Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Convictions require proof that the cheque was issued for the discharge of a debt or liability that was legally enforceable at the time ["2025 0 Supreme(Gau) 436"] ["2025 0 Supreme(Gau) 597"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
Note: This summary synthesizes main points from the provided sources, focusing on legal requirements, procedural directions, and key judicial insights relevant to drafting a petition under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Cheque bounce cases are alarmingly common in India, often arising from business transactions or personal loans gone sour. When a cheque is dishonoured due to insufficient funds or other reasons, it can lead to significant financial loss and legal battles. Under
If you're asking, Write a Petition under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act 1881, this guide is for you. We'll break down the process, provide a ready-to-use template, explain legal prerequisites, and draw insights from relevant case laws. Note: This is general information and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
Section 138 addresses the dishonour of cheques due to insufficiency of funds or exceeding arrangement. As per the provision: Where any cheque drawn by a person on an account maintained by him with a banker for payment of any amount of money to another person from out of that account for the discharge, in whole or in part, of any debt or other liability, is returned by the bank unpaid, either because of the amount of money standing to the credit of that account is insufficient to honour the cheque or that it exceeds the amount arranged to be paid... such a person shall be deemed to have committed an offence. 2019 0 Supreme(Bom) 2116
Punishment includes imprisonment up to two years, a fine up to twice the cheque amount, or both. Importantly, Section 139 creates a presumption that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt, shifting the burden to the accused to rebut it. The presumption of liability under
Before drafting, ensure these conditions are met:- The cheque must be presented within its validity period (typically 3 months).- It was dishonoured due to 'insufficient funds' or similar reasons.- A legal demand notice is sent to the drawer within 30 days of dishonour, demanding payment within 15 days (now 30 days post-2018 amendment).- No payment is made within the notice period.- The complaint is filed within 1 month of the notice expiry (condonation possible for delay).
Failure here can doom your case, as seen in delays without condonation applications. 2015 0 Supreme(Raj) 760
A Section 138 petition is a criminal complaint filed before the Magistrate's Court. It must include facts, evidence, and prayers for relief. Here's how to structure it professionally.
Identify the petitioner (payee/complainant) and respondent (drawer).
Chronologically detail:- Cheque issuance date, amount, bank, purpose.- Presentation and dishonour dates.- Legal notice date and non-payment.
Invoke Sections 138 and 139, supported by precedents like LAXMI DYECHEM VS STATE OF GUJARAT (Supreme Court) affirming offence on dishonour without funds. 2012 8 Supreme 274 Also, Visnagar Nagrik Sahakari Bank Ltd. VS State of Gujarat confirms compliance with notice requirements strengthens the case. 2011 0 Supreme(Guj) 682
Typically:1. Payment of cheque amount + 18-24% interest from dishonour.2. Litigation costs.3. Other relief.
Below is a customizable template based on standard formats:
Petition Under
This petition is filed under
Facts of the Case:- On Date of Cheque Issuance, the Respondent issued a cheque for Amount of Cheque drawn on Name of Bank to the Petitioner for Purpose of Cheque.- The Petitioner presented the cheque for payment on Date of Cheque Presentation at Name of Bank.- The cheque was dishonoured on Date of Dishonor due to Reason for Dishonor.- The Petitioner sent a legal notice to the Respondent on Date of Notice demanding payment within Number days.- The Respondent failed to make payment within the stipulated time.
Relief Sought:The Petitioner prays for:1. An order directing the Respondent to pay the cheque amount of Amount of Cheque along with interest at Interest Rate% per annum from the date of dishonor.2. Costs of this petition.3. Any other relief deemed fit.
Legal Arguments:- Issuance and dishonour constitute an offence under Section 138. LAXMI DYECHEM VS STATE OF GUJARAT - Supreme Court- All conditions precedent fulfilled. Visnagar Nagrik Sahakari Bank Ltd. VS State of Gujarat - Gujarat- Failure to pay post-notice. Visnagar Nagrik Sahakari Bank Ltd. VS State of Gujarat - Gujarat
Conclusion:The Petitioner requests the Hon'ble Court to grant the relief sought.
Dated:DatePlace:PlaceAdvocate: Name of Advocate
Courts emphasize the presumption under Section 139. In one case, the accused borrowed Rs. 5 lakhs, issued a cheque that bounced; despite claiming it was blank, conviction held as presumption wasn't rebutted. 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 891
On compensation, courts may award up to twice the cheque amount. In a case with Rs. 42,750 cheque, Rs. 80,000 compensation was upheld, noting no interest on compensation absent provision. 2016 0 Supreme(Raj) 554
Jurisdiction matters post-2015 amendments. Even if the drawee bank is elsewhere, the payee's bank location (where dishonour intimated) has jurisdiction retrospectively. E.g., cheque on Chandigarh bank, presented in Indore—Indore court has jurisdiction.
Bridgestone India Pvt. Ltd. VS Inderpal Singh
2015 0 Supreme(SC) 1087Other cases reinforce convictions under Section 138 with sentences like 6 months imprisonment.
M A Mohaiman Khan (Hanif) vs The State - 2024 Supreme(
Md. Talukder Hemayet Uddin vs The State and another - Supreme Court)(SC) 15094Disclaimer: This guide provides general insights into Section 138 NI Act petitions. Legal outcomes vary by facts; always seek professional advice from an advocate. For jurisdiction or specific filings, refer to latest amendments and local rules.
Stay informed on NI Act updates to protect your financial interests!
#Section138 #ChequeBounce #NIACT
Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 . Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 , in terms of which, the petitioners and the respondent have resolved to settle the dispute at a sum of Rs.6,40,200/-.
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the convict-appellant before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sirajganj on 12.07.2016. ... 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and convicting the appellant under the said section section sentencedspan style
200 of Cr.P.C, for the offences punishable under Section 138 of the Act, 1881. ... the file of XII Metropolitan Magistrate Court at Manoranjan Court Complex, Nampally, Hyderabad, wherein the petitioner was arrayed as accused, registered for the offences punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short “ the Act, 1881 ... When a cheque is dishonoured under Secti....
200 of Cr.P.C, for the offences punishable under Section 138 of the Act, 1881. ... the file of XII Metropolitan Magistrate Court at Manoranjan Court Complex, Nampally, Hyderabad, wherein the petitioner was arrayed as accused, registered for the offences punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short “ the Act, 1881 ... When a cheque is dishonoured under Secti....
Negotiable Instruments - Section 138, 139 of N.I. ... Accused thereby committed the offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I. Act, 1881. 4. ... Chapter XVII comprising Sections 138 to 142 of the N.I Act, 1881 was introduced in the statute by Act 66 of 1988. ... Section 139 of N.I Act, 1881 puts the burden ....
5, 6) ... ... Facts of the case: ... The applicant sought a directive for the trial of a complaint under Section ... Haji Istekar Ali, under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act, 1881'), Police Station-Hasanpur, District-Amroha, within a stipulated period. 3. ... We, therefore, direct all the criminal courts in the country dealing with Section 138 cases to fol....
the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the accused. ... 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and as such the trial Court found the accused-petitioner guilty ... 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 though the accused appellant was not present on the said date and there was an span style="font-size:14pt
of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 before the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, Dhaka and hence the case. ... 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and sentencing him to suffer imprisonment for a period of 06(six)
Act - Dishonour of Cheque - Section 138, General Clauses Act, 1897, Section 27 - The court discussed the provisions of Section 138 ... A complaint under Section 138 of the N.I. ... Whether the dishonour of the cheque for 'referred to the drawer' falls under Section 138 of the N.I. Act. 2. ... 138 of N.I. ... Therefore, he submits that due to aforesaid reason for dishonour of cheque is not covered ....
138/141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. ... No.443 of 2015 convicting the appellant under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and sentencing him tothe Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and issued summon against the convict-appellant on 26.08.2015. ... 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 188....
7. Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,1881 is reproduced as under: "138. Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency, etc., of funds in the account.- Where any cheque drawn by a person on an account maintained by him with a banker for payment of any amount of money to another person from out of that account for the discharge, in whole or in part, of any debt or other liability, is returned by the bank unpaid, either because of the amount of money standing to the credit of that account is insufficient to honour the cheque or that it exceeds the amount arranged to be pa....
The compensation of Rs. 70,000/- against total cheque amount of Rs. 42,750/- was given. 2. The petitioner maintained a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (in short “the Act of 1881”).
under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The decision rendered by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Indore, was again assailed by the accused-respondent in yet another petition filed by him under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh before its Indore Bench. 7. The Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Indore, yet again, by an order dated 11.01.2010 held, that he had the territorial jurisdiction to adjudicate upon the controversy raised by the appellant – M/s Bridgestone India Pvt.Ltd. The High Court accepted the p....
The High Court accepted the prayer made by the accused-respondent -Inderpal Singh by holding, that the jurisdiction lay only before the Court wherein the original drawee bank was located, namely, at Chandigarh, where-from the accused-respondent had issued the concerned cheque bearing No.1950, drawn on the Union Bank of India, Chandigarh. The decision rendered by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Indore, was again assailed by the accused-respondent in yet another petition filed by him under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, in the High Court of Madhya Pradesh before its Indore B....
petition, a challenge is made to the proceedings in Criminal Complaint No.78/2007 pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Rajakhera. It is on a complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.