Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Temporary Relief & Extension of Time: Courts may grant extensions for filing court fees if the plaintiff is unable to affix the fee for no fault of their own. Such extensions are valid under Section 149 CPC and relate back to the original filing date, allowing the suit to proceed without immediate payment of court fee, provided the fee is deposited within the extended period ["2023 0 Supreme(Del) 1705"].
Legal Validity & Jurisdiction: Even if the application does not explicitly mention the relevant legal provision, courts with proper jurisdiction can validate the order for court fee payment. The court has discretion to allow delayed payment or deficit court fee, and non-mentioning of law provisions does not invalidate the order ["2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 113"].
Refund & Return of Court Fee: Refund of court fee is permissible at various stages, including appellate levels, under specific statutes like the Court Fees Act, 1870, and the Kerala Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act. General principles under the Law include refund upon return of plaint or proceedings if excess or wrongly paid court fee was involved ["2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 658"].
Court Fee on Specific Claims: Court fees are generally payable on the amount claimed, such as mesne profits or other monetary claims. However, courts have held that no ad valorem fee is payable on certain claims like use and occupation during the pendency of the suit unless specifically provided ["00300084689"].
Valuation & Proper Payment: Proper valuation of the suit and correct court fee payment are critical. Courts may reject plaints if the fee is improperly paid or the valuation is incorrect, but opportunities are provided for the plaintiff to rectify such errors before rejection ["2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 442"].
Procedure & Court's Discretion: Under Rules like Order VII Rule 11, courts determine the proper court fee and give plaintiffs opportunities to pay the correct fee. If not paid within the prescribed time, the plaint can be rejected. The court's discretion allows for payment at different stages, relating back to the original filing date ["2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 389"], ["2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 20"].
Specific Cases & Instrument Valuation: For suits seeking annulment of instruments or transfer deeds, ad valorem court fee is payable based on the value or consideration involved, as established by courts and Supreme Court rulings ["2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 389"].
Amendments & Court Fee: When a plaint is amended after filing, the court fee paid initially may or may not be considered valid depending on whether it was used or acted upon, affecting the right to refund or additional fee payment ["2025 0 Supreme(All) 2404"].
The provision for court fee in filing suits involves a combination of statutory rules, judicial discretion, and procedural safeguards. Courts can grant extensions and allow delayed payments, relating back to the original filing date, ensuring that procedural technicalities do not unjustly bar access to justice. Refund mechanisms exist but are subject to specific statutory provisions. Proper valuation and timely payment are essential, with courts empowered to reject improperly valued or insufficiently paid fees. Overall, the legal framework aims to balance procedural flexibility with the integrity of court fee collection.
References:- ["2023 0 Supreme(Del) 1705"]- ["2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 113"]- ["2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 658"]- ["2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 468"]- ["2024 0 Supreme(Kar) 442"]- ["2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 20"]- ["2023 0 Supreme(Kar) 434"]- ["2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 389"]- ["2025 0 Supreme(All) 2404"]- ["2022 0 Supreme(Cal) 1211"]
Filing a second appeal can be a critical step in challenging a lower court's decision, but one often overlooked aspect is the correct court fee. Many litigants face rejections or penalties due to improper fee calculation. If you're wondering, What is the provision for court fee for filing a Second Appeal (SA)?, this guide breaks it down based on key statutes and judicial precedents. We'll explore ad valorem and fixed fees, governing laws, and practical tips—generally applicable, though consulting a lawyer for your case is advisable.
The Court Fees Act, 1870, forms the backbone of fee provisions, supplemented by state-specific Court Fees Rules. Schedules I and II outline the structure: Article 1 of Schedule I mandates ad valorem fees (based on subject matter value) for plaints and certain appeals [
#SecondAppeal #CourtFees #LegalGuide
This provision is meant to give temporary relief to a plaintiff where for no fault of his, he is unable to affix the required court fee on the plaint. ... Concealment of material fact while filing application for extension of date for payment of court fee can be a ground for dismissal. ... But that provision does not envisage an order that the payment of cour....
Palanisamy (Supra) itself that " it is well settled that mentioning of the wrong provision or non-mentioning of a provision does not invalidate an order if the Court and/or statutory authority had the requisite jurisdiction therefore". ... Though in the said application, the plaintiff did not specifically mention the provision of law under which it had been filed but the Apex Court has observed in P.K. ......
fees, so deposited at the time of the filing of such application. ... provision enabling refund of court fee at the appellate stage under the Act of 1993, recourse may be had to Section 21(1) of the LA Act, 1997 - which granted refund of court fee in accordance with the provisions of Court Fees Act, 1870, by virtue of the non-obstante clause contained in Section 25 of .....
He submits that there is no provision in the Court Fee Act, 1870 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the 1870 Act’), providing for payment of ad valorem court fee on the amount claimed for use and occupation of the premises during the pendency of the suit. 6. ... Som Nath and Others, 2012(2) Land L.R. 436 (P&H) : 2013 (1) RCR (Civil) 367, the court held that no ad valorem court#HL_EN....
Thus, there is a two stage approach required to be followed by the Court under clauses (b) and (c) of Rule 11 of Order VII. Firstly, the determination of the proper Court fee to be paid and to provide an opportunity to the plaintiff to make payment of the Court fee. ... No.138/2020 on the ground that the said plaint is not properly valued and a proper Court fee has not ....
It could be seen from the records that this court framed issues after filing the written statement. ... A reading of clauses (c) and (d) of the above provision demonstrates a marked difference. ... The respondents resisted the suit by filing their written statements, inter alia, contending that the suit was not maintainable in law. 9. The court below had formulated seven issues. ... This Court#H....
fee accordingly. ... The proviso states that if a caveat is entered and the application is registered as a suit, the court fee shall be paid on one half of the fee prescribed in Article 1 of Schedule I on the market value of the estate minus the fee already paid on the application. ... fee, is not applicable. ... Therefore, she opined that the proviso to Article 11(l)(ii)(3) of Schedule ....
Though, attention of the court has not been drawn to any separate provision for payment of court fee on a suit for cancellation/annulment of an instrument, however, a Full Bench of this court in Niranjan Kaur vs Nirbigan Kaur, AIR 1981 P&H 368, has held that such suit will be ... The dispute in these six connected revision petitions, is with regard to liability of the plaintiff to pay ad-valorem #HL_STAR....
Section 30 of the Act, 1870 read with Rule 252 to 259 of the Rules, 1942 and the corresponding Rule 384 to 386 of the General Rule (Civil) 1957, but, in a case such as the present one, where, after filing of the said court-fee, the plaint was subsequently amended, but, the consequential ... C-62 for accepting the court- fee also stood rejected, therefore, in this peculiar factual scenario it cannot be sai....
(c) What was the amount of court fee initially paid by the appellant, therein, at the time of filing of above stated appeal? Ans. Rs.100 (d) What was the exact court fee required for filing of an appeal preferred against a decree? ... In our view Section 149 does not give an absolute unfettered right to the plaintiff to pay deficit court fee as and wh....
7.3 Therefore, firstly, there was no question of consideration of pecuniary jurisdiction for the purpose of recording compromise. Courts can record compromises unfettered by their pecuniary limits so long as the compromise relates to the parties to the Suit. Further, such allegations of lack thereof, will not in any event affect the validity of the decree passed. Accordingly, the question is answered. “23. We find ourselves in agreement with the approach taken by the High Courts in the decisio....
(f) What is the additional amount paid as deficit court fee by the appellant, therein and what was the date for making such payment? (e) What was the exact amount of deficit court fee at the time of initial filing of the above stated appeal by the Appellant therein? (d) What was the exact court fee required for filing of an appeal preferred against a decree?
Limited question posing for answer is as to what court fee is to be affixed? The petitioner has claimed that when she has neither executed the sale deed nor has received the consideration nor had even been dispossessed nor she is claiming possession, she is not entitled to pay advalorem court fee.
There is no other provision under the Act which deals with payment of costs for processing request and/or even for the Court fees. Therefore, the applicants/petitioners whosoever invoke this provision are required to pay Court fee and in the cases where notices are issued further process fee and/or Court fee needs to be paid and/or deposited as per the requisite rules. The respective rules of respective Courts based upon the Court Fees Act Central as well as State Act provide for req....
It cannot be that only whilst applying for review of a judgment or whilst making an application under the LAA or ITA or ST Act that the Court fee would have to be paid initially and for filing other plaints and petitions the court fee would have to be paid when the order is passed or grant is made.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.