Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Definition and Application of Dormant Company - A company can apply for the status of a dormant company under Section 455 of the Companies Act, 2013, if it has not carried on any business or operations for two consecutive financial years and has not filed any application for dormant status during that period. Such companies may be struck off if they fail to file necessary documents or respond to notices. ["PR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX VS REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES MUMBAI - National Company Law Tribunal"], ["BBN TELE INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED VS 1. Registrar of Companies Delhi & Haryana - National Company Law Tribunal"], ["M/s S S Swami Developers & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. VS ROC Delhi - National Company Law Tribunal"], ["M/s S S Swami Developers & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. VS ROC Delhi - National Company Law Tribunal"]
Filing and Compliance Requirements - To obtain or restore dormant status, companies must file statutory documents and may need to apply to the Registrar of Companies (RoC). Failure to do so can lead to the company's name being struck off from the register. Conversely, companies seeking revival must file outstanding documents and follow prescribed procedures. ["BBN TELE INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED VS 1. Registrar of Companies Delhi & Haryana - National Company Law Tribunal"], ["M/s S S Swami Developers & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. VS ROC Delhi - National Company Law Tribunal"]
Struck Off and Revival - If a company's name is struck off due to non-compliance or failure to file for dormant status, it can potentially be restored to active status through legal or administrative procedures, provided all statutory obligations are fulfilled. Notices such as STK-1 are issued to inform companies of defaults, and restoration involves compliance with relevant laws. ["BBN TELE INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED VS 1. Registrar of Companies Delhi & Haryana - National Company Law Tribunal"], ["M/s S S Swami Developers & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. VS ROC Delhi - National Company Law Tribunal"], ["M/s S S Swami Developers & Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. VS ROC Delhi - National Company Law Tribunal"]
Distinction from Inactive or Non-Dormant Companies - Companies that have filed financial statements, conducted operations, or have revenue, even if minimal or nil, may not qualify as dormant. Dormant status is discretionary and typically requires specific application and compliance; mere inactivity does not automatically confer dormancy. ["Nandish Enterprises Private Limited VS - National Company Law Tribunal"], ["STERLING TOOLS LIMITED VS - National Company Law Tribunal"]
Legal and Procedural Aspects - Dormant companies are subject to specific legal provisions, including the filing of statutory returns and notifications to the RoC. The process involves obtaining shareholder approval, filing necessary forms, and complying with procedural requirements for either applying for dormant status or restoring active status after being struck off. ["India Comnet International Private Limited vs Infinite Computer Solutions (India) Limited - National Company Law Tribunal"], ["INVENT ASSETS SECURITISA TION AND RECONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED VS BANK OF BARODA AND ANR - National Company Law Tribunal"], ["Income Tax Officer VS The Registrar of Companies West Bengal ( In the matter of Ganeshvani Commotrade Private Limited) - National Company Law Tribunal"]
Industry and Operational Context - Some companies remain dormant due to operational challenges, financial constraints, or strategic decisions, especially during economic downturns or industry-specific issues. The inability to resume operations or attract orders can lead to dormancy, but such companies must still adhere to legal compliance for status changes. ["G RAVISHANKAR VS HYDERABAD POLLUTION CONTROLS LIMITED - National Company Law Tribunal"]
A dormant company under Section 455 of the Companies Act, 2013, is one that has not conducted business for two consecutive financial years and complies with filing requirements. Companies can apply for dormant status or seek to restore active status if struck off, but this process requires adherence to statutory procedures, filings, and notifications. Merely being inactive or having minimal operations does not automatically qualify a company as dormant; explicit application and compliance are essential. The legal framework provides mechanisms for both establishing dormancy and reviving companies, ensuring regulatory oversight and accountability.
In the dynamic world of Indian corporate law, businesses sometimes enter periods of inactivity due to strategic decisions, future projects, or holding assets. But what happens when a company has no significant operations? This is where the concept of a dormant company comes into play. If you've ever wondered, What is a Dormant Company?, this guide breaks it down under the Companies Act, 2013, and related rules.
A dormant company retains its legal existence while pausing major activities, offering a compliant way to stay on the register without full operational burdens. We'll explore definitions, procedures, revival processes, and distinctions from dissolution—drawing from key legal provisions and case insights. Note: This is general information, not specific legal advice. Consult a professional for your situation.
A dormant company is typically one with no significant accounting transactions during a specified period, yet it remains a legal entity capable of reactivation. According to the Companies (Registration of Dormant Companies) Rules, 2014, a dormant company as one that has not carried on any business or operation, nor has made any significant accounting transaction during the last two financial years RAGHUBAR DAYAL VS BANK OF UPPER INDIA, LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) - 1919 0 Supreme(SC) 5.
This status is distinct from complete inactivity. Even an inactive company—defined as a company which has not been carrying on any business or operation, or has not made any significant accounting transaction during the last two financial years, or has not filed financial statements and annual returns during the last two financial years—may apply for dormant status Zacharia Maramkandathil Mohan VS Union Of India - 2021 Supreme(Ker) 417. Such companies are ideal for holding intellectual property, future projects, or assets without ongoing compliance hassles.
Key points include:- No significant transactions in the last two financial years RAGHUBAR DAYAL VS BANK OF UPPER INDIA, LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) - 1919 0 Supreme(SC) 5.- Retains legal personality; dormancy ≠ dissolution RAGHUBAR DAYAL VS BANK OF UPPER INDIA, LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) - 1919 0 Supreme(SC) 5.- Maintained in a special RoC register RAGHUBAR DAYAL VS BANK OF UPPER INDIA, LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) - 1919 0 Supreme(SC) 5.
The cornerstone is Section 455 of the Companies Act, 2013, which allows companies formed for future projects or to hold assets with no significant transactions to seek dormant status. Where a company is formed and registered under this Act for a future project or to hold an asset or intellectual property and has no significant accounting transaction, such a company or an inactive company may make an application to the Registrar in such manner as may be prescribed... Zacharia Maramkandathil Mohan VS Union Of India - 2021 Supreme(Ker) 417.
The Registrar of Companies (RoC) verifies and issues a certificate of dormancy, entering the company into the dormant register RAGHUBAR DAYAL VS BANK OF UPPER INDIA, LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) - 1919 0 Supreme(SC) 5. This framework, introduced via the 2014 Rules, promotes administrative efficiency while preserving corporate shells for potential revival RAGHUBAR DAYAL VS BANK OF UPPER INDIA, LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) - 1919 0 Supreme(SC) 5.
Applying for dormant status is straightforward but requires compliance:1. Eligibility Check: Confirm no significant transactions (e.g., no sales, purchases beyond minimal statutory fees) in the prior two years RAGHUBAR DAYAL VS BANK OF UPPER INDIA, LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) - 1919 0 Supreme(SC) 5.2. File Application: Submit in the prescribed form with financial statements showing inactivity RAGHUBAR DAYAL VS BANK OF UPPER INDIA, LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) - 1919 0 Supreme(SC) 5.3. RoC Approval: Upon satisfaction, RoC issues the certificate RAGHUBAR DAYAL VS BANK OF UPPER INDIA, LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) - 1919 0 Supreme(SC) 5.
To retain status, dormant companies must:- Maintain at least the minimum directors.- File annual returns and basic compliances (reduced obligations) RAGHUBAR DAYAL VS BANK OF UPPER INDIA, LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) - 1919 0 Supreme(SC) 5.
Failure risks strike-off from the dormant register RAGHUBAR DAYAL VS BANK OF UPPER INDIA, LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) - 1919 0 Supreme(SC) 5. In one case, a company like Kaposta Carpets Private Limited was kept dormant post-incorporation without business, illustrating practical use for planned ventures Rajeev Kapur VS Grentex & Company Private Limited - 2013 Supreme(Bom) 546.
Reactivation is simple: Submit an application with fees and documents proving readiness to operate. RoC removes dormant status upon verification RAGHUBAR DAYAL VS BANK OF UPPER INDIA, LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) - 1919 0 Supreme(SC) 5.
Even struck-off companies can be restored. Even after being struck off or de-registered, a company’s name can potentially be restored or the company can be revived if procedures are followed Khushru Dorab Madan VS Union of India, represented by its Ministry of Corporate Affairs - 2020 0 Supreme(Mad) 1006. Under Section 252, approach the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) for restoration, especially if directors face disqualification from defaults Zacharia Maramkandathil Mohan VS Union Of India - 2021 Supreme(Ker) 417.
Courts emphasize revival viability: Directors of struck-off firms can challenge via NCLT, as Petitioner and their Companies in such cases have a remedy for challenging striking off, under Section 252 of Act, 2013 before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) Zacharia Maramkandathil Mohan VS Union Of India - 2021 Supreme(Ker) 417.
Dormancy is temporary and revocable—unlike winding up (asset liquidation and end of existence) or dissolution RAGHUBAR DAYAL VS BANK OF UPPER INDIA, LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) - 1919 0 Supreme(SC) 5. A dormant firm remains a separate legal entity capable of resuming business activities when required RAGHUBAR DAYAL VS BANK OF UPPER INDIA, LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) - 1919 0 Supreme(SC) 5.
Strike-off under Section 248 targets non-operational firms without dormant application: Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013 empowers the Registrar of Companies to strike off the name of a Company from the Register of Companies if the Company is not carrying on any business or operation for a period of immediately preceding two financial years and has not made any application within such period for obtaining the status of a dormant Company Zacharia Maramkandathil Mohan VS Union Of India - 2021 Supreme(Ker) 417.
Director impacts: Disqualification under Section 164(2) for non-filing doesn't automatically deactivate DINs, and prior notice may be needed Meethelaveetil Kaitheri Muralidharan VS Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Corporation Affairs, New Delhi - 2020 Supreme(Mad) 1759Meethelaveetil Kaitheri Muralidharan VS Union of India - 2020 Supreme(Mad) 2217. ROC is not empowered to deactivate the DIN under the relevant rules Meethelaveetil Kaitheri Muralidharan VS Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Corporation Affairs, New Delhi - 2020 Supreme(Mad) 1759.
Judicial precedents reinforce dormancy's flexibility. Courts distinguish it from permanent cessation, allowing revival even post-strike-off Khushru Dorab Madan VS Union of India, represented by its Ministry of Corporate Affairs - 2020 0 Supreme(Mad) 1006. In director disqualification challenges, High Courts (e.g., Delhi, Allahabad) ruled DIN deactivation improper without basis, urging NCLT remedies for restoration Zacharia Maramkandathil Mohan VS Union Of India - 2021 Supreme(Ker) 417Meethelaveetil Kaitheri Muralidharan VS Union of India - 2020 Supreme(Mad) 2217.
Another view: Accordingly, if a company is not carrying on business, it is possible for such a company to apply for and register itself as a dormant company. He also pointed out that there is a provision to be registered as a dormant company under Section 455 of CA 2013 Meethelaveetil Kaitheri Muralidharan VS Union of India, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Corporation Affairs, New Delhi - 2020 Supreme(Mad) 1759.
Exceptions:- Non-compliance leads to strike-off; revival needs Tribunal intervention RAGHUBAR DAYAL VS BANK OF UPPER INDIA, LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) - 1919 0 Supreme(SC) 5.- Directors disqualified pre-2014 may challenge validity Zacharia Maramkandathil Mohan VS Union Of India - 2021 Supreme(Ker) 417.- Not for evading liquidation if debts exist.
Dormant companies offer a compliant 'pause button' under Indian law, preserving legal existence for future use. Governed by Section 455 and 2014 Rules, they differ markedly from wound-up entities, with clear paths for revival even post-strike-off RAGHUBAR DAYAL VS BANK OF UPPER INDIA, LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) - 1919 0 Supreme(SC) 5Khushru Dorab Madan VS Union of India, represented by its Ministry of Corporate Affairs - 2020 0 Supreme(Mad) 1006.
By leveraging this status, businesses can hold assets efficiently. Always ensure RoC filings and seek expert advice to navigate nuances like director disqualifications Zacharia Maramkandathil Mohan VS Union Of India - 2021 Supreme(Ker) 417.
Disclaimer: This overview is for informational purposes. Laws evolve; professional legal counsel is essential for specific cases.
#DormantCompany, #CompaniesAct2013, #IndianCorporateLaw
application within such period for obtaining the status of dormant company u/s 455 of the Companies Act. ... The Erstwhile Company has not carried on any business or operations for a period of two immediately preceding financial years and has not made any application during such period for obtaining the status of a dormant company under Section 455 of the Companies Act, 2013. ... The Respondent No. 1 submitted that the Erstwhile Company, M/s. ... Allow the Company Pet....
Moreover, no subsequent documents had been filed by the company with this office to obtain the status of a "Dormant Company" under Section 455 of the Companies Act, 2013. ... Moreover, no subsequent documents had been filed by the company with this office to obtain the status of a "Dormant Company" under Section 455 of the Companies Act, 2013. Hence, the name of the Company was struck off from the Register of Companies. ... The Applicant submits that in the event of ....
Moreover, no subsequent documents had been filed by the company with this office to obtain the status of a "Dormant Company" under Section 455 of the Companies Act, 2013. ... of the Company. ... company from ‘struck off’ to ‘Active’. ... with law, for any other violations/offences, if any, committed by the Appellant company prior to or during the period the name of the Company remained struck off. ... The Respondent further submitted that the notice in the form of STK....
Moreover, no subsequent documents had been filed by the company with this office to obtain the status of a "Dormant Company" under Section 455 of the Companies Act, 2013. ... of the Company. ... company from ‘struck off’ to ‘Active’. ... with law, for any other violations/offences, if any, committed by the Appellant company prior to or during the period the name of the Company remained struck off. ... The Respondent further submitted that the notice in the form of STK....
In view of the above, it is hereby submitted that the Transferee Company is not "Dormant Company" or akin to a "Dormant Company" as defined u/s 455 of the Act. 14. ... In view of the above, it is hereby submitted that the Transferor Company No.3 is not "Dormant Company" or akin to a "Dormant Company" as defined u/s 455 of the Act.7. ... In view of the above, it is hereby submitted that the Transferor Comp....
for dormant companies. ... for dormant companies. ... Considering the aforesaid facts, the Transferor Company 4 cannot be classified as a dormant company under Section 455 of the Act. 8. ... jurisdictional Registrar of Companies shall issue a notice to that company and enter the name of such company in the register maintained for dormant companies. ... make an application to the jurisdictional Registrar of Companies in such manner as may be prescribe....
COMPANY PETITION/APPLICATION NO. ... Inadvertently, part of the amount, i.e., Rs.95,01,366.54 was remitted in dormant account of the CD. The details of the said invoices are given in para No.7.17 of the Application. 4. ... No.2 NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH COURT HALL NO: II Hearing Through: VC and Physical (Hybrid) Mode CORAM: SHRI. RAJEEV BHARDWAJ – HON’BLE MEMBER (J) CORAM: SHRI. ... There is no dispute that the CD is having dormant account bearing No.12700200000426 with the Respondent No.1. During....
financial years and has not made any application within such period for obtaining the status of dormant company under Section 455 of the Companies Act, 2013 against the Company. ... It is submitted that the respondent company has not paid income tax dues for the period of last two (2) immediate preceding financial years and has not made any application within such period for obtaining the status of dormant company under ___________________________________________________________ ... Th....
Therefore, the Transferor Company cannot be classified as a dormant company. ... transaction, such a company or an inactive company may make an application to the Registrar in such manner as may be prescribed fir obtaining the status of a dormant company. ... obtaining consent of at least 3/4th shareholders (in value)" Upon perusal of the aforesaid provisions, it is amply clear that obtaining the status of dormant comp....
industry to resume work; the Respondent could not resume operations and reopen the factory as Company’s order book was NIL and the prospects of fetching orders were bleak consequently, in the financial year beginning April, 2020 ending March, 2021 also the Respondent Company remained dormant. ... to retire by rotation each year, as the Respondent Company is a public Limited Company. ... is a public Limited Company. ... 2.3 It is stated that the Respondent Company could not hire accoun....
3 had permanently travelled to USA since 1997 and was not readily available to tract any business of the company. 2 company, which became dormant and other permanent Director, respondent no.
(i) “inactive company” means a company which has not been carrying on any business or operation, or has not made any significant accounting transaction during the last two financial years, or has not filed financial statements and annual returns during the last two financial years; Dormant company - (1) Where a company is formed and registered under this Act for a future project or to hold an asset or intellectual property and has no significant accounting transaction, such a company or an inactive company may make an application to the Registrar in such manner as may be prescribed....
Accordingly, if a company is not carrying on business, it is possible for such a company to apply for and register itself as a dormant company. He also pointed out that there is a provision to be registered as a dormant company under Section 455 of CA 2013. He concluded his submissions by pointing out that the expression 'public interest' is used in several provisions of CA 2013 and emphasized that actions taken in public interest, such as the disqualification and deactivation of DIN, should not be interfered with by the Court. Once this is done, it would ....
Once this is done, it would not be necessary to comply with Section 164(2) of CA 2013. He concluded his submissions by pointing out that the expression 'public interest' is used in several provisions of CA 2013 and emphasized that actions taken in public interest, such as the disqualification and deactivation of DIN, should not be interfered with by the Court. Accordingly, if a company is not carrying on business, it is possible for such a company to apply for and register itself as a dormant company. On this issue, he emphasized out that the deactivation is automatic or se....
Valsad, Gujarat for setting up a factory for the manufacture of woolen textiles. In view thereof, on or about 23rd June 2007, the Appellant No. 1 along with his son incorporated a Company named Kaposta Carpets Private Limited (“Kaposta”). The said Company was kept dormant and did not carry on any business. On or about 29th May 2008, the Appellant No. 1 along with his wife and son incorporated another Company named Kapotex Industries Private Limited (“Kapotex”) and purchased land, machinery, etc. in GIDC, Sarigam, Dist.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
