Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Guardianship Provision - Guardianship for persons with disabilities is generally governed by the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, which emphasizes limited guardianship rather than permanent guardianship. Section 14 of the Act allows for the appointment of guardians, but explicitly states that every guardian functions as a limited guardian, and there is no provision for permanent guardianship for a person with disability ["Pooja Sharma VS State Of U. P. - Allahabad"].
Filing Location - Guardianship applications for persons with disabilities are to be filed before the district court or any designated authority, as notified by the State Government ["Bindumol A T W/o Ashok Kumar VS Union of India - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 53"], ["LATHA T.B vs UNION OF INDIA - Kerala"], ["M.A.sumathi vs The principal Secretary - Madras"], ["Aakarsh Matta VS Consortium of National Law Universities - Allahabad"], ["Dileep Antony VS Shobin Sebastian S/o. Sebastian - Kerala"]. The District Collector or local level committees also play a role in considering guardianship applications, especially for limited guardianship ["Abootty K. A. VS Kolangottil Pathumma - 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 746"].
Specific Provisions and Procedures - The Act mandates that guardianship must be justified by the person's need and purpose, with authorities considering whether the individual requires a guardian and the purpose of guardianship ["Pooja Sharma VS State Of U. P. - Allahabad"], ["Bindumol A T W/o Ashok Kumar VS Union of India - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 53"], ["Sunil Podar VS National Trust For Welfare of Person With Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation And Multiple Disability - Delhi"]. Guardianship is deemed limited by default, and any appointment must be based on a legal finding that the person cannot take legally binding decisions independently ["Abootty K. A. VS Kolangottil Pathumma - 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 746"].
No Provision for Permanent Guardianship - The law explicitly states that there is no provision for permanent guardianship of a person with disability, and guardians are appointed for limited support only ["Bindumol A T W/o Ashok Kumar VS Union of India - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 53"], ["Pooja Sharma VS State Of U. P. - Allahabad"]. The concept of permanent guardianship is considered alien to the current legal framework.
Summary:Guardianship of a permanently disabled person should be filed in the district court or designated authority as notified by the State Government. The process involves assessing whether the individual needs a guardian and the purpose of guardianship, with the appointment being limited in nature. There is no legal provision for permanent guardianship under the current laws, including the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 ["Pooja Sharma VS State Of U. P. - Allahabad"] ["Bindumol A T W/o Ashok Kumar VS Union of India - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 53"].
Navigating guardianship for a loved one with a permanent intellectual disability can be overwhelming. Families often ask: where and which provision guardianship of permanent intellectual disable person be filed? This question touches on critical aspects of Indian disability law, emphasizing support rather than control. This post breaks down the process, key laws, and practical steps, drawing from established legal frameworks. Note: This is general information, not specific legal advice—consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
Indian law prioritizes the autonomy of persons with disabilities. The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 (RPWD Act) revolutionized guardianship by introducing limited guardianship, replacing outdated permanent models. Section 14 of the RPWD Act states: Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, on and from the date of commencement of this Act, where a district court or any designated authority, as notified by the State Government, finds that a person with disability, who had been provided adequate and appropriate support but is unable to take legally binding decisions, may be provided further support of a limited guardian... Latha T. B. @ Latha Ravi VS Union Of India - 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 423Abootty K. A. VS Kolangottil Pathumma - 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 746Sudha V. Mohan, W/o. Mohan V. VS Authorized Officer, Hdfc Bank Limited - 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 216.
Limited guardianship is a system of joint decision which operates on mutual understanding and trust between the guardian and the person with disability, which shall be limited to a specific period and for specific decision and situation and shall operate in accordance to the will of the person with disability. Latha T. B. @ Latha Ravi VS Union Of India - 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 423. There's no provision for permanent guardianship; courts consistently reject such requests, deeming pre-existing guardians as limited under Section 14(2) Latha T. B. @ Latha Ravi VS Union Of India - 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 423.
Section 2(s) of the RPWD Act defines a person with disability as a person with long-term physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairment which, in interaction with barriers, hinders his full and effective participation in society equally with others. Justice Sunanda Bhandare Foundation VS Union of India - 2017 6 Supreme 581Latha T. B. @ Latha Ravi VS Union Of India - 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 423. This covers permanent intellectual disabilities.
Applications under Section 14 must be filed before:- District Court, or- Designated authority notified by the State Government Abootty K. A. VS Kolangottil Pathumma - 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 746Sudha V. Mohan, W/o. Mohan V. VS Authorized Officer, Hdfc Bank Limited - 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 216.
For instance, in Kerala, the Government of Kerala hereby designate the Sub Divisional Magistrate of the area as the designated authority for granting limited guardianship under the said Act. Abootty K. A. VS Kolangottil Pathumma - 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 746Sudha V. Mohan, W/o. Mohan V. VS Authorized Officer, Hdfc Bank Limited - 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 216. The District Court has concurrent jurisdiction (Section 14 uses or), but in practice, petitions may be redirected to the designated authority, as seen in a case where a District Court returned a petition to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate Abootty K. A. VS Kolangottil Pathumma - 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 746.
Always check your state's gazette notifications for the local authority. The process involves assessing if the person needs support despite adequate assistance, with mandatory consultation to gauge their comprehension Latha T. B. @ Latha Ravi VS Union Of India - 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 423.
For intellectual disabilities classified as mental retardation, the National Trust for the Welfare of Persons with Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation and Multiple Disabilities Act, 1999 offers a parallel route. Section 2(j) defines person with disability as a person suffering from any of the conditions relating to autism, cerebral palsy, mental retardation or a combination of any two or more of such conditions... Latha T. B. @ Latha Ravi VS Union Of India - 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 423G. Nityanandam VS D. Saritha - 2013 0 Supreme(Mad) 1631.
Applications go to the Local Level Committee using Form A, confirmed in Form B. Eligible applicants include parents, relatives, or registered organizations G. Nityanandam VS D. Saritha - 2013 0 Supreme(Mad) 1631. However, this aligns with RPWD's limited guardianship principles—no permanent option exists Bindumol A T W/o Ashok Kumar VS Union of India - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 53.
Courts interpret the National Trust Act in light of the RPWD Act. In a case involving schizophrenia (a mental illness, not retardation), the court directed guardianship under the National Trust Act, emphasizing purposive interpretation and empowerment via Local Level Committees G. Babu VS District Collector - 2023 Supreme(Mad) 3252. RPWD prevails as the general law Latha T. B. @ Latha Ravi VS Union Of India - 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 423.
The concept of permanent guardianship is alien to the Disabilities Act, which permits only limited guardianship based on mutual understanding and trust. Bindumol A T W/o Ashok Kumar VS Union of India - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 53. Petitions for permanent guardianship are routinely rejected. For example:- Local Level Committee rejected a permanent guardianship application for mental disability, upheld by courts affirming limited guardianship only Bindumol A T W/o Ashok Kumar VS Union of India - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 53.- In a bipolar disorder case (45% disability), permanent request denied Bindumol A T W/o Ashok Kumar VS Union of India - 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 53.
Pre-RPWD guardians are auto-converted to limited Latha T. B. @ Latha Ravi VS Union Of India - 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 423. For broader mental health issues like Alzheimer's or schizophrenia, courts may invoke parens patriae (state as parent) where specific provisions lack, but still favor limited support Anushka Rajiv Mohite VS Union of India - 2023 Supreme(Bom) 1784.
These highlight distinguishing mental retardation (National Trust) from other intellectual/mental disabilities (RPWD).
Jurisdiction varies:- Kerala: SDM designated; appeals to District Collector Abootty K. A. VS Kolangottil Pathumma - 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 746.- Check local rules, e.g., Kerala guidelines (Ext.P6) require specifying limited scope Sudha V. Mohan, W/o. Mohan V. VS Authorized Officer, Hdfc Bank Limited - 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 216.
Aggrieved parties appeal to state-notified authorities. Repeated limited grants may prompt reviews for fuller support Latha T. B. @ Latha Ravi VS Union Of India - 2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 423.
Guardianship aims to empower, not curtail rights. Stay informed on state notifications and consult professionals for tailored guidance. Empowering persons with disabilities starts with understanding these supportive frameworks.
#DisabilityGuardianship #RPWDAct #LimitedGuardianship
Section 14 lays down provision for guardianship for a person with disability who is unable to take decisions and needs limited support by the guardian. Section 14(2) lays that every guardian appointed for a person with disability will be deemed to function as a limited guardian. ... However, there is no provision in the Act for appointment of Guardianship for a person who is in comatose state. Persons With Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, protection of Rights and Fu....
Presumably, it is in the above context that the Parliament, in its wisdom, has only permitted limited guardianship and not permanent guardianship. Therefore, the concept of permanent guardianship is alien to the Disabilities Act. ... There is no enactment in the country that enables the appointment of a permanent legal guardian for a person with mental disability. ... However, the Committee rejected the application on the finding that there is no provision#H....
The aforesaid provision provides for appointment of guardian for a “person with disability”. ... Union of India, (2014) 7 Mad LJ 649 dealt with a similar case of guardianship for a person in comatose condition. ... defined in measurable terms and includes a person with disability where specified disability has been defined in measurable terms, as certified by the certifying authority; (s) “person with disability” means a person with long term physical, mental, #HL_STA....
(5) The alternative care under sub-regulation (4) shall not be permanent in nature and shall be placed by permanent guardianship within a period of one year. ... they stand placed require a guardian to be a permanent resident of India. ... That provision reads as follows: "16. ... That provision is extracted hereunder: "35. ... (2) No person shall be entitled to the guardianship by virtue of the provisions of this Act or of any law relating to #HL_....
Provision for guardianship.-(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, on and from the date of commencement of this Act, where a district court or any designated authority, as notified by the State Government, finds that a person with disability, who had been ... Granting of limited guardianship. (1) The designated authority/Court, before granting limited guardianship for a person with disability, shall satisfy itself that such person....
In Paragraph 5 of the order, this court noted that there was no provision made in Mental Health Act, 1987 or Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 for appointing a son or a daughter or a sibling of an aged person suffering from mental health issues to be a legal guardian of that person. ... Unfortunately, there is no provision of law made in either Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 or in the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017, or any other Act for conferring such a status upon the....
Rejoinder-affidavit filed today is taken on record. 2. ... The contention of Shri Manik Sinha, learned Senior Advocate is that Section 2(s) of the Act, 2016 defines a person with disability as a person with long term physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairment. 17. ... As the petitioner is aged 17 years, he obviously cannot be possessed of a permanent disability certificate considering the provision of Clause 22.6 of the Guidelines dated 5.1.2018 which itself indicates that fo....
Provision for guardianship (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, on and from the date of commencement of this Act, where a district court or any designated authority, as notified by the State Government, finds that a person with disability ... JUDGMENT : The writ petition is filed seeking appointment of the first petitioner as the guardian of Prameela A.M. (hereinafter referred to as “the ward”) who is stated to be a mentally ill person. ... Appointment for....
) the purpose for which the guardianship is required for person with disability. ... Provision for guardianship (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, on and from the date of commencement of this Act, where a district court or any designated authority, as notified by the State Government, finds that a person with disability, who had ... Appointment for guardianship (1) A parent of a person with disability or his relative ....
intellectual property rights or not. ... rights of any person. ... allowed by him to use the property does not while so using infringes the intellectual property rights of any other person or to while allowing advertisements to be published in its newspaper and magazine keep vigilance that the contents of the advertisement do not infringe the intellectual property ... To put in another words, the counsel for the plaintiffs reads into the IT Rules aforesaid an obligation on the intermediary to, after hav....
The application with respect to guardianship of person of minor can be filed only before the District Court having jurisdiction which is the place where the minor ordinarily resides. Reliance has been placed upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Ruchi Majoo v. Sanjeev Majoo reported in (2011) 6 SCC 479 wherein it has been laid down that the solitary test for determining the jurisdiction of the Court under section 9 is the “ordinary residence” of the applicant. The non-applicant No.2 is residing at Tehsil-Depalpur, District-Ujjain hence the Court at....
This provision is applicable only when application is filed under Section 7 of the Guardianship Act.
A petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act was filed by the appellant/mother, seeking permanent custody of the person and property of her son. The order of the trial court was upheld by the High Court. The court appointed her the permanent and lawful guardian of the person and property of the child.
The court appointed her the permanent and lawful guardian of the person and property of the child. The order of the trial court was upheld by the High Court. A petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act was filed by the appellant/mother, seeking permanent custody of the person and property of her son.
However, for the purpose of Section 363 IPC (Penal Section) the offence under Section 361 is required to be looked into. So the case in such circumstances under Section 363 IPC could not be registered against the accused. The section 361 is applicable to the case where some minor or unsound person is taken out from the possession of lawful guardianship. In case of female she must be below 18 years of age.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
