Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query!
Scanned Judgements…!
Reference for Larger Bench: Multiple judgments indicate that the correctness of the decision in Nabam Rebia (supra) has been referred to a larger Bench of seven Judges for consideration. For instance, arguments have been concluded on whether to refer the Nabam Rebia judgment for a review by a larger Bench, emphasizing its significance as a binding precedent ["Subhash Desai VS Principal Secretary, Governor of Maharashtra - 2023 0 Supreme(SC) 885"] ["Dr. Dasoju Sravan Kumar vs The Secretary to Her Excellency - Telangana"] ["Dr. Dasoju Sravan Kumar vs The Secretary to Her Excellency - Telangana"].
Impact of Referred Judgment: The judgment in Nabam Rebia has been acknowledged for its constitutional importance, particularly regarding the discretionary powers of the Governor and the constitutional limits on executive actions. Its principles have been considered in subsequent cases, with some judgments explicitly noting that if the decision is referred to a larger Bench, it retains its binding character ["Dr. Dasoju Sravan Kumar vs The Secretary to Her Excellency - Telangana"] ["Dr. Dasoju Sravan Kumar vs The Secretary to Her Excellency - Telangana"].
Reasons for Referral: The reasons for referring the Nabam Rebia decision for a larger Bench have no direct bearing on the facts of subsequent cases, but the Court has highlighted the importance of clarifying constitutional principles laid down in Nabam Rebia ["Dr. Dasoju Sravan Kumar vs The Secretary to Her Excellency - Telangana"] ["Dr. Dasoju Sravan Kumar vs The Secretary to Her Excellency - Telangana"].
Judicial Review and Constitutional Interpretation: The judgment in Nabam Rebia has been cited for its stance on judicial review limits, the role of the Governor, and the interpretation of constitutional provisions, which are deemed significant enough to warrant further examination by a larger Bench ["Subhash Desai VS Principal Secretary, Governor of Maharashtra - 2023 0 Supreme(SC) 885"] ["Dasoju Sravan Kumar VS Secretary to Her Excellency, Hon’ble Governor, State of Telangana - Telangana"].
The judgment in Nabam Rebia (supra) is frequently referred for its constitutional principles, especially concerning the discretionary powers of the Governor and the limits of executive actions. Several cases have indicated that the correctness of Nabam Rebia has been or is being considered by larger Benches of the Supreme Court, reflecting its importance as a constitutional precedent. The references to Nabam Rebia for a larger Bench underscore its significance in constitutional law, particularly in matters of legislative and executive interactions, and the Court's cautious approach to its interpretation. Despite these references, the judgment continues to serve as a binding precedent unless explicitly overruled or modified by a larger Bench ["Subhash Desai VS Principal Secretary, Governor of Maharashtra - 2023 0 Supreme(SC) 885"] ["Dr. Dasoju Sravan Kumar vs The Secretary to Her Excellency - Telangana"] ["Dr. Dasoju Sravan Kumar vs The Secretary to Her Excellency - Telangana"].
The Nabam Rebia v. Union of India judgment stands as a cornerstone in Indian constitutional law, particularly regarding the Speaker's role in disqualification proceedings under the Tenth Schedule and the discretionary powers of the Governor. Delivered by a Constitution Bench, it clarified critical boundaries on gubernatorial interventions in state legislative affairs. But what happens when later courts grapple with its principles? If you're searching for a note on cases where the judgment on Nabam Rebia is referred, this post dives deep into key references, judicial debates, and evolving interpretations.
This analysis draws from Supreme Court orders and related judgments, highlighting how Nabam Rebia continues to shape discourse on legislative disqualifications, floor tests, and executive-legislative balances. Note: This is general information for educational purposes and not specific legal advice.
In Nabam Rebia v. Union of India (2016), the Supreme Court addressed the Arunachal Pradesh political crisis, ruling on the Governor's powers under Articles 163, 174, and 175. Key holdings included:- Governors must act on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers for summoning, proroguing, or dissolving the Assembly, except in limited discretionary situations. NABAM REBIA vs DEPUTY SPEAKER- The Speaker's role as a Tribunal under the Tenth Schedule requires impartiality; proceedings against the Speaker (e.g., removal notice under Article 179(c)) halt disqualification decisions. - No gubernatorial interference in Speaker removal or disqualification matters. NABAM REBIA, AND BAMANG FELIX VS DEPUTY SPEAKER - 2016 5 Supreme 227
The judgment emphasized democratic principles, ministerial responsibility, and judicial review limits. Per J.S. Khehar, J.: Governor is only a formal or constitutional head. NABAM REBIA, AND BAMANG FELIX VS DEPUTY SPEAKER - 2016 5 Supreme 227
Courts have frequently invoked Nabam Rebia in disqualification and Speaker bias contexts, often debating its referral to a larger Bench.
In a February 17, 2023, order, the Supreme Court linked Nabam Rebia's applicability to case merits: whether its principles impact the factual position of the present case must be deliberated together with the case's merits. The Court emphasized that the issue of referring the Nabam Rebia decision to a larger Bench (seven Judges) cannot be considered in isolation. Subhash Desai VS Principal Secretary, Governor of Maharashtra - 2023 0 Supreme(SC) 885
This reflects cautious judicial engagement, tying overruling questions to facts.
Petitioners argued Nabam Rebia bars Speakers from deciding disqualifications post-removal notice: Nabam Rebia prohibits a Speaker from adjudicating disqualification petitions when a notice for removal from the Speaker's office is issued. Subhash Desai VS Principal Secretary, Governor of Maharashtra - 2023 0 Supreme(SC) 500
Respondents countered it doesn't overrule Kihoto Hollohan or Yeddyurappa: Nabam Rebia addresses the role of the Speaker during proceedings initiated against MLAs and does not overrule or conflict with earlier judgments. Subhash Desai VS Principal Secretary, Governor of Maharashtra - 2023 0 Supreme(SC) 500
Nabam Rebia is routinely cited on Governor's discretion, especially under Articles 171 and 200.
In cases involving Telangana and Maharashtra Legislative Councils:- Another Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Nabam Rebia (supra) referred to discretionary powers of the Governor... (i) to give assent or withhold or refer a Bill for Presidential assent under Article 200. Sri. Kurra Satyanarayana vs The Secretary to Her Excellency - 2024 Supreme(Online)(Telangana) 45771- Courts quashed Governor rejections, holding: The Governor must act on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers... judicial review is permissible for actions exceeding constitutional authority. Sri. Kurra Satyanarayana vs The Secretary to Her Excellency - 2024 Supreme(Online)(Telangana) 45771- Similarly: The Governor must act on the advice of the Council of Ministers under Article 171(5), with judicial review permitted in cases of ultra vires actions or mala fides. Dasoju Sravan Kumar VS Secretary to Her Excellency - 2024 Supreme(Telangana) 75
In a Maharashtra PIL: Nabam Rebia (supra) was also referred to... Governor is not answerable to the Court in view of Article 361. Ratan Soli Luth VS State of Maharashtra - 2021 Supreme(Bom) 307
A Nagaland case clarified: Reading the paragraphs 166 and 210 of the Nabam Rebia (Supra) judgment... The Governor requiring the writ petitioner to prove his majority in the floor of the Nagaland Legislative Assembly, cannot be said to be inconsistent with the ratio laid down in Nabam Rebia (Supra). Shurhozelie Liezietsu, S/o Late Khrusietsu Liexietsu VS Nagaland Legislative Assembly - 2017 Supreme(Gau) 635
This upholds Governors' role in ensuring majority support without ministerial advice in crises.
Petitioners seek larger Bench referral citing clashes with Kihoto Hollohan: Petitioners sought a reference, citing conflicts with Kihoto Hollohan and concerns about misuse of disqualification proceedings. Subhash Desai VS Principal Secretary, Governor of Maharashtra - 2023 0 Supreme(SC) 885
Solicitor General opposes: Nabam Rebia is based on constitutional and ethical considerations and does not conflict with prior rulings. Subhash Desai VS Principal Secretary, Governor of Maharashtra - 2023 0 Supreme(SC) 500Subhash Desai VS Principal Secretary, Governor of Maharashtra - 2023 0 Supreme(SC) 885
The cautious application of the doctrine of implied overruling, noting that Nabam Rebia has not explicitly overruled earlier decisions. P. Vetrivel VS P. Dhanabal, Speaker Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly - 2018 0 Supreme(Mad) 1608
It is pointed out that even if a judgment is referred for consideration to a Larger Bench, the same retains its character as a binding precedent. Sri. Kurra Satyanarayana vs The Secretary to Her Excellency - 2024 Supreme(Online)(Telangana) 45771
The correctness of the view expressed in Nabam Rebia (supra) has been referred for consideration to a Larger Bench in Subhash Desai vs... Dasoju Sravan Kumar VS Secretary to Her Excellency - 2024 Supreme(Telangana) 75Dr. Dasoju Sravan Kumar vs Governor of Telangana - 2024 Supreme(Online)(Telangana) 49537
The Nabam Rebia judgment remains pivotal, referenced in over a dozen cases on gubernatorial limits and legislative autonomy. Its principles guide floor tests, nominations, and disqualifications, though larger Bench prospects loom. Key takeaways:- Speakers must recuse post-removal notice in disqualification matters.- Governors act on ministerial advice, subject to review for illegality.- Democratic majorities via floor tests are paramount.
For tailored advice, consult a constitutional law expert. Stay updated as Supreme Court deliberations continue.
References synthesized from court orders and judgments; case-specific application varies.
#NabamRebia #TenthSchedule #ConstitutionalLaw
Consequently, the batch of cases is set down for hearing on merits on Tuesday, 21 February 2023 at 10.30 am. ... Whether, the above principle which has been formulated in Nabam Rebia (supra) has an impact upon the factual position in the present case, needs deliberation. 9. ... Arguments have been concluded on the issue as to whether a reference should be made on the correctness of the decision in Nabam Rebia (supra) to a Bench of seven Judges. 4. ... In the above backdrop, the issue whether a referenc....
Union of India22 and Nabam Rebia (supra) have taken note of position of the Governor under the Constitution of India. ... Another Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Nabam Rebia (supra) referred to discretionary powers of the Governor and it was held that the Governor has following discretionary powers, namely : (i) to give assent or withhold or refer a Bill for Presidential assent under Article 200 of the ... It is pointed out that even if a judgmen....
Union of India22 and Nabam Rebia (supra) have taken note of position of the Governor under the Constitution of India. ... Another Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Nabam Rebia (supra) referred to discretionary powers of the Governor and it was held that the Governor has following discretionary powers, namely : (i) to give assent or withhold or refer a Bill for Presidential assent under Article 200 of the ... It is pointed out that even if a judgmen....
, (2010) 6 SCC 331 and Nabam Rebia (supra) have taken note of position of the Governor under the Constitution of India. In B.P. ... It is pointed out that concession with regard to power of the judicial review was given in Nabam Rebia (supra). It is further pointed out that the correctness of the view expressed in Nabam Rebia (supra) has been referred for consideration to a Larger Bench in Subhash Desai vs. ... Another Constitution Bench of the Supre....
Another Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Nabam Rebia (supra) referred to discretionary powers of the Governor and it was held that the Governor has following discretionary powers, namely : (i) to give assent or withhold or refer a Bill for Presidential assent under Article 200 of the ... It is pointed out that even if a judgment is referred for consideration to a Larger Bench, the same retains its character as a binding precedent. ... It is further pointed out that the correc....
, (2010) 6 SCC 331 and Nabam Rebia (supra) have taken note of position of the Governor under the Constitution of India. ... It is pointed out that concession with regard to power of the judicial review was given in Nabam Rebia (supra). It is further pointed out that the correctness of the view expressed in Nabam Rebia (supra) has been referred for consideration to a Larger Bench in Subhash Desai vs. ... Another Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court....
Another Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Nabam Rebia (supra) referred to discretionary powers of the Governor and it was held that the Governor has following discretionary powers, namely : (i) to give assent or withhold or refer a Bill for Presidential assent under Article 200 of the ... It is further pointed out that the correctness of the view expressed in Nabam Rebia (supra) has been referred for consideration to a Larger Bench in Subhash Desai vs. ... It....
Nos. 6203-6204 of 2016) Nabam Rebia … Petitioner versus Deputy Speaker and others … Respondents O R D E R Prayer for hearing in open Court is rejected ... No. 6203-6204/2016 NABAM REBIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS DEPUTY SPEAKER AND ORS Respondent(s) (With ... Having carefully perused the petition for review, the judgment impugned and the papers annexed in support thereof, we do not find any err....
Although the decision in Nabam Rebia (supra) is not applicable to the factual scenario before us, we are alive to the competing considerations which animated this Court in its order dated 23 August 2022 by which the decision in Nabam Rebia (supra) was referred to a Constitution Bench. ... As noticed in the previous segment of this judgment, this Court deferred taking a view on the question of whether the decision in Nabam Rebia (supra) ought to be #H....
... 14.3 Reading the paragraphs 166 and 210 of the Nabam Rebia (Supra) judgment, Mr. ... ... 13.3 The learned senior counsel cites Nabam Rebia and Bamang Felix vs. ... In those circumstances, the Governor requiring the writ petitioner to prove his majority in the floor of the Nagaland Legislative Assembly, cannot be said to be inconsistent with the ratio laid down in Nabam Rebia (Supra). ... The direction of the Governor of Arunachal Pradesh which led to the #HL_STAR....
Since Mr. Chinoy had extensively referred to the leading judgment authored by Hon’ble J.S. Khehar, J. (as the former Chief Justice of India then was), Mr. Dada refrained from referring to the same. However, pointed attention of this Court was drawn by Mr. Dada to the concurring opinion of Hon’ble Madan B. Lokur, J. (as His Lordship then was) in paragraphs 257 and 258 thereof. The decision in Nabam Rebia (supra) was also referred to by Mr. Dada.
It is true as argued by the writ petitioners that Nabam Rebia, supra, has not overruled Yeddyurappa, supra. As observed above, Nabam Rebia, supra, neither discussed nor overruled Yeddyurappa, supra. (d) Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, learned Senior counsel appearing for third respondent EPS made submissions, which can broadly be summarised as follows: (ii) Yeddyurappa judgment has clearly been overruled by Nabam Rebia by implied overruling principle was his assertion. To be noted, the other writ petitions are W.P. Nos. 26017, 27853 to 27856 of 2017, wherein inter-alia a direction t....
Accordingly, it was pointed out on behalf of the respondents, that there was no reason/occasion for the above file to be at the official residence or custody of the Speaker. They made complaints against the Chief Minister – Nabam Tuki and the Speaker – Nabam Rebia, to the Governor. Shortly thereafter on 19.11.2015, 13 MLAs (-11 from the BJP and 2 Independent MLAs) sought the removal of the Speaker – Nabam Rebia under Article 179(c). The Chief Minister and the Speaker being cousins, were adopting all sorts of means, in support of one another. A notice of resolution....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
