SupremeToday Landscape Ad
AI Thinking

AI Thinking...

Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!

Scanned Judgements…!


AI Overview

AI Overview...

Quantum for Fibula Bone Fracture

Single Fibula Fracture

  • RM30,000 awarded for closed fracture right midshaft fibula, deemed reasonable and affirmed; comparable to RM30K for left tibia and fibula in Mohamad Faiz ["2021"] and slightly above RM25K per fibula (half of RM50K for two fibulas) in Reminder Kaur. ["

    ISMAIL DAUD vs MUHAMMAD SYAFIQ ABD JALIL - High Court

    "] Quote: I therefore find that the SCJ's award of RM30K for the fracture of one fibula bone is reasonable... RM30K for one fractured fibula is merely RM5K more than half the RM50K awarded for the fracture of two fibulas ie RM25K each in Reminder Kaur (supra).

Tibia + Fibula Fractures

  • RM30,000 for right mid-shaft tibia and fibula closed fracture. ["

    TEH CHIN HENG vs TAN CHOON HOE - High Court

    "] Quote: Right mid-shaft tibia and fibula closed fracture RM30,000.00.
  • RM38,000 for distal 1/3 right tibia fibula and 3rd proximal fibula. ["

    SEKARAN MUNIANDY & ANOR vs RAMAN VARATHAN - High Court

    "] Quote: fracture distal 1/3 right tibia fibula and 3rd proximal fibula: RM 38,000.
  • Open fracture right tibia and fibula with residuals (1cm bone loss, 4cm shortening, etc.), quantum assessed but not specified standalone. [](https://supremetoday.ai/doc/judgement/MY_MLRH_2009_9_MLRH_727) ["

    MOHAMAD SHAHNNY RAHAMAN @ ZAINAL LWN. ORATHAI @ FATIMAN ABDULLAH - High Court

    "] Quote: Open fracture right tibia and fibula dimana plaintif mengalami residual dan hilangupaya berikut iaitu bone loss 1cm, bone grafting, 4cm shortening...

Disability Assessments (India)

  • Fibula fracture (with others) assessed at 28% disability; no standalone quantum. ["PHILIP C.GEORGE Vs SUBHADRA S.NAIR - Kerala"] Quote: Ext.A6 disability certificate shows that he had 28% disability.
  • Tibia + fibula fracture: 47% limb/15-16% whole body disability debated (not 100%); fibula as supporting bone. ["2023 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 32861"] ["2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 35602"] ["PHILIP C.GEORGE Vs SUBHADRA S.NAIR - Kerala"] Quote: fracture of tibia and fibula bone certainly not having percentage of permanent partial disability as 47%... fibula is a supporting bone to tibia.

Analysis and Conclusion

  • Awards for isolated fibula fracture cluster around RM30K (Malaysia), rising to RM30K-38K with tibia involvement or complications; Indian cases emphasize disability % (15-47%) over quantum, often for tibia-fibula combos without fixed sums. Quantum varies by jurisdiction, residuals (e.g., shortening, grafting), and comparables. ["

    ISMAIL DAUD vs MUHAMMAD SYAFIQ ABD JALIL - High Court

    "] ["

    TEH CHIN HENG vs TAN CHOON HOE - High Court

    "] ["

    SEKARAN MUNIANDY & ANOR vs RAMAN VARATHAN - High Court

    "] ["2023 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 32861"]
Determining Quantum Compensation Awards for Fibula Fracture Personal Injury Claims in Malaysia

Fibula Fracture Compensation in Malaysia: What’s the Typical Quantum?

Suffering a fibula bone fracture from an accident can be a painful and life-altering experience. If you're in Malaysia and pursuing a personal injury claim, one key question arises: Quantum for fracture fibula bone—what compensation can you expect? While every case is unique, Malaysian courts typically award general damages ranging from RM25,000 to RM40,000 for fibula fractures, depending on factors like fracture type and complications. This guide breaks down precedents, influencing factors, and practical insights to help you understand your potential claim.

Note: This is general information based on judicial precedents and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.

Understanding Quantum in Personal Injury Claims

In Malaysian law, quantum refers to the monetary value of damages awarded in personal injury cases, primarily under heads like general damages for pain, suffering, and loss of amenities. Fibula fractures—often occurring alongside tibia injuries due to their location in the lower leg—are assessed based on medical evidence and past awards.

Courts rely on compendiums such as the Bar Council's Revised Compendium of Personal Injury Awards 2018 to guide decisions, adjusting for case specifics. No fixed amount exists; instead, awards reflect the injury's severity and impact.

LIM SIL HAO vs SELVARAJAH PERUMAL - 2021 MarsdenLR 4

Typical Range of Awards for Fibula Fractures

From analyzed cases, quanta generally fall between RM25,000 and RM40,000:

  • RM25,000: For a closed fracture of the distal end of the left fibula. This serves as a baseline for simpler cases.

    NOR AZNI ARSHAD @ ROSLAN LWN. AZRUL ALI - 2019 MarsdenLR 1036

  • RM30,000: Suggested for a segmental malunited fibula with bone loss (e.g., 5-6 cm bone loss, 2.02 cm shortening, stiffness, and limp). The plaintiff argued: Menurut Plaintif beliau masih tidak dapat berjalan dengan sempurna dan terdapat kependekkan sebanyak 2.02 cm dan 5 cm hingga 6 cm bone loss. Keadaan kaki Plaintif 'stiff dan mengalami 'limb'.

    NOR AZNI ARSHAD @ ROSLAN LWN. AZRUL ALI - 2019 MarsdenLR 1036

  • RM38,000: For an open segmental fibula fracture (distal right tibia and segmental right fibula), part of broader general damages totaling RM166,400 after a 10% reduction.

    MOHD SHAHRIL ABDUL RAHMAN vs AHMAD ZULFENDI ANUAR - 2021 MarsdenLR 3512

  • RM40,000: For an open fracture distal third of right tibia and fibula with 1 cm shortening. The court noted: The type of fracture sustained here is unlike a simple fracture but refers to bone broken into several fragments. Treatment for the fracture was by way of interlocking nail insertion over the right tibia. The medical reports tendered in evidence suggests some limitation of movement presently. This aligned with compendium ranges of RM36,000 to RM63,000.

    LIM SIL HAO vs SELVARAJAH PERUMAL - 2021 MarsdenLR 4

These awards highlight how closed fractures attract lower sums, while open, comminuted, or malunited ones with disabilities push quanta higher.

Key Factors Influencing Quantum Assessment

Courts evaluate several elements to determine the appropriate award:

  • Fracture Type: Simple/closed vs. open, comminuted, segmental. Open fractures command higher awards due to infection risk and complex treatment.

    LIM SIL HAO vs SELVARAJAH PERUMAL - 2021 MarsdenLR 4

    MOHD SHAHRIL ABDUL RAHMAN vs AHMAD ZULFENDI ANUAR - 2021 MarsdenLR 3512

  • Complications: Shortening (e.g., 1 cm or 2.02 cm), bone loss, stiffness, limp, muscle wasting, or reduced power. Factors include: (a) whether there is union or malunion of the fractured bone; (b) whether there is any resultant permanent shortening and if so, the extent of the permanent shortening; and (c) whether it is simple fracture or complex / comminuted fracture.

    SURENDRAN JAYA SEELAN vs MUHAMMAD AIZAT MOHD SANI - 2023 MarsdenLR 484

  • Medical Evidence: Union quality, movement limitations, and permanent disability percentage.
  • Overall Impact: Precedents build on each other; a RM25,000 closed fracture baseline adjusts upward for severity.

    NOR AZNI ARSHAD @ ROSLAN LWN. AZRUL ALI - 2019 MarsdenLR 1036

Insights from Comparable Cases

While Malaysian precedents dominate, international cases (e.g., from India) provide context on fibula fracture claims in motor vehicle accidents:

  • In one appeal, compensation was enhanced by Rs.85,000 for injuries including fibula and tibia fractures, emphasizing loss of earning capacity and suffering.

    PHILIP C.GEORGE Vs SUBHADRA S.NAIR - 2008 Supreme(Online)(KER) 33670

  • A tailor with ulna and fibula fractures highlighted functional impacts, as proper movement of hands and legs is necessary to run a tailoring machine.

    THE BRANCH MANAGER vs VEERACHAMY,

  • For undisplaced fibula and patella fractures, 5% whole-body disability was assessed, noting fibula as a supporting bone to tibia. Tribunal awards were scrutinized for adequacy.

    LATHA Vs THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KSRTC

  • Severe cases like Type IIIC open tibia-fibula fractures with bone/soft tissue loss involved future medicals (Rs.25,000) and total awards up to Rs.8,32,106, reduced on appeal. 2017 0 Supreme(Kar) 1617 2021 0 Supreme(Mad) 45

These underscore global patterns: higher awards for open fractures with disability, often in accident claims under no-fault liability (e.g., Rs.25,000 baseline contested). 2011 0 Supreme(MP) 741

Exceptions and Potential Reductions

Awards aren't always straightforward:

  • Overlapping Injuries: 10% deductions for multiple leg injuries to avoid double-counting pain: All of the above complaints are derived from the injuries to the same leg... The pain cannot and should not be segregated and compartmentalised.

    ABDUL WAFFIY WAHUBBI & ANOR vs AK NAZARUDDIN AHMAD - 2017 MarsdenLR 1489

  • Full Recovery: If medicals show perfect union without residuals, quanta may dip below RM25,000—though rare in precedents.
  • Special Damages: Excluded here; focus is general damages. Courts stick to compendiums but adjust judiciously.

    LIM SIL HAO vs SELVARAJAH PERUMAL - 2021 MarsdenLR 4

Practical Recommendations for Claimants

To maximize your claim:1. Gather detailed medical reports on fracture type, treatment (e.g., nailing), and residuals.2. Reference compendiums and precedents like RM25,000 (closed) to RM40,000 (open comminuted).

NOR AZNI ARSHAD @ ROSLAN LWN. AZRUL ALI - 2019 MarsdenLR 1036

LIM SIL HAO vs SELVARAJAH PERUMAL - 2021 MarsdenLR 4

3. Argue against deductions for multi-injury cases by showing distinct impacts.4. Consider holistic effects like limp or earning loss, supported by evidence.

Legal professionals should cross-check against Bar Council guidelines and prepare for appeals on quantum adequacy.

Key Takeaways

  • Range: RM25,000–RM40,000 typically for fibula fractures in Malaysia.
  • Severity Matters: Open/segmental with complications = higher awards.
  • Evidence-Driven: Medical reports and precedents guide courts.
  • Seek Expertise: Engage a lawyer early for tailored advice.

Fibula fractures deserve fair compensation reflecting your suffering. Stay informed, document everything, and pursue justice effectively.

References

  1. LIM SIL HAO vs SELVARAJAH PERUMAL - 2021 MarsdenLR 4

    : RM40,000 for open comminuted fracture.
  2. MOHD SHAHRIL ABDUL RAHMAN vs AHMAD ZULFENDI ANUAR - 2021 MarsdenLR 3512

    : RM38,000 for open segmental fibula.
  3. NOR AZNI ARSHAD @ ROSLAN LWN. AZRUL ALI - 2019 MarsdenLR 1036

    : RM30,000 suggested for malunited with loss.
  4. SURENDRAN JAYA SEELAN vs MUHAMMAD AIZAT MOHD SANI - 2023 MarsdenLR 484

    : Factors like union/shortening.
  5. ABDUL WAFFIY WAHUBBI & ANOR vs AK NAZARUDDIN AHMAD - 2017 MarsdenLR 1489

    : Overlap deductions.

Word count: ~1050. Last updated based on available precedents.

#FibulaFracture #MalaysiaInjuryClaims #PersonalInjuryLaw
Chat Download
Chat Print
Chat R ALL
Landmark
Strategy
Argument
Risk
Chat Voice Bottom Icon
Chat Sent Bottom Icon
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top