. ... Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that learned trial Court has passed the judgment of acquittal only on the fact that the the cheque return memo filed was without any bank seal and signature of the concerned authority and on that ....
Yeh ki prativadi jaisa ki purva me likha ja chuka hai ki vaadi ki sampatti ko ek sadyantra ke tahat hadap kar lena chahta tha tatha vaadi ki hatya kar uski sampatti par kabij hona chahta tha." Yeh ki isi prakaran me vaadi ne apni bhumi jo arjan ho chuki thi ki ijrai evam hakuk bhi Ghanshyam Das putra Parmanand ko purn pratifal lekar vikray kar chuka tha evam shastam Apar Jila Judge mahoday, Bulandshahar ke nyaylay me ukt Ghamshyam
Yeh ki isi prakaran me vaadi ne apni bhumi jo arjan ho chuki thi ki ijrai evam hakuk bhi Ghanshyam Das putra Parmanand ko purn pratifal lekar vikray kar chuka tha evam shastam Apar Jila Judge mahoday, Bulandshahar ke nyaylay me ukt Ghamshyam Yeh ki prativadi jaisa ki purva me likha ja chuka hai ki vaadi ki sampatti ko ek sadyantra ke tahat hadap kar lena chahta tha tatha vaadi ki hatya kar uski sampatti par kabij hona chahta tha.”
Yeh ki prativadi jaisa ki purva me likhaja chuka hai ki vaadi ki sampatti ko ek sadyantra ke tahat hadap kar lena chahta tha tatha vaadi ki hatya kar uski sampatti par kabij hona chahta tha.” Yeh ki isi prakaran me vaadi ne apni bhumijo arjan ho chuki thi ki ijrai evam hakuk bhi Ghanshyam Das putra Parmanand ko purn pratifal lekar vikray kar chuka tha evam shastam Apar Jila Judge ma-hoday, Bulandshahar ke nyaylay me ukt Ghanshyam
Farm ke us sthan per jahan avedak ke hastakshar hetu jagah chuta hai vahan mritak ki patni ya mata/pita apna hastakshar ya bayen anguthe ki nishan bana de. The above contents of the letter alleged to have been received by the applicants would clearly indicate that the said Sh. Is hetu apke pas patra/patravahak ko sambhandit farm ke sath bhej raha hun. S.S. Shambhuti had voluntarily offered his services to the applicants by supplying them with the necessary performa application etc.
7. It would further be appropriate to quote the confessional letter of the workman dated 28-6-1976 as below: "nivedan hai ki Deena Nath Prasad ke savings Bank khata No. 1117 se mere pehchan par jo 8100/- rupiyaa; eight thousand one hundred nikala gaya hai oose main jama kar doonga. Ate prarthana hai ki es rakam ko jama karne ke fiye mujhe 15 din; pandrah din ka samay diya jai. "
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
