Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
Jurisdiction of Police Station - Relevance under Section 27 The scheme of the Domestic Violence Act emphasizes that the jurisdiction for registering complaints and issuing protection orders is primarily linked to the place where domestic violence is alleged to have occurred. Section 27 specifically regulates the place of trial and the jurisdiction of courts and police stations. Multiple sources clarify that the police station's jurisdiction is relevant for the enforcement of orders and investigation, but not necessarily a strict precondition for initiating proceedings. For instance, ["Vidit Mahajan VS Sunali Mahajan - Jammu and Kashmir"] states: Section 27 of the Domestic Violence Act, which is about jurisdiction reads as under... and emphasizes that the place of domestic violence and the place of the aggrieved person are the action points where the Magistrate can give directions. Similarly, ["SHARAD KUMAR PANDEY vs MAMTA PANDEY - Delhi"] notes that the CJM has jurisdiction or officer of the nearest police station to enforce the protection to the aggrieved person. This indicates that while jurisdiction is significant for enforcement and execution, the Act permits some flexibility, especially when dealing with temporary residences or situations where the violence occurred outside the local jurisdiction.
Main Points and Insights
The jurisdiction of police station is relevant for enforcement, investigation, and executing protection orders but does not strictly bar initiating proceedings if the violence occurred outside the jurisdiction, especially in cases of temporary residence or international incidents, as clarified in ["Sumeet s/o Suresh Ninave VS Himani Sumeet Ninave Nee - Bombay"] and ["Shammil VS State Of Kerala - Kerala"].
Analysis and Conclusion The dominant understanding from the materials is that the jurisdiction of the police station under Section 27 is primarily relevant for enforcement and execution of protection orders and investigation, rather than a strict requirement for initiating proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act. The Act’s scheme allows for flexibility, particularly in cases involving temporary residence or violence outside India, where jurisdiction is determined based on the place of residence or where the violence is alleged to have occurred. Notably, the judgment in ["SHARAD KUMAR PANDEY vs MAMTA PANDEY - Delhi"] supports this interpretation, stating that the scheme of jurisdiction, domestic violence is alleged to have been committed... in terms of section 27 of Act, CJM has jurisdiction or officer of the nearest police station to enforce the protection to the aggrieved person. Therefore, the police station's jurisdiction is not an absolute precondition to initiate proceedings under Section 27 of the Domestic Violence Act, but it is relevant for enforcement, investigation, and executing orders within the territorial scope of the Act. This understanding aligns with the legislative intent to provide accessible and effective remedies irrespective of strict territorial limitations, especially in cases involving temporary or international residences.
Domestic violence cases often raise complex questions about where to file complaints and which authorities have power. A common query is: under a Domestic Violence Act, jurisdiction of police station is not relevant under S. 27—give relevant judgment. This issue highlights the distinction between court jurisdiction and police roles under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act). While police stations play a procedural part, Section 27 primarily governs court jurisdiction, focusing on the residence of parties or where the cause of action arises. This blog breaks it down with judicial precedents, statutory insights, and practical takeaways.
Note: This is general information based on case law and statutes. It is not legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your specific situation.
Section 27 outlines the territorial jurisdiction of courts to entertain complaints under the DV Act:
A court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the respondent resides or carries on business or is employed, or where the cause of action arises, shall have jurisdiction to entertain a complaint.
This provision prioritizes three factors:- Respondent's residence (permanent or temporary);- Place of respondent's business or employment;- Location where the cause of action (domestic violence) arises.
Notably, police station jurisdiction is not a direct determinant for court proceedings under Section 27. Police involvement typically arises in enforcement or reporting, but courts look to the above criteria. Courts have interpreted residence broadly, especially for temporary residence of the aggrieved person when displaced by violence. Vikram S/o Devidas Rathod VS Vrushali w/o Vikram Rathod - 2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 461Ajay Kaul VS State of J&K - Crimes (2019)
Indian courts have clarified that temporary residence qualifies if it's not merely casual. For example:
In a key ruling, the court held that an aggrieved woman's temporary residence with parents after eviction from the matrimonial home establishes jurisdiction. This applies even if outside the original incident location, provided there's a concrete intention to reside there due to domestic violence. Vikram S/o Devidas Rathod VS Vrushali w/o Vikram Rathod - 2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 461Ajay Kaul VS State of J&K - Crimes (2019)
Cause of action extends to places with continuing effects of violence. If violence occurred in one state but the woman shelters elsewhere, the new residence court can proceed. Ajay Kaul VS State of J&K - Crimes (2019)
Another judgment reinforced: residence with parents after eviction from the matrimonial home qualifies as a temporary residence under Section 27, enabling local courts to act. Ajay Kaul VS State of J&K - Crimes (2019)
Jurisdiction also ties to the respondent's temporary residence, especially post-violence shifts. Courts emphasize pragmatism to protect victims who relocate for safety. Ajay Kaul VS State of J&K - Crimes (2019)
Objections to jurisdiction must be raised early; delays may imply waiver. Vikram S/o Devidas Rathod VS Vrushali w/o Vikram Rathod - 2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 461
While Section 27 sidelines police station limits for court jurisdiction, police are involved elsewhere:
Protection Officers forward Domestic Incident Reports (DIR) to the police station where domestic violence is alleged committed. Rule 5 mandates: forward copies thereof to the police officer in charge of the police station within the local limits of whose jurisdiction domestic violence is alleged to have been committed. NARENDRAKUMAR @ NITINBHAI MANILAL SHAH VS STATE OF GUJARAT - 2014 Supreme(Guj) 17Rakesh Manhas VS Aruna Manhas - 2014 Supreme(J&K) 355SHARAD KUMAR PANDEY vs MAMTA PANDEY
Enforcement: Magistrates can direct the officer-in-charge of the police station within jurisdiction or the nearest station to enforce protection orders. However, the act is not designed to issue such order out of the State in some contexts. Ajay Kaul VS State of J&K - 2019 Supreme(J&K) 439AJAY KAUL AND ORS vs STATE TH.HOME DEPTT.AND ORS
Thus, police station jurisdiction matters for DIR submission and enforcement, but not for initiating court complaints under Section 27. This distinction ensures victims aren't barred by incident location. Nabeen Kumar Choudhury, Son of Sri Suresh Chandra VS Simrat Kaur Phull - 2017 Supreme(Gau) 721
Courts can pass orders without a DIR if satisfied by affidavits. It is not mandatory for a Magistrate to obtain a domestic incident report before passing orders under the DV Act. Ajay Kaul VS State of J&K - Crimes (2019)Ajay Kaul VS State of J&K - Current Civil Cases (2019)
Jurisdiction remains flexible for inter-state cases. Orders on shared households outside court limits are valid if personal jurisdiction exists. Argument... that residence order cannot be passed with regard to property which is situated outside State is not tenable. Ajay Kaul VS State of J&K - Crimes (2019)Ajay Kaul VS State of J&K - Current Civil Cases (2019)AJAY KAUL AND ORS vs STATE TH.HOME DEPTT.AND ORS
DV Act blends civil remedies with criminal enforcement. Proceedings under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 are predominantly of civil nature, but breach of orders (S.31) attracts criminality. Section 468 CrPC doesn't apply strictly. P. Ganesan VS Revathy Prema Rubarani - 2022 Supreme(Mad) 650
In quashing attempts, courts note: Mere use of the provisions of Cr.P.C. for limited purposes... would not ipso facto attract Section 482 of Cr.P.C.. NARENDRAKUMAR @ NITINBHAI MANILAL SHAH VS STATE OF GUJARAT - 2014 Supreme(Guj) 17
From J&K cases (similar provisions): Applications maintainable only against those in domestic relationship, with interim relief reconsidered post-hearing. other sources context
The DV Act's design reflects realities of violence, empowering courts beyond rigid police limits. For tailored guidance, seek professional legal help.
It reads: ... "9(1)(b). to make a domestic incident report to the Magistrate, in such form and in such manner as may be prescribed, upon receipt of a complaint of domestic violence and forward copies thereof to the Police Officer In-charge of the Police Station within the local limits ... of whose jurisdiction domestic violence is alleged to have been committed and to the service providers in that area." ... Correct it is that an #H....
a domestic violence case. ... Act is, therefore, an abuse of process of law; that, the alleged domestic violence took place in London, where police investigated and found no evidence, refusing to press charges. Moreover, the Section 12 D.V. ... It is also undisputed that the alleged incident of domestic violence took place in London, where she lodged a complaint with the local police. After inquiry, the UK police ....
manner as may be prescribed, upon receipt of a complaint of domestic violence and forward copies thereof to the police officer in charge of the police station within the local limits of whose jurisdiction domestic violence is alleged to have been committed and to the service providers in that area; ... jurisdiction in the area where the domestic violence took place; ... (b) get the aggrieved pers....
Rule 5 casts a duty on the Protection Officer to prepare Domestic Incident Report (DIR) in Form-1 on receipt of a complaint of domestic violence and submit the same to the Magistrate and forward copies thereof to the Police Officer, Incharge of the Police Station within the local limit of jurisdiction ... Rule 5 casts a duty on the Protection Officer to prepare Domestic Incident Report (DIR) in Form-1 on receipt of a complaint of domestic#H....
police station within the local limits of whose jurisdiction domestic violence is alleged to have been committed and to the service providers in that area. ... Section 27 of the Domestic Violence Act, which is about jurisdiction reads as under: India.” 6. ... Section 9 (g) casts a duty on the protection officer to get the aggrieved person medically examined for bodily injuries and forward....
Section 27 of the Domestic Violence Act, which is about jurisdiction reads as under: ... "27. ... s duties envisage preparation of a report of incident of domestic violence at the place of violence and sending copies to police station incharge and service provider so that the victim of domestic violence can be provided different services as available under the ....
Thus, the Magistrate under the Act can either order the officer incharge of the police station within his jurisdiction or officer of the nearest police station to enforce the protection order. The act is not designed to issue such order out of the State. ... , while forwarding copies of the complaint to the Police Officer in charge of the Police Station within the local limits of whose j....
Thus, the Magistrate under the Act can either order the officer incharge of the police station within his jurisdiction or officer of the nearest police station to enforce the protection order. The act is not designed to issue such order out of the State. ... , while forwarding copies of the complaint to the Police Officer in charge of the Police Station within the local limits of whose j....
Thus, the Magistrate under the Act can either order the officer in-charge of the police station within his jurisdiction or officer of the nearest police station to enforce the protection order. The act is not designed to issue such order out of the State. ... copies of the complaint to the Police Officer in charge of the Police Station within the local limits of whose jurisdiction#HL_END....
The scheme of jurisdiction, domestic violence is alleged to have been committed. ... So in terms of section 27 of Act, CJM has jurisdiction or officer of the nearest police station to enforce the protection to the aggrieved person.
(c) Section 468 Cr.P.C is not applicable for proceedings under Domestic Violence Act. Thus, even assuming that the Magistrate while exercising the power under Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act is not a Criminal Court, the Magistrate is exercising the power under the Cr.P.C. in view of the Section 28 (1) of the Domestic Violence Act. (e) Therefore, in order to exercise the power under Section 482 the case has to be either pending before the Court which would mean a Criminal Court or whence a power is exercised by the Court under the Code of Criminal P....
Although, the settled position of law is that proceedings under the DV Act are not required and the same can also be raised as defence in the suit, the basic requirements of the said Act ought to be satisfied. The present is not a case where the case set up is one under the DV Act, involving domestic violence.
Thus, the applications, which all are filed, seeking Maintenance for wife, children and parents alone shall be tried by exercising the powers conferred under Section 7(2)(a) of the Family Courts Act, 1984. Thus, with reference to the jurisdiction as contemplated under the Domestic Violence Act, the Family Courts/Civil Courts are not having jurisdiction to deal with certain offences defined under the provisions of the Domestic Violence Act. 35. Section 407 of the Code of Civil Procedure Code provides Power of High Court to transfer cases and appeals.
v. Whether the respondent/O.P. is entitled for protection under relevant provision of domestic violence act, 2005? To what other relief or reliefs, if any, the petitioner is entitled to in the eye of law and the court in this case?” iv. Whether the O.P./respondent is legally wedded wife of the petitioner and entitled for any alimony/maintenance allowance as claimed in the written statement?
Jurisdiction- (1) The Court of Judicial Magistrate,1st Class or the Metropolitan Magistrate as the case may be, within the local limit of which- So far as the territorial jurisdiction of a Magistrate to entertain a petition U/S 12 of the Domestic Violence Act it is relevant to quote the provisions of Section 27 of the Domestic Violence Act which reads as follows: On the next on perusal of records it reflects that at the time of filing of divorce case the petitioner resided at Dibrugarh at her parental address and while filing the case in Guwahati her temporary address is sh....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
