Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
In several judgments, including recent ones, the Court has quashed FIRs where the core dispute is civil, and the allegations are fabricated or exaggerated to pressure the accused into settlement ["Tarun Banerjee VS State of West Bengal - Calcutta"], ["PRAVEEN R., BASAVARAJAPPA P, MANISH KUMAR BANSAL vs STATE BY DEVARAJEEVANAHALLI POLICE STATION & MR. BASAVALINGSWAMY - Karnataka"], ["DEEPAK CLAUDIUS vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH - Chhattisgarh"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["Kapil Kamboj Son of Late Rakesh Kamboj VS State of Bihar - Patna"]- ["S.Kalaipunithan vs State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Vachakarapatti Police Station, Virudhunagar District. - Madras"]- ["Helan Kumar Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh - Chhattisgarh"]- ["Rakhi Singh, D/o. Arvind Kumar VS Pawan Putra Enterprise, Represented By Manager Debajit Das - Gauhati"]- ["Tarun Banerjee VS State of West Bengal - Calcutta"]- ["PRAVEEN R., BASAVARAJAPPA P, MANISH KUMAR BANSAL vs STATE BY DEVARAJEEVANAHALLI POLICE STATION & MR. BASAVALINGSWAMY - Karnataka"]- ["Deepak Lodhi vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh"]- ["Black Short India Ltd. VS Pawan Putra Enterprise, Represented By Manager Debajit Das - Gauhati"]- ["DEEPAK CLAUDIUS vs STATE OF CHHATTISGARH - Chhattisgarh"]
In today's litigious environment, financial disputes often spill over into criminal proceedings. Imagine settling a loan only to face a First Information Report (FIR) lodged as retaliation or to extract more money. This raises a critical question: Deepak Kumar Shrivas (SC, 2024) – Can you quash an FIR if it's for money recovery via pressure, mirroring a false FIR after loan payment?
This scenario is increasingly common in loan transactions gone sour. Courts in India, exercising powers under Section 482 of the CrPC, have addressed such misuse of process. This blog post breaks down the legal principles, key judgments like Deepak Kumar Shrivas vs. State of Chhattisgarh, and when quashing is viable versus when it's not. Note: This is general information; consult a lawyer for specific advice.
The cornerstone principle is that FIRs filed solely for money recovery, especially if motivated by pressure or mala fide intent, can generally be quashed if proven false or retaliatory, particularly post-loan settlement. Courts view such proceedings as an abuse of process, not genuine criminal pursuits. Anukul Singh VS State of Uttar Pradesh - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 1732
Key points include:- FIRs driven by pressure, mala fides, or retaliation lack genuine criminal intent and warrant quashing. Anukul Singh VS State of Uttar Pradesh - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 1732- Criminal proceedings masking civil disputes or used as coercion tactics constitute abuse of process. Anukul Singh VS State of Uttar Pradesh - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 1732- A false FIR post-loan payment, aimed at pressure or ulterior motives, justifies judicial intervention. Anukul Singh VS State of Uttar Pradesh - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 1732Abhishek Singh VS Ajay Kumar - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 944- Courts prohibit using criminal law for civil recovery; false allegations lead to quashing. Anukul Singh VS State of Uttar Pradesh - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 1732
High Courts' inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC are extraordinary and exercised sparingly to prevent abuse or secure justice, especially in purely civil matters. Anukul Singh VS State of Uttar Pradesh - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 1732 Criminal proceedings cannot be tools for harassment or pressure.
In Deepak Kumar Shrivas vs. State of Chhattisgarh (SC 2024), allegations involved money recovery through pressure after loan payment. The Supreme Court referenced precedents like Vijay Kumar Ghai vs. State of West Bengal and others, holding: ...such criminal prosecution should not be allowed... PRAVEEN R. vs STATE BY DEVARAJEEVANAHALLI POLICE STATION - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 25640
Applying principles:- Post-settlement FIRs for pressure are abuse of process. Anukul Singh VS State of Uttar Pradesh - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 1732Abhishek Singh VS Ajay Kumar - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 944- If retaliatory and false, quashing is appropriate, preventing criminal law misuse for financial coercion.
Judgments reinforce selective quashing, balancing individual relief with public interest.
Not all cases allow quashing. Courts refuse if prima facie cognizable offences like cheating (Section 420 IPC) or forgery (Sections 467/468/471) exist, especially impacting public order.
These contrast highlights: Quashing fits pressure-driven recovery post-payment but not genuine crimes.
If facing such an FIR:- File a Section 482 Petition: Cite abuse if post-repayment and mala fide. Gather repayment proofs, FIR timing, motives. Anukul Singh VS State of Uttar Pradesh - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 1732- Evidence Matters: Balance sheets, settlements, delays strengthen claims. Shiv Kumar VS State of NCT of Delhi - 2023 Supreme(Del) 5192- Avoid Self-Help: Courts prevent criminal coercion for civil ends.
High Courts must judiciously use powers: ...inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be exercised sparingly to prevent abuse of process... Nagraj V. vs UT of J&K through P/S Anantnag - 2025 Supreme(J&K) 37
Under precedents like Deepak Kumar Shrivas (SC 2024), FIRs for money recovery via pressure—especially false ones post-loan payment—are typically quashable as abuse of process. Anukul Singh VS State of Uttar Pradesh - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 1732Abhishek Singh VS Ajay Kumar - 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 944 However, serious criminal elements like forgery with public impact bar quashing.
Key Takeaways:- Prove mala fides, retaliation, civil nature for success.- Courts prioritize preventing harassment but protect legitimate probes.- Always seek professional legal counsel; outcomes depend on facts.
This analysis draws from established rulings, emphasizing judicious use of Section 482 CrPC. Stay informed to navigate financial disputes wisely.
#QuashFIR, #Section482, #LoanRecovery
The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Deepak Kumar Shrivas and Anr. vs. ... The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Deepak Kumar Shrivas (supra) at paragraph nos. 15 and 16 has held as follows: “15. ... The Supreme Court in the case of Deepak Kumar Shrivas (supra) has clearly held that no person can be prosecuted for an allegation of having received money for prov....
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in similar facts in the case of Deepak Kumar Shrivas and another Vs. State (cited supra) had held as follows: “13. ... case of deceiving the defacto complainant and receiving money by promising to obtain a Government job; that the allegations would be squarely covered by the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Deepak Kumar Shrivas and another Vs. ... For all the reasons recorded above, we are of the view that such criminal pr....
With regard to the reliance placed by the petitioner on Deepak Kumar Shrivas (supra), the same is distinguishable and not applicable to the facts of the present case, as here the petitioner obtained money on the assurance of securing employment for respondent No. 2’s wife, whereas the factual ... In support of his contention, learned counsel has placed reliance upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Deepak Kumar Shrivas & Anr. v. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors....
650 and Deepak Kumar Shrivas & Another -Versus- The State of Chattisgarh & Others, since reported in 2024 SCC Online SC 158. ... 9 (iii) Likewise in the case of Deepak Kumar Shrivas (supra), the Apex Court quashed the FIR lodged after three years delay and held at paragraph 16 as under: “16. ... For all the reasons recorded above, we are of the view that such criminal prosecution should not be allowed to continue where the object ....
to recover the money under coercion and pressure. ... Deepak Kumar Shrivas & Anr. Vs State of Chhattisgarh & Ors. reported in 2024 (3) SCC 601. 9. Ld. Counsel, Mr. A.K. Gayen, appearing on behalf of the opposite party no. 2 submitted nothing on merit. Mr. ... Senior Counsel, has taken assistance of the case of Deepak Kumar Shrivas (supra) wherein Hon’ble Apex Court dealt with a case of claims and counter claims by both the parties ....
In the case of Deepak Kumar Shrivas vs. State of Chhattisgarh , the Hon'ble Apex Court, as held in para Nos.12, 13, 14 15 & 16 is held as under: 12. ... State of Karnataka, AIRONLINE 2021 KAR 3377 iii) Deepak Kumar Shrivas vs. ... For all the reasons recorded above, we are of the view that such criminal prosecution should not be allowed to continue where the object to lodge the FIR is not for criminal prosecution and for punishing the offender for the offence committ....
In the case of Deepak Kumar Shrivas vs. State of Chhattisgarh, the Hon'ble Apex Court, as held in para Nos.12, 13, 14 15 & 16 is held as under: 12. ... i) Vijay Kumar Ghai vs. State of West Bengal.1 ii) Santhosh Chinnappa Reddy Tulasiram, s/o Mr.Tulasiram Chinnappa Reddy, Bengaluru vs. State of Karnataka.2 iii) Deepak Kumar Shrivas vs. State of Chhattisgarh.3 4. ... For all the reasons recorded above, we are of the view that such criminal prosecution should not be al....
Bhanu Pratap Vaishya was identified as Jitendra Kumar Shrivas, son of Mohan Lal Shrivas, resident of Village Sersa. He was arrested on 25-12-2023. ... Petitioner in association with co-accused Jitendra Kumar Shrivas and Anoop Singh Rana, has issued forged appointment letters, secured payment of Rs.7 lac from each of the victims. Investigation is revealing cheating, forgery and misappropriation of amount in relation to many persons. ... Pending the investigation against absconding accus....
Reliance has also been placed on Mitesh Kumar J. SHA v. The State of Karnataka, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 976, whereby the Hon'ble Apex Court inter alia observed as under: "47. ... Senior Counsel relies on the judgement in Anand Kumar Mohatta v. State (NCT of Delhi), (2019)11 SCC 706, and submits that there is no bar to quash the proceedings even after the charge sheet has been filed. ... It is trite law that an FIR or any proceedings can be quashed at any stage provided this court feels the justifiable reason....
Bhanu Pratap Vaishya was identified as Jitendra Kumar Shrivas, son of Mohan Lal Shrivas, resident of Village Sersa. He was arrested on 25-12-2023. ... Petitioner in association with co-accused Jitendra Kumar Shrivas and Vikram Rana, has issued forged appointment letters, secured payment of Rs.7 lac from each of the victims. Investigation is revealing cheating, forgery and misappropriation of amount in relation to many persons. ... Pending the investigation against absconding accused Vi....
20. Therefore, it is not permissible to look into the documents produced by the petitioner with the petition. “13. As has already been observed hereinabove, the Court would not be justified in embarking upon an enquiry as to the reliability or genuineness or otherwise of the allegations made in the FIR or the complaint at the stage of quashing of the proceedings under Section 482 Cr. P.C. However, the allegations made in the FIR/complaint, if taken at their face value, must disclose the commission of an offence and make out a case against the accused. At the cost of repetition, in the presen....
12. It was submitted that allegations in the F.I.R. are false, and the informant had lodged the FIR as a counterblast to the FIR lodged against her. This submission will not help the petitioners. It was laid down in Maneesha Yadav v. State of U.P., 2024 SCC OnLine SC 643, that the Court exercising inherent jurisdiction to quash the FIR cannot go into the truthfulness or otherwise of the allegations. It was observed: - 11. The informant specifically stated in the FIR that the petitioner, Dhinu Ram, grabbed the informant’s breasts, slapped, abused, and threatened her. His wif....
00 Crore as principal amount and Rs.1.00 Crore as compensation), however, both cheques got bounced due to insufficient amount. In the complaint/impugned FIR, it has been mentioned that petitioner paid Rs.5.25 Lacs to respondent No.2 prior to registration of FIR, however for repaying the remaining amount, petitioner was asking for time. Respondent No. on the very same day without approaching SHO concerned. Petitioner was arrested on 9th May 2023 and the entire residence was searched without any search warrant. From 10th May 2024 to 16th May 2024, when petitioner was in custody of police, resp....
This is a very belated FIR. If really it is not a false case, she would have disclosed it and lodged her complaint way back in February, 2024 itself after FIR.No.90 of 2024 was registered The argument of high level conspiracy is imaginary.Though, it is alleged that many big people are involved in Mumbai case so far, they are not made accused in the present Cr.No.469 of 2024. Therefore, the conspiracy alleged by the State is fictitious. Police doing their own duty and doing it quickly is now found fault with and that cannot be countenanced. All through the above-mentioned pr....
(14) All through the above-mentioned proceedings, Dr. Kadambari Narendra Kumar Jethwani did not make any allegation against any police atrocity or any custodial violence (17) Police doing their own duty and doing it quickly is now found fault with and that cannot be countenanced. (16) The argument of high level conspiracy is imaginary. Though, it is alleged that many big people are involved in Mumbai case so far, they are not made accused in the present Cr.No. 469 of 2024. Therefore, the conspiracy alleged by the State is fictitious. (15) This is a very belated FIR. If really it is....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
