Generating Results...
Finding Result as Supreme Court Cases
Finding Result as Most Cited
Finding Result as Latest Records
Found Rusult Successfully !
Generating Results...
Finding Result as Supreme Court Cases
Finding Result as Most Cited
Finding Result as Latest Records
Found Rusult Successfully !
Certain statutes and legal interpretations clarify that children born outside marriage have limited or no rights to paternal property unless specific provisions, such as those in the Hindu Succession Act, are invoked, which generally favor legitimate children. References ["Ashoke Bagdi @ Putu Bagdi VS Jayanta Banerjee - Calcutta"], ["Rajendra Kumhar son of late Indru Kumhar VS Deputy Commissioner, P. O. & P. S. - Gumla, Dist. Gumla - Jharkhand"] support this view.
Analysis and Conclusion
References:- ["Nagendra Kumar Joshi, son of Gulab Chandra Joshi VS Suklal Bandhe, son of late Bisahu Das Bandhe - Chhattisgarh"], ["UKKU v. HORATHALA"], ["KM. SANAYA SHARMA (MINOR) AND ANOTHER Vs State - Allahabad"], ["Sucheta Bhadoriya vs Ambarish Singh - Madhya Pradesh"], ["Sudeep Suhas Kulkarni VS Abbas Bahadur Dhanani - Bombay"], ["Ashoke Bagdi @ Putu Bagdi VS Jayanta Banerjee - Calcutta"], ["Rajendra Kumhar son of late Indru Kumhar VS Deputy Commissioner, P. O. & P. S. - Gumla, Dist. Gumla - Jharkhand"], ["Amrik Singh VS Union Territory of Chandigarh Through Its Principal Secretary - Punjab and Haryana"], ["Raunak Yadu, S/o. Homeshwar Yadu, (Minor), Through Uncle Gulab Yadu VS General Public - Chhattisgarh"], ["T. Mallika VS K. Mathivanam - Madras"]
In family matters, parents often seek to secure their children's future by transferring assets like property. A common question arises: Can a father register property in the name of his minor child? This query is particularly relevant under Indian law, especially Hindu law, where distinctions between ancestral property, self-acquired property, legitimate and illegitimate children play crucial roles. While parents generally have flexibility with self-acquired assets, inheritance rights and transfers involve statutory limits and judicial interpretations.
This post breaks down the legal position, drawing from key statutes like the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and Hindu Succession Act, 1956, along with Supreme Court rulings. Note: This is general information, not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Under Indian law, a father can typically gift or register self-acquired property in his minor child's name. No child, whether legitimate or illegitimate, acquires any right by birth in the separate or self-acquired property of parents. BHAGELA SAHU VS RAJU SAHU - 2020 Supreme(Chh) 192 No child whether legitimate or illegitimate, acquires any right by birth in the separate property or the self acquired property of its parents. Thus they acquire no title to such property by birth. BHAGELA SAHU VS RAJU SAHU - 2020 Supreme(Chh) 192
However, ancestral or coparcenary property follows different rules under Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) laws. Illegitimate children are generally not coparceners and cannot claim birth rights here. Balkrishna Pandurang Halde VS Yeshodabai Balkrishna Halde - 2018 Supreme(Bom) 1137 As illegitimate child is not a coparcener, he can exercise his right in father's property only on his father dying intestate. Balkrishna Pandurang Halde VS Yeshodabai Balkrishna Halde - 2018 Supreme(Bom) 1137
Legitimate minor children have coparcenary rights by birth in ancestral property under the Hindu Succession Act (amended 2005). Fathers can partition or gift shares, but minors need guardians.
Children born of void or voidable marriages (e.g., bigamy) are deemed legitimate under Section 16(1) and (2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, but with restrictions.
Section 16(3) limits their rights: Nothing contained in sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) shall be construed as conferring upon any child of a marriage which is null and void or which is annulled... any rights in or to the property of any person, other than the parents. Shyama Devi (Singh) VS State of Tripura - 2014 0 Supreme(Tri) 388SARO JAMMA VS NEELAMMA - 2005 0 Supreme(Kar) 417
Illegitimate son is not a co-parcener - He has no right in coparcenary property - However he has a right in share of father in co-parcenary property - That right he can exercise only on his father dying intestate. BHAGELA SAHU VS RAJU SAHU - 2020 Supreme(Chh) 192
A father can still gift self-acquired property to an illegitimate minor child, as it's not inheritance but a voluntary transfer. But ancestral property gifts may require coparcener consent.
The Supreme Court in Jinia Keotin clarified: Children of void/voidable marriages lack inheritance rights in ancestral property during the ancestor's (grandfather's) lifetime. Rights are confined to parents' property. Shyama Devi (Singh) VS State of Tripura - 2014 0 Supreme(Tri) 388
Reiterated Section 16(3) restrictions: No extension to coparcenary property. Raghunath Nana Patil VS Nana Rama Patil & others - 1985 0 Supreme(Bom) 248Raghunath Nana Patil VS Nana Rama Patil & others - 1985 0 Supreme(Bom) 248 (2023 SCC 1087).
However, he has equal right like his legitimate sibling in the property of his father. Indubai Jaydeo Pawar VS Draupada @ Draupadi Jaydeo Pawar
| Property Type | Legitimate Child Rights | Illegitimate Child Rights ||---------------|--------------------------|----------------------------|| Ancestral/Coparcenary | Birth right as coparcener | None during father's/grandfather's life; only via parent's intestate share post-death Balkrishna Pandurang Halde VS Yeshodabai Balkrishna Halde - 2018 Supreme(Bom) 1137 | | Self-Acquired | On intestacy or gift/will | On intestacy or gift/will; equal to legitimate siblings Indubai Jaydeo Pawar VS Draupada @ Draupadi Jaydeo Pawar |
Separate property cannot be the subject matter of partition amongst the member of a co-parcenary. Rights accrue on parents' death, not birth. BHAGELA SAHU VS RAJU SAHU - 2020 Supreme(Chh) 192
During father's lifetime, no automatic claim; voluntary registration is key.
In summary, a father generally can register self-acquired property in his minor child's name, legitimate or not. But ancestral property involves hurdles for illegitimate children, confined to parents' assets per Section 16(3). Rely on judgments like Jinia KeotinShyama Devi (Singh) VS State of Tripura - 2014 0 Supreme(Tri) 388 and RevanasiddappaRaghunath Nana Patil VS Nana Rama Patil & others - 1985 0 Supreme(Bom) 248 for clarity.
Disclaimer: Laws evolve; this reflects positions from cited sources. Always consult professionals for personalized advice.
References:1. Jinia Keotin Shyama Devi (Singh) VS State of Tripura - 2014 0 Supreme(Tri) 3882. Section 16(3) HMA SARO JAMMA VS NEELAMMA - 2005 0 Supreme(Kar) 4173. Revanasiddappa Raghunath Nana Patil VS Nana Rama Patil & others - 1985 0 Supreme(Bom) 2484. Other cases BHAGELA SAHU VS RAJU SAHU - 2020 Supreme(Chh) 192, Balkrishna Pandurang Halde VS Yeshodabai Balkrishna Halde - 2018 Supreme(Bom) 1137, Indubai Jaydeo Pawar VS Draupada @ Draupadi Jaydeo Pawar
#IndianPropertyLaw, #MinorChildRights, #HinduSuccessionAct
On 11.04.2022, statement of the child was also recorded before this Court, in which, minor child – Tanishq stated that he does not want to join the company of appellant/father and wants to stay with the respondent/maternal grand father. ... after him, the mother; Provided that the custody of a minor who has not completed the age of five years shall ordinarily be with the mother; (b) in the case of an #HL_....
Armour (Perera's Edition), page 8, section 7, deals with the case of a man who had an illegitimate son. The father died first and then the grand-father. ... We would, accordingly, recommend that illegitimate children be declared to have no rights whatsoever to the paraveni property of their father, and that legitimate children or their issue should be ....
—In this section, the expression "father" and "mother" do not include a step-father and a step-mother" Section 6(a) of the said Act, therefore, preserves the right of the (b) in case of an illegitimate boy or an illegitimate unmarried girl—the mother, and after her, the father; (c)in the case of a married girl—the husband: Provided that no person shall be entitled to act as the natural guardia....
personality would be more prominent in guardianship of his father rather than in company of his maternal grand parents. ... child, as father. ... : provided that the custody of a minor who has not completed the age of five years shall ordinarily be with the mother; (b) in case of an illegitimate boy or an illegitimate unmarried girl—the mother, and after her, the father....
are not considered, merely because the personal law applicable to the minor child indicates that being an ‘illegitimate child’, she can have no rights towards inheritance or descent. ... as the father, although petitioner No.1 is the biological father of the minor child. ... Learned counsel for the petitioners has fairly brought to the notice of this Court the position ....
of their father and could only stake a claim in his self-acquired property. ... conferring legitimacy in terms of sub-section (1) on a child born from a void marriage and under sub-section (2) to a child born from a voidable marriage which has been annulled, the legislature has stipulated in subsection (3) of Section 16 that such a child will have rights to or in the property#H....
of an illegitimate boy or an illegitimate unmarried girl-the mother, and after her, the father”; 15. ... (3) Nothing contained in sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) shall be construed as conferring upon any child of a marriage which is null and void or which is annulled by a decree of nullity under section 12, any rights in or to the property of any person, other than the parents, ... i....
this Act, such child would have been incapable of possessing or acquiring any such rights by reason of his not being the legitimate child of his parents”. ... At the time of Admission of this appeal, the following substantial questions of law were framed vide order dated 07.09.2022 :- (i) Whether an illegitimate son from a concubine is entitled to inherit the property of his father? ... ....
The law thus did not extend to confer any right at par on father of an illegitimate child as have been conferred on father of a legitimate child. ... stigma of being an illegitimate child. ... being of the minor illegitimate girl child. ... The only check on the guardians act of giving child in adoption is under Sect....
rights in the property of any person other than the parent. ... claim a right to the property which does not belong exclusively to his father. ... Lakshmiammal and others, wherein the learned Judges have held that a father can make provision of property for an illegitimate son. d. Recognition of plaintiff as family member by defendants 1, 3 to 5. 14.5. ... While conferr....
No child whether legitimate or illegitimate, acquires any right by birth in the separate property or the self acquired property of its parents. Thus they acquire no title to such property by birth. Separate or self acquired property of a member of the coparcenary or joint family cannot be the subject matter of partition amongst the member of a co-parcenary or Joint family. They do not possess any antecedent title to such property.
As illegitimate child is not a coparcener, he can exercise his right in father's property only on his father dying intestate. Consequently, such a child does not acquire any right by birth in any property, much less coparcenery or joint family property. He has no right by birth and hence, he cannot be given any share even in the property of his parents till they are alive.
There, the question is whether the child has been begotten in a sexual intercourse with the person from whom maintenance is claimed. An illegitimate child is also entitled to get maintenance from his father. So, legitimacy of birth is totally irrelevant and insignificant while considering the right of the child to get maintenance from his father. In short, legitimacy and paternity are different and distinct.
However, he has equal right like his legitimate sibling in the property of his father. 10. Section 16 was introduced by the Act No.68 of 1976 to recognise the right of an illegitimate child in the father’s property. There is no doubt that in an ancestral property of the father, illegitimate child cannot claim any share. The Legislature has taken a progressive step by introducing this section with a view to remove certain social anomalies in respect of the child born to a coup....
10. Section 16 was introduced by the Act No. 68 of 1976 to recognise the right of an illegitimate child in the father's property. The Legislature has taken a progressive step by introducing this section with a view to remove certain social anomalies in respect of the child born to a couple in the void marriage. There is no doubt that in an ancestral property of the father, illegitimate child cannot claim any share. However, he has equal right like his legitimate sibling in th....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
