Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Jurisdiction for trial is now generally confined to the court within the local jurisdiction where the cheque is dishonoured or where the account is maintained, especially after amendments introduced by the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act, 2015 ["
Liugong India Pvt. Ltd. vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) - Delhi
"].Analysis and Conclusion:
Anil Kumar Sawhney VS Gulshan Rai - Dishonour Of Cheque
"].
Imagine issuing a cheque from a joint bank account to settle a business debt, only for it to bounce due to . The payee files a complaint under (), targeting all account holders. But what if the cheque was signed by only one joint holder? Does this trigger for everyone? This is a common query in cases: Check signed by only one of the joint account holders with the offence under attracted?
In this post, we break down the legal position, drawing from judicial precedents and key principles. Note: This is general information based on case law and not specific legal advice. Consult a lawyer for your situation.
Section 138 criminalizes due to or exceeding arrangements, aiming to promote trust in banking transactions. However, liability is not automatic—it hinges on specific elements, starting with who drew the cheque.
Courts have repeatedly held that only the —the person who signed the cheque—can be prosecuted under Section 1382008 0 Supreme(Del) 7 2001 1 Supreme 24. The signature represents the 's intent to discharge a 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 908. Without it, there's no valid negotiable instrument for criminal purposes.
Joint accounts complicate matters. Typically, banks allow either holder to operate, but for Section 138 proceedings, all joint account holders must sign the cheque to establish collective liability 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 908
.
.
1998 0 Supreme(Mad) 1358.
.
This stems from the principle that liability is personal to the signer, not vicarious. As one ruling notes: The court reaffirmed that a joint account holder cannot be prosecuted unless the cheque is signed by all joint account holders, emphasizing the importance of signatures for establishing liability under Section 138
.
Indian courts have clarified this in several cases:
These rulings align with broader goals, like those in cases involving partnerships, where partners are liable only if cheques are issued on firm behalf with proper authority 2023 0 Supreme(Cal) 434. The object of bringing ... is to inculcate faith in the efficacy of banking operations 2023 0 Supreme(Cal) 434.
Prosecution must prove signature authenticity. In disputes, courts may order expert verification, but delays in government labs (e.g., overburdened with serious crimes like rape/murder) often lead to private experts 2018 0 Supreme(Raj) 1793 2018 0 Supreme(Raj) 1752.
One case allowed private handwriting analysis at the accused's cost, noting: The is heavily overburdened with the reports to be submitted in the rape and murder cases 2018 0 Supreme(Raj) 1793. This underscores procedural fairness in Section 138 matters.
While strict, exceptions exist:- Authorization: If a holder authorizes another via documented , it may suffice 1998 0 Supreme(Mad) 1358. Evidence is key.- No : Joint holders aren't liable merely by account association
.
Related issues include:- Post-Dated Cheques: Treated as until payable; Section 138 clock starts from the date on the cheque
. A 'post dated cheque' is only a bill of exchange... it becomes a cheque from the date shown on its face
.- Account Closure: Dishonour for account closed can attract liability if post-issuance, even without holder consent 2017 0 Supreme(Ker) 1499. When the account was closed without the knowledge and consent of the account holder, definitely, an offence under Section 138... can be attracted 2016 0 Supreme(Ker) 352.- Presumptions: Under , cheques presume debt discharge, but complainants must prove loan capacity 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 1980.
These reinforce that Section 138 focuses on intent, amplified in joint scenarios.
To avoid pitfalls:- Always Get All Signatures: For joint accounts, ensure every holder signs before issuing.- Document Authority: Use powers of attorney for substitutes, with proof.- Verify Before Suing: Check signatures to prevent case quashing.- Expert Analysis: In disputes, opt for prompt private verification.- Compliance Check: Confirm cheque validity, including dates and funds
Refex Energy Ltd. VS Union of India
..
In conclusion, a cheque signed by only one joint account holder generally does not attract Section 138 liability for others. This protects against unwarranted prosecutions while upholding banking integrity. Stay informed, but seek professional advice for your case.
: Joint holder prosecution requires all signatures.
Presumptions as to negotiable instruments. ... 138. Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency, etc., of funds in the account. ... Section 139 of the Act is an example of a reverse onus clause that has been included in furtherance of the legislative objective of improving the credibility of negotiable instruments. ... Section 139 has been held to be an example of a 'reverse onus clause' that has been included in furtherance of the legislative objective o....
Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Section 138 - Post dated cheque – A "post dated cheque" is only a bill of exchange ... 138 of the Act are not applicable to post dated cheques. ... months period has to be reckoned from the date mentioned on the face of cheques - High Court erred in holding that provisions of section ... One of the main ingredients of the offence under Section 138 of the Act is, the return of the cheque by the bank unpai....
Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Section 138 - Post dated cheque – A "post dated cheque" is only a bill of exchange ... 138 of the Act are not applicable to post dated cheques. ... months period has to be reckoned from the date mentioned on the face of cheques - High Court erred in holding that provisions of section ... One of the main ingredients of the offence under Section 138 of the Act is, the return of the cheque by the bank unpai....
punishable under Section 138 of the Negotialb Instruments Act, 1881 holding that the complaint filed by the complainant is under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instructments Act which has not been presented as per the provisions of the Act and is not in circulation. ... is under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instructments Act, 1881 which has not been filed as per the provisions of the Act. ... Cheque No.005414 was signed#HL....
(iv) The facts constituting cause of action do not constitute the ingredients of the offence under Section 138 of the Act. ... clause (c) of proviso to Section 138. ... To sum up: (i) An offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is committed no sooner a cheque drawn by the accused on an account being maintained by him in a bank for discharge of debt/liability is returned unpaid for insufficiency of funds or ....
The object of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is to infuse credibility into negotiable instruments, including cheques, and to encourage and promote the use of negotiable instruments, including cheques, in financial transactions. ... The cheque was dishonoured with an endorsement ‘account blocked’. The cheque issued as a security also attracts an offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I. Act on its....
The object of bringing Sections 138 to 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on statute appears to be to inculcate faith in the efficacy of banking operations and credibility in transacting business of negotiable instruments. ... under Section 138 of Act – Held, considering well settled position of law on point as applicable to factual scenario, Petitioner was prima facie liable for dishonour of cheques as partner of firm on whose behalf negotiable instruments were is....
(iv) The facts constituting cause of action do not constitute the ingredients of the offence under Section 138 of the Act. ... (c) of proviso to Section 138. ... To sum up: (i) An offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is committed no sooner a cheque drawn by the accused on an account being maintained by him in a bank for discharge of debt/liability is returned unpaid for insufficiency of funds or for the....
under Section 138 of the Act. ... (c) of proviso to Section 138. ... In the principal Act, section 142 shall be numbered as sub-section (1) thereof and after sub- section (1) as so numbered, the following sub- section shall be inserted, namely:— "(2) The offence under section 138 shall be inquired into and tried only by a court within ... To sum up: (i) An offence under #HL_START....
We are satisfied, that Section 142(2)(a), amended through the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Second Ordinance, 2015, vests jurisdiction for initiating proceedings for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, inter alia in the territorial jurisdiction of the Court, where ... 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, after the promulgation of the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Second Ordinance, 2015.....
Act will get attracted, if the said debt happens to be legally enforceable. In any transaction, when cheque is issued, it is presumed to be issued to discharge the existing debt. Offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Therefore, the existing debt pre-suppose a presumption.
Offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Counsel further contends that the petitioner-accused filed an application praying that the cheque, in question be sent to the handwriting expert at State Forensic Science Laboratory Rajasthan, Jaipur for comparison of the handwriting. It is common knowledge that the State Forensic Science Laboratory Rajasthan, Jaipur is heavily over burdened with the reports to be submitted in the rape and murder cases.
Offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Counsel further contends that the petitioner accused filed an application praying that the cheque, in question be sent to the handwriting expert at State Forensic Science Laboratory Rajasthan, Jaipur for comparison of the handwriting. It is common knowledge that the State Forensic Science Laboratory Rajasthan, Jaipur is heavily over burdened with the reports to be submitted in the rape and murder cases.
Even if the accused had issued the cheque and thereafter closed the account, it could be treated that the account holder did not want to continue with the account and to keep any money in his account so that he got back the entire amount from his account and closed the account. It is true that this is a case wherein the account maintained by the 1st respondent was closed by the Bankers themselves, without the knowledge and consent of the account holder, the accused. When the account was closed without the knowledge and consent of the account holder, definitely, an offence under S.1....
It is true that this is a case wherein the account maintained by the 1st respondent was closed by the Bankers themselves, without the knowledge and consent of the account holder, the accused. When the account was closed without the knowledge and consent of the account holder, definitely, an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Even if the accused had issued the cheque and thereafter closed the account, it could be treated that the account holder did not want to continue with the account and to keep any money in his account so that he got back the entire a....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
