Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
It indicates that such decisions are not binding and can be disregarded in subsequent cases.
Legal Precedents and Court Opinions:
For example, a Full Bench of the Allahabad High Court observed that per incurium judgments suffer from ignorance or forgetfulness of some statutory provisions or where the Court omits to consider a binding precedent ["IND02500053356"].
No Need to Follow Per Incurium Decisions:
Additionally, a decision cannot be referred to a larger Bench solely on the asking of a party; if the earlier decision is per incurium, it loses binding authority ["Govt. of A. P. VS B. Satyanarayana Rao - Supreme Court"].
Implication in Case Law:
There are multiple judicial pronouncements affirming that decisions rendered per incurium are not binding and should not be followed, especially when they overlook statutory provisions or binding precedents. This principle ensures that courts do not adhere to flawed judgments based on oversight, maintaining the integrity of the judicial process.
References:- ["IND02500053356"]- ["Govt. of A. P. VS B. Satyanarayana Rao - Supreme Court"]- ["DEEPTHI.V.R vs CO-OPERATIVE ARBITRATION COURT(SOUTHERN) - Kerala"]
In the intricate world of legal precedents, not every judicial decision carries the weight of authority. Imagine a scenario where a court overlooks a key statute or binding authority, rendering its ruling flawed from the outset. A frequent question from lawyers and law students alike is: pls give me any case which says that since the given case is per incuriam of the other case, there is no need in following the same. This query strikes at the heart of the per incuriam doctrine, an essential exception to the rigid rule of stare decisis.
This blog post delves into the per incuriam principle, drawing from landmark Supreme Court judgments and related cases. We'll explore why such decisions lack precedential value, key examples, and practical implications for legal practice. Note: This is general information and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
The term per incuriam, Latin for through lack of care, refers to a decision given in ignorance of a relevant statute, binding precedent, or authority. It serves as a safety valve against perpetuating judicial errors. As explained in Halsbury’s Laws of England, a decision is per incuriam when the court acts in ignorance of a previous decision of its own or of a court of coordinate jurisdiction, or in ignorance of a relevant statute SHAH FAESAL VS UNION OF INDIA - 2020 3 Supreme 48.
Courts have repeatedly affirmed that such rulings are not binding. In Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Gurnam Kaur, (1989) 1 SCC 101, the Supreme Court held: A judgment which was delivered without arguments and consideration of provisions of the Act was passed sub silentio and did not constitute a binding precedent... Chandrapal Singh VS State of U. P. - 2023 0 Supreme(All) 1341. Similarly, State of U.P. and Another v. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd., (1991) 4 SCC 139, clarified: A decision given per incuriam is not binding as a judicial precedent. Such a decision would not be binding as a judicial precedent. Bilkis Yakub Rasool VS Union Of India - 2024 1 Supreme 449
Key principles include:- Decisions in ignorance of statutes or binding authorities lack authority and should be ignored SHAH FAESAL VS UNION OF INDIA - 2020 3 Supreme 48Bilkis Yakub Rasool VS Union Of India - 2024 1 Supreme 449.- The doctrine applies strictly to prevent oversight, not mere disagreement with prior rulings State Of Bihar VS Kalika Kuer @ Kalika Singh - 2003 3 Supreme 505.- Subsequent courts of equal or higher jurisdiction may disregard them without hesitation.
The Supreme Court has consistently applied this doctrine. In Ramkrit Singh v. State of U.P., an earlier Full Bench decision was deemed per incuriam for failing to consider if consolidation authorities were courts of limited jurisdiction. The Court noted: An earlier decision may seem incorrect to a Bench of coordinate jurisdiction considering the question later, but it would not be a reason to say that the decision was rendered per incuriam and liable to be ignored. State Of Bihar VS Kalika Kuer @ Kalika Singh - 2003 3 Supreme 505. This underscores that mere perceived error isn't enough—actual ignorance is required.
In B.S. Yadav and allied matters, the Court reaffirmed: decisions ignoring statutes or precedents are per incuriam and non-binding M. S. Sandhu VS State of Punjab - 2014 4 Supreme 567. Likewise, Damodar Prasad held that rulings without considering statutory provisions or proper arguments are to be ignored FAUJDAR VS DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION - 2006 0 Supreme(All) 1.
A recent Full Bench elucidation in Farhat Hussain Azad v.... explains: What constitute 'per incuriam' need not detain our attention since time and again it has been explained by the Apex Court. PUBLIC WELFARE HOSPITAL, VARANASI VS STATE OF U. P. - 2011 Supreme(All) 1476. This reinforces the doctrine's well-settled status.
The doctrine is particularly vital for coordinate benches. In a West Bengal Land Reforms case, the tribunal held: It is also settled law that the judgment of a Co-ordinate Bench, if fails to take into consideration the amendments and/or provision of the statute such judgment suffers from doctrine of per incurium and the later Co-ordinate Bench may not be bound by such judgment. Seema Begum VS Marium Bibi - 2011 Supreme(Cal) 198. Quoting Halsbury’s: A decision is given per incuriam when the court has acted in ignorance of a previous decision of its own or of a court of coordinate jurisdiction... Seema Begum VS Marium Bibi - 2011 Supreme(Cal) 198.
In Employees State Insurance Corporation matters, the Andhra Pradesh High Court distinguished an Apex Court ruling, stating: Therefore there is no need to consider whether the ratio therein is per incurium the ratio in M/s. Rajkamal Transport case. Regional Director, E. S. I. Corporation VS Farmacia Ananta - 2013 Supreme(Bom) 907. This shows how courts navigate potential per incuriam without labeling unless ignorance is clear.
Another instance from Tamil Nadu land encroachment litigation clarified: Further, it is submitted that it is not a case of per incuriam since the order passed by the Division Bench... is not a case of an order passed ignorance of an earlier order. A. Muniappan VS Tahsildar, Tambaram Taluk, Tambaram - 2014 Supreme(Mad) 2586. Here, res judicata prevailed over per incuriam claims, highlighting contextual limits.
Consider these scenarios:- Ignorance of Statute: A court overlooks a key provision, as in Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd.—subsequent benches ignore it Bilkis Yakub Rasool VS Union Of India - 2024 1 Supreme 449.- Sub Silentio Rulings: Decisions without argument, like Gurnam Kaur, hold no sway Chandrapal Singh VS State of U. P. - 2023 0 Supreme(All) 1341.- Coordinate Oversight: A later bench spots failure to note amendments, freeing it from binding effect Seema Begum VS Marium Bibi - 2011 Supreme(Cal) 198.
In labor and tenancy disputes, courts have invoked per incuriam to correct oversights, ensuring justice aligns with law Regional Director, E. S. I. Corporation VS Farmacia Ananta - 2013 Supreme(Bom) 907PUBLIC WELFARE HOSPITAL, VARANASI VS STATE OF U. P. - 2011 Supreme(All) 1476. However, it's not a tool for disagreement; as Ramkrit Singh warns, perceived incorrectness alone doesn't suffice State Of Bihar VS Kalika Kuer @ Kalika Singh - 2003 3 Supreme 505.
While not always central, per incuriam appears in diverse fields. In ESI Act cases, demands for contributions were scrutinized against precedents, avoiding per incuriam pitfalls by detailed analysis Regional Director, E. S. I. Corporation VS Farmacia Ananta - 2013 Supreme(Bom) 907. Tenancy tribunals rejected jurisdiction claims rooted in overlooked amendments Seema Begum VS Marium Bibi - 2011 Supreme(Cal) 198. These illustrate the doctrine's versatility in upholding legal integrity.
Unrelated areas like family law or RTI (e.g., pension details exemptions Santosh Bagali vs State Bank of India, Vijayapur, Karnataka - 2025 Supreme(Online)(CIC) 4200) remind us precedents must be contextually sound, but per incuriam applies universally where ignorance taints.
The judiciary's stance is clear: per incuriam decisions—born of ignorance—are voids in precedent law, needing no adherence. From Gurnam Kaur to modern bench rulings, courts empower themselves to sidestep flawed authority, safeguarding justice SHAH FAESAL VS UNION OF INDIA - 2020 3 Supreme 48Bilkis Yakub Rasool VS Union Of India - 2024 1 Supreme 449.
Key Takeaways:- Per incuriam voids binding force if statute or precedent ignored.- Coordinate benches may disregard earlier oversights Seema Begum VS Marium Bibi - 2011 Supreme(Cal) 198.- Use sparingly; not for mere dissent State Of Bihar VS Kalika Kuer @ Kalika Singh - 2003 3 Supreme 505.- Always verify full context in arguments.
This principle maintains precedent's sanctity while allowing correction. For tailored advice, engage legal experts. Stay informed on evolving jurisprudence!
References:- SHAH FAESAL VS UNION OF INDIA - 2020 3 Supreme 48, Bilkis Yakub Rasool VS Union Of India - 2024 1 Supreme 449, Chandrapal Singh VS State of U. P. - 2023 0 Supreme(All) 1341, State Of Bihar VS Kalika Kuer @ Kalika Singh - 2003 3 Supreme 505, M. S. Sandhu VS State of Punjab - 2014 4 Supreme 567, FAUJDAR VS DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION - 2006 0 Supreme(All) 1, PUBLIC WELFARE HOSPITAL, VARANASI VS STATE OF U. P. - 2011 Supreme(All) 1476, Seema Begum VS Marium Bibi - 2011 Supreme(Cal) 198, Regional Director, E. S. I. Corporation VS Farmacia Ananta - 2013 Supreme(Bom) 907, A. Muniappan VS Tahsildar, Tambaram Taluk, Tambaram - 2014 Supreme(Mad) 2586
#PerIncuriam, #LegalPrecedent, #IndianLaw
Of course, the AO need to give sufficient and reasonable opportunity to the assessee. 8. In the result, the appeal of assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes. ... No finding was given in the assessment order with regard to actual receipts as per the Books of account and the Bank account. ... For the AY.2011-12, assessee had the licensed capacity of 62,20,800 PLs which is equivalent to 6.48 per case as per IMFL, it works out to 9,60,0....
If as per your info, if you say that pension amount are reflecting in this bank statement, then pls provide all pension details from this given detail. ... As per your information it seems you had joined this office recently and you need time to study the case. For that after we gave more than week time and even sent letter, for which we had still not received reply back from office and not even updating us how much time you need to reply back. ... For 6th and 7th pa....
The SMS dated 12.01.2008 sent at 3:23 pm would read as under: Pls arrange 45000 im very much need of it pls try 2 understd vr not made 4 each other once im settld ill cum and give u divorce once u have given d money ill never even sms pls i have mental ... (iii) The permanent alimony of Rs.45 lakhs shall carry interest at the rate of 6% per annum in case the said amount is not paid within three months from this date. ... It is also the c....
The Industrial Court failed to take into account the following relevant factors: (a) COW3 and COW4 had given the respondent directions as early as August 2017 immediately following his transfer; (b) The respondent was given ... [59] During the domestic inquiry proceedings, the respondent had in fact said: "If let's say the Human Resources give me a warning letter, the case will be closed, then I don't need to go through training already". ... (b) COW3's email d....
At the same time, “a concerted refusal to deal need not necessarily possess all of these traits to merit per se treatment.” Id. at 295. The Court has provided little guidance since then. ... In that case, the Court held that a group boycott “generally” falls into the per se category if “the boycotting firms possess[] a dominant position in the relevant market,” 18 PLS.COM V. ... Ct. at 2284. 16 PLS.COM V. NAT’L ASS’N OF REALTORS PLS#HL....
On 18/06/2022 clinical psychologist report of the child was submitted before the committee by District Child Protection Officer, Thrissur and child says that "pls help me mom I want to stay with my father ... We direct the clinical psychologist to give counselling sessions to the child in the presence of the mother in accordance with their convenience. We make it clear that the counselling session need not be conducted during the scheduled period of examination of the child...”. ... However, the mother was not #HL_START....
Then comes the doctrine of per incurium. What constitute “per incurium” need not detain our attention since time and again it has been explained by the Apex Court. Recently a Full Bench of this Court in Farhat Hussain Azad v. ... Per incurium are decisions given in ignorance or forgetfulness of some statutory provisions or where the Court omits to consider a binding precedent of the same Court or the superior Court rendered on the s....
[59] During the domestic inquiry proceedings, the respondent had in fact said: "If let's say the Human Resources give me a warning letter, the case will be closed, then I don't need to go through training already". ... The Industrial Court failed to take into account the following relevant factors: (a) COW3 and COW4 had given the respondent directions as early as August 2017 immediately following his transfer; (b) The respondent was given sufficient time to comply (b....
We, therefore, find that rule of per incurium cannot be invoked in the present case. Moreover, a case cannot be referred to a larger Bench on mere asking of a party. ... Sadanandam (supra) has to be ignored on the principle of per incurium as certain relevant provisions of the Rules were not considered in the said case, and in any case this case requires to be referred to a larger bench of three Judges. ... Rule of per#HL_....
GUPTA PERFORMANCE BOND OF USD 68000/-IS GIVEN FAVOURING THE BUYER OF JEDDAH EXTENSION IN L/C NOT RECD STILL NOW PLS EXPEDITE THE MATTER AND ARRANGE TO GET AT THE EARLIEST THE EXTENSION IN LETTER OF CREDIT. MATERIAL ARRIVING+AWAITING SHIPMENT AT PORT. ... WE ARE READY TO DISCUSS ALL OR ANY TRADE DISPUTE WITH THE ABOVE PARTIES AS PER INTERNATIONAL TRADE PRICE+ PRACTICES(.) ... DHAR GENERAL OVERSEAS PRIVATE LIMITED MSG OVER PLS ACK HOW RECD+? ... Following the dictum laid down by the Supreme Court I have ....
Further, it is submitted that it is not a case of per incuriam since the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the earlier round is not a case of an order passed ignorance of an earlier order. It is further submitted that the petitioners in the writ petitions/appeals, who are all members of the Association/Federation in the earlier round of litigation. It is further submitted that if a finding has been rendered in a given case, which shall be binding and there can be no per incurium in a case of res judicata and the finding rendered inter parties is biding. In....
Even if the wife was compelled to leave the matrimonial home due to the conduct of her husband and family, it would amount to desertion by the husband. It was sufficient that the appellant had stated that she had been living separately from the respondent for more than two years before presenting the petition because she had been treated with cruelty. Regarding desertion, the trial Court erred in holding that the appellant was not deserted by the respondent. There is no need to give any particular date of desertion in each case.
Regarding desertion, the trial Court erred in holding that the appellant was not deserted by the respondent. There is no need to give any particular date of desertion in each case. Even if the wife was compelled to leave the matrimonial home due to the conduct of her husband and family, it would amount to desertion by the husband. It was sufficient that the appellant had stated that she had been living separately from the respondent for more than two years before presenting the petition because she had been treated with cruelty.
Therefore there is no need to consider whether the ratio therein is per incurium the ratio in M/s. Rajkamal Transport case. Thus, the Andhra Pradesh High Court distinguished the decision of the Apex Court in M/s. Rajkamal Transport (supra) on the fact situation of the case before it.
It is also settled law that the judgment of a Co-ordinate Bench, if fails to take into consideration the amendments and/or provision of the statute such judgment suffers from doctrine of per incurium and the later Co-ordinate Bench may not be bound by such judgment. The doctrine of per incurium is defined in Halsbury’s Laws of England 4th Edition Vol. 26 in following terms: “A decision is given per incurium when the court has acted in ignorance of a previous decision of its own or of a court of coordinate jurisdiction which covered the case before it, in which case it must decide w....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
