Back
V. R. K. KRUPA SAGAR
Kanthi Rana Tata S/o Tata Muralisankar – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The Criminal Petition No. 6640 of 2024, under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), is filed by the petitioner/A.3 - Sri Kanthi Rana Tata, I.P.S., IGP, seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No. 469 of 2024 of Ibrahimpatnam Police Station, N.T.R. District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 192, 211, 218, 220, 354(D), 467, 420, 469, 471, 166, 166-A and 349 read with 120B I.P.C. and Section 66(A) of the Information Technology Act, 2000.
2. Sri S.Sriram, the learned Senior Counsel being assisted by Sri T.Nagarjuna Reddy, the learned counsel for petitioner submitted arguments and cited legal authorities. Sri D.Srinivas, learned Advocate General, Sri M.Lakshmi Narayana, the learned Public Prosecutor and Sri A.Sai Rohit and Sri Neelothpal Ganji, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No. 1-State submitted arguments. Sri Prabhunath Vasireddy and Sri Narra Srinivasa Rao, the learned counsels for respondent No. 2 submitted arguments. The counters are filed on behalf of respondent No. 1 and 2.
3. The Criminal Petition No. 6702 of 2024, under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNS
The court granted anticipatory bail to police officers and an advocate due to procedural irregularities in the investigation and emphasized the necessity of a complaint from the court for certain off....
The registration of multiple FIRs concerning the same incident is barred unless initiated by the court involved in the first FIR, ensuring adherence to procedural safeguards in criminal justice.
The court affirmed that serious fraud allegations necessitate custodial interrogation, and delay in FIR does not negate the urgency for investigation.
The judgment emphasizes the need for fair investigation and clarifies the exceptional circumstances for transferring investigation to the CBI.
The court dismissed anticipatory bail petitions due to the serious nature of allegations against the petitioner, emphasizing the need for custodial interrogation and the risk of witness tampering.
The court established that a person cannot be deemed a proclaimed offender without a formal declaration under Section 82(4) CrPC, allowing for the possibility of anticipatory bail.
Grant of Bail - While grant of anticipatory bail court has to consider the nature of the offence, the role of the person, the likelihood of his influencing the course of investigation, or tampering w....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
