Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
References:["N.Srinivasa Rao vs The State of Telangana - Telangana"], ["2022 R.S. Dhanasekaran .. Petitioner Vs 1. The District Forest Officer O/o. the District Forest Officer, Kodaikanal, Dindigul District 2. The Forest Ranger Perumpallam Range, - Madras"], ["N.Srinivasa Rao vs The State of Telangana - Telangana"]
In the realm of Indian legal history, commissions of inquiry play a pivotal role in investigating significant events and providing recommendations. One such body, the Justice Venugopal Committee—formally a Commission of Inquiry headed by retired Madras High Court Judge Justice P. Venugopal—has been referenced in various judicial proceedings. A common query among legal researchers and historians is: when was the Justice Venugopal Committee constituted? This post delves into the details, drawing from official documents and court records to clarify the timeline.
Understanding the constitution date not only sheds light on administrative processes but also highlights post-retirement appointments of judges, a practice governed by specific government notifications. Let's explore the facts step by step.
Justice P. Venugopal served as a Judge of the Madras High Court until his retirement on 07.12.1981Justice P. Venugopal VS State of Tamilnadu rep. by the Chief Secretary Fort St. George - 2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 2950. Immediately following his retirement, the Government of Tamil Nadu appointed him to lead a Commission of Inquiry. This swift transition underscores the reliance on experienced judicial figures for sensitive investigations.
In later cases, his service as a Commissioner has been scrutinized, particularly regarding pension entitlements. For instance, courts have examined whether periods served as a Commission of Inquiry could be factored into pension calculations under relevant acts ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, M. P. VS S. K. DUBEY - 2012 Supreme(SC) 200. The Supreme Court in Justice P. Venugopal v. Union of India clarified aspects of such post-retirement roles, emphasizing that emoluments for these positions are distinct from high court pensions ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, M. P. VS S. K. DUBEY - 2012 Supreme(SC) 200.
The precise date of the Justice Venugopal Committee's constitution is 28 December 1981. This is evidenced by G.O. Ms. No. 1504 issued by the Government of Tamil Nadu, which formally appointed Justice P. Venugopal (Retired) as the Commission of Inquiry Justice P. Venugopal VS State of Tamilnadu rep. by the Chief Secretary Fort St. George - 2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 2950.
Key excerpts from the document confirm this:
Government of Tamil Nadu i.e., the respondent herein issued G.O. Ms. No. 1504, ... dated 28.12.1981. Justice P. Venugopal VS State of Tamilnadu rep. by the Chief Secretary Fort St. George - 2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 2950
Additionally:
Justice P. Venugopal (Retired) who has been appointed as the Commission of Inquiry ... will draw the total emoluments last drawn by him as a Judge of the High Court, minus the pension ... Justice P. Venugopal VS State of Tamilnadu rep. by the Chief Secretary Fort St. George - 2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 2950
These provisions indicate the appointment was effective from the date of the G.O., allowing him to receive emoluments equivalent to a sitting High Court Judge. The formal order authorizing payments was also issued on the same day, solidifying 28.12.1981 as the constitution date Justice P. Venugopal VS State of Tamilnadu rep. by the Chief Secretary Fort St. George - 2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 2950.
While no document uses the exact phrase date of constitution, the issuance of the G.O. serves as the definitive marker, as it legally established the commission.
The committee was constituted in response to specific events, notably communal riots in Mandaikkaadu, Kanyakumari District, in 1982 Fr. P. George Ponnaiah VS Inspector of Police, Kanyakumari District, Kanyakumari - 2022 Supreme(Mad) 59. A court observation notes:
They rather echo the recommendations made by Hon'ble Mr. Justice P. Venugopal Commission which was constituted following the communal riots that took place in the year 1982 at Mandaikkaadu in Kanyakumari District. Fr. P. George Ponnaiah VS Inspector of Police, Kanyakumari District, Kanyakumari - 2022 Supreme(Mad) 59
This highlights the commission's role in inquiring into riot-related matters, aligning with the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952, which empowers governments to appoint such bodies for public importance.
Retiring just three weeks prior on 07.12.1981, Justice Venugopal's appointment exemplifies immediate post-retirement utilization of judicial expertise Justice P. Venugopal VS State of Tamilnadu rep. by the Chief Secretary Fort St. George - 2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 2950. Courts have upheld such appointments, provided they adhere to emolument rules minus pension, preventing double benefits from the Consolidated Fund of India ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, M. P. VS S. K. DUBEY - 2012 Supreme(SC) 200.
In pension disputes, the Supreme Court ruled that service as a Commission of Inquiry cannot be clubbed with High Court service for pension computation, reinforcing separation of roles ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, M. P. VS S. K. DUBEY - 2012 Supreme(SC) 200. This principle was echoed in cases like Justice P. Venugopal v. Union of India, where emoluments were limited to salary minus pension ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, M. P. VS S. K. DUBEY - 2012 Supreme(SC) 200.
References to Justice Venugopal appear in diverse contexts:- Pension and Service Matters: Discussions on whether Commission service qualifies under the High Court Judges (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Act, 1954, or Consumer Protection Act, 1986 ACCOUNTANT GENERAL, M. P. VS S. K. DUBEY - 2012 Supreme(SC) 200.- Communal Inquiry: Linking to 1982 riots, influencing subsequent recommendations Fr. P. George Ponnaiah VS Inspector of Police, Kanyakumari District, Kanyakumari - 2022 Supreme(Mad) 59.- Other Committees: While unrelated, similar post-retirement commissions (e.g., under Gujarat Municipalities Act or Bombay Primary Education Act) illustrate the pattern of judicial appointments M. A. SHAIKH VS PUNAMCHAND P. PATEL - 1999 Supreme(Guj) 607.
These cases demonstrate how such committees contribute to policy and justice administration, often cited in writ petitions and appeals.
| Key Timeline Events | Date | Reference ||---------------------|------|-----------|| Retirement from Madras High Court | 07.12.1981 | Justice P. Venugopal VS State of Tamilnadu rep. by the Chief Secretary Fort St. George - 2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 2950 || G.O. Ms. No. 1504 Issued | 28.12.1981 | Justice P. Venugopal VS State of Tamilnadu rep. by the Chief Secretary Fort St. George - 2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 2950 || Formal Payment Order | 28.12.1981 | Justice P. Venugopal VS State of Tamilnadu rep. by the Chief Secretary Fort St. George - 2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 2950 || Related Riots Inquiry | 1982 | Fr. P. George Ponnaiah VS Inspector of Police, Kanyakumari District, Kanyakumari - 2022 Supreme(Mad) 59 |
Legal documents sometimes lack explicit constitution phrasing, relying instead on appointment notifications. Here, the G.O. fills this gap definitively Justice P. Venugopal VS State of Tamilnadu rep. by the Chief Secretary Fort St. George - 2006 0 Supreme(Mad) 2950. Researchers should cross-reference with Tamil Nadu Gazette notifications for completeness.
This information is derived from publicly available court documents and is for informational purposes only. Legal interpretations may vary by context; consult a qualified attorney for advice specific to your situation. For deeper research, review original judgments like those cited.
Stay informed on legal history—share your thoughts in the comments!
#JusticeVenugopal, #LegalHistory, #TamilNaduLaw
In view of the same, the petitioner is directed to sent a fresh representation to the newly constituted commitee within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order giving all particulars in the prescribed format ... As per Section 3(ii ) of the Act if the petitioner intends to remove any trees permission can be granted if appropirate application is made to the commitee constituted under Section 2(a) of the Act and after obtaining permission ... BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH....
JUSTICE GOPINATH P. ... 4 THE AREA COMMITEE, MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD,REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT,KASARGOD DISTRICT, PIN-671 314. 5 U. ... SRI.K.R.SUNIL, SC, MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD SMT.P.K.RADHIKA, SC, MALABAR DEVASWOM BOARD SRI.VENUGOPAL V, GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: p class
In view of the same, the petitioner is directed to sent a fresh representation to the newly constituted commitee within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order giving all particulars in the prescribed format. ... As per Section 3(ii ) of the Act if the petitioner intends to remove any trees permission can be granted if appropirate application is made to the commitee constituted under Section 2(a) of the Act and after obtaining permission from the authorities, he can remove the timbers. ... ....
VENUGOPAL, J Date: 28.03.2025 ESP THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. ... THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. ... VENUGOPAL 3343 WRIT PETITION No.30750 OF 2024 Dated: 28.03.2025 ESP ... Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide G.O.Rt.No.175 dated 13.05.2022 respondent No.1 had constituted a Renovation Committee consisting of thirteen members including the petitioner herein for a period of six months circumventing the order dated 13.11.2020 passed by this Court in W.P.No.21586 ... VENUGOPAL#HL....
During the pendency of the petition, it is stated by the learned Counsel, more than one elections to the Municipality have taken place, requiring the new Primary Education Commitee to be constituted after such election. ... Under Section 6 (2) of the Bombay Primary Education Act, 1947, it is provided that whenever a new authorised Municipality has been constituted, it shall elect the members of the school Board (now the Primary Education Committee), as soon as possible. ... The petition was filed on 13. 10. 1987 and it was stated therein ....
JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH Order President, District Establishment Commitee, District President, District Establishment Commitee, District President, District Establishment Commitee, District President, District Establishment Commitee, Bhilwara p style="position:absolute;white-space:pre;margin:0;padding:0;top:901pt;left:159pt
We are of the view that in the matter of placement of the fourth respondent requires appreciation of facts and, therefore, it would be appropriate that the matter be examined by the Regional Assistant Director of Education (Basic) who is the Chairman of the Regional Commitee, constituted to examine the ... Under the relevant order, the District Basic Education Officer has the limited power to direct the concerned Commitee of Management to issue a letter of appointment. ... It is the Regional Commitee framed under the Gov....
_____________________ E.V.VENUGOPAL, J Date: 21.11.2025 ESP THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL ... THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL CONTEMPT CASE No.2066 OF 2023 O R D E R: The
In view thereof, we direct that the following Commitee be constituted forthwith, consisting of :- p style="position:absolute;white-space:pre;
A Commitee was constituted to enquire into this matter and submit its report The Committee report Annexure P/6 on 15 4 1989 in. favour of the petitioner. The matter was placed before the Board of Directors. ... " ... ( 7 ) IT is noticeable that the order has been passed in violation of principles of natural justice. ... ... ( 8 ) IN the result, I quash order Annexure P/18, but grant liberty to respondents 1 and 2 to decide the question of expulsion consistent with principles of natural justice in conformity with law, wi....
They rather echo the recommendations made by Hon'ble Mr.Justice P.Venugopal Commission which was constituted following the communal riots that took place in the year 1982 at Mandaikkaadu in Kanyakumari District. The thoughts expressed by Shri.Aravindan Neelakandan are not new.
During the arguments it was stated by Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learned Attorney General, that an expert committee heading by Justice B.N. Srikrishna (Retd.) was constituted which was looking into the matter. The Government is not unmindful of this essential requirement.
The matter was listed before the Full Bench on various dates and the same was heard. The matter was accordingly placed before The Hon’ble The Chief Justice and on the orders of The Hon’ble The Chief Justice dated 02.04.2012, a Full Bench was constituted consisting of the Hon’ble Mr.Justice Elipe Dharma Rao, Hon’ble Mr. Justice M. Venugopal and Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh.
Act, 1986 could be taken into consideration for computing the pensionary benefits. The question for consideration in that matter was as to whether the period during which Justice P. Venugopal served as the Commission of Inquiry or as the Commissioner of Payments under the Madras Race Club (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) I shall first refer to the legal position exposited by this Court in the case of Justice P. Venugopal.
Considering the doctrine of merger, and the law laid down by the Apex Court on the subject, certainly ""the decision"" of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Civil Appeal No. 2053 of 2000 stood merged in the order of the Apex Court passed on 26-7-2001 in Narendra Doshi's case. 44.The said decision was followed in (Justice P. Venugopal v. Union of India and others)37, reported in A.I.R. 2003 S.C.W. 4472 : 2003(7) S.C.C. 726. The said order of the Madhya Pradesh High Court was, however, not on the point of liability to pay interest on interest by the revenue under the provisi....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
