IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
V.R.K. KRUPA SAGAR, J.
Kanthi Rana Tata S/o Tata Muralisankar – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Criminal Petition No. 6640 of 2024
Decided On : 07-01-2025
ORDER :
1. The Criminal Petition No. 6640 of 2024, under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), is filed by the petitioner/A.3 - Sri Kanthi Rana Tata, I.P.S., IGP, seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 469 of 2024 of Ibrahimpatnam Police Station, N.T.R. District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 192, 211, 218, 220, 354(D), 467, 420, 469, 471, 166, 166-A and 349 read with 120B I.P.C. and Section 66(A) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.
2. Sri S.Sriram, the learned Senior Counsel being assisted by Sri T.Nagarjuna Reddy, the learned counsel for petitioner submitted arguments and cited legal authorities. Sri D.Srinivas, learned Advocate General, Sri M.Lakshmi Narayana, the learned Public Prosecutor and Sri A.Sai Rohit and Sri Neelothpal Ganji, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No. 1-State submitted arguments. Sri Prabhunath Vasireddy and Sri Narra Srinivasa Rao, the learned counsels for respondent No. 2 submitted arguments. The counters are filed on behalf of respondent No. 1 and 2.
3. The Criminal Petition No. 6702 of 2024, under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), is filed by the petitioner/A.5 – Sri M.Satyanarayana, Inspector of Police, seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 469 of 2024 of Ibrahimpatnam Police Station, N.T.R. District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 192, 211, 218, 220, 354(D), 467, 420, 469, 471, 166, 166-A and 349 read with 120B I.P.C. and Section 66(A) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.
4. Sri Vinodh Kumar Deshpande, the learned Senior Counsel being assisted by Sri Aneel Kumar Dasari, the learned counsel for petitioner submitted arguments and cited legal authorities. Sri D.Srinivas, learned Advocate General, Sri M.Lakshmi Narayana, the learned Public Prosecutor, Sri A.Sai Rohit and Sri Neelothpal Ganji, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No. 1-State submitted arguments. Sri Prabhunath Vasireddy and Sri Narra Srinivasa Rao, the learned counsels for respondent No. 2 submitted arguments. The counters are filed on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2.
5. The Criminal Petition No 6734 of 2024, under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), is filed by the petitioner/A.6 – Sri Vishal Gunni, I.P.S., D.I.G., seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 469 of 2024 of Ibrahimpatnam Police Station, N.T.R. District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 192, 211, 218, 220, 354(D), 467, 420, 469, 471, 166, 166-A and 349 read with 120B I.P.C. and Section 66(A) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.
6. Sri O.Manohar Reddy, the learned Senior Counsel being assisted by Sri P.Raj Kumar, the learned counsel for petitioner submitted arguments and cited legal authorities. Sri D.Srinivas, learned Advocate General, Sri M.Lakshmi Narayana, the learned Public Prosecutor, Sri A.Sai Rohit and Sri Neelothpal Ganji, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No. 1-State submitted arguments and counter is filed on behalf of respondent No. 1/State.
7. The Criminal Petition No 6802 of 2024, under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), is filed by the petitioner/A.4 – Sri K.Hanumantha Rao, D.S.P., seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 469 of 2024 of Ibrahimpatnam Police Station, N.T.R. District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 192, 211, 218, 220, 354(D), 467, 420, 469, 471, 166, 166-A and 349 read with 120B I.P.C. and Section 66(A) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.
8. Sri V.Pattabhi, the learned Senior Counsel being assisted by Sri K.L.N. Swamy, the learned counsel for petitioner submitted arguments and cited legal authorities. Sri D.Srinivas, learned Advocate General, Sri M.Lakshmi Narayana, the learned Public Prosecutor, Sri A.Sai Rohit and Sri Neelothpal Ganji, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearin
Abdul Rehman v. K.M. Anees-ul-Haq
Iqbal Singh Marwah v. Meenakshi Marwah
Lalita Kumari V. Govt. of UP. AIR 2014 SC 187
Pratibha Manchanda V. State of Haryana
Shri Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia V. State of Punjab
The court granted anticipatory bail to police officers and an advocate due to procedural irregularities in the investigation and emphasized the necessity of a complaint from the court for certain off....
The registration of multiple FIRs concerning the same incident is barred unless initiated by the court involved in the first FIR, ensuring adherence to procedural safeguards in criminal justice.
The court affirmed that serious fraud allegations necessitate custodial interrogation, and delay in FIR does not negate the urgency for investigation.
The judgment emphasizes the need for fair investigation and clarifies the exceptional circumstances for transferring investigation to the CBI.
The court dismissed anticipatory bail petitions due to the serious nature of allegations against the petitioner, emphasizing the need for custodial interrogation and the risk of witness tampering.
The court established that a person cannot be deemed a proclaimed offender without a formal declaration under Section 82(4) CrPC, allowing for the possibility of anticipatory bail.
Grant of Bail - While grant of anticipatory bail court has to consider the nature of the offence, the role of the person, the likelihood of his influencing the course of investigation, or tampering w....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.