Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Provision for Filing Application to Set Aside Exparte Decree - The court can entertain an application under Section 151 CPC or Order 9 Rule 13 CPC to set aside an exparte decree, provided the applicant demonstrates valid reasons such as non-service of summons or lack of opportunity to defend Harsha Soni vs Suraj Bhan - Delhi, Soneko Marketing Pvt. Ltd. VS Rashmi Metaliks Ltd. - Calcutta, Kurivella Rama Rao, S/o Late Kotaiah (Died) VS Kurivella Krishna Rao, S/o Late Kotaiah - Andhra Pradesh.
Conditions for Filing Such Applications - The applicant must show that they were not served with summons, or that they had no knowledge of the suit, and that the application is filed within a reasonable time after knowledge of the exparte order/decree. Delay beyond a prescribed period (often 30 days) can be a ground for rejection unless sufficient cause is shown Harsha Soni vs Suraj Bhan - Delhi, Soneko Marketing Pvt. Ltd. VS Rashmi Metaliks Ltd. - Calcutta, Febrina Indra Neela @ Indra Febrina Thomas Vs Jebasingh Jacob @ Sankar - Madras.
Discretionary Power of Court - Courts exercise discretion based on facts, such as whether a substantial part of evidence has been recorded, whether the applicant has a prima facie case, and whether there was a deliberate delay or negligence Gopala Krishnan @ G.K.Nair, S/o.Late Sundaresan Nair vs Sarath Lal, S/o. Sivankutty & Remani - Kerala, Soneko Marketing Pvt. Ltd. VS Rashmi Metaliks Ltd. - Calcutta.
Specific Applications and Procedures - An application under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC is typically filed to set aside exparte judgments/decrees, and must be supported by affidavits explaining the reasons for non-appearance. If the suit proceeds exparte, the defendant can also file a petition to recall or set aside the exparte order, often accompanied by an application for condonation of delay if applicable Gopala Krishnan @ G.K.Nair, S/o.Late Sundaresan Nair vs Sarath Lal, S/o. Sivankutty & Remani - Kerala, Febrina Indra Neela @ Indra Febrina Thomas Vs Jebasingh Jacob @ Sankar - Madras.
Impact of Non-appearance and Non-service - Non-appearance or non-service of summons is a valid ground to set aside exparte orders, especially if the applicant can prove they were not aware of the proceedings or were prevented from appearing Harsha Soni vs Suraj Bhan - Delhi, Kurivella Rama Rao, S/o Late Kotaiah (Died) VS Kurivella Krishna Rao, S/o Late Kotaiah - Andhra Pradesh.
Finality and Limitation - Once an exparte decree is passed, it can be challenged within the statutory period, generally 30 days from the date of knowledge, but courts may allow condonation of delay if sufficient cause is shown Soneko Marketing Pvt. Ltd. VS Rashmi Metaliks Ltd. - Calcutta, Febrina Indra Neela @ Indra Febrina Thomas Vs Jebasingh Jacob @ Sankar - Madras.
Analysis and Conclusion:To file an application where a suit has proceeded exparte and before passing of a decree, the appropriate provision is generally under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC for setting aside exparte judgments or decrees, or Section 151 CPC for inherent powers of the court in exceptional cases. The application should be filed promptly, ideally within 30 days of knowledge of the exparte order, and must convincingly demonstrate reasons such as non-service, lack of notice, or other sufficient cause. Courts exercise discretion based on the merits and circumstances, including whether substantial evidence has been recorded and whether there was deliberate neglect. Proper procedural adherence is crucial, and applications filed beyond the limitation period may require condonation, which courts may grant if justified Harsha Soni vs Suraj Bhan - Delhi, Soneko Marketing Pvt. Ltd. VS Rashmi Metaliks Ltd. - Calcutta, Febrina Indra Neela @ Indra Febrina Thomas Vs Jebasingh Jacob @ Sankar - Madras.
Imagine receiving news that a civil suit against you has proceeded ex parte—meaning without your presence—yet no final decree has been passed. Panic sets in: What provision allows you to file an application to intervene or recall the proceedings? This is a common dilemma for defendants in Indian civil litigation under the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908.
In this comprehensive guide, we break down the legal remedies available when a suit has proceeded ex parte before passing of a decree. We'll clarify misconceptions around Order IX Rule 13 CPC, explore alternative remedies like recall petitions and intervention, and draw from key case laws and judicial precedents. Note: This is general information, not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your case.
Ex parte proceedings occur when one party (usually the plaintiff) appears in court without the other party (defendant) due to non-appearance, often from non-service of summons or other reasons. The court may proceed to hear the suit unilaterally, but outcomes differ based on the stage:
Understanding this distinction is crucial, as the wrong application can lead to dismissal or delays. As per legal documents, if a suit proceeds ex parte before a decree, the remedy involves seeking recall or participation, not a post-decree provision. Gram Panchayat Kabirpur VS Additional Commissioner (Administration) Varanasi Division - 2021 0 Supreme(All) 1636Richa Agarwal VS Pawan Arya - 2014 0 Supreme(All) 3245
Which Provision to File an Application where a Suit has Proceeded Exparte and before Passing of a Decree?
The straightforward answer: It is generally not under Order IX Rule 13 CPC. This rule applies only after an ex parte decree is passed. Instead, before the decree stage, defendants typically file:
Legal sources emphasize this timing. For instance, UNION OF INDIA VS JAIN AND ASSOCIATES - 1998 0 Supreme(Cal) 454 states that Order IX Rule 13 deals with setting aside a decree passed ex parte, and the remedy is available after the decree is passed. Similarly, Asha Singh VS Kamal Kumar Rathi - Current Civil Cases (2021) clarifies that Order IX Rule 13 is for applications after a decree is passed ex parte, within generally 30 days. UNION OF INDIA VS JAIN AND ASSOCIATES - 1998 0 Supreme(Cal) 454Asha Singh VS Kamal Kumar Rathi - Current Civil Cases (2021)
If the suit is at the hearing or pre-judgment stage and has gone ex parte:
From other precedents, one case notes: One of the defendant was proceeded exparte and upon his application to allow the co-defendant to join the proceedings by setting aside the order proceeding the said defendant exparte... Tarsem Kaur VS Gurmit Singh - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 474 - 2023 0 Supreme(P&H) 474. Another highlights: the Family Court Judge... proceeded to decide the divorce suit exparte... accompanied with the application under Order 9 Rule 7... for recall of the order... to proceed with the suit exparte. Smt. Renu Yadav Vs Amit Kumar Yadav - Allahabad
Key Conditions:- Act promptly—courts favor diligence.- Provide sufficient cause (e.g., non-service, illness).- File within a reasonable time; condonation of delay may be sought if needed. Harsha Soni vs Suraj Bhan - DelhiSoneko Marketing Pvt. Ltd. VS Rashmi Metaliks Ltd. - Calcutta
Once the court passes an ex parte decree, the statutory remedy shifts to Order IX Rule 13 CPC. This allows setting aside the decree if:
The application must be filed within 30 days from the decree date or knowledge thereof (Article 123, Limitation Act). Courts exercise discretion judiciously. As held in Parimal vs. Veena, Order IX Rule 13 applies only after a decree is passed. UNION OF INDIA VS JAIN AND ASSOCIATES - 1998 0 Supreme(Cal) 454
In G.P. Srivastava v. R.K. Raizada, it was emphasized: the application under Order IX Rule 13 must be supported by a plea that the decree was passed ex parte and the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause. Chinmaya Sahu VS Amit Kumar Sahu - 2023 0 Supreme(Ori) 186
Post-decree examples include: If the petitioner was aggrieved by the exparte decree... it was open for him either to file an application before the Trial Court for setting aside the exparte decree... Executive Engineer, Irrigation Department VS Mahadev s/o Baswantrao Bidwe - 2017 Supreme(Bom) 128 - 2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 128. Additional sources affirm: The court can entertain an application under Section 151 CPC or Order 9 Rule 13 CPC to set aside an exparte decree, provided valid reasons. Harsha Soni vs Suraj Bhan - DelhiSoneko Marketing Pvt. Ltd. VS Rashmi Metaliks Ltd. - CalcuttaKurivella Rama Rao, S/o Late Kotaiah (Died) VS Kurivella Krishna Rao, S/o Late Kotaiah - Andhra Pradesh
Supreme Court and High Court rulings consistently distinguish stages:
In one appeal: the suit was proceeded exparte... dismissing the suit exparte is set-aside... Alamgir and others vs Shalah Uddin and others - 2025 Supreme(BD)(SC) 976 - 2025 Supreme(BD)(SC) 976. Another: The contention... appellant has to file an application before the trial court to set aside the exparte decree... K. Balakrishnan VS S. Dhanasekar - 2017 Supreme(Mad) 3973 - 2017 0 Supreme(Mad) 3973K. Balakrishnan VS S. Dhanasekar - 2017 Supreme(Mad) 3977 - 2017 0 Supreme(Mad) 3977
Courts are cautious: The court must be very cautious while exercising its power while passing an exparte decree... R. Manikandan VS B. N. Sridharamoorthy - 2013 Supreme(Mad) 3933 - 2013 0 Supreme(Mad) 3933. Discretion considers prima facie case, delay, and evidence recorded. Gopala Krishnan @ G.K.Nair, S/o.Late Sundaresan Nair vs Sarath Lal, S/o. Sivankutty & Remani - Kerala
To navigate this:1. Monitor Proceedings: If unaware, act on knowledge.2. Before Decree: File recall/intervention petition immediately, with affidavit.3. After Decree: Use Order IX Rule 13 within limitation; seek condonation if delayed.4. Documentation: Prove non-service or cause (e.g., postal records).5. Avoid Appeals Prematurely: Direct applications preferred over appeals without setting aside. K. Balakrishnan VS S. Dhanasekar - 2017 Supreme(Mad) 3973 - 2017 0 Supreme(Mad) 3973
Pro Tip: In execution stages, challenges are limited—act early. Maniammal @ K. Mani VS M. V. Ranjendran - 2023 Supreme(Mad) 2396 - 2023 0 Supreme(Mad) 2396
For a suit proceeded ex parte before passing of a decree, Order IX Rule 13 CPC does not apply. Opt for recall petitions, intervention, or participation under procedural rules/Section 151 CPC. Post-decree, pivot to Order IX Rule 13.
Key Takeaways:- Pre-Decree: Recall ex parte order or intervene. Asha Singh VS Kamal Kumar Rathi - Current Civil Cases (2021)UNION OF INDIA VS JAIN AND ASSOCIATES - 1998 0 Supreme(Cal) 454- Post-Decree: Order IX Rule 13, within 30 days. Chinmaya Sahu VS Amit Kumar Sahu - 2023 0 Supreme(Ori) 186- Prompt action ensures substantial justice.- Always demonstrate sufficient cause.
This framework, backed by precedents like Parimal vs. VeenaUNION OF INDIA VS JAIN AND ASSOCIATES - 1998 0 Supreme(Cal) 454 and others, empowers defendants. For tailored advice, engage a legal expert promptly.
#ExParteRemedies, #CPCOrder9, #SetAsideDecree
for passing a decree in his favour or the suit was otherwise not maintainable. ... For application of the provision, the court has to satisfy itself that (a) substantial portion of the evidence of any party has been already recorded; (b) such party has failed to appear on any day and (c) the day is one to which the hearing of the suit is adjourned. ... As the provision itself shows, disc....
Learned counsel submits that it was only during the first week of January, 2022 that she was informed about the pendency of the suit by Defendant No.2 and after certain enquiries and inspecting the file, the Petitioner came to know that she was proceeded exparte as far back as on 06.07.2017. ... It is trite that the contents of the application would be the determining factors to adjudicate in a Court of l....
Theinstant application to set-aside the exparte order in EP.NO.181 of 2020 isonly to delay the delivery of possession to the respondent and hence, prayedfor dismissal of the appeal. 6. ... The brief facts leading to the above appeal are as follows:- (a) The appellants are the Judgment Debtors and had suffered adecree in a Suit for Specific Performance in O.S.No.608 of 2012 on the fileof the learned III Additi....
knowledge of the order passed exparte the application should not be allowed. ... Even after the petitioner came to know of the final order of the suit passed exparte, it filed the application on hand belatedly. ... Again the suit appeared in the list dated 5th May, 2022 also under heading ‘Undefended Suit’. Since the petitioner preferred not to contest the sui....
• Exparte decree has been passed in the suit on 30.09.2005. • After passing a preliminary decree in the suit, on application made by the plaintiff in the final decree petition, Advocate Commissioner was appointed in I.A. No.698 of 2006. ... The Hon’ble Court observed that, even after passing of the exparte decree, notice was served on him and despite having knowledge, ....
One of the defendant was proceeded exparte and upon his application to allow the co-defendant to join the proceedings by setting aside the order proceeding the said defendant exparte, the plaintiff has raised no objection for setting aside the said exparte order so that the said defendant can participate ... Once, the plaintiff has not raised any objection for setting aside the exparte o....
Instead of doing so, the Family Court Judge acting like an adversarial court proceeded to decide the divorce suit exparte and, thereafter, the matter had been prolonged for a period ... Act accompanied with the application under Order 9 Rule 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure for recall of the order dated 03.04.2019 to proceed with the suit exparte, on account of ....
“[8] Sections 96 and 100 of the CPC make provision for an appeal being preferred from every original decree or from every decree passed in appeal respectively; none of the provisions enumerates the person who can file an appeal. ... The plaintiff/respondent No. 1 had filed a suit seeking adecree for declaration to the effect that he is the owner in possession of the suit land measuring 0-18 bighas compri....
and thus, the suit was proceeded exparte, vide order dated 27.01.2015. ... In this backdrop, the suit was proceeded exparte in which the plaintiffs examined in all 4 witnesses to prove their ... No. 89 of 2011 dismissing the suit exparte. ... No. 89 of 2011 dismissing the suit exparte is set-aside without any order ....
The defendant has chosen to file the present application to condone the delay of 145 days in filing an application to set aside the exparte decree. According to the defendant, he had engaged a counsel at Tirunelveli to attend his case at Valliyur. ... in filing an application to set aside the exparte decree. ... The only option open to the defendant is to file an appeal....
The contention of the respondent/plaintiff is that the appellant has to file an application before the trial court to set aside the exparte decree and restore the suit on file. Without filing such application, the Appeal suit is not maintainable. Therefore, the Appellate court has rightly dismissed the Appeal suit.
Without filing such application, the Appeal suit is not maintainable. Therefore, the Appellate court has rightly dismissed the Appeal suit. The contention of the respondent/plaintiff is that the appellant has to file an application before the trial court to set aside the exparte decree and restore the suit on file.
It is well settled that the Executing Court cannot go behind the decree. If the petitioner was aggrieved by the exparte decree passed by the Civil Court, it was open for him either to file an application before the Trial Court for setting aside the exparte decree and for restoration of the suit for trial or to file an appeal against the exparte decree. It was not open for the petitioner to challenge validity of the said exparte decree before the Executing Court.
As a result, the set aside application is not numbered and is still pending on the file of trial Court. However, knowing the passing of exparte award, the contested respondent rushed to the Tribunal and filed an application for setting aside the exparte award, before numbering the said application, the claimant has filed the above appeal before this Court and the same has been admitted. Subsequently, the trial Court records were called for to decide the above appeal. Therefor....
Gobardhan Sao and others) 2002 3 SCC 195 wherein it was held that a liberal approach should be given in matters of condonation of delay to ensure substantial justice. The learned senior counsel also would contend that even for passing an exparte decree reasons must be stated for arriving at a conclusion. The court must be very cautious while exercising its power while passing an exparte decree, whether the defendant attempts to file a written statement and on reading of the judgment,....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
