Can the Liquidator Settle an Arbitral Award Under the IBC?

In the complex world of corporate insolvency, liquidators play a pivotal role in managing a distressed company's assets. But what happens when an arbitral award comes into play? Businesses and creditors often wonder: Can the Liquidator Settle an Arbitral Award under the IBC? This question arises frequently in liquidation proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), where balancing creditor rights with dispute resolutions is crucial. This post dives deep into the liquidator's powers, potential hurdles, and best practices, drawing from key judicial insights.

While the IBC provides a structured framework for asset distribution, it doesn't offer a straightforward yes or no on settling arbitral awards. Generally, liquidators must prioritize fairness and statutory compliance. Let's break it down step by step.

The Liquidator's Role in IBC Liquidation

Under the IBC, once the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) fails, the company enters liquidation. The liquidator, appointed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), takes control of the corporate debtor's assets. Their primary duty is to sell these assets and distribute proceeds according to the waterfall mechanism in Section 53(1) of the IBC2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 921.

The liquidator... is responsible for distributing the assets of a company undergoing liquidation according to the priority set out in Section 53(1) of the IBC. 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 921

This priority ensures secured creditors, workmen dues, and others receive payments in a fixed order. Any action by the liquidator, including settlements, must not undermine this hierarchy. For instance, in cases involving warehoused goods, the liquidator can only take possession of assets legally cleared and belonging to the corporate debtor under Section 35(1)(b) of the IBC2022 0 Supreme(SC) 855. The liquidator can take into his possession only the assets of the Corporate Debtor as under Section 35(1)(b) of the IBC. 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 855

Arbitral Awards and Their Place in IBC Proceedings

Arbitral awards, governed by the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, represent binding decisions on disputes. The IBC does not explicitly bar liquidators from settling such awards. However, settlements must align with Section 53(1) priorities 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 921. A liquidator cannot favor one creditor at the expense of others.

In practice, arbitral awards may be treated as claims during liquidation. Claims are consolidated under Section 38 of the IBC, allowing the liquidator to admit or reject them per Section 40, with appeals under Section 422021 0 Supreme(Bom) 1006. This has been made ilea by Section 38 of the IBC which provides for consolidation of claims which Respondent No.4 is entitled to admit or reject in terms of Section 40 of the IBC. 2021 0 Supreme(Bom) 1006

Moreover, execution of an arbitral award may be restricted during liquidation. The provision against the Appellant to execute the Arbitral Award is covered by Section 14(1)(a). Present is the case where there is already an Arbitral Award in favour of the Appellant execution of which had already been initiated. 2024 Supreme(Online)(NCLAT) 886

Key Challenges in Settling an Arbitral Award

Settling an arbitral award isn't always straightforward. Several challenges can arise:

• Ongoing Challenges to the Award: If the award is under dispute, settlement may be delayed. If an arbitral award is challenged, the liquidator may face difficulties in settling the award... the challenge to the award indicates an ongoing dispute.

  Technimont Private Limited vs ONGC Petro Additions Limited - Delhi

• Violation of Other Laws: Awards breaching statutes like the Companies Act could be voided 2020 0 Supreme(Mad) 1286. For example, orders terminating arbitral proceedings under Section 32(2)(c) of the Arbitration Act aren't awards and can be challenged separately 2021 0 Supreme(Del) 9. An order terminating arbitral proceedings under Section 32(2)(c) of the A&C Act is not an award and can be challenged under Section 14(2) of the A&C Act. 2021 0 Supreme(Del) 9

• IBC Not for Premature Enforcement: The IBC isn't a tool for hasty debt recovery. The IBC is not intended to be a substitute for debt enforcement procedures. 2018 0 Supreme(SC) 1068

• Priority Conflicts with Other Laws: IBC often overrides conflicting statutes, like the Customs Act, limiting recovery actions during moratoriums 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 855. Similarly, motor vehicles tax claims must follow IBC claim processes 2021 0 Supreme(Bom) 1006.

• Arbitral Tribunal Extensions: In insolvency, courts may extend tribunal mandates without full consent if proceedings are advanced 2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 9295. The Court may extend the mandate of an arbitral tribunal even without consent from all parties if justified by sufficient cause. 2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 9295

These issues highlight why settlements require caution to avoid prejudicing creditors.

When Can a Liquidator Proceed with Settlement?

Typically, a liquidator may settle if:

1. The award is unchallenged and final.
2. Settlement respects Section 53 priorities.
3. No extraneous motives drive the decision.

Judicial precedents reinforce IBC's primacy. For example, schemes under Section 230 of the Companies Act can integrate into IBC liquidation as a revival tool, but must comply with IBC frameworks 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 144. The proposal of a compromise or arrangement under Section 230 in a situation where the company is in liquidation under the IBC is a facet of the liquidation process under the IBC. 2021 0 Supreme(SC) 144

Practical Recommendations for Liquidators

To navigate this terrain effectively:

• Consult Legal Experts: Always seek counsel to assess IBC compliance 2020 0 Supreme(Mad) 1286.

• Prioritize Creditors: Ensure settlements don't harm higher-priority claims.

• Obtain NCLT Approval: Approval may be necessary for complex settlements 2020 0 Supreme(Mad) 1286.

• Document Thoroughly: Maintain records of claim verifications and distributions.

• Monitor Arbitral Timelines: Be aware of extensions or terminations affecting awards 2024 Supreme(Online)(DEL) 9295 2021 0 Supreme(Del) 9.

These steps help mitigate risks and uphold the IBC's goal of maximizing asset value.

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

In summary, while the IBC does not outright prohibit a liquidator from settling an arbitral award, such actions must strictly adhere to Section 53(1) distribution priorities and avoid prejudicing other stakeholders 2022 0 Supreme(Mad) 921. Potential challenges like disputes, statutory violations, and overriding laws demand careful handling

Technimont Private Limited vs ONGC Petro Additions Limited - Delhi

Key Takeaways:- Liquidators focus on fair distribution under Section 53.- Settlements are possible but require legal scrutiny and possibly NCLT nod.- IBC prevails over many conflicting laws in liquidation.

This post provides general insights based on judicial precedents and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified professional for case-specific guidance.

Stay informed on evolving IBC jurisprudence to protect your interests in insolvency matters.