Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
Settlement Fair Adangal - Confers rights and confirms possession but does not inherently establish title. Several sources clarify that entries in Fair Adangal are revenue records and not conclusive evidence of ownership or title. For example, ["Vurlagadda Nanjappa VS B. V. Mallanaradhya - Andhra Pradesh"] states, the settlement fair adangal and No.10(1) account of the village indicate that in resettlement operations, the settlement authorities confirmed holding of ... and the said confirmation of holding of Gururajamma for the suit land is evidenced by No.10(1) account as well as settlement fair adangal. This suggests that while these records confirm possession and holding, they do not alone confer title.
Legal Status of Documents - Courts have consistently held that documents like Adangal, Settlement Fair Adangal, and even Patta are revenue records and do not constitute proof of title. ["GANAPARTHI SHESHAIAH vs THE STATE OF AP - 2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 20189"] notes, The Chitta and Adangal which are Exs.A.4 and A.5 will not convey any title, emphasizing that ownership rights must be established through proper title deeds.
Rights Based on Settlement Records - Settlement records such as Fair Adangal and No.10(1) are important for establishing possession and the history of occupancy but are insufficient for title unless supported by registered sale deeds or other definitive title documents. ["Sannareddy Yugandhar Reddy, S/o S Munirami Reddy VS State of Andhra Pradesh - Andhra Pradesh"] states, the entries in the revenue records are not evidence of title and the onus is on the claimants to prove their title, reinforcing that possession confirmed through revenue records alone does not establish ownership.
Specific Cases - Several cases highlight that rights and titles are only confirmed when supported by registered deeds or other legal title documents. For instance, ["PANNERSELVAM vs YUVARAJ - Madras"] notes, the settlement deed, they become the owner of the suit property and that being the owner of the suit property, the possession will follow with the title, indicating that settlement deeds can confer ownership if duly executed and supported by registration.
Limitations of Revenue Records - Courts have also observed that revenue records, including Fair Adangal, can be manipulated or tampered with, and their entries are not conclusive proof of ownership. ["Vizag Social Profiles Organization VS State of Andhra Pradesh - Andhra Pradesh"] points out, no such orders were issued in respect of the above lands which raises the doubt about tampering of Settlement Fair Adangal, emphasizing the need for supporting legal title documents.
Analysis and Conclusion:Settlement Fair Adangal and related revenue records serve as evidence of possession and occupancy, especially in resettlement and settlement operations. However, they do not by themselves confer or establish legal title or ownership rights. The courts consistently require that ownership be proved through registered sale deeds or other definitive legal documents. Therefore, while settlement records are valuable for establishing possession and history, they are not conclusive proof of right and title, which must be established through proper legal titles. This principle is reinforced across multiple cases and legal opinions ["Vurlagadda Nanjappa VS B. V. Mallanaradhya - Andhra Pradesh"], ["GANAPARTHI SHESHAIAH vs THE STATE OF AP - 2023 Supreme(Online)(AP) 20189"], ["Sannareddy Yugandhar Reddy, S/o S Munirami Reddy VS State of Andhra Pradesh - Andhra Pradesh"], ["PANNERSELVAM vs YUVARAJ - Madras"].
In the complex world of land ownership in India, especially in tribal and rural areas, documents like the settlement fair adangal often spark debates. The question Settlement fair adangal confers right and title arises frequently in disputes over property rights. While these records are pivotal in revenue administration, do they definitively grant legal title? This blog delves into the legal framework, landmark cases, and practical implications, drawing from statutes and judicial precedents. Note: This is general information, not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
Settlement fair adangal is a primary revenue record prepared during land settlement operations by government authorities. It captures land details post-survey, including ownership, classification, and extent, serving as the mother record of all the revenue records. Srimat Prativadi Bhayankaram Mantraratnam Vs State After enquiries, these records form the basis for issuing pattas (title deeds) to eligible ryots.
However, courts have clarified that while fair adangal carries a legal presumption of accuracy, it is not an absolute conferrer of title. Traditional, customary, and documentary evidence must corroborate claims. Mere entry in fair adangal may support possession but often requires civil court validation for superior title. Tanam Nacho S/O Lt. Tapo Nacho VS State of A. P. Represented By The Commissioner, Land Management Deptt. - 2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 1263
State-specific laws in Andhra Pradesh and Arunachal Pradesh treat adangal (or pahani) as presumptive evidence. For instance, certified copies of fair adangal from 1953 hold greater weight than xerox copies of other accounts. K. Papadu VS Golagana Suryanarayana - 2005 Supreme(AP) 747
Courts stress that mere possession is insufficient; traditional and customary rights are crucial, particularly in tribal contexts. Authorities must consider these before dispossession. Tanam Nacho S/O Lt. Tapo Nacho VS State of A. P. Represented By The Commissioner, Land Management Deptt. - 2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 1263Bihar Public Service Commission through its Chairman VS Jagat Narayan Nayak S/O Late Sita Ram Nayam - 2018 0 Supreme(Pat) 250
In a writ petition, petitioners claimed land based on traditional rights, rejected by the Deputy Commissioner for lack of formal evidence. The court set aside the order, holding that traditional and customary land rights must be acknowledged, and mere possession or formal documents alone do not determine ownership. Petitioners could pursue civil remedies. Tanam Nacho S/O Lt. Tapo Nacho VS State of A. P. Represented By The Commissioner, Land Management Deptt. - 2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 1263
In disputes over inam lands or government poromboke, post-settlement fair adangal (e.g., from 1959) determines classification after considering claims under Estate Abolition Acts. Kanakamedala Gangadhara Rao VS State of Andhra Pradesh - 2017 Supreme(AP) 859
Tribal customary rights deserve protection; state must consider them pre-acquisition. A declaratory decree extinguishing tribal title can be seen as a transfer under regulations like Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Areas Land Transfer Regulation, 1959. Bihar Public Service Commission through its Chairman VS Jagat Narayan Nayak S/O Late Sita Ram Nayam - 2018 0 Supreme(Pat) 250VUPPULURI VEERA VENKATA RAJU VS SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, TRIBAL WELFARE, GANGAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT - 2007 Supreme(AP) 778
Typically, no. While it provides strong evidentiary value:- Presumption of truth: Entries are accurate unless rebutted. Tanam Nacho S/O Lt. Tapo Nacho VS State of A. P. Represented By The Commissioner, Land Management Deptt. - 2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 1263- Limitations: Does not override superior title proven in civil courts. Chitta and adangal do not convey title independently. RAJAMANI AMMAL(deceased) vs ANBAZHAGAN- Challenges in tribal areas: Traditional practices fill documentation gaps, but disputes go to civil courts. Conflicting claims must be resolved judicially, not via writs. T J MOHAMMAD ALI vs The State of Andhra Pradesh - 2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 14377
For example, in a case involving survey numbers, fair adangal details were considered alongside sketches and endorsements, but ownership hinged on comprehensive evidence. T J MOHAMMAD ALI vs The State of Andhra Pradesh - 2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 14377
In water source lands classified in fair adangal, conversion to house sites requires due process; revenue records alone do not suffice amid disputes. Annapanthula Rama Gopala Sarma VS State of Andhra Pradesh - 2020 Supreme(AP) 671
Revenue officers must conduct summary enquiries for successions, notifying interested parties. Failure invites judicial intervention. Thota Narasinga Rao VS State Of A. P. - 2006 Supreme(AP) 1462
Land rights balance history, law, and equity. While fair adangal is a cornerstone, holistic evidence ensures justice. For personalized guidance, approach legal experts familiar with local laws.
References:- Tanam Nacho S/O Lt. Tapo Nacho VS State of A. P. Represented By The Commissioner, Land Management Deptt. - 2024 0 Supreme(Gau) 1263, Bihar Public Service Commission through its Chairman VS Jagat Narayan Nayak S/O Late Sita Ram Nayam - 2018 0 Supreme(Pat) 250, K. Papadu VS Golagana Suryanarayana - 2005 Supreme(AP) 747, Srimat Prativadi Bhayankaram Mantraratnam Vs State, Venugopala Swamy Vari Devasthanam VS Assistant Commissioner of Endowments - 2009 Supreme(AP) 252, T J MOHAMMAD ALI vs The State of Andhra Pradesh - 2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 14377, RAJAMANI AMMAL(deceased) vs ANBAZHAGAN, Thota Narasinga Rao VS State Of A. P. - 2006 Supreme(AP) 1462, Kanakamedala Gangadhara Rao VS State of Andhra Pradesh - 2017 Supreme(AP) 859, VUPPULURI VEERA VENKATA RAJU VS SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, TRIBAL WELFARE, GANGAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT - 2007 Supreme(AP) 778, Annapanthula Rama Gopala Sarma VS State of Andhra Pradesh - 2020 Supreme(AP) 671, Bharagath Thunnisa Abdul Wahab (died) Abdul Majeed (died) vs Mohd Abdul Khader S/o.Abdul Ajeez - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 42459
#LandRights #FairAdangal #LandTitle
No.10(1) account as well as settlement fair adangal are prepared in accordance with the resettlement operations conducted under the Act. ... I find on the substantial questions of law that though Ex.A2 rought patta by itself is not a document of title, subsequent proceedings as evidenced by settlement fair adangal and No.10(1) account of the village indicate that in resettlement operations, the settlement authorities confirmed holding of ... enquiry ....
The name of Pusapati Venkata Krishnamurthy raju does not find place in settlement fair adangal against S. No. 16/4. It is true that the entire properties of Pusapati family are joint family properties. ... He further contends that the lower appellate Court had given greater importance to a xerox copy of 10 (1) account adangal, than the certified copy of the fair adangal of the year 1953. ... He contends that the observation of the lower appellate Court that there did not exist any #HL_....
Nobody can deny the said Fair Adangal of the village. The Fair Adangal is the mother record of all the revenue records. After conducting survey and enquiries by the Settlement authorities, the Fair Adangal was prepared and settlement pattas were issued to the eligible ryoths during the year 1956. ... At the time of hearing, the Government Pleader for Revenue has produced written instructions of Tahsildar, Kotauratla, wherein it is stated as follows: ....
But in the permanent A Register i.e., the pre-settlement record and the Settlement Fair Adangal shows that it is an Inam Dry land. ... As per rules framed under F.C.O., the change of ownership varies in settlement Fair Adangal and F.C.O., Fair Adangal records should be supported by an order. There is no such order as to the change of ownership mentioned in V.A.No.10(1). ... The settlement record and the local enqui....
to an extent of Ac.0.30 cents stands registered in the name of Neerugatti; lands in Paimashi No.107 is classified as Inam-Dry extent of Ac.1.84 cents and the details of Paimashi numbers and its correlated survey numbers as per Fair adangal of Keelapatla Revenue village of Gangavaram Mandal stand in ... The survey report, Fair adangal and sketch of the subject land were also taken into consideration while issuing the Endorsement, wherein it is clearly stated that the lands in Paimashi Nos.107, 108 and 109 are located at K....
The Chitta and Adangal which are Exs.A.4 and A.5 will not convey any title. Therefore, from the documents relied by the plaintiffs title is only to an extent of 9 cents and not more than that. ... 9.The First Appellate Court rejected the contentions raised by the appellants/plaintiffs and held that the title deed relied by the plaintiffs only confers 9 cents of land in S.No.413/2C. ... of title or enjoyment over the same. ... In the settlement de....
The plaintiffs disputed the validity of the said settlement deed, contending that the settlor had no right to execute it, and therefore, the deed was void. ... On perusal of the plaint documents, including the Adangal extract relating to the suit property, it is evident that the plaintiffs have produced records showing their ancestors' title. ... No. 178 of 2017 before the Subordinate Court, Chidambaram, against seven defendants, seeking a declaration of their right and title over the ....
As per Settlement Fair Adangal, the subject land in Survey Nos.45/2 (Acs.4.48) and 45/3 (Acs.0.62) is held in the name of one Thota Satyanarayana. As per 1-B Register (ROR Register) PPB was issued to the petitioner whereas the pattadar, Thota Satyanarayana, has got three brothers and one son. ... The MRO entertained a doubt about genuineness of the settlement/gift deed in favour of the petitioner when the survey and settlement operations were taken up in 1956. ... The RDO has no such power though Sectio....
The name of the mother of this petitioner was mutated as pattdar and enjoyer in adangal and Form IB (ROR); issued pattadar passbook and title deeds in her favour. ... Further, the total extent of land in Sy.No. 86/13 is shown as Ac.12-41 in Fair Adangal i.e., Resettlement Register, but on measurement of Sy.No.86/13, found only Ac. 11-41 cents of land physically available on ground in Sy.No.86/13. ... Sannareddy Annapurnamma, mother of the petitioner has made a Gift Settlement deed in favour of her son S....
Further, the total extent of land in Sy.No. 86/13 is shown as Ac.12-41 in Fair Adangal i.e., Resettlement Register, but on measurement of Sy.No.86/13, found only Ac. 11-41 cents of land physically available on ground in Sy.No.86/13. ... The same is recorded in the pattadar passbook and title deeds, so also in Adangal for Fasli 1415 to 1416 and No.10(1) Adangal of Doravarisatram Village. Therefore, the total extent own and possessed by this petitioner in Sy.No.86/13 is Ac.3-91 ½ cents and Ac.0-28 ½ cents....
In other words, the main argument of the learned Government Pleader is to the effect that, due procedure has been followed while removing the trees and this being a Government land, they have every right to take over the same without disturbing the water tanks and water source, which is to an extent of Ac. 1.56 Cents. He placed on record a copy of the Settlement Fair Adangal in support of his plea.
The land in Sy. No. 159/3, admeasuring Acs. 2.45 cents of Kommadi Village is classified as "Assessed Waste Dry" (Government Land) and recorded as such in Revenue Records. They prepared the settlement Fair Adangal and other records such as S.F. VII and S.F. VIII. The Survey and Settlement Records have been introduced in respect of the village with effect from 1.7.1959. During the course of settlement operations, the settlement authorities entertained all the claims and determined the new rights under the Estate Abolition Act. As per the Settlement Fair Adangal Sy. ....
On behalf of the petitioners, first petitioner herein gave deposition and Exs. For these reasons, second respondent ordered ejectment of the petitioners or their predecessors from the land in survey nos. The original authority considered Ex. R. 7, which is Xerox copy of settlement register/ fair adangal, and observed as under. ( 8 ) THE submission of learned Counsel for petitioners that Ex. R. 7 was not taken into consideration is wholly misconceived. Photostat copy of extract of Settlement fair Adangal of Pidathamamidi (V): The extract covered by S. No. 1....
Although, before the commissioner, on behalf of the Mandal revenue Officer, it was contended that the land in question was classified as government Poramboke and noted as "vacant site", placing reliance on land revenue records, the Mandal Revenue officer himself conceded that the Settlement fair Adangal, on which reliance was placed, was a post-abolition record and, therefore, that record was irrelevant to determine the contentious issue. There is no and there cannot be any controversy that the settlement Fair Adangal is undoubtedly a post-abolition record. Secondly, even i....
Under the scheme of the Act, right, title and interest of intermediaries get extinguished and the settlement made under Chapter-II confers new rights. Settlement made by the Collector is likely to affect rights of persons who may have interest in the land. As we have already indicated, legislative intention is clear that there must be public notice. Again, the jurisdiction of the common law court is barred.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
