Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Examples include non-disclosure of material facts, incorrect auction notices, or conduct not in accordance with rules, which can render the sale void or liable to be set aside ["Pramod alias Prashanth and Others v. Deputy Commissioner Dakshina KannadaMangalore and Others - Karnataka"], ["Tadisetty Murali Mohan VS Kasi Srinivas - National Company Law Tribunal"], ["C. Rajamallaiah VS State of Karnataka - Karnataka"].
Material Irregularity - Legal Principles and Court Viewpoints
The Supreme Court and High Courts have held that irregularities like inadequate publicity, irregular publication, or procedural lapses are not sufficient unless they result in prejudice or injury to the parties ["Himachal Pradesh Financial Corporation vs Sh Onkar Singh and Sh Narinder Singh Shah - Himachal Pradesh"], ["Pankaj Jain VS Bakshi Tejeswar Singh - Delhi"].
Factors Influencing Material Irregularity
The conduct of the auction, such as conducting at odd hours or without proper publicity, can be deemed material irregularity if it prejudices the fairness of the process ["Himachal Pradesh Financial Corporation vs Sh Onkar Singh and Sh Narinder Singh Shah - Himachal Pradesh"].
Court's Approach to Material Irregularity
Analysis and ConclusionMaterial irregularity in auction sales refers to procedural or substantive breaches that significantly prejudice the fairness of the auction process, such as improper publication, non-disclosure of material facts, or conduct at irregular hours, which causes injury or substantial prejudice to parties involved ["Himachal Pradesh Financial Corporation vs Sh Onkar Singh and Sh Narinder Singh Shah - Himachal Pradesh"]. Courts have consistently held that mere irregularities are insufficient; the irregularity must be material and result in injury for the sale to be challenged or set aside ["Divyam Agarwal vs Indian Bank - Orissa"]. Proper publicity, adherence to procedural rules, and transparency are critical, and irregularities affecting these aspects can be deemed material if they impact the integrity of the sale ["Rajesh Upadhyay, Son of late Bhukhal Upadhyay VS State Of Bihar - Patna"]. However, casual or technical irregularities without prejudice generally do not warrant setting aside an auction ["Pankaj Jain VS Bakshi Tejeswar Singh - Delhi"].
Auction sales, particularly those conducted in execution of court decrees, are critical processes in civil litigation. However, they can be fraught with challenges if procedural flaws occur. A common question arises: What is material irregularity in auction sale? This post delves into the concept under Order 21 Rule 90 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908, explaining its scope, examples, and requirements for setting aside a sale. While this provides general insights, consult a legal professional for advice tailored to your situation.
Material irregularity in an auction sale under Order 21 Rule 90 CPC refers to significant defects in the publishing (e.g., proclamation, notice, or publicity) or conducting (e.g., timing, manner, or fairness) of the sale that deviate from statutory requirements or procedural fairness. Importantly, it is distinguished from mere irregularities or illegalities that render the sale void ab initio. AL-CAN Export Pvt. Ltd. VS Prestige H. M. Polycontainers Ltd. - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 564Kadiyala Rama Rao VS Gutala Kahna Rao - 2000 2 Supreme 2Saheb Khan VS Mohd. Yusufuddin - 2006 3 Supreme 474
To succeed in an application to set aside the sale, the applicant must prove two essential elements:- Specific allegations of material irregularity or fraud.- Substantial injury resulting from it. AL-CAN Export Pvt. Ltd. VS Prestige H. M. Polycontainers Ltd. - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 564Chilamkurti Bala Subrahmanyam VS Samanthapudi Vijaya Lakshmi - 2017 4 Supreme 158
Order 21 Rule 90(2) explicitly states: no sale shall be set aside on the ground of irregularity or fraud unless upon the facts proved the Court is satisfied that the applicant has sustained substantial injury by reason of such irregularity or fraud. AL-CAN Export Pvt. Ltd. VS Prestige H. M. Polycontainers Ltd. - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 564Kadiyala Rama Rao VS Gutala Kahna Rao - 2000 2 Supreme 2 Sub-rule (3) applies constructive res judicata, barring grounds that were available before the proclamation of sale. Kadiyala Rama Rao VS Gutala Kahna Rao - 2000 2 Supreme 2
The Explanation excludes certain defects, such as the mere absence or irregularity in the attachment of the property sold, resolving prior judicial conflicts. AL-CAN Export Pvt. Ltd. VS Prestige H. M. Polycontainers Ltd. - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 564
Material irregularity is narrowly confined to flaws in publishing or conducting the auction of immovable property in execution proceedings. It does not cover issues like saleable interest or prior objections. Kadiyala Rama Rao VS Gutala Kahna Rao - 2000 2 Supreme 2Saheb Khan VS Mohd. Yusufuddin - 2006 3 Supreme 474
Publishing defects center on the adequacy of proclamation and notice under Rules 54, 66, and 67:- Insufficient publicity: Lack of drum beating, handbills, posters, or newspaper ads where required by Order 21 Rule 54(2)/67(1), or non-compliance with Rule 54(3). Saheb Khan VS Mohd. Yusufuddin - 2006 3 Supreme 474Chilamkurti Bala Subrahmanyam VS Samanthapudi Vijaya Lakshmi - 2017 4 Supreme 158RAM KRISHNA KAPOOR VS PURSHOTTAM DAS PODDAR - 1980 0 Supreme(All) 323SATYA DEVI VS UNITED COMMERCIAL BANK - 1990 0 Supreme(HP) 59- Improper proclamation: Verified only by process server report without counter-evidence. RAM KRISHNA KAPOOR VS PURSHOTTAM DAS PODDAR - 1980 0 Supreme(All) 323- Inadequate notice: Failure to provide clear 15 days' notice or proper valuation, though courts may uphold if records show compliance. Chilamkurti Bala Subrahmanyam VS Samanthapudi Vijaya Lakshmi - 2017 4 Supreme 158
However, newspaper publication isn't mandatory without court direction; customary modes like beat of drum suffice. Saheb Khan VS Mohd. Yusufuddin - 2006 3 Supreme 474Chilamkurti Bala Subrahmanyam VS Samanthapudi Vijaya Lakshmi - 2017 4 Supreme 158
Conducting defects relate to auction execution:- Hurried or unfair manner: Rushed sale with few bidders, leading to low price. RAM KRISHNA KAPOOR VS PURSHOTTAM DAS PODDAR - 1980 0 Supreme(All) 323SATYA DEVI VS UNITED COMMERCIAL BANK - 1990 0 Supreme(HP) 59- Wrong timing: Sale starting after notified time (e.g., 3:30 PM instead of 11 AM-3 PM) or outside permissible hours (not between 12 noon-4 PM). H. P. FINANCIAL CORPORATION VS HIMACHAL SHODDY MILLS LTD. - 1998 0 Supreme(HP) 172RAM KRISHNA KAPOOR VS PURSHOTTAM DAS PODDAR - 1980 0 Supreme(All) 323- Bidder interference: Dissuasion, e.g., agent proclaiming restrictions to deter bids. H. P. FINANCIAL CORPORATION VS HIMACHAL SHODDY MILLS LTD. - 1998 0 Supreme(HP) 172- Inspection issues: Inability to inspect due to late arrival. H. P. FINANCIAL CORPORATION VS HIMACHAL SHODDY MILLS LTD. - 1998 0 Supreme(HP) 172
Mere typographical errors (e.g., auction date mistake) don't qualify if multiple bidders participated publicly. Pothuraju Hymavathi VS Raghu Babu Bandi - 2024 0 Supreme(AP) 1286 No irregularity exists if rules are followed, even if market value claims are higher, absent linked injury. Saheb Khan VS Mohd. Yusufuddin - 2006 3 Supreme 474Chilamkurti Bala Subrahmanyam VS Samanthapudi Vijaya Lakshmi - 2017 4 Supreme 158
Charges must include specific particulars; bald allegations fail. Saheb Khan VS Mohd. Yusufuddin - 2006 3 Supreme 474Kusum Kumria VS Pharma Venture (India) Pvt Ltd. - 2013 0 Supreme(Del) 1291 Proof of injury requires direct or circumstantial evidence. Saheb Khan VS Mohd. Yusufuddin - 2006 3 Supreme 474Chilamkurti Bala Subrahmanyam VS Samanthapudi Vijaya Lakshmi - 2017 4 Supreme 158
Even proven irregularity won't set aside a sale without substantial injury. Inadequacy of price alone isn't enough; it must link to the irregularity. Saheb Khan VS Mohd. Yusufuddin - 2006 3 Supreme 474Chilamkurti Bala Subrahmanyam VS Samanthapudi Vijaya Lakshmi - 2017 4 Supreme 158RAM KRISHNA KAPOOR VS PURSHOTTAM DAS PODDAR - 1980 0 Supreme(All) 323
For instance, in cases where spot sales and court auctions fetched similar high bids (e.g., Rs.61 lakhs and Rs.63.25 lakhs), claims of irregularity were rejected, as it is not the material irregularity that alone is sufficient for setting aside of the sale. P. Prathiba, Since Dead By Her Lrs. - Swetha C. VS Avenue Super Chits (P) Ltd. , By Its Manager, K. Veerabhadrappa - 2023 Supreme(Kar) 294
Courts emphasize: Unless there is material irregularity, which has resulted in causing substantial injury to judgment-debtor in conducting sale, question of interference by setting aside sale... P. Prathiba, Since Dead By Her Lrs. - Swetha C. VS Avenue Super Chits (P) Ltd. , By Its Manager, K. Veerabhadrappa - 2023 Supreme(Kar) 294
Insights from analogous laws reinforce this. Under Rule 61 of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Act, 1961, material irregularity allows setting aside sales, but objections must be substantial. In one case, the court dismissed insubstantial claims of undervalue and incorrect description, upholding auction purchaser relief. P. Kanagasabhavathy VS Indian Renewable Energy Development - 2023 Supreme(Del) 3398
In SARFAESI auctions, banks must disclose material facts; failure leads to irregularity findings, as a bank conducting a public auction must disclose all material facts and respond to inquiries from bidders. Santhosh Kumar B. S. VS Uco Bank - 2024 Supreme(Kar) 253
Executing courts must adjudicate pre-sale objections under Section 47 CPC; proceeding without is a material irregularity which vitiates the sale. K. Subashini VS Margadarsi Chit Fund Limited - 2021 Supreme(AP) 483
Non-deposit of balance sale price within time can render sales void, distinct from irregularity. Ramakanthinani VS Madhukar R. Bhangay
In recovery proceedings, irregular auctions at low prices with poor notice cause prejudice, warranting set-aside. Mohd. Zaki Ghouri VS Board of Revenue,Lucknow Thru Member - 2014 Supreme(All) 2904
Post-auction, decree holders, purchasers, or affected persons may apply. Raghavan (Died) VS Sivakumar - 2023 Supreme(Mad) 3225 File promptly with affidavits detailing irregularities (e.g., failed publicity) and injury evidence (e.g., comparable sales). Avoid barred grounds like attachment defects. AL-CAN Export Pvt. Ltd. VS Prestige H. M. Polycontainers Ltd. - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 564
Decree-holders should ensure wide customary publicity per Rules 54/66/67 to preempt claims.
In summary, while Order 21 Rule 90 protects against flawed processes, it balances this with execution efficiency. For challenges, gather specifics early. This is general information; outcomes vary by facts and jurisdiction—seek expert counsel.
References (select citations):1. AL-CAN Export Pvt. Ltd. VS Prestige H. M. Polycontainers Ltd. - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 564 - Core definition and Rule text.2. Kadiyala Rama Rao VS Gutala Kahna Rao - 2000 2 Supreme 2 - Prerequisites and bars.3. Saheb Khan VS Mohd. Yusufuddin - 2006 3 Supreme 474 - Specifics and injury burden. (Full list in source materials)
#MaterialIrregularity, #AuctionSaleCPC, #LegalAuctionGuide
Shyam Behari Singh, AIR 1971 SC 2337, the Apex Court observed that in order to set aside the auction sale mere proof of a material irregularity and inadequacy of price realised in such a sale, is not sufficient. ... Shah, Advocate was present at the auction sale may be for helping his brother - auction - purchaser. ... Whether the sale by public auction held on 26-12-1990 is liable to be set aside on the grounds of materia....
The learned DRAT had remanded the matter to the learned DRT solely to consider the petitioner's contention that there was a material irregularity in the auction sale in terms of Rule 61 of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Act, 1961. ... sale, apply to the Tax Recovery Officer to set aside the sale of the immovable property on the ground that notice was not served on the defaulter to pay the arrears as required by this Schedule or on the ground of a material irregularity in publish....
In Chilamkurti Bala Subrahmanyam’s case supra it was found that the proper publicity was given for auction-sale in papers pursuant to which as many as seven bidders had participated in the auction sale. ... In the case before us, no such particulars have been given by the respondent of the alleged collusion between the other respondents and the auction-purchaser. There is also no material irregularity in publishing or conducting the sale. ... Under Order 21 Rule 90 CP....
The sale of immoveable property i.e. sold in execution of a decree can be set aside on the ground of `material irregularity or fraud in publishing or conducting the sale. Relevant rule in this regard i.e. ... In the considered opinion of this Court, the appellant has failed to point out any material irregularity or fraud to justify setting aside the sale. It will be improper to set aside auction on the basis of a very casual allegations of irregularity. ... , reported as (2006) 4 SCC 4....
Now, this Court has to examine whether there is material irregularity or fraud in conducting the auction sale, due to which petitioner suffered substantial injury. ... From the material available on the record it transpires that the mandatory requirement of rule 64 has not been complied as it wan not estimated that what was the value of the property at the time of auction sale and auction sale of how much part will satisfy the decree. ... The price o....
After auction sale, the decree holder, the purchaser or any other persons whose interest are affected by sale can apply to the Court to set aside the sale on the ground of material irregularity or fraud in publishing or conducting the sale. ... (iii)The auction purchaser was not impleaded as one of the parties to the petition under Order 21 Rule 90 of C.P.C. (iv) There is no evidence to show that there is fraud or material#HL_END....
When the spot sale and Court auction was conducted and also in the spot sale, highest bid was Rs.61,00,000/-and in the Court sale, it was Rs.63,25,000/-and accordingly, the amount was deposited, the very contention that there is material irregularity, cannot be accepted. ... It is not the material irregularity that alone is sufficient for setting aside of the sale. ... land value as on the sale was Rs.16,00,000/-per acre and auction....
It is further settled that sale pursuant to a public auction can only be set aside where the material on record clearly reveals that the property was frittered away on a wholly inadequate/unrealistic consideration or by reason of fraud/collusion or on any material irregularity/illegality in conducting ... Senior Counsel submits that the auction cannot be set aside since no material irregularities and/or illegality, collusion or fraud were found in the present case. ... Schedule-I to th....
The petitioner participated in the public auction sale conducted by the respondent on 08.09.2020 and the petitioner was declared as highest bidder for sale price of Rs.55,75,000/-. ... Further, on 09.02.2021, the property has been notified for re-auction and concluded on 24.02.2021 with a sale price of Rs.51,52,000/- thereby reducing the earlier sale price by Rs.4,23,000/-. This reduction in sale price can be for the reasons/defects pointed out by the petitioner. ... ....
The distinction between a stranger who purchases at an auction sale and an assignee from a decree - holder purchaser at an auction sale is quite clear. ... Nextly, it was submitted that the paper publication for conducting the auction sale was made on 21.10.2017 and the auction sale was conducted on 25.10.2017 which is not in conformity with O.21, R.68 of CPC. Minimum 15 days time was necessary for conducting the auction s....
In our view the High Court was not right in observing that the objections could be decided at a later date even after the sale of the shares to which the objections pertained. The appellant has thereby lost his valuable right to have his objections adjudicated upon in accordance with law. The objections were raised much prior to the auction sale and they ought to have been decided before the auction sale took place. Proceeding with the auction sale without adjudicating upon the objections is a material irregularity which vitiates the sale.
The Apex Court quashed auction sale and all the consequential proceedings on the ground of commission of material irregularity in conducting auction sale. The Apex Court while referring to its earlier judgments in the case of (i) Divya Manufacturing Co. (P) Ltd. & Anr. v. Union Bank of India & Ors., AIR 2000 SC 2346; and (ii) FCS Software Solutions Ltd. v. La Medical Devices Ltd. & Ors., (2008) 10 SCC 440 observed that the law as can be summarized, is to the effect that recovery of the public dues must be made strictly in accordance with the procedure prescribed by law. Exp....
Hence, the auction sale is liable to be set aside on the ground of material irregularity. For the foregoing reasons, the impugned order passed by the Court below is set aside and the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is allowed as prayed for. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. In the instant case, auction sale was conducted not in accordance with Order 21 Rule 64 of C.P.C.
The concurrent findings of fact recorded in respect of irregularity as well as material prejudice being caused to the defaulters cannot be re-assessed and re-examine by this Court. 9. Additional Commissioner further found that the auction was held for very low amount than the actual value of the property. Thus, there is finding that the material prejudice has been caused to the defaulters in auction sale.
The learned P.O. has held that respondent No. 1 was not seeking cancellation of the auction sale under Rule 61 of the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Act, 1961, on the ground of material irregularity, wherein it is provided that the defaulter or any person affected by the sale, may move an application for setting aside the impugned sale before the Recovery Officer, on the ground of material irregularity within 30 days from the date of the auction sale. The limitation as provided under Rule 61 of the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Act, 1961 will not apply to the application moved by resp....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
