Property Conveyance Without Title: Null & Void?

He accordingly asked (a) for a declaration that the purported conveyance under Dl was null and void; (b) for damages, and (c) to be restored to possession of the property. ... ) were wrongfully setting up an independent title under the void deed Dl. ... Held, (i) that, under section 6 of the Jaffna Matrimonial Rights and Inheritance Ordinance, the conveyance execu....

Defendant, in answer, objected to the sufficiency of the declara­tion, in that the sale of the trees to plaintiff "is null and void, " plaintiff's vendor not having any title in them to convey, he not " having taken out Fiscal's transfers for the same." ...     Action for declaration of title by purchaser at a sale in execution, without conveyance, from Fiscal-Validity of such a....

2022 0 Supreme(Del) 1734

dated 24th February, 1986 in favour of the defendant no.5 in respect of the suit property as null and void and hence, the present suit is barred by limitation. ... Deed dated 12.08.2013 executed by DDA in favour of Defendant No.5 with respect to the property bearing house bearing No.S-94, Panchsheel Park, New Delhi as null, void and not binding on the Plaintiff. ... performance of a cont....

2022 0 Supreme(P&H) 2007

A perusal of the judgments of the Courts below shows the plaintiffs could not establish that conveyance deed, dated 04.03.1968 (Exh.D1), was illegal, null and void. ... The suit has been filed seeking a declaration that conveyance deed in favour of defendant no.3, dated 04.03.1968, as well as the subsequent sale deeds in favour of defendant Nos.1 and 2 are sham transactions, null and #HL....

2024 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 37190

The plaintiff has sought for possession of the suit schedule property by directing defendant No.2 to hand over the same in favour of the plaintiff, and for holding the sale deed dated 20.01.1971 to be null and void. ... Sri.T.Govindaraja, learned counsel appearing for the appellants would submit that the sale deed dated 20.01.1971 is in the nature of mortgage, is not a sale, as such is null and void. .......

As a matter of fact, the first defendant had an absolute conveyance for the property in her favour, though this conveyance referred to the deed of gift in favour of her vendor. ... ) In the present case there is no fraud alleged or proved, and the deed under which the defendant claims title gives her the property without any restriction whatever. She has acted bona fide. She is 1 (1....

    By the Roman-Dutch Law private sales of immovable property were null and void unless made " before the Court " and the transfer registered and duty paid thereon (Grotius Introd. 2, 5, 13; 2 Kotze's Van Leeuwen 137), and I gather that sales in execution equally required the written transfer ... II., chapter V., section 13; Van der Linden 490-492) formality of conveyance of immovable property was....

High Court Malaya Shah Alam

the transfer of the same be declared null and void and that the second defendant ("2nd Defendant") refund to the Plaintiff the loan disbursed by the Plaintiff for the financing of the said property. ... [29] Since the Imposter's title over the Property is defeasible and ought to be set aside, it follows that the 2nd Defendant's title over the Property remain intact and....

In addition to the usual prayer of an action under section 247 he prayed that the deed of transfer be " declared to have been executed in trust and therefore null and void ". ... He found in favour of the first respondent and decree was entered declaring the first respondent entitled to these shares of the land, that they were not liable to sale under the appellant's writ, and declaring the deed of transfer No. 105, P 1, null and #HL_....

The Appellants argued that a cause of action to have the deed P2 declared null and void cannot be joined with a cause of action for a declaration of title to immovable property without leave of court first had and obtained. ... It was contended by the defendant-appellant that the cause of action to have the impugned deed declared null and void cannot be join....

2018 0 Supreme(Bom) 2276

5. Does the plaintiffs proves that the construction done by the defendants invades right of the plaintiff ? 6. Does the plaintiff proves that he is entitled for the reliefs claimed ? 1 from that ownership of the plaintiff in the manner shown in Exhibit "A" and described in paras ? 4. Does the plaintiff proves that the sale deed and conveyance is null and void and not binding on the plaintiffs ?

2016 0 Supreme(Bom) 840

I say that without setting aside the Award and/or Decree TCI could not have transferred their right and title by Conveyance Deed dated 31.12.1999 to Badriprasad Bhoruka Family Trust, and therefore the said Conveyance Deed is null and void. I further say that the Hon'ble Division Bench of Bombay High Court vide their order dated 27.07.2001 has held that the suit property belongs to Defendant only. I say that the said Conveyance Deed was executed while there was an injunction o....

2016 0 Supreme(Cal) 180

1 without any due process of law and that a declaration that the deed of conveyance of Defendant No. 1 is void and no title has been passed by way of such deed of conveyance. They have also prayed for a declaration of permanent injunction so that the petitioner/defendant cannot disturb their peaceful possession.

2015 0 Supreme(Bom) 1992

The learned Counsel further points out that the sale deed pursuant to which the respondents are claiming title is in respect of the property under Survey No. 204/8, whereas the suit property is surveyed under No. 204/10 of Chimbel village. The learned Counsel further points out that the sale deed itself is null and void, as according to him the vendors of the respondents do not have any exclusive title to the property. The learned Counsel further points out that the appellant....

2013 0 Supreme(Bom) 2099

In the plaint, the Plaintiff has asserted that the Power of Attorney dated 24 October 1981 was not issued for consideration; the conveyance dated 18 August 1989 was executed on behalf of some minors and no sanction from the High Court was obtained despite a specific stipulation in that regard; the conveyance dated 18 August 1989 was executed by the promoters of Defendant No.41 on the basis of the Power of Attorney dated 24 October 1981, despite the fact that on 18 August 1989, at least four of....