Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Checking relevance for Jaggo VS Union Of India...
2025 3 Supreme 26 : A person can claim regularisation of their services if they have rendered long, uninterrupted, and continuous service for a period extending well beyond ten years, performed indispensable duties that were integral to the day-to-day functioning of the organization, and their employment was not through any illegal or surreptitious route. The nature of the work must be essential and ongoing, and the employee must have no adverse service record. Courts must look beyond the surface label of ''''temporary'''' or ''''contractual'''' appointments and consider the actual reality of employment, including sustained contribution, recurrent and regular performance of duties akin to sanctioned posts, and the absence of mala fide or illegalities in the appointment. The regularisation is warranted when the work was inherently required on a regular basis and the employee''''s role was indispensable, especially when no other personnel were engaged for the same tasks during their tenure.Checking relevance for Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Chennai VS Thiru R. Govindaswamy...
2014 0 Supreme(SC) 129 : A person can claim regularisation of services only if they were appointed in pursuance of a regular recruitment process in accordance with relevant rules, against sanctioned vacant posts, through an open competitive process. Mere continuation of service, even for over 10 years, does not confer a right to regularisation if the employee was not working against a sanctioned post. Part-time, temporary, or ad hoc employees cannot claim regularisation, nor can they claim parity in salary with regular employees on the principle of equal pay for equal work. The right to claim regularisation must arise from a legal basis such as a contract or statute, and courts cannot issue directions for regularisation that would violate the constitutional scheme of Articles 14 and 16. Additionally, schemes providing for regularisation with a cut-off date do not allow those appointed after the cut-off to claim extension of the date or demand fresh schemes.Checking relevance for Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Chennai VS Thiru R. Govindaswamy...
2014 2 Supreme 432 : A person can claim regularisation of services only if they were appointed in pursuance of a regular recruitment process in accordance with relevant rules, against a sanctioned vacant post, through an open competitive process. Mere long-term service, even if continuous for over 10 years, does not entitle a temporary, ad hoc, daily-wage, or part-time employee to regularisation. Regularisation cannot be granted if the appointment was not made against a sanctioned post, or if it violates the constitutional scheme of equality under Articles 14 and 16. Part-time employees are not entitled to regularisation as they are not working against any sanctioned posts, and courts cannot issue directions for their absorption or permanent continuance. Sympathy or sentiment cannot substitute for a legal right to regularisation.Checking relevance for Jacob M. Puthuparambil: Jacob M. Puthuparambil: P. Mohanan: Sasidharan C. P. : C. A. Jose: Mary C. L. : Nazar K. M. : P. V. Sasikumar: Parassala Sivanandan: M. S. Sreekumar: P. B. Prasadchandran: C. V. Balakrishnan: Abdul Buriyain O. H. : A. G. Dasankunju VS Kerala Water Authority: Kerala Water Authority: Kerala Water Authority: State Of Kerala: State Of Kerala: State Of Kerala: Kerala Water Authority: Kerala Water Authority: Kerala Water Authority: Kerala Water Authority: Kerala Water Authority: Kerala Water...
1990 0 Supreme(SC) 562 : A person can claim regularisation of his services if he was employed between 1st April, 1984 and 4th August, 1986 and possesses the requisite qualifications for the post as prescribed on the date of his appointment. For workers appointed after 4th August, 1984, regularisation is possible if they possess the requisite qualifications and have rendered continuous service for at least one year, with artificial breaks ignored. In such cases, the services should be regulated in accordance with Act 19 of 1970, and the Kerala Public Service Commission will take steps to regularise their services as a separate block, with the age bar waived.Checking relevance for Ramakrishna Kamat VS State of Karnataka...
Checking relevance for Regional Manager, SBI VS Mahatma Mishra...
Checking relevance for Ashok Kumar Sonkar VS Union of India...
Checking relevance for Vijay Laxmi VS State of U. P. ...
2004 0 Supreme(All) 991 : A person can claim regularisation of his services only if he is in service on the date of enforcement of the Regularisation Rules. The mere fulfillment of eligibility conditions, such as possessing requisite qualifications and completing three years of service, is not sufficient if the person is not in service on that date. Regularisation requires both the fulfillment of conditions under the rules and the person being actively in service at the time of regularisation. There is no provision for deemed or automatic regularisation. The Government must pass a formal regularisation order for regularisation to occur. Therefore, the key condition for claiming regularisation is continuous service on the date the rules come into force.
