Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Jurisdiction of courts to determine arbitrability is limited; courts typically do not decide on the arbitrability of disputes at the reference stage, reserving such questions for the arbitral tribunal unless the dispute is clearly non-arbitrable ["MS GURINDER SINGH CONTRACTOR Vs THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS - Punjab and Haryana"], ["Bcc-monalisha (jv) VS Container Corporation of India Limited - Delhi"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["Bcc-monalisha (jv) VS Container Corporation of India Limited - Delhi"]- ["MS GURINDER SINGH CONTRACTOR Vs THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS - Punjab and Haryana"]- ["G. S. R. Ventures Private Limited, Represented by its Authorized Signatory K. Mohammed Rafi, S/o. K. C. Imam Saheb VS Union Of India, Represented By The General Manager, N. F. Railway, Guwahati - Gauhati"]- ["UNION OF INDIA VS MADNANI CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION - Allahabad"]- ["PENINSULA EDUCATION (SETIA ALAM) SDN BHD vs BIAXIS (M) SDN BHD - Court Of Appeal"]- ["DATO LER CHENG CHYE & ANOR vs ATURAN PRISMA SDN BHD & ORS - High Court"]- ["Motilal Oswal Financial Services Limited VS Santosh Cordeiro - Supreme Court"]- ["Dimple Enterprises vs Wework India Management Pvt. Ltd. - Bombay"]- ["Tewatia Construction Pvt. Ltd. vs Union of India - Delhi"]- ["Omega Finvest LLP VS Direct News Private Limited - Delhi"]- ["Danieli India Limited vs Mishra Dhatu Nigam Limited - Telangana"]- ["Danieli India Limited vs Mishra Dhatu Nigam Limited - Telangana"]
In the world of business contracts, disputes often arise when one party seeks to terminate the agreement. A common question emerges: Is termination of a contract arbitrable? This issue is critical for companies, as it determines whether such disputes go to arbitration or court. Understanding arbitrability can save time, costs, and relationships. This post breaks down the legal principles, drawing from key judgments and doctrines to provide clarity.
Generally, disputes over contract termination are arbitrable if they fall within the arbitration agreement's scope and relate to contractual rights. However, exceptions exist for statutory or public policy matters. Let's dive deeper.
The arbitrability of contract termination clauses hinges on the arbitration agreement's scope and whether the dispute involves arbitrable issues per the contract and applicable law. Courts typically hold that termination disputes are arbitrable when challenged on contractual grounds, such as breach, and covered by a broad arbitration clause. Branch Manager, M/s. Magma Leasing &Finance Limited VS Potluri Madhavilata - 2009 6 Supreme 746Harsha Constructions VS Union of India - 2014 7 Supreme 81
Arbitration clauses are viewed as collateral terms that survive contract termination, covering related disputes. As noted, arbitration clauses survive the termination of the contract and remain enforceable for disputes arising in respect of or with regard to the contract. Branch Manager, M/s. Magma Leasing &Finance Limited VS Potluri Madhavilata - 2009 6 Supreme 746
Courts interpret arbitration clauses broadly to include disputes arising out of or in connection with the contract, including termination, unless explicitly excluded. Harsha Constructions VS Union of India - 2014 7 Supreme 81
For instance, in cases where termination is linked to contractual defaults, courts direct parties to arbitration rather than judicial review. The court in Marymatha Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Mary Matha Construction Company), Represented By Its Managing Director VS Roads & Bridges Development Corporation Of Kerala Ltd. , Represented By Its Managing Director - 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 516 emphasized resolving disputes through the contractual mechanism, dismissing challenges to termination as arbitrable.
A key principle is the separability presumption, treating arbitration agreements as independent from the main contract. Even if the contract ends due to breach or frustration, the arbitration clause endures. The reason is that the parties intend to treat an arbitration agreement contained in an underlying contract as distinct from the other terms of the contract; and... notwithstanding the invalidity, illegality, or termination of such contract. KARAN PAUL Vs K P H DREAM CRICKET PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS - 2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8471
This doctrine ensures tribunals can rule on their own competence, including post-termination disputes. Sushma Shivkumar Daga VS Madhurkumar Ramkrishnaji Bajaj - 2023 8 Supreme 502
Several judgments reinforce that termination-related disputes are typically arbitrable:
Additional sources highlight nuances:
In construction contracts, claims incidental to termination, like escalation or loss of profit, are arbitrable if not expressly excepted. Claims which are incidental to and arise out of or flow from the contract but which do not form the subject matter of the contract cannot be termed as ‘excepted matters’... Union of India VS Build Fab - 2017 Supreme(Cal) 314
Not all termination disputes are arbitrable. Key exceptions include:
Courts scrutinize if fraud allegations are serious enough to oust arbitration; mere contractual fraud typically does not. Plea of fraud must be serious in nature in order to oust jurisdiction of Arbitrator. Sushma Shivkumar Daga VS Madhurkumar Ramkrishnaji Bajaj - 2023 8 Supreme 502
In price variation post-termination, tribunals cannot rewrite contracts or extend beyond evidence like force majeure. National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd. VS General Electric Company Ltd. - 2013 Supreme(Del) 450
Payments post-execution are arbitrable if contractual, but claims exceeding limits may be set aside. Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust VS Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. - 2013 Supreme(Bom) 2331Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust VS Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. - 2013 Supreme(Bom) 2333
To navigate these issues:
Parties should interpret clauses broadly unless excluded, favoring arbitration for efficiency.
In summary, contract termination disputes are generally arbitrable when tied to contractual rights and covered by a surviving arbitration clause. Courts uphold this, promoting party autonomy, but carve out exceptions for non-arbitrable matters. Always review specific agreements and laws.
Key Takeaways:- Arbitration clauses survive termination. Branch Manager, M/s. Magma Leasing &Finance Limited VS Potluri Madhavilata - 2009 6 Supreme 746- Broad scope includes termination challenges. Harsha Constructions VS Union of India - 2014 7 Supreme 81- Exceptions: Statutory rights, out-of-scope claims. Marymatha Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Mary Matha Construction Company), Represented By Its Managing Director VS Roads & Bridges Development Corporation Of Kerala Ltd. , Represented By Its Managing Director - 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 516- Separability ensures validity post-invalidity. KARAN PAUL Vs K P H DREAM CRICKET PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS - 2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8471
This post provides general information based on case law and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for your situation.
References:1. Marymatha Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly Mary Matha Construction Company), Represented By Its Managing Director VS Roads & Bridges Development Corporation Of Kerala Ltd. , Represented By Its Managing Director - 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 516: Contractual mechanisms for termination.2. Branch Manager, M/s. Magma Leasing &Finance Limited VS Potluri Madhavilata - 2009 6 Supreme 746: Clause survival.3. Harsha Constructions VS Union of India - 2014 7 Supreme 81: Scope limitations.4. Rcc Hari Agro Ventures Pvt. Ltd. VS Food Corporation of India - 2022 0 Supreme(Del) 2148: Broad interpretation caveats.5. Additional: KARAN PAUL Vs K P H DREAM CRICKET PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS - 2025 Supreme(Online)(P&H) 8471, DATO LER CHENG CHYE & ANOR vs ATURAN PRISMA SDN BHD & ORS, etc.
#ArbitrationLaw, #ContractTermination, #LegalInsights
Arbitrators are creatures of the contract who draw their life and sustenance from the contract between the parties. In view of the clear embargo in Clause 64, the claims raised in the present petition are `non-notified' claims and hence, non-arbitrable. ... The aggregate value of the claims raised by the Petitioner exceed 20% of the contract value, hence they are not arbitrable. 6. In Srico Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. ... Petitioner has not contested that the aggregate value of the claims would exceed 20% o....
This aspect, as to whether it is arbitrable or non- arbitrable, lies within the scope of the arbitrator and not within the scope of this Court at the stage of reference under Section 11 of the Act. ... The reason is that the parties intend to treat an arbitration agreement contained in an underlying contract as distinct from the other terms of the contract; and Fourth, the validity of an arbitration agreement, in the face of the invalidity of the underlying contract, allows the Arbitral Tribunal to ... ....
, as far as these individual claims are concerned, which are less than 20% of the value of the contract, these are certainly arbitrable. ... will not be arbitrable, will be rendered infructuous. ... arbitrable, the said Clauses do not contemplate that the claims are to be clubbed together. ... It specifically mentions that the claims or disputes between the parties should be less than or equal to 20% of the value of the contract only when it becomes arbitrable and in the present case, ....
The General Manager of the Railways (the GM) rejected it on 24th March 1986 on the ground that the dispute was non-arbitrable as it fell under excepted matters of the contract. ... The counsel for the Railways could not point out any clause of the contract under which these could be covered. In view of this they are not excepted matters and were arbitrable. ... (v) Whether the dispute relates to excepted matters under the contract and was non-arbitrable? (vi) Whether the terms of the #....
The reason is that the parties intend to treat an arbitration agreement contained in an underlying contract as distinct from the other terms of the contract; and Fourth, the validity of an arbitration agreement, in the face of the invalidity of the underlying contract, allows the Arbitral Tribunal to ... The separability presumption gives effect to this by ensuring the validity of an arbitration agreement contained in an underlying contract, notwithstanding the invalidity, illegality, or termination of such con....
Companies Act 2016 and is therefore, allegedly, non-arbitrable. C1. Set off disputes is not exclusively within the purview of liquidation. Right to arbitrate is inherent from the contract 7. ... Contract arbitration between Pustaka and Aturan. ... [25] Both Letters of Awards are based on the PAM Contract. The PAM Contract is deemed part of the contracts. ... An insolvency claim is not arbitrable by virtue of s 4 of the s 4 of the a href="./..
[25] Both Letters of Awards are based on the PAM Contract. The PAM Contract is deemed part of the contracts. ... A claim under an insolvency regime is non-arbitrable 13. ... PAM Contract arbitration between Pustaka and Aturan. ... of whatsoever nature arising under or in connection with the contract, including issues pertaining to set off disputes (Arbitration Clauses); (d) the Set Off Dispute is clearly within the ambit or scope of the PAM Contract, PAM Clause and Arbitration Clauses....
was in respect of non-arbitrable dispute. ... One of the objections raised by the appellant in the proceedings under Section 33 was that under the terms of the contract the claim sought to be put up in the notice given by the respondent was not arbitrable. ... He reached the conclusion whether or not the dispute or the claim is arbitrable and obviously he was of the opinion that all the claims are arbitrable and he is empowered to decide it either rightly or wrongly. ... From a reading thereof, it is cl....
shall be treated as an agreement independent of the other terms of the contract. ... Section 7 of the Contract Act, 1872 requires the acceptance of a contract to be absolute and unqualified [Dresser Rand S.A. vs. Bindal Agro Chem Ltd. (2006) 1 SCC 751, BSNL vs. Telephone Cables Ltd. ... (4) When the subject-matter of the dispute is expressly or by necessary implication non-arbitrable as per mandatory statutes.” ... (b) a decision by the arbitral tribunal that the contract is null and void shall not en....
The term “agreement” is not defined in the Arbitration Act, albeit it is defined in Section 10 of the CONTRACT ACT , 1872 (for short “the CONTRACT ACT ”), … as contracts made by free consent of parties competent to contract, for a lawful consideration ... The separability presumption insulates the arbitration agreement from the defects of the underlying contract, and thereby ensures the sustenance of the tribunal's jurisdiction over the substantive rights and obligations of the parties under the underlying co....
The arbitrator on this point, inter-alia, held:- “...........But claims which are incidental to and arise out of or flow from the contract but which do not form the subject matter of the contract cannot be termed as ‘excepted matters’ as for instance refund of security deposit, escalation, loss of profit due to prolongation of the contract beyond the stipulated period of completion, loss due to blockage of working capital, loss due to inability to plough back the working capital to any gainful enterprise because of delay in making timely payment of ‘on account’ bills etc. etc. Before me, not....
Here the question arises whether the dispute expressly made non- arbitrable by the contract, if referred by the Court for arbitration, would become arbitrable. 44. Bench of seven judges of the Hon’ble The Apex Court in the case of SBP & Company v. Patel Engineering Ltd, (2005) 8 SCC 618, in para 47 while discussing scope of excise of such power has observed the following :
It is, therefore, however, arbitrable once the contract is executed and the claim is made. Hence the grant of claim No.2 for the running length of the two guide walls within the BOQ of 315 m is within the terms of the contract and correctly granted. It is further seen that the payment which is to be made upon the execution of the contract would be the contratual matter and must be guided by the terms of the contract for the determination of the payment.
Hence the grant of claim No.2 for the running length of the two guide walls within the BOQ of 315 m is within the terms of the contract and correctly granted. It is, therefore, however, arbitrable once the contract is executed and the claim is made. It is further seen that the payment which is to be made upon the execution of the contract would be the contratual matter and must be guided by the terms of the contract for the determination of the payment.
The following matters appear to arise as issues that have to be determined by the Arbitral Tribunal. 3. If the claims are valid, to what sum or sums is MIL entitled in respect of price variation? 1. Is there any claim made by the Claimants which is arbitrable under the Contract? 2. If there is, are the claims made by the Claimants valid in principle in so far as they rest upon the contention that price variation is payable upon 100% of the Contract Prices?
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
