Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Checking relevance for Atma Singh VS Gurmej Kaur (D)...
Atma Singh VS Gurmej Kaur (D) - 2017 0 Supreme(SC) 1027 : The mother, even after remarriage, retains her right to inherit the estate of her son. In the case of a Hindu male dying intestate, the property devolves upon Class I heirs under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and the mother is a Class I heir. The remarriage of the mother does not divest her of her interest in her son''''s property. Therefore, upon the mother''''s death intestate, her share in the estate of her deceased son (Pal Singh) will devolve upon her own heirs, which include her children (the two children of the deceased Hindu male). The widow''''s right to inherit ceases on remarriage only in relation to her husband''''s property or lineal successors, but not in relation to her son''''s estate. Thus, the two children of the deceased Hindu male are the heirs to succeed the share of the deceased mother.Checking relevance for Bhagat Ram (D) By Lrs. VS Teja Singh...
Checking relevance for Arunachala Gounder (Dead) By Lrs. VS Ponnusamy...
Arunachala Gounder (Dead) By Lrs. VS Ponnusamy - 2022 2 Supreme 272 : The property of the deceased mother (who died intestate) will devolve according to Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Since the mother died intestate and left no issue (children), the property inherited by her from her father or mother would go to the heirs of her father. However, the mother''''s share in the property of the Hindu male (her son) would be considered self-acquired or inherited property. As per Section 15(1)(a), if the mother had any issue, the property would devolve upon her husband and children. But since she died intestate without leaving any issue, and assuming she had no husband at the time of her death (as the widow remarried, and the husband of the deceased male is not the same as the mother''''s husband), the property inherited by her from her son (the deceased male) would be treated as property inherited from her son. However, Section 15(2) applies only to property inherited from father, mother, husband, or father-in-law. Since the mother''''s share in the property of the deceased male is not inherited from her husband or father-in-law, and she had no issue, the property would devolve upon the heirs of her father (as per Section 15(2)(a)). Therefore, the heirs of the deceased mother are the heirs of her father.Checking relevance for Sachidhanandam Since Dead Through His Lrs. VS E. Vanaja...
Checking relevance for Revanasiddappa VS Mallikarjun...
Checking relevance for V. Dandapani Chettiar VS Balasubramanian Chettiar (Dead) By Lrs. ...
Checking relevance for Lata Maitri VS State of Delhi...
Checking relevance for Prem Chand VS Krishan Lal...
Checking relevance for Thummala Bharatamma VS Joint Collector, Collectorate, Nalgonda...
Thummala Bharatamma VS Joint Collector, Collectorate, Nalgonda - 2021 0 Supreme(Telangana) 377 : Under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the mother of a deceased Hindu male is a Class I heir and is entitled to an equal share in the property of her son. When the mother dies intestate, her share in the property devolves upon her legal heirs. The legal heirs of the mother, in the absence of a will, include her children (including those from a previous marriage) and her husband (if alive). In this case, since the mother died intestate after the son''''s death and before the widow remarried, her share in the son''''s property would pass to her own heirs, which include her children (including the son of the deceased male) and any other children she may have had. The remarriage of the widow does not affect the mother''''s status as a Class I heir or her right to inherit from her son. Therefore, the heirs of the deceased mother are her children (including the son of the deceased male) and any other surviving children she may have had, as per Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, and the Schedule defining Class I heirs.Checking relevance for Shakuntala Mathur VS Beena Mathur...
Checking relevance for B. HANUMAN PRASAD VS MST. INDRAWATI...
Checking relevance for State Of Punjab: Chand Singh VS Balwant Singh...
Checking relevance for Narashimahamurthy VS Susheelabai...
Checking relevance for Anar Devi VS Parmeshwari Devi...
Checking relevance for Balwant Kaur VS Chanan Singh...
Checking relevance for Pichandi VS E. Ramaswami...
Pichandi VS E. Ramaswami - 1970 0 Supreme(Mad) 41 : Under Hindu law, when a Hindu widow remarries and subsequently dies intestate, her children from her first marriage and her children from her second marriage are both entitled to succeed to her property as bandhus (cognates). The sons of the same mother by different fathers are recognized as having a heritable relationship through the mother and are considered Binnagotra sapindas. The rule of propinquity of blood, as laid down by Vijnaneswara, establishes that such sons are entitled to succeed to each other as bandhus. Therefore, both the children from the first marriage and the children from the second marriage are heirs to the share of the deceased mother, with the closer degree of relationship determining preference in succession.Checking relevance for Gurdit Singh VS Darshan Singh...
Checking relevance for Madan And Another VS Ram Narayan And Another...
Checking relevance for Angammal(died), Eswari VS Palaniammal...
Checking relevance for Sindhu Ajayan VS Damodaran Pillai...
Checking relevance for Mamta Dinesh Vakil VS Bansi S. Wadhwa...