Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
In a significant ruling, the Madras High Court has addressed a common procedural hurdle faced by litigants invoking its supervisory powers under Article 227 of the Constitution. The question at the heart of this decision is: Registry Can’t Raise Objections On Maintainability Even If Alternative Remedy Available, High Court’s Discretion To Exercise Powers Under Article 227: Madras HC. This judgment reinforces the High Court's wide discretionary authority, distinguishing between maintainability and entertainability, and curbs the Registry's role in preliminary objections. While this offers relief to petitioners, it underscores that courts exercise such powers sparingly, guided by self-imposed restraints rather than absolute bars. This post breaks down the ruling, key principles, and practical implications, drawing from Supreme Court precedents and related cases. Note: This is general information and not specific legal advice; consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
The Madras High Court explicitly overruled objections raised by its Registry against numbering petitions under Article 227, where alternative statutory remedies—like appeals or revisions under the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC)—were available. The court held: Once it is held that it is for the Court to decide whether it will or will not exercise the constitutional power, it follows that the Registry does not have the right to question the maintainability of such petition, on the ground of availability of alternative remedy. Rt. Rev. Timothy Ravinder Dev Pradeep, The Bishop, CSI Coimbatore Diocese, CSI Diocese Office, 256, Race Course Road, Coimbatore VS Rev. Charles Samraj. N Presbyter - 2021 0 Supreme(Mad) 3442
Key directive to the Registry: In future, the Registry shall not raise objections on the ground of maintainability of any cases, where the litigant seek to invoke the supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. Rt. Rev. Timothy Ravinder Dev Pradeep, The Bishop, CSI Coimbatore Diocese, CSI Diocese Office, 256, Race Course Road, Coimbatore VS Rev. Charles Samraj. N Presbyter - 2021 0 Supreme(Mad) 3442 This stems from a crucial distinction: It is one thing to say that the Revision is not maintainable and it is another to say that the High Court will not exercise the power of superintendence in view of the availability of alternative remedy. Rt. Rev. Timothy Ravinder Dev Pradeep, The Bishop, CSI Coimbatore Diocese, CSI Diocese Office, 256, Race Course Road, Coimbatore VS Rev. Charles Samraj. N Presbyter - 2021 0 Supreme(Mad) 3442
Article 227 confers supervisory jurisdiction wider than writ powers under Article 226, and statutes cannot restrict it entirely. The availability of CPC remedies is not a jurisdictional bar but a self-imposed restraint or as a matter of prudence and discipline. Rt. Rev. Timothy Ravinder Dev Pradeep, The Bishop, CSI Coimbatore Diocese, CSI Diocese Office, 256, Race Course Road, Coimbatore VS Rev. Charles Samraj. N Presbyter - 2021 0 Supreme(Mad) 3442
The decision leans heavily on established Supreme Court jurisprudence:
These principles ensure High Courts examine each case for exceptional circumstances, such as jurisdictional errors or patent injustice, rather than mechanically dismissing petitions. Rt. Rev. Timothy Ravinder Dev Pradeep, The Bishop, CSI Coimbatore Diocese, CSI Diocese Office, 256, Race Course Road, Coimbatore VS Rev. Charles Samraj. N Presbyter - 2021 0 Supreme(Mad) 3442
While petitions are maintainable, entertainability remains discretionary. Courts typically refrain if:- An effective statutory remedy exists, promoting judicial discipline. Deep Industries Limited VS Oil And Natural Gas Corporation Limited - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 2277Balkrishna Ram VS Union Of India - 2020 1 Supreme 179- No jurisdictional error, natural justice violation, or gross injustice is evident. Godrej Sara Lee Ltd. VS Excise And Taxation Officer-Cum-Assessing Authority - 2023 1 Supreme 257
For instance, in cases involving service disputes against Central Government departments, courts have directed parties to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal first under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, Section 14, sustaining Registry objections at the SR stage. S. Willis Narayanan VS Director, Directorate of Field Publicity, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India, New Delhi - 2018 Supreme(Mad) 888 However, this aligns with self-restraint, not a maintainability bar, distinguishing it from the Madras HC's focus on Registry overreach.
Similarly, other rulings caution against invoking Article 227 when CPC-specific remedies like Order VII Rule 11 are available: High Courts should not exercise supervisory powers under Article 227 when specific remedies under the Civil Procedure Code are available. P. Suresh VS D. Kalaivani - 2026 Supreme(SC) 131 Yet, the Madras HC emphasizes the court's ultimate call post-admission. Rt. Rev. Timothy Ravinder Dev Pradeep, The Bishop, CSI Coimbatore Diocese, CSI Diocese Office, 256, Race Course Road, Coimbatore VS Rev. Charles Samraj. N Presbyter - 2021 0 Supreme(Mad) 3442
In contrast, where trial courts fail duties—like passing wholly illegal ex-parte decrees—the High Court intervened under Article 227, noting no total bar despite CPC remedies: Even the Hon’ble Supreme Court has only said that the availability of a remedy under the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure may have to be construed as a near total bar. Shanthimalai Trust, Represented by its Managing Trustee, Thiruvanamalai VS Arunachala Education & Environment Development Trust (AEED Trust), Rep by its Managing Trustee, Fr. Pancras - 2020 Supreme(Mad) 1308
Article 227 is supervisory, not for re-appreciating facts or correcting appealable errors:- Avoids displacing statutory procedures. Surya Dev Rai VS Ram Chander Rai - 2003 5 Supreme 390Rt. Rev. Timothy Ravinder Dev Pradeep, The Bishop, CSI Coimbatore Diocese, CSI Diocese Office, 256, Race Course Road, Coimbatore VS Rev. Charles Samraj. N Presbyter - 2021 0 Supreme(Mad) 3442- Exceptions for order or the proceedings are wholly without jurisdiction. Godrej Sara Lee Ltd. VS Excise And Taxation Officer-Cum-Assessing Authority - 2023 1 Supreme 257
Related contexts, like quashing FIRs under CrPC Section 482, echo this: If an effective alternative remedy is available, the High Court will not exercise its powers under this section. Jagdish Valecha VS State of MP - 2018 Supreme(MP) 445Dalveer Singh VS State of M. P. - 2018 Supreme(MP) 223Edara Sambasiva Prasad VS State Through SHO Mangalagiri Rural P. S. , Rep. by its Public Prosecutor - 2014 Supreme(AP) 899 These reinforce restraint but do not empower Registry pre-screening in constitutional matters.
In domestic violence proceedings, Article 227 may still apply for patent jurisdictional lacks, even alongside statutory appeals. Arul Daniel VS Suganya - 2022 Supreme(Mad) 2521
This ruling promotes access to constitutional remedies while upholding discipline, potentially influencing other High Courts.
Litigants benefit from clearer procedural paths, ensuring supervisory powers aren't stifled at the threshold. Stay informed on evolving jurisprudence to navigate these nuances effectively.
Word count approx. 1050. This analysis draws from cited judgments for educational purposes.
#Article227, #MadrasHighCourt, #LegalPrecedent
No such rule appears to have been framed for exercise of High Court's power under Article 227 possibly to keep such exercise entirely in the domain of the discretion of High Court. 23. ... Even if where a remedy by way of an appeal has not been provided for against the order and judgment of a District Judge, the remedy available to the aggrieved person is to file a revision befo....
It is made clear that in future, the Registry shall not raise objections on the ground of maintainability of any cases, where the litigant seek to invoke the supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. ... The Registry cannot raise objection as to the maintainability of the petition on the ground of availability of alternative remedy either under the Code of Civil Pro....
It is made clear that in future, the Registry shall not raise objections on the ground of maintainability of any cases, where the litigant seek to invoke the supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. ... Once it is held that it is for the Court to decide whether it will or will not exercise the constitutional power, it follows that the Registry does not have the right to question the maintai....
However, that is not to say that existence of an alternative remedy automatically renders a writ petition not maintainable. Even where an alternative remedy is available, the courts can still entertain a writ petition. ... One of the self-imposed restrictions on the exercise of power under article 226 that has evolved through judicial precedents is that the High Courts should normally not entertain a writ petition, where an effectiv....
Despite objections to the maintainability of such petition under Article 227, unavailability of appeal remedy under Civil Procedure Code, the High Court allowed the petition and set aside the injunction granted by the trial Court. ... Otherwise, there is a danger that someone may challenge in a revision under Article 227, even a decree passed in a suit, on the same grounds on which the respondents....
226/227 of the Constitution of India before the concerned jurisdictional High Court. ... with them under Article 226 of the Constitution of India cannot be taken away or ousted by the mere fact of availability of alternative remedy. ... The remedy available for the petitioner is to agitate the issue before the Central Administrative Tribunal, if he is advised to do so. ... 13. In view of the above, objections raised by the #HL_START....
Availability of an alternative civil remedy and/or under the CPC shall be treated as complete and near total bar on the High Court to venture to invoke and exercise its power available under Article 227 of the Constitution, except where exercise of supervisory jurisdiction becomes absolutely necessary ... This proposition, in its analogousness, would justify holding that powers under Article #HL_S....
It is no more res integra that High Court would normally not exercise its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, if an effective and efficacious alternative remedy is available. ... Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that High Court may entertain writ petition in its discretion even though alternative remedy was no....
It is no more res integra that High Court would normally not exercise its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, if an effective and efficacious alternative remedy is available. ... Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that High Court may entertain writ petition in its discretion even though alternative remedy was no....
But the High Court has imposed upon itself certain restrictions one of which is that if an effective and efficacious remedy is available, the High Court would not normally exercise its jurisdiction. ... what grounds and with what rationale the Registry raises objections regarding maintainability of writ petitions under Article 226 or Article 227 of the Constitut....
34. Further in para 22 of Kamatchi's case (cited supra), the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is not maintainable. If an effective alternative remedy is available, the High Court will not exercise its powers under this section, specially when the applicant may not have availed of that remedy.” Therefore, permitting a petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to challenge the proceedings under Section 12 of the D.V.Act without exhausting the remedies available under the Statute before the learned Magistrate and the Court of Sessions, ther....
34. Ms.S.Radha Gopalan, would also contend that the petitioner herein is guilty of latches. I am therefore of the considered opinion that this is a fit case where the powers of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, will have to be exercised to put the suit back on track, so that the rights of the contesting parties are determined at the earliest. No doubt the Hon’ble Supreme Court has pointed out that there is an alternative remedy available in a Civil Court under the Code of the Civil Procedure, the High Court shall not ordinarily exercise its powers under Art....
If an effective alternative remedy is available, the High Court will not exercise its powers under this section, specially when the applicant may not have availed of that remedy. It cannot be used if it is inconsistent with specific provisions provided under the Code (vide Kavita v. State 2000 Cri LJ 315 and B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana (2003) 4 SCC 675).
If an effective alternative remedy is available, the High Court will not exercise its powers under this section, specially when the applicant may not have availed of that remedy. It cannot be used if it is inconsistent with specific provisions provided under the Code (vide Kavita v. State 2000 Cri LJ 315 and B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana (2003) 4 SCC 675).
It cannot be used if it is inconsistent with specific provisions provided under the Code (vide Kavita v. State {2000 Cri LJ 315 (Del)} and B.S. Joshi v. State of Haryana {(2003) 4 SCC 675}. If an effective alternative remedy is available, the High Court will not exercise its powers under this section, specially when the applicant may not have availed of that remedy.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
