Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Multiple Extensions Allowed - The sources indicate that the time for passing declarations or completing probation can be extended more than once under certain conditions. For example, ["R. Venkata Ramudu VS State of A. P. - Supreme Court"] states that the appointing authority may, at any time, before or after the expiry of the prescribed period of probation either extend by not more than one year, implying multiple extensions are permissible if justified. Similarly, ["SRI.G VENKATESHWARULU vs STATE OF TG PRL.SCY FINANCE HYD AND 2 - Telangana"] and ["G Venkateshwarulu vs State Of TG PRL.SCY Finance Hyd - Telangana"] mention that the declaration of probation can be extended by the government till the date of his passing such tests or acquiring such qualifications, suggesting successive extensions are possible depending on circumstances.
Conditions for Multiple Extensions - Extensions are typically subject to specific rules or orders, and the decision to extend must be made soon after the expiry of the previous period, as per rules like Rule 18 and Rule 17 referenced in ["R. Venkata Ramudu VS State of A. P. - Supreme Court"] and ["SRI.G VENKATESHWARULU vs STATE OF TG PRL.SCY FINANCE HYD AND 2 - Telangana"]. The extensions are often granted based on performance, pending tests, or administrative discretion, and there is no explicit limit to the number of extensions, provided the conditions are met and proper procedures are followed.
Limitations and Legal Considerations - While multiple extensions are generally allowed, the courts emphasize that such extensions must be justified and within prescribed limits (e.g., not more than one year at a time for probation, as per ["R. Venkata Ramudu VS State of A. P. - Supreme Court"]). In some cases, failure to adhere to procedural requirements or unreasonable delays may render extensions invalid, but the overall principle remains that extensions can be granted more than once under lawful authority.
Analysis and Conclusion: Based on the provided sources, the prevailing view is that the time for passing declarations, completing probation, or similar time-bound processes can be extended multiple times, subject to rules, administrative approval, and justified reasons. There is no inherent legal bar to multiple extensions, but each extension must be properly justified and within the limits prescribed by applicable rules or orders ["R. Venkata Ramudu VS State of A. P. - Supreme Court"] ["SRI.G VENKATESHWARULU vs STATE OF TG PRL.SCY FINANCE HYD AND 2 - Telangana"] ["G Venkateshwarulu vs State Of TG PRL.SCY Finance Hyd - Telangana"].
References:- ["R. Venkata Ramudu VS State of A. P. - Supreme Court"]- ["SRI.G VENKATESHWARULU vs STATE OF TG PRL.SCY FINANCE HYD AND 2 - Telangana"]- ["G Venkateshwarulu vs State Of TG PRL.SCY Finance Hyd - Telangana"]
In legal proceedings, time is often of the essence. Parties frequently face strict deadlines for submitting declarations, passing awards, or completing formal submissions. But what happens when unforeseen circumstances arise? A common question arises: whether the time for passing declaration can be extended for more than once. This post delves into the legal nuances, drawing from court precedents and statutory interpretations to provide clarity. While this is general information and not specific legal advice, understanding these principles can help navigate procedural challenges effectively.
Deadlines for declarations—whether in arbitration, land acquisition, or administrative matters—are designed to ensure efficiency. However, courts recognize that rigidity can sometimes undermine justice. The key question is whether these timelines can be extended repeatedly, and under what conditions.
Generally, the answer is yes: multiple extensions are permissible provided there is mutual consent between parties and court approval. There is no blanket statutory prohibition against successive extensions, allowing flexibility to accommodate ongoing proceedings or complex cases. This approach prioritizes fairness over strict adherence to initial timelines.
Legal documents illustrate that courts routinely grant multiple extensions when justified. For instance, in arbitration-related matters, extensions for passing awards have been allowed several times with party agreement.
Consider these examples:- In one case, parties extended the period by six months, which expired on 9.09.2019. Subsequently, By consent of the parties, time for completion of proceedings and passing of award is extended for further period of 9 months.HCL Infotech Ltd. vs Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited - Delhi (2019)- Similarly, another reference notes: By mutual consent, the parties extended the period by six months upto 07.11.2019. ... Further, with the parties' consent, time for passing of the award is extended upto 31st January, 2020.Rajwant Singh Engineers and Contractors vs Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation - Delhi (2019)
These instances demonstrate courts' willingness to approve successive extensions, reflecting procedural flexibility. Mohan VS State Of Maharashtra - 2007 3 Supreme 408 provides statutory context under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, where fixed frames exist but extensions remain possible via consent and orders.
Courts interpret procedural rules pragmatically. While some statutes impose fixed limits, judicial discretion allows extensions to prevent injustice. Mutual consent is pivotal—it signals no prejudice to opposing parties—and court oversight ensures extensions serve the proceedings' completion rather than indefinite delays.
This principle extends beyond arbitration. In probation contexts, extensions have been granted to allow candidates time to meet qualifications. For example, a petitioner was given extended probation to pass required tests, underscoring that extensions do not constitute punishment but opportunities for complianceM. Bhaskara Rao VS State Of A. P. - 1962 Supreme(AP) 71. The court emphasized procedural fairness, invalidating premature declarations without meeting prerequisites.
Multiple extensions appear in diverse scenarios, reinforcing the trend:
COVID-19 Extensions: During the pandemic, limitation periods were extended repeatedly via Supreme Court orders in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020. However, these did not always apply to scheme-specific payments like SVLDRS, where post-determination deadlines remained firm Singh Enterprises (a Proprietorship concern), through its Proprietor, Munna Singh VS Union of India, through the Commissioner of CGST & C. X. , Jamshedpur - 2024 Supreme(Jhk) 101. This highlights that while extensions are common in crises, they must align with statutory intent.
Urgent Applications and Suspensions: In constitutional matters, courts assess further extensions based on reasons, consequences, and justice interests, even for 'eleventh-hour' requests Speaker of National Assembly and Others vs New Nation Movement NPC and Others - 2023 Supreme(SA)(ZACC) 9.
Service and Promotion Rules: Vacancies may be determined once yearly, but extensions or carry-forwards occur, with select lists valid for limited periods State of Rajasthan VS Jagdish Chopra - 2007 6 Supreme 242, Chandra Shekhar Dave S/o Sh. Mishri Lal VS State of Rajsthan - 2017 Supreme(Raj) 425. Promotions adhere to quotas without retroactive probing of origins Chandra Shekhar Dave S/o Sh. Mishri Lal VS State of Rajsthan - 2017 Supreme(Raj) 425.
Tax and Compliance: Late submissions of forms like Form-F were reconsidered if justified, directing reassessment for fairness M/S BPL LTD BPL WORK vs STATE OF KERALA - 2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 8687.
Criminal and Remand Contexts: Under UAP Act Section 43-D(2), remands can be extended multiple times with specific reasons, not general procedures Shakul Hammed VS State by The Superintendent of Police National Investigation Agency Kochi - 2018 Supreme(Mad) 2098.
Societal Governance: Supersession periods can extend up to three years aggregate R. Parthasarathy VS The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by the Secretary to the Government & Others - 2007 Supreme(Mad) 4284.
These cases show extensions are not anomalous but a judicial tool, balanced against abuse risks.
While flexible, extensions are not unlimited:- No Indefinite Delays: Courts guard against misuse that prejudices justice or efficiency.- Specific Reasons Required: Vague requests fail; detailed justifications are essential.- Statutory Overrides: Some schemes (e.g., SVLDRS payments) resist general extensions Singh Enterprises (a Proprietorship concern), through its Proprietor, Munna Singh VS Union of India, through the Commissioner of CGST & C. X. , Jamshedpur - 2024 Supreme(Jhk) 101.
Recommendations for Parties:- Secure written mutual consent.- File timely applications with court, citing progress needs.- Document reasons to demonstrate good faith.
Courts exercise discretion judiciously, balancing speed with equity.
In summary, the time for passing a declaration can typically be extended more than once with mutual consent and court approval, as evidenced by precedents like HCL Infotech Ltd. vs Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited - Delhi (2019) and Rajwant Singh Engineers and Contractors vs Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation - Delhi (2019). This flexibility ensures procedural fairness across arbitration, service, tax, and other domains, though subject to safeguards against abuse.
Key Takeaways:- Mutual consent + court order = pathway to multiple extensions.- Provide specific reasons; avoid generalities.- Consult professionals for case-specific strategies—this overview is informational only.
Stay informed on evolving jurisprudence to manage deadlines proactively. For tailored advice, engage a legal expert.
References:- HCL Infotech Ltd. vs Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited - Delhi (2019), Rajwant Singh Engineers and Contractors vs Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation - Delhi (2019), Mohan VS State Of Maharashtra - 2007 3 Supreme 408, M. Bhaskara Rao VS State Of A. P. - 1962 Supreme(AP) 71, Singh Enterprises (a Proprietorship concern), through its Proprietor, Munna Singh VS Union of India, through the Commissioner of CGST & C. X. , Jamshedpur - 2024 Supreme(Jhk) 101, Speaker of National Assembly and Others vs New Nation Movement NPC and Others - 2023 Supreme(SA)(ZACC) 9, M/S BPL LTD BPL WORK vs STATE OF KERALA - 2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 8687, Shakul Hammed VS State by The Superintendent of Police National Investigation Agency Kochi - 2018 Supreme(Mad) 2098, Chandra Shekhar Dave S/o Sh. Mishri Lal VS State of Rajsthan - 2017 Supreme(Raj) 425, State of Rajasthan VS Jagdish Chopra - 2007 6 Supreme 242, R. Parthasarathy VS The State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by the Secretary to the Government & Others - 2007 Supreme(Mad) 4284
#LegalExtensions, #CourtDeadlines, #DeclarationTime
[19] In determining whether this matter is urgent, this Court considers, among others , the adequacy of the reasons provided for the failure to comply with the extended suspension period, the consequences if the relief sought is or is not granted, and the prospects of curing ... MAYA DCJ 5 [8] As in the first extension application, the tussle here was about whether the urgent application for an extension should be granted, with re gard being had to the principles relating to urgent applications, the time the appl....
time for payment available to the Petitioner stood extended up to 28th May, 2022. ... He further submits that with effect from 23rd March, 2020, due to widespread of COVID-19 Virus, lockdown was imposed and the Hon’ble Apex Court, taking into consideration the aforesaid emergent situation, was pleased to extend the period of limitation from time to time by passing orders in Suo Motu Writ ... Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 in respect of Judicial and Quasi-Judicial proceedings and extended#HL_EN....
The appointing authority may, at any time, before or after the expiry of the prescribed period of probation either extend by not more than on year, whether on duty or otherwise, the period of probation of a probationer, in case the probation has not been extended under sub-rule (b) of this rule or terminate ... By a statutory declaration the period of probation stands extended until the Assistant Executive Engineer passes the prescribed test. ... ... (b) (i) The decision whether the p....
It is also stated that after the correspondence made with Government from time to time, the Government declared probation of the applicant as per Rule 16 (h) for declaration of probation, considering the date of publication of result of last examination which would be two years anterior to the said ... extended by the Government by an order under Rule 31 till the date of his passing such tests or acquiring such qualifications, shall have to be commenced the probation with effect from the date to be fix....
It is also stated that after the correspondence made with Government from time to time, the Government declared probation of the applicant as per Rule 16 (h) for declaration of probation, considering the date of publication of result of last examination which would be two years anterior to the said date ... Government by an order under Rule 31 till the date of his passing such tests or acquiring such qualifications, shall have to be commenced the probation with effect from the date to be fixed by the Government, which wo....
The same has been revised from time to time based on the pay revision orders. 4. ... To examine whether there is any change after Exhibit P9 judgment as far as the system is concerned, a reference to Exhibit P3 and Exhibit P7, a letter by the Director will be of advantage. ... Accordingly it is made clear that passing of MOP is required. 9. ... There will be a declaration as prayed for. There will be a direction to the respondents to grant monetary benefits like W.P. ... Exhibit P3 only says that the Sp....
This apart, the facts of the instant case make it plain that when an explanation was called for from the petitioner, he prayed for time for passing the remaining test. ... It is stated by the petitioner that the Government communicated the impugned order on 30-12-1959 and the extended time was only upto 31-3-1960 and that during the time so left to him, no examinations were held. ... There, the declaration with which the Supreme Court was dealing related to the question wheth....
From a reading of the above provision, it is clear that the interval between two dates, i.e., the date of commencement and the date of declaration of the probation shall be equivalent to the prescribed period of probation whether on duty or otherwise. ... , which would be anterior to a date to his passing such tests or acquiring such special qualifications, so, however, that the interval between the two dates shall be equivalent to the prescribed period of probation, whether on duty or otherwise and seniority of ....
It is submitted that at that time no temporary injunction was there because the temporary injunction order dated 15.05.2014 was not extended and had over lived its life of one year. ... It is submitted by counsel for petitioners that the suit was instituted by respondents in the year 2012 for declaration of title, partition, permanent injunction as well as for declaration of Will dated 20.04.2002 and 20.12.2011 as null and void as well as for declaration of mutation on the basis of ... It is further sub....
The petitioner is liable to face the consequence of its failure to produce Forms-F even within the extended time granted by this Court in Ext.P2, asserted the Government Pleader. ... The petitioner has to blame itself for non-production of Forms even within the extended time. Section 6A (2) contemplates an enquiry by the assessing authority to ascertain the truthfulness of the declaration/claim. Nevertheless, such declaration has to be filed “within the prescribed time#HL_END....
The ratio laid down in Mustaq's case (supra), clearly emphasises that it is within the domain of the Special Court to exercise its power either once or from time to time, however, depending upon the period of remand as prescribed u/s 43-D (2) of the UAP Act. It is to be emphasised that the Supreme Court has given its stamp of approval by holding that the remand can be extended more than once even, thereby implying that the remand can be extended at a stretch or more than once, however, subject to the satisfaction of the Court.
(3) Whether vacancies can be determined more than once in a year. Vacancies occurring after the Departmental Promotion Committee meeting has been held shall be treated as the vacancies of the next year. (2) The Appointing Authority shall also determine the vacancies of earlier years, year wise which were required to be filled in by promotion, if such vacancies were not determined and filled earlier in the year in which they were required to be filled in.
(1) The Appointing Authority may determine vacancies on 1st April or at the earliest thereafter any time during the financial year. (2) Where vacancies occurring during the year, besides including vacancies due to retirement could include posts created during the financial year and lien vacancies due to long term deputation. (3) Whether vacancies can be determined more than once in a year. 3. Points raised by various Appointing Authorities have been considered by the Government and these are clarified as under:-
Section 34 defines the power of the Registrar to call for information or explanation and Section 34-A empowers the Government to supersede the committee and appoint a person as a Special Officer to manage the affairs of the society for a specified period not exceeding one year. Such period can be extended from time to time but not for a period more than three years in the aggregate. Sections 37 and 38 empowers the Registrar to cancel the registration of a society. Under Section 36 the Registrar has the power to inquire into the affairs of the registered society.
Vacancies shall be determined only once a year: Vacancies occurring after the Departmental Promotion Committee meeting has been held shall be treated as the vacancies of the next year. Variation in the vacancies that may crop up between the date of requisitioning the Department Promotion Committee and the date of Departmental Promotion Committee meeting held shall be taken into account at the Departmental Promotion Committee meeting.” Whether vacancies can be determined more than once in a year.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
