Supreme Today AI
SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Comparison of No-Fault Liability and Fault-Based Claims under Motor Vehicles Act

Section 164 vs. Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act: Essential Differences for Accident Victims

Motor vehicle accidents can leave victims and their families grappling with medical bills, lost income, and emotional trauma. In India, the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (MV Act) provides crucial mechanisms for compensation through claims tribunals. A common question arises: What is the difference between Section 164 and Section 166 of the MV Act? This blog post breaks it down, highlighting no-fault versus fault-based liability, compensation structures, and procedural nuances to help you navigate your options.

Note: This is general information based on legal provisions and case references. It is not a substitute for professional legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your specific situation.

Overview of Compensation Under the MV Act

The MV Act establishes Motor Accident Claims Tribunals (MACTs) to handle compensation claims efficiently. Sections 164 and 166 offer distinct pathways:- Section 164 focuses on no-fault liability, providing quick relief without proving negligence.- Section 166 is fault-based, requiring evidence of wrongdoing for potentially higher payouts.

These provisions were significantly updated by the Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 2019, which streamlined no-fault claims under Section 164 and clarified options for claimants. 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 108 2023 0 Supreme(Cal) 191

Section 164: No-Fault Liability Explained

Section 164 embodies a beneficial, victim-centric approach. It mandates compensation for death (Rs. 5 lakhs) or grievous hurt (Rs. 2.5 lakhs) without proving negligence by the driver or owner. Key features include:

The 2019 amendments replaced the old Sections 140-144 with a structured formula under Section 164, making it applicable to hit-and-run cases and general accidents without fault proof. Courts view it as a social security measure. 2022 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 1623 2023 0 Supreme(All) 2741

For example, legal heirs or injured parties can claim fixed amounts promptly, ideal when evidence is scarce.

Section 166: Fault-Based Claims in Detail

In contrast, Section 166 requires proving negligence or wrongful act. This section allows broader claims, including for property damage, and is filed by:- Injured persons- Property owners- Legal representatives of deceased victims 2007 4 Supreme 260

Key Procedural Aspects:

  • Filing timeline: Generally within six months, though post-1994 omission of subsection (3), courts emphasize timely action. 2007 4 Supreme 260 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 108
  • Compensation assessment: Tribunals determine just compensation based on evidence like income loss, medical costs, and negligence degree. Amounts can exceed Section 164 caps significantly. 1988 0 Supreme(SC) 50 2013 1 Supreme 686
  • Jurisdiction flexibility: File where the accident occurred, claimant resides, or other specified locations. 2017 0 Supreme(Cal) 13

Application for compensation– (1) An application for compensation arising out of an accident of the nature specified in sub-section (1) of section 165 may be made – (a) by the person who has sustained the injury.... 2014 0 Supreme(Bom) 96

Key Differences: A Side-by-Side Comparison

Here's a clear breakdown:

| Aspect | Section 164 (No-Fault) | Section 166 (Fault-Based) ||-------------------------|------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|| Proof of Negligence | Not required 2023 2 Supreme 470 | Essential 1988 0 Supreme(SC) 50 || Compensation | Fixed: Rs. 5L (death), Rs. 2.5L (grievous hurt)| Variable, case-specific (often higher) || Claimants | Legal heirs/victims | Injured, property owners, heirs 2007 4 Supreme 260| Process | Simpler, faster | Evidence-heavy, hearings required || Limitation | No specific period; beneficial provision | Within 6 months ideally 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 108 || Post-2019 Role | Structured formula for no-fault 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 108| Proving fault for enhanced claims |

  1. Fault vs. No-Fault: Section 164 skips proof, while 166 demands it. The principal distinction lies in fault-based vs. no-fault claims. 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 108
  2. Payout Potential: Fixed under 164; unlimited under 166 based on damages.
  3. Interplay: Claimants may choose or pursue both, but tribunals adjust for overlaps. Note references to Section 163A (third-party no-fault), but 164 now dominates post-amendments. 2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 15233

The legal position with respect to the remedies available under Sections 164 and 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, has been clarified by the Hon’ble Apex Court... 2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 13629

Impact of 2019 Amendments and Judicial Insights

The 2019 changes, via provisions relating to old Sections 145-164 and 166, enhanced accessibility. The aforesaid provisions of S.50 to 57 of the Amendment Act relate to S.140 to 144, S.145 to 164, S.165, S.166... 2022 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 1623

Courts advise:- Use 164 for quick, guaranteed relief.- Opt for 166 with strong negligence evidence (e.g., rash driving). 2025 0 Supreme(P&H) 188 2024 0 Supreme(AP) 359

Section 164 ... is considered a beneficial provision and is often invoked in no-fault liability cases. 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 108 While Section 166 requires the claimant to prove fault of the driver or vehicle. 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 108

Police reports under related sections aid filings by forwarding details to tribunals. 2012 0 Supreme(Gau) 1214

Practical Recommendations for Claimants

  • Gather evidence early: FIR, medical records, witness statements.
  • Choose wisely: No negligence proof? Go 164. Clear fault? Pursue 166 for more.
  • Seek legal help: Tribunals are quasi-judicial; representation boosts success.
  • File promptly: Even without strict limits, delays hurt.

Conclusion and Key Takeaways

Sections 164 and 166 complement each other under the MV Act, balancing speed (no-fault) with justice (fault-based). Post-2019, Section 164's structured approach empowers victims, while 166 ensures accountability. Ultimately, your choice depends on evidence and needs.

Key Takeaways:- 164: Fast, fixed, no-fault. 2023 2 Supreme 470- 166: Flexible, higher potential, proof-required. 2007 4 Supreme 260- Amendments favor victims; consult experts.

For personalized guidance, contact a motor accident specialist. Stay safe on the roads!

References:2023 2 Supreme 470 2007 4 Supreme 260 1988 0 Supreme(SC) 50 2013 1 Supreme 686 2017 0 Supreme(Cal) 13 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 108 2023 0 Supreme(Cal) 191 2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 1198 2022 0 Supreme(SC) 1868 2023 0 Supreme(All) 2741 2022 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 1623 2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 15233 2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 13629

#MVA ctIndia, #MotorAccidentClaims, #NoFaultLiability
Chat Download
Chat Print
Chat R ALL
Landmark
Strategy
Argument
Risk
Chat Voice Bottom Icon
Chat Sent Bottom Icon

Related Judgments

Vijayan, S/o Sivaraman VS Manoj. K. , S/o Anandan B. K. - 2023 Supreme(Ker) 108

2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 108

Petitions were filed under Section 164 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and not under Section 166. ... It would be appropriate to reproduce Section 164 and sub section 3 of Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. 164. Payment of compensation in case of death or grievous hurt, etc. ... Provisions of Section 166(3) Act for determini....

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Rajinder Kaur - 2025 Supreme(P&H) 188

2025 0 Supreme(P&H) 188

On the contrary, the award itself records that the claimants had prayed that their claim petition be considered either under Section 164 or, in the alternative, under Section 166 of the Act. ... Therefore, the claim petition originally filed under Section 164 of the MOTOR VEHICLES ACT , 1988 postmendment i.e. 2019 amendment w.e.f. 01.04 2022), can also be converted to Section 166 of ....

Senjuti Roy (Nee Sengupta) VS New India Assurance Co. Ltd. - 2023 Supreme(Cal) 191

2023 0 Supreme(Cal) 191

If we read Section 149, 164 & Second Proviso of Sub Section 1 of Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 after the Amendment Act, 2019, it comes to view that a claimant who filed a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 can claim compensation under Section 164 i.e. no fault liability ... The High Court has affirmed the judgment of the Tribunal in re....

Sushma Devi VS Tarlochan Singh - 2024 Supreme(P&H) 1198

2024 0 Supreme(P&H) 1198

The said Section 164 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is reproduced herein below: - “164. ... 4 The High Court has affirmed the judgment of the Tribunal in regard to the dismissal of the claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988. ... In the said case also, the accident as well as the award were much prior to the coming in force of Section 164 of the Motor Vehicles #HL_START....

Ram Murti VS Punjab State Electricity Board - 2022 Supreme(SC) 1868

2022 0 Supreme(SC) 1868

There is no cogent basis for this Court to entertain the challenge against the findings of fact which have been recorded concurrently by the Tribunal and by the High Court while dismissing the claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988. ... The provisions of Section 140 which formed a part of Chapter 10 of the Motor Vehicles Act 1988 were omitted by Act 32 of 2019. ... The Tribunal dismissed the application fil....

Mukesh Patle v. Shailendra Verma and Others - 2022 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 1623

2022 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 1623

The aforesaid provisions of S.50 to 57 of the Amendment Act relate to S.140 to 144, S.145 to 164, S.165, S.166, S.168, S.169, S.170 and S.173 of the Principal Act respectively. ... the Principal Act, which contained the provisions prescribed under S.145 to 164. ... The aforesaid Act was, however, repealed subsequently by virtue of the enforcement of the Principal #HL_ST....

Narsingh VS State of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(All) 2741

2023 0 Supreme(All) 2741

It is no doubt, clear from the provisions of Section 168A read with the provisions of Section 166 and 167 of the 1950 Act that if such a transaction resulting in a fragmentation is arrived at, then the subject matter of transfer shall be with effect from the date of transfer be deemed to have vested ... He next added that the Revisional Court without considering the thin difference that the transfer of a share is distinguishable from transf....

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Telukutla Lakshmi Narayana Reddy - 2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 15233

2025 Supreme(Online)(AP) 15233

Therefore, the victim of an accident or his dependants have an option either to proceed under S.166 of the Act or under S.163A of the Act. ... Learned counsel for the appellant raised the only submission that the claim petition was filed under S.163A of the MV Act. It was not under S.166 of the MV Act. ... Consequently, we are of the view that though the title of the claim petition was '....

IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Vs. SMT. NIRMALA BAI - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 13629

2025 Supreme(Online)(Raj) 13629

164 of the Act. ... claim application Under Section 166(4) and would not debar the claimant(s) to seek compensation if he/they could not file the application Under Section 166(1) of the Act. ... The legal position with respect to the remedies available under Sections 164 and 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, has been clarified by the Hon’ble Apex Court i....

New India Assurance Company Limited VS Telukutla Lakshmi Narayana Reddy S/o. Narasa Reddy - 2024 Supreme(AP) 359

2024 0 Supreme(AP) 359

We have already held that the claim is under Section 166 of the M.V.Act. 36. ... Therefore, the victim of an accident or his dependants have an option either to proceed under Section 166 of the Act or under Section 163A of the Act. ... Learned counsel for the appellant raised the only submission, that the claim petition was filed under Section 163-A of the M.V Act. It was not under Secti....

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. VS Shalumol - 2021 Supreme(Ker) 625

2021 0 Supreme(Ker) 625

On a comparison of Section 166 and Section 163 A of the Act, 1988, a subtle difference can be noticed.

Yashodhara Shroff VS Union of India - 2019 Supreme(Kar) 1258

2019 0 Supreme(Kar) 1258

Act applied only to public companies, Section 164 of the Act applies to both public as well as private companies. There is a slight difference between Section 274(1)(g) of 1956 of the Act and Section 164(2) of the Act. Vacating of office of a director on account of the disqualification due to a default under Section 274(1)(g) of the 1956 Act was not contemplated under the 1956 Act. That, Section 283(1) of 1956 Act was enforced from 28.12.1960, but was not amended after the in....

Bhukant Prabhu VS Ajay Guno Kerkar - 2014 Supreme(Bom) 96

2014 0 Supreme(Bom) 96

The learned Counsel for respondent/insurance company submitted that the evidence given by the employee of petroleum company and the record show that petroleum company was the owner of the diesel and so the claimant cannot claim compensation under Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act, for short). Application for compensation– (1) An application for compensation arising out of an accident of the nature specified in sub-section (1) of section 165 may be made – (a) by the person who has sustained the injury....

Bhagwanjibhai Rudabhai Kanjia VS Bhikhu Bhoja Odedara - 2013 Supreme(Guj) 567

2013 0 Supreme(Guj) 567

Provided that where all the legal representatives of the deceased have not joined in any such application for compensation, the application shall be made on behalf of or for the benefit of all the legal representatives of the deceased and the legal representatives who have not so joined, shall be impleaded as respondents to the application. Application for compensation.- (1) An application for compensation arising out of an accident of the nature specified in sub-section (1) of section 165 may....

Sujata Deb (Gupta) VS State of Tripura - 2012 Supreme(Gau) 1214

2012 0 Supreme(Gau) 1214

As soon as any information regarding any accident involving death or bodily injury to any person is recorded or report under this section is completed by a police officer, the officer-in-charge of the police station shall forward a copy of the same within thirty days from the date of recording of information or as the case may be, on completion of such report to the Claims Tribunal having jurisdiction and a copy thereof to the concerned insurer, and where a copy is made available to the owner,....

SupremeToday Portrait Ad

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

App_Store_Badge Google_Play_Store

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

WhatsApp Telegram Instagram Icon X YouTube Facebook LinkedIn

Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

whatsapp-icon