Generating Results...
Finding Result as Supreme Court Cases
Finding Result as Most Cited
Finding Result as Latest Records
Found 18 Rusult Successfully !
Generating Results...
Finding Result as Supreme Court Cases
Finding Result as Most Cited
Finding Result as Latest Records
Found 18 Rusult Successfully !
Natural guardianship for minors generally includes the father (for boys and unmarried girls) and the mother; grandmothers or other relatives do not automatically acquire guardianship rights, though courts may weigh their claims based on welfare considerations Nagendra Kumar Joshi, son of Gulab Chandra Joshi VS Suklal Bandhe, son of late Bisahu Das Bandhe - Chhattisgarh, KM. SANAYA SHARMA (MINOR) AND ANOTHER Vs State - Allahabad, Sucheta Bhadoriya vs Ambarish Singh - Madhya Pradesh.
Legal Principles on Illegitimacy and Property Rights
Analysis and ConclusionIllegitimate children generally do not have rights to their paternal grandfather's ancestral or paraveni property under Indian law, with inheritance rights primarily confined to self-acquired property of the parents. Custody and guardianship are determined based on the child's welfare, with courts often favoring the mother for young children and considering other factors like age and guardianship laws. While laws recognize illegitimate children, their inheritance rights are limited, and they are often excluded from collateral inheritance unless specific legal provisions or circumstances apply. Overall, the legal framework aims to protect the child's welfare but restricts their property rights based on their illegitimacy status.
In family disputes over inheritance, one common question arises: Illegitimate Child has no Rights in Grand Father’s Property? This issue touches on deep-rooted principles of Hindu law, balancing social legitimacy with legal protections. Under Indian Hindu law, illegitimate children—particularly those born from void or voidable marriages—face significant restrictions when claiming property from grandparents. This blog post breaks down the legal framework, key judicial precedents, exceptions, and practical implications, drawing from statutes and case law. Note: This is general information, not legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your specific situation.
Hindu law distinguishes sharply between legitimate and illegitimate children regarding property rights. An illegitimate child generally does not have rights in the grandfather's property, especially ancestral or coparcenary property. Their inheritance is typically confined to the parents' property only. This stems from
Nothing contained in sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) shall be construed as conferring upon any child of a marriage which is null and void or which is annulled by a decree of nullity under section 12, any rights in or to the property of any person, other than the parents... SARO JAMMA VS NEELAMMA - 2005 0 Supreme(Kar) 417
This provision creates a 'legal fiction' of legitimacy for such children but explicitly bars them from claiming beyond parental property. The legislative intent is clear: protect the child without disrupting ancestral lines or joint family holdings. Revanasiddappa VS Mallikarjun - 2011 0 Supreme(Raj) 286RAVANASIDDAPPA VS MALLIKARJUN - 2011 0 Supreme(UK) 183
Supreme Court rulings have solidified this position. In Jinia Keotin v. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi (2003), the Court held that children from void marriages cannot claim inheritance in ancestral coparcenary property, limiting them to parents' property. SARO JAMMA VS NEELAMMA - 2005 0 Supreme(Kar) 417
The landmark Revanasiddappa case (2011) further clarified:
Children conferred legitimacy under Section 16 are restricted to rights in their parents' property only and do not inherit ancestral or grandparental property. Rajendra Kumhar son of late Indru Kumhar VS Deputy Commissioner, P. O. & P. S. - Gumla, Dist. Gumla - 2022 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1211Navya VS State of H. P. - Current Civil Cases (2024)
These judgments emphasize that Section 16(3) prevents such children from becoming coparceners under Mitakshara law's survivorship principle (Section 6, Hindu Succession Act, 1956). Revanasiddappa VS Mallikarjun - 2011 0 Supreme(Raj) 286SARO JAMMA VS NEELAMMA - 2005 0 Supreme(Kar) 417
Additional case law reinforces: As illegitimate child is not a coparcener, he can exercise his right in father's property only on his father dying intestate. Balkrishna Pandurang Halde VS Yeshodabai Balkrishna Halde - 2018 Supreme(Bom) 1137 - 2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 1137 Consequently, no birthright exists in joint family or coparcenary property. BHAGELA SAHU VS RAJU SAHU - 2020 Supreme(Chh) 192 - 2020 0 Supreme(Chh) 192
Ancestral/Coparcenary Property: Illegitimate children have no automatic rights. They are not coparceners by birth, so no share in grandfather's undivided family holdings. There is no doubt that in an ancestral property of the father, illegitimate child cannot claim any share. Indubai Jaydeo Pawar VS Draupada @ Draupadi Jaydeo Pawar - Current Civil CasesIndubai Jaydeo Pawar VS Draupada @ Draupadi Jaydeo Pawar - 2017 Supreme(Bom) 2054 - 2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 2054
Parents' Self-Acquired Property: Limited rights upon parents' intestate death. However, No child whether legitimate or illegitimate, acquires any right by birth in the separate property or the self acquired property of its parents. BHAGELA SAHU VS RAJU SAHU - 2020 Supreme(Chh) 192 - 2020 0 Supreme(Chh) 192
Grandfather's Self-Acquired Property: Generally excluded unless willed or adopted into the family. Rights do not extend collaterally. UKKU v. HORATHALARajendra Kumhar son of late Indru Kumhar VS Deputy Commissioner, P. O. & P. S. - Gumla, Dist. Gumla - 2022 0 Supreme(Jhk) 1211
This framework preserves joint family integrity while safeguarding minimal parental inheritance.
While the rule is strict, exceptions exist:
Legal Adoption: If the grandfather or family adopts the child, full coparcenary rights may apply. Revanasiddappa VS Mallikarjun - 2011 0 Supreme(Raj) 286
Legitimation via Statute: Rare, but specific laws could confer rights.
Maintenance Rights: Illegitimate children retain maintenance claims from the father, as An illegitimate child is also entitled to get maintenance from his father. So, legitimacy of birth is totally irrelevant... Ivan Rathinam S/o. Late Rathnampillai VS Milan Joseph - 2018 Supreme(Ker) 283 - 2018 0 Supreme(Ker) 283
Custody and Guardianship: Welfare paramount. Mother often preferred for young children; father as natural guardian for boys/unmarried girls, but not step-relations. In this section, the expression 'father' and 'mother' do not include a step-father and a step-mother. KM. SANAYA SHARMA (MINOR) AND ANOTHER Vs State - Allahabad Courts prioritize child welfare over legitimacy. Nagendra Kumar Joshi, son of Gulab Chandra Joshi VS Suklal Bandhe, son of late Bisahu Das Bandhe - Chhattisgarh
Illegitimate children may share equally in father's self-acquired property like legitimate siblings, per post-1976 amendments, but not ancestral. Indubai Jaydeo Pawar VS Draupada @ Draupadi Jaydeo Pawar - Current Civil Cases
Courts consistently exclude illegitimate children from 'paraveni' (ancestral) property of paternal grandfather. UKKU v. HORATHALA Rights are generally limited to the child's self-acquired property or the property of the parents. Ashoke Bagdi @ Putu Bagdi VS Jayanta Banerjee - CalcuttaRaunak Yadu, S/o. Homeshwar Yadu, (Minor), Through Uncle Gulab Yadu VS General Public - Chhattisgarh
Section 16 (Hindu Marriage Act, amended 1976) recognizes such children in father's property to address social anomalies, but ancestral claims remain barred. Indubai Jaydeo Pawar VS Draupada @ Draupadi Jaydeo Pawar - 2017 Supreme(Bom) 2054 - 2017 0 Supreme(Bom) 2054
Recent views note stigma should not deprive rights entirely, yet property limits persist. Sudeep Suhas Kulkarni VS Abbas Bahadur Dhanani - Bombay Guardianship favors mother for under-5s, with age-based considerations. Sucheta Bhadoriya vs Ambarish Singh - Madhya Pradesh
Pursue Adoption: Formal adoption can unlock ancestral rights.
Document Parentage: Prove paternity for maintenance/parental inheritance.
Will Planning: Grandparents can bequeath self-acquired property via will.
Court Scrutiny: Claims require strict proof; Section 16 legitimacy alone insufficient.
Families should adhere to precedents to avoid disputes. T. Mallika VS K. Mathivanam - 2024 0 Supreme(Mad) 2248Revanasiddappa VS Mallikarjun - 2011 0 Supreme(SC) 345
Under Hindu law, an illegitimate child typically has no rights in the grandfather’s property, confined to parents' holdings per Section 16(3) HMA and Supreme Court rulings like Revanasiddappa and Jinia Keotin. Exceptions via adoption or wills offer paths forward, but ancestral coparcenary remains off-limits. While maintenance and custody protections exist, inheritance stops at parents.
This position upholds joint family traditions while providing essentials. For personalized guidance, seek expert legal counsel—laws evolve, and facts matter.
Word count: 1028. Sources integrated for comprehensive view.
#IllegitimateChildRights #HinduInheritanceLaw #AncestralProperty
On 11.04.2022, statement of the child was also recorded before this Court, in which, minor child – Tanishq stated that he does not want to join the company of appellant/father and wants to stay with the respondent/maternal grand father. ... after him, the mother; Provided that the custody of a minor who has not completed the age of five years shall ordinarily be with the mother; (b) in the case of an #HL_....
Armour (Perera's Edition), page 8, section 7, deals with the case of a man who had an illegitimate son. The father died first and then the grand-father. ... We would, accordingly, recommend that illegitimate children be declared to have no rights whatsoever to the paraveni property of their father, and that legitimate children or their issue should be ....
—In this section, the expression "father" and "mother" do not include a step-father and a step-mother" Section 6(a) of the said Act, therefore, preserves the right of the (b) in case of an illegitimate boy or an illegitimate unmarried girl—the mother, and after her, the father; (c)in the case of a married girl—the husband: Provided that no person shall be entitled to act as the natural guardia....
personality would be more prominent in guardianship of his father rather than in company of his maternal grand parents. ... child, as father. ... : provided that the custody of a minor who has not completed the age of five years shall ordinarily be with the mother; (b) in case of an illegitimate boy or an illegitimate unmarried girl—the mother, and after her, the father....
are not considered, merely because the personal law applicable to the minor child indicates that being an ‘illegitimate child’, she can have no rights towards inheritance or descent. ... as the father, although petitioner No.1 is the biological father of the minor child. ... Learned counsel for the petitioners has fairly brought to the notice of this Court the position ....
of their father and could only stake a claim in his self-acquired property. ... conferring legitimacy in terms of sub-section (1) on a child born from a void marriage and under sub-section (2) to a child born from a voidable marriage which has been annulled, the legislature has stipulated in subsection (3) of Section 16 that such a child will have rights to or in the property#H....
of an illegitimate boy or an illegitimate unmarried girl-the mother, and after her, the father”; 15. ... (3) Nothing contained in sub-section (1) or sub-section (2) shall be construed as conferring upon any child of a marriage which is null and void or which is annulled by a decree of nullity under section 12, any rights in or to the property of any person, other than the parents, ... i....
this Act, such child would have been incapable of possessing or acquiring any such rights by reason of his not being the legitimate child of his parents”. ... At the time of Admission of this appeal, the following substantial questions of law were framed vide order dated 07.09.2022 :- (i) Whether an illegitimate son from a concubine is entitled to inherit the property of his father? ... ....
The law thus did not extend to confer any right at par on father of an illegitimate child as have been conferred on father of a legitimate child. ... stigma of being an illegitimate child. ... being of the minor illegitimate girl child. ... The only check on the guardians act of giving child in adoption is under Sect....
rights in the property of any person other than the parent. ... claim a right to the property which does not belong exclusively to his father. ... Lakshmiammal and others, wherein the learned Judges have held that a father can make provision of property for an illegitimate son. d. Recognition of plaintiff as family member by defendants 1, 3 to 5. 14.5. ... While conferr....
No child whether legitimate or illegitimate, acquires any right by birth in the separate property or the self acquired property of its parents. Thus they acquire no title to such property by birth. Separate or self acquired property of a member of the coparcenary or joint family cannot be the subject matter of partition amongst the member of a co-parcenary or Joint family. They do not possess any antecedent title to such property.
As illegitimate child is not a coparcener, he can exercise his right in father's property only on his father dying intestate. Consequently, such a child does not acquire any right by birth in any property, much less coparcenery or joint family property. He has no right by birth and hence, he cannot be given any share even in the property of his parents till they are alive.
There, the question is whether the child has been begotten in a sexual intercourse with the person from whom maintenance is claimed. An illegitimate child is also entitled to get maintenance from his father. So, legitimacy of birth is totally irrelevant and insignificant while considering the right of the child to get maintenance from his father. In short, legitimacy and paternity are different and distinct.
However, he has equal right like his legitimate sibling in the property of his father. 10. Section 16 was introduced by the Act No.68 of 1976 to recognise the right of an illegitimate child in the father’s property. There is no doubt that in an ancestral property of the father, illegitimate child cannot claim any share. The Legislature has taken a progressive step by introducing this section with a view to remove certain social anomalies in respect of the child born to a coup....
10. Section 16 was introduced by the Act No. 68 of 1976 to recognise the right of an illegitimate child in the father's property. The Legislature has taken a progressive step by introducing this section with a view to remove certain social anomalies in respect of the child born to a couple in the void marriage. There is no doubt that in an ancestral property of the father, illegitimate child cannot claim any share. However, he has equal right like his legitimate sibling in th....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.