IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
INDIRA BANERJEE, M. SUNDAR, JJ.
P. Vetrivel – Petitioner
Versus
Mr. P. Dhanabal, Speaker Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly – Respondent
W.P. Nos. 25260 to 25267, 25393 to 25402 of 2017 and W.M.P. Nos. 26704, 26706, 26708, 26710, 26712, 26714, 26716, 26718, 26830 to 26832, 26834, 26836, 26838, 26840, 26842, 26844, 26846, 26848, 27514 to 27531 of 2017
Decided On : 14-06-2018
INDIRA BANERJEE, J.
1. All these writ petitions, are directed against an order dated 18.9.2017 of the Speaker of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly declaring the writ petitioners, eighteen in number, as disqualified from the membership of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly on the ground that they had voluntarily given up the membership of the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) party.
2. The issues involved in all these writ petitions being identical, the writ petitions were heard together and are now being disposed of by this common judgment and order. The facts giving rise to the impugned order of the Speaker are set out briefly hereinafter.
3. After the death of Selvi J. Jayalalithaa, Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu and leader of the AIADMK on 5.12.2016, Mr. O. Panneerselvam was elected as the leader of AIADMK in the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly. Mr. O. Panneerselvam was sworn in as the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu on 6.12.2016.
4. Mr. O. Panneerselvam resigned from the office of the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu on 6.2.2017, after which Mr. E. Palaniswami was elected as the leader of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly on 14.2.2017. Mr. E. Palaniswami was sworn in as Chief Minister on 16.2.2017.
5. In the writ petitions, it is stated that on 18.2.2017, the Chief Minister faced a floor test, wherein 122 MLAs of the AIADMK Party, including the 18 writ petitioners, voted in favour of Mr. E. Palaniswami in line with the direction issued by the Chief Government Whip. However, Mr. O. Panneerselvam and 10 other MLAs voted against Mr. E. Palaniswami, while one MLA supporting Mr. O. Panneerselvam abstained. However, the majority votes went in favour of Mr. E. Palaniswami. According to the writ petitioners, the party, that is, AIADMK, did not condone the action of Mr. O. Panneerselvam and 11 other MLAs of voting against the direction of the Chief Government Whip, within 15 days or at all.
6. On 16.3.2017, the O. Panneerselvam faction raised a dispute before the Election Commission of India under Paragraph 15 of the Symbols Order claiming themselves to be the true AIADMK Party against the majority group headed by Mr. T.T.V. Dhinakaran with Mr. E. Palaniswami as the Chief Minister.
7. On 22.3.2017, the Chief Election Commission passed an order freezing the Two Leaves Symbol and directing that neither the AIADMK (Purachi Thalaivi) nor the T.T.V. Dhinakaran E. Palaniswami AIADMK (Amma) could use the party symbol.
8. In the meanwhile, on 20.3.2017, some of the writ petitioners filed petitions before the Speaker of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly for disqualification of Mr. O. Panneerselvam and ten others from the membership of the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly, under Paragraph 2(1)(b) of the Tenth Schedule for having voted against the party directive to support its Chief Minister. No notice has yet been issued on the said petition. According to the writ petitioners, they moved the application after waiting for thirty days, which was beyond the period of fifteen days, within which voting against whip and/or directive of the party could be condoned.
9. Later in August, 2017, Mr. O. Panneerselvam and Mr. E. Palaniswami buried their differences and the two factions re-united. Mr. O. Panneerselvam and one Mr. K. Pandiarajan, one of the 12 MLAs who had voted against Mr. E. Palaniswami on 18.2.2017, were sworn in as Deputy Chief Minister and Minister respectively on 21.8.2017. Of course, under the Constitution there is no post of Deputy Chief Minister and the Deputy Chief Minister is actually a Minister, as has been held by this Court by its order dated 8.9.2017 in W.P. No. 23540 of 2017, V. Elangovan vs. Chief Secretary and Others.
10. Thereafter, Mr. T.T.V. Dhinakaran requested all MLAs of AIADMK (Amma) to protest to the Governor against the Chief Minister and his governance. On 22.8.2017, the writ petitioners along wi
Amarjit Singh vs. Khatoon Quamarain
AIADMK vs. State Election Commission
A.K. Kraipak vs. Union of India
Ayaaubkhan Noorkhan Pathan vs. State of Maharashtra
Alagaapuram R. Mohanraj vs. Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly
Board of Mining Examination and Chief Inspector of Mines and Another vs. Ramjee
Balachandra L. Jarikholi and Others vs. B.S. Yeddyurappa and Others
Barium Chemicals Ltd. vs. Company Law Board
Badrinath vs. Government of Tamil Nadu
B.R. Kapur vs. State of Tamil Nadu
C.B. Gautam vs. Union of India
Chandigarh Administration vs. Jagjit Singh
Doiwala Sehkari Shram Samvida Samiti Ltd. vs. State of Uttaranchal
Dharampal Satyapal Ltd. vs. Deputy Commissioner of C.E. Gauhati
Dr. Akshaibar Lal vs. Vice-Chancellor
Escorts Farms Ltd. vs. Commissioner
Express Newspapers Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India
Election Commission of India vs. Dr. Subramaniam Swami
Estate and Trust Agencies Ltd. vs. Singapore Improvement Trust
Goodyear India Limited vs. State of Haryana and Others
G. Narayanaswami Naidu vs. Inspector of Police, Mayavaram
G. Viswanathan vs. Speaker, Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly
Haryana Financial Corporation and Others vs. Kailash Chandra Ahuja
In Re: Powers, Privileges and Immunities of State Legislatures
J. Mohapatra and Company vs. State of Orissa
Jai Mangal Oraon vs. Mira Nayak
Jagjit Singh vs. State of Haryana
Kuldeep Singh vs. Commr. of Police (1999) 2 SCC 10 : 1999 SCC (L&S) 429 : AIR 1999 SC 677
K. Prabhakaran vs. P. Jayarajan
Krishena Kumar vs. Union of India
K.L. Tripathi vs. State Bank of India and Others
Kalinga Mining Corporation vs. Union of India
Kanungo and Company vs. Collector of Customs and Others
Manoj Narula vs. Union of India
Mohinder Singh Gill vs. Chief Election Commissioner
Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India
Managing Director, ECIL, Hyderabad vs. B. Karunakar and Others
Mahachandra Prasad Singh vs. Chairman, Bihar Legislative Council
Nabam Rebia and Bamang Felix vs. Deputy Speaker, Arunachal Pradesh
Orissa Legislative Assembly vs. Utkal Keshari Parida
Philip Jeyasingh vs. Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies
Prakash Amichand Shah vs. State of Gujarat and Others
Prakash Singh Badal vs. Union of India and Others
Prabodh Sagar vs. Punjab State Electricity Board
Puranlal Lakhanpal vs. Union of India
PRP Exports vs. State of Tamil Nadu (2014) 13 SCC 692
Rajinder Kumar Kindra vs. Delhi Administration
Ram Krishna Verma vs. State of U.P. (1992) 2 SCC 620
Raja Ram Pal vs. Hon`ble Speaker, Lok Sabha
Rajendra Singh Rana vs. Swami Prasad Maurya
Ravi Yashwant Bhoir vs. District Collector
Ram Manohar Lohia vs. State of Bihar and Another
Rajendra Singh Rana and Others vs. Swami Prasad Maurya and Others
State of Kerala vs. G.M. Francis and Co. (1961) 3 SCR 181 : AIR 1961 SC 617
State of Bombay vs. K.P. Krishnan
State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Sheo Shanker Lal Srivastava
Speaker, Haryana Vidhan Sabha vs. Kuldeep Bishnoi
State of Andhra Pradesh vs. Goverdhanlal Pitti
S.R. Venkataraman vs. Union of India
S. Pratap Singh vs. State of Punjab
S.R. Tewari vs. Union of India
Tata Cellular vs. Union of India
Telstar Travels (P) Ltd. vs. Enforcement Directorate
Union of India vs. Tulsiram Patel
Union of India vs. Tulsiram Patel
Union of India vs. G. Ganayutham
gpt-4
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.