Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
Creating a complete list of dates in civil cases involves explicitly seeking court permission and following procedural steps. For example, in I.A. 30827/2025, the plaintiff was permitted to file a lengthy list of dates and events, which was scheduled before the Joint Registrar and the Court on specific dates ["RASIKA BHATIA & ANR. VS. PRABHAT KAMAL SOOD - Delhi"].
When compiling such lists, it is essential to include all relevant dates accurately and present them in a chronological order. The court may require the list to be filed before designated officials or courts, with clear reference to the dates of events, as seen in the case where lists were scheduled for specific dates ["RASIKA BHATIA & ANR. VS. PRABHAT KAMAL SOOD - Delhi"].
In some cases, the court emphasizes the importance of detailed and meaningful presentation of dates and events to avoid confusion or incomplete records, which can impact case proceedings ["VED PRAKASH VS MARUDHAR SERVICES LIMITED - Delhi"].
Overall, the main approach involves obtaining court approval to file a comprehensive list, ensuring all relevant dates are included, and adhering to scheduled dates for submission and review ["RASIKA BHATIA & ANR. VS. PRABHAT KAMAL SOOD - Delhi"].
Analysis and Conclusion:To create a complete list of dates in a civil case argument, litigants should seek formal permission if necessary, compile all relevant dates chronologically with precision, and ensure timely filing before the court or designated officials. This process enhances clarity and supports the case's factual accuracy, as demonstrated in the permitted filing procedures ["RASIKA BHATIA & ANR. VS. PRABHAT KAMAL SOOD - Delhi"].
In civil litigation, timely and orderly scheduling of court hearings is crucial for efficient justice delivery. Many litigants and lawyers grapple with how to create a complete list of dates in argument in civil case, often facing delays, procedural errors, or even case dismissals due to mismanagement. This guide breaks down the procedural guidelines, drawing from court directives and case law, to help you navigate the process effectively. Note: This is general information and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
Proper listing of dates ensures transparency, fairness, and adherence to natural justice principles. Courts emphasize that scheduling must prevent errors like incorrect categorization or unexplained delays, which can vitiate proceedings. For instance, unexplained delays in handling cases have led to orders being quashed, as seen where the gap between 14th December, 1984, to 28th February, 1985, reveals a complete disregard of the requirement of urgently dealing with cases BHUPINDER SINGH VS UNION OF INDIA - 1985 Supreme(Del) 292.
Efficient listing facilitates case management, reduces adjournments, and upholds procedural integrity. Courts direct administrative offices to process files vigilantly, with failure leading to corrective orders Shantanu Kumar Choudhary VS State of Jharkhand - 2013 0 Supreme(Jhk) 570.
Categorize cases accurately, such as 'Hearing' or 'for orders', to reflect their stage. Incorrect categorization can lead to procedural lapses and mismanagement Shantanu Kumar Choudhary VS State of Jharkhand - 2013 0 Supreme(Jhk) 570. Proper headings ensure clarity and efficient court functioning.
Court offices must process files carefully, adhering strictly to established directions and guidelines. This reduces errors such as incorrect listing or misplacement of cases Shantanu Kumar Choudhary VS State of Jharkhand - 2013 0 Supreme(Jhk) 570. Uniform adherence promotes consistency.
For multiple cases or complex applications, obtaining the consent of the opposing counsel is mandatory. This practice fosters cooperation and prevents disputes over scheduling Shantanu Kumar Choudhary VS State of Jharkhand - 2013 0 Supreme(Jhk) 570. Consent minimizes adjournments by aligning on convenient dates.
Fix dates considering parties' convenience, judicial availability, and urgency. The process should be transparent, fair, and based on mutual agreement where possible Shantanu Kumar Choudhary VS State of Jharkhand - 2013 0 Supreme(Jhk) 570. In seniority disputes, courts stress that for determination of seniority, the dates of appointment were to be treated as dates of birth in the cadre Sushil Pandey VS State of U. P. Thr. Principal Secretary (Home) - 2023 Supreme(SC) 37, highlighting precise date tracking.
All interim applications (I.As.) must be duly registered before being listed. Unregistered applications should not be placed on the court board until defects are rectified Delhi Development Authority VS Skipper Construction - 1998 0 Supreme(SC) 1397. Registration is a prerequisite for systematic management.
The Registrar must prepare a clear statement indicating the reliefs claimed in each application... within a stipulated timeframe (e.g., one week) Delhi Development Authority VS Skipper Construction - 1998 0 Supreme(SC) 1397. This enhances clarity during arguments.
List matters on suitable dates, factoring in case nature and convenience. Courts issue directions for specific classes, like disciplinary matters, on designated dates Delhi Development Authority VS Skipper Construction - 1998 0 Supreme(SC) 1397. In property tax challenges, failure to follow statutory procedures barred civil suits, underscoring proper listing channels D. S. MEHTA VS NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION - 1995 Supreme(Del) 157.
In cases with civil consequences like blacklisting, adhere to natural justice: opportunity for a personal hearing before listing or final decision AK Interior & Exterior Associates vs Indian Oil Corporation Limited - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 6078. Avoid arbitrary 'Holiday List' placements without notice.
Courts issue directions for vigilance in scheduling, with non-compliance risking remand Shantanu Kumar Choudhary VS State of Jharkhand - 2013 0 Supreme(Jhk) 570. Litigants must track dates meticulously; petitioners listing events like on 15th September, 1983 the conveyance was executed highlight how timelines in arguments can sway outcomes Adi Dara Patel VS S. R. Jondhale - 2016 Supreme(Bom) 535Adi Dara Patel VS S. R. Jondhale - 2016 Supreme(Bom) 534.
Absence during arguments due to advocate lapses led to ex-parte orders in one case, where no order was passed by the Tribunal regarding absence of the engaged Advocate and evidence wasn't adduced Maleka Khatun VS Union of India - 2015 Supreme(Gau) 1048. Always ensure representation and document readiness.
In service matters, upsetting settled seniority via improper date lists was contested, as promotions must reference actual dates of promotion to special trade posts K.V.Rami Reddy vs The State of Telangana - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 26051K.V.Rami Reddy vs The State of Telangana - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 50930.
A complete list of dates strengthens arguments by demonstrating timelines. Courts review such lists for delays or compliance. For example:- Chronological Order: Present events sequentially, e.g., filing, registration, hearings.- Evidence Support: Back with orders, notices.- Relevance to Relief: Link dates to claims, like unexplained gaps vitiating detention BHUPINDER SINGH VS UNION OF INDIA - 1985 Supreme(Del) 292.
In land acquisition, guidelines infringing statutory rights for compensation redetermination were invalidated, emphasizing procedural timelines K. Papeshwar Rao VS Government Of A. P. - 1997 Supreme(AP) 1111.
Creating a complete list of dates for civil arguments demands precision, cooperation, and procedural fidelity. By following these guidelines—categorization, consents, registration, and fairness—you minimize risks and bolster your case. Courts prioritize administrative accuracy to deliver justice efficiently.
Key Takeaways:- Always secure opposing counsel's consent.- Register applications before listing.- Track dates rigorously to avoid unexplained delays.- Integrate timelines into arguments for persuasive impact.
For tailored advice, engage a legal professional. Stay updated on local court rules.
References:- Shantanu Kumar Choudhary VS State of Jharkhand - 2013 0 Supreme(Jhk) 570- Delhi Development Authority VS Skipper Construction - 1998 0 Supreme(SC) 1397- AK Interior & Exterior Associates vs Indian Oil Corporation Limited - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 6078- BHUPINDER SINGH VS UNION OF INDIA - 1985 Supreme(Del) 292- D. S. MEHTA VS NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION - 1995 Supreme(Del) 157- Adi Dara Patel VS S. R. Jondhale - 2016 Supreme(Bom) 535- Adi Dara Patel VS S. R. Jondhale - 2016 Supreme(Bom) 534- Maleka Khatun VS Union of India - 2015 Supreme(Gau) 1048- K.V.Rami Reddy vs The State of Telangana - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 26051- Sushil Pandey VS State of U. P. Thr. Principal Secretary (Home) - 2023 Supreme(SC) 37- K. Papeshwar Rao VS Government Of A. P. - 1997 Supreme(AP) 1111
This post synthesizes court directives for educational purposes.
#CivilLaw, #CourtScheduling, #LegalProcedures
I.A. 30827/2025 (seeking leave to file lengthy list of dates and events) 3. For the reasons stated, the plaintiff is permitted to file lengthy list of dates and events. 4. ... List before the Joint Registrar on 12th February, 2026. 13. List before the Court on 16th April, 2026. ... It is the case of the plaintiff that both parents expired intestate. 17. ... In view of the above, a prima facie case is made out on behalf of the plaintiff. Balance of c....
The defendant has deliberately not given the dates of the drafts and whenthey were given in order to create confusion. The plaintiffs have not acceptedany money at all from the defendant after issue of said notice of terminationdated 2. 3. 1998. ... Having perused these decision I am of theview that they have no application. to the facts of the present case. ... ... ( 7 ) HAVING considered the submissions made before me I am satisfied that, on acomplete and meaningful reading of the Written Statement, there is an admiss....
We cannot accept the argument of Mr. Bagai that this period of two and half months was utilized for preparing the draft grounds. We consequently bold that the delay in this case remains unexplained. ... In our opinion, the gap between 14th December, 1984, to 28th Februry, 1985, reveals acomplete disregard of the requirernent of urgently dealing with cases involving preventive detention. The official record is silent as to who was handling it between the said two dates. ... It should have applied its mind in the facts and....
Punjab Municipal Act in; so far property tax matters are concerned is acomplete Code and detailed, procedure is given in regard to the assessment of theproperty tax and the manner in which the assessment could be challenged. Insobha Singh and Songs (P) Ltd. V,. ... Therefore, the case of the petitionersthat they had made the entire payment on account of levy of property tax is notcorrect. The demands as detailed in the written statement were not complied withnor any proceedings were taken under the Act to challenge the property tax assessment. ... Supreme ....
His entire argument is on G.O.Ms. No. 69, dated 07.04.1997, which he interprets as mandating that promotions within specialist trades be governed by a combined seniority list that specifically references the actual dates of promotion to special trade posts. ... Specialists are eligible for promotion within their trade or against general duty vacancies, but this does not create a separate seniority stream. ... His core argument is that this action upsets a previously settled seniority order, and therefor....
His entire argument is on G.O.Ms. No. 69, dated 07.04.1997, which he interprets as mandating that promotions within specialist trades be governed by a combined seniority list that specifically references the actual dates of promotion to special trade posts. ... Specialists are eligible for promotion within their trade or against general duty vacancies, but this does not create a separate seniority stream. ... His core argument is that this action upsets a previously settled seniority order, and therefor....
Thus, Section 28a is acomplete code in ilself providing substantive right to an interested owner who received compensation under Section 18 without protest for higher compensation, and remedy has been provided to make a written application within the prescribed period. ... In the instant case, as held above, the offending portion of the guidelines is contrary to Section 28a and infringe upon statutory rights of the claimants for redetermination of the compensation under Section 28a. For the said reason the Writ Petition is maintainable. ... Collector, if t....
If that be the case, it is very clear that this appellant had full knowledge of dates of births of his own siblings. ... The fact that his father had two wives and different children was never the part of his pleaded case. There was no opportunity for the defendants in the suit to controvert that. The argument of the appellant is that in the interest of justice this application may be allowed. ... All that argument may be available for consideration if at all the established facts allow such a....
It is admitted that the topic of legislation of the impugned Pondicherry Civil Courts Act falls under Entry 3 of the State List Indubitably, if the Pondicherry Legislative Assembly has power to enact laws with respect to matters in the State List, it has the requisite legislative power to pass the Civil ... The argument is that, when all the topics of legislation under the State List and Concurrent Lists are given to a Legislative Assembly thus created, it is not a specification of pow....
Similar is in the case of the promotees. Both of them undergo probation. ... There is no dispute or contra argument that Marathi was published on 10/10/2005. ... Selection does not amount to an appointment as selection does not create any right in an individual to claim appointment. ... The dates of the advertisement, selection and the actual appointment orders, are p style="position:absolute;white-space:pre;margin
The selection list stipulated how the vacancy positions shall be filled but for determination of seniority, the dates of appointment were to be treated as dates of birth in the cadre. In relation to the two streams of entry, after they entered the cadre, their seniority were to be decided on the basis of such dates of entry. In the present proceeding, the manner in which appointment orders were issued was found to be in breach of the provisions of Rule 17 in the first judgment. This practise, in our opinion, is contrary to the seniority order as contemplated in Rule 17.
The petitioners also commenced objecting to the conveyance deed on 21st September, 1983/25th October, 1983. However, we do not find any steps being taken against RBI when it took no cognizance of this letter. The petitioners themselves, in the list of dates and events, have pointed out as to how on 15th September, 1983 the conveyance was executed in favour of RBI.
The petitioners themselves, in the list of dates and events, have pointed out as to how on 15th September, 1983 the conveyance was executed in favour of RBI. The petitioners also commenced objecting to the conveyance deed on 21st September, 1983/25th October, 1983. However, we do not find any steps being taken against RBI when it took no cognizance of this letter.
The petitioner approached several times to her engage Advocate to get information of the proceeding in connection of the said case. How many dates was fixed for argument in absence of engage Advocate of the petitioner not found on record. But in reply the said Advocate told that every thing was going on properly in support of the petitioner. Further no order was passed by the Tribunal regarding absence of the engage Advocate.
The argument of non-payment of dividend is advanced to some how create a case to restrain the petitioners from invoking a negative covenant stipulated under the MoU. If for the last 22 years there has never been a demand for payment of dividend, it clearly means that Godrej never considered non-payment of dividend as a breach of the MoU. Thus, three breaches of the MoU, which according to the Godrej disentitle the petitioners from relying on the MoU, do not constitute any breaches.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
