Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
If the applicant believes the response is unjustified or incomplete, they can file a second appeal before the Central or State Information Commission, which will decide based on the merits and procedural compliance ["Ranjeet Kumar Lal VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand"], ["Sonadhan Chakma VS State of Assam - Gauhati"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["Ranjeet Kumar Lal VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand"]- ["STATE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION vs E. MANOJ KUMAR - Kerala"]- ["The Central Public Information vs The Central Information - Madras"]- ["Lakshmi Bai Arakh vs CPIO, Office of the Divisional Railway Manager, RTI Cell, West Central Railway, Jabalpur - Central Information Commission"]- ["Janardhanan Rajasekaran vs CPIO, Income Tax Officer (HQ). O/o the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, VU-1, 63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - Central Information Commission"]- ["Sonadhan Chakma VS State of Assam - Gauhati"]- ["XXXX VS State Information Commissioner, Haryana - Punjab and Haryana"]- ["Syed Ahmed vs State of Telangana - Telangana"]
In legal proceedings, informants often play a crucial role, but accessing relevant public records can be challenging. A common query arises: What is the procedure to send RTI information to an informant? This guide breaks down the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 process in India, helping informants or applicants obtain and share information effectively. Whether you're an informant seeking records or assisting one, understanding this statutory framework is essential. We'll explore applications, responses, appeals, and key judicial precedents for a comprehensive overview. Note: This is general information; consult a legal expert for specific cases.
The procedure to send RTI information to an informant typically involves submitting a formal application under the RTI Act, paying applicable fees, and awaiting a response from the Public Information Officer (PIO). If denied or delayed, appeals or complaints follow as per the Act. Courts stress strict adherence to these steps Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India VS Subhash Chandra Agarwal - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 1256.
Key judicial insights reinforce that informants can use RTI to access records, such as in cases where false complaints were challenged via RTI-obtained evidence Dinesh Kumar VS State of H. P. - 2024 Supreme(HP) 146. For instance, The informant sought the information under the Right to Information Act and found that the record was obtained by Rishi Bhardwaj and he had made a false complaint against the informant Dinesh Kumar VS State of H. P. - 2024 Supreme(HP) 146.
Start with a clear, written or electronic request under Section 6(ii), detailing the exact information needed. Address it to the PIO of the public authority holding the records Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India VS Subhash Chandra Agarwal - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 1256. Informants might seek case files, complaints, or investigation details, but specificity is key to avoid rejection.
In one case, an applicant used RTI to uncover records related to false complaints against an informant, highlighting RTI's role in legal defenses Dinesh Kumar VS State of H. P. - 2024 Supreme(HP) 146.
Fees vary by authority (e.g., ₹10 application fee, plus copying costs). Pay via cash, demand draft, or online. PIO processes only after fee receipt Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India VS Subhash Chandra Agarwal - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 1256.
PIO must reply within 30 days. If exempted under Section 8(1), provide reasoned denial Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India VS Subhash Chandra Agarwal - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 1256. For life/liberty matters, respond in 48 hours. Non-citizens, like a Tibetan national, can also apply, as the Act uses person broadly A. S. Rawat VS Dawa Tashi - 2023 Supreme(Del) 1175. The court held, the RTI Act, 2005 is not restricted to citizens alone and that non-citizens can also seek information under the Act A. S. Rawat VS Dawa Tashi - 2023 Supreme(Del) 1175.
No response in 30 days? File a first appeal under Section 19 to the First Appellate Authority within 30 days Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India VS Subhash Chandra Agarwal - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 1256. If unsatisfied, second appeal or complaint to Information Commission.
Courts distinguish Section 18 (complaints for denial) from Section 19 (appeals): The nature of the power under Section 18 is supervisory in character whereas the procedure under Section 19 is an appellate procedure High Court for the State of Telangana VS Telangana State Information Commission - 2023 Supreme(Telangana) 250. Prefer Section 19 for fuller redress Chandra Pal Verma VS State Information Commission Uttar Pradesh Lko. - 2024 Supreme(All) 1633.
Commissions can direct disclosure and penalize PIOs, but must ensure compliance, not just fines Chandra Pal Verma VS State Information Commission Uttar Pradesh Lko. - 2024 Supreme(All) 1633. The State Information Commission must actively ensure compliance with information requests under the RTI Act Chandra Pal Verma VS State Information Commission Uttar Pradesh Lko. - 2024 Supreme(All) 1633. Penalties require hearing; violations of natural justice void orders Harsh Mangla VS Jharkhand State Information Commission - 2021 Supreme(Jhk) 934.
Precedents mandate exhausting appeals before writs: The applicant must first request the information and exhaust the internal remedies (appeal under Section 19) State Information Commission (Represented By Its Secretary), Office of the State Information Commission VS C. V. Rajendran, S/o. C. C. Velayudhan - 2022 0 Supreme(Ker) 861.
Public authorities must proactively disclose under Section 4 to minimize RTI use A. S. Rawat VS Dawa Tashi - 2023 Supreme(Del) 1175.
In framing charges, courts evaluate RTI evidence at charge stage Dinesh Kumar VS State of H. P. - 2024 Supreme(HP) 146.
Navigating RTI to send information to informants empowers transparency in legal matters. Follow the structured process—application, fee, response, appeals—to enforce rights effectively. Key takeaway: Adhere to timelines and procedures for success Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India VS Subhash Chandra Agarwal - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 1256State Information Commission (Represented By Its Secretary), Office of the State Information Commission VS C. V. Rajendran, S/o. C. C. Velayudhan - 2022 0 Supreme(Ker) 861.
This guide draws from statutory provisions and cases; outcomes vary. Generally, proactive, documented steps yield results. For personalized advice, seek professional legal counsel.
References:- Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India VS Subhash Chandra Agarwal - 2019 0 Supreme(SC) 1256: RTI procedures overview.- State Information Commission (Represented By Its Secretary), Office of the State Information Commission VS C. V. Rajendran, S/o. C. C. Velayudhan - 2022 0 Supreme(Ker) 861: Appeals and commissions.- Others integrated as cited.
#RTIIndia,#RightToInformation,#LegalGuide
Both the said applications were received by the Public Information Officer cum District Sub-Registrar and they were replied on 23.07.2021 whereby the information sought by the informant was denied by saying that the information sought for, does not come under the purview of Right to Information Act, ... Opposite party no.2 has filed complaint case being Complaint Case No.2734 of 2021 alleging therein that the informant is a RTI Activist. ... The Public Infor....
The petitioners contend that the impugned appellate order fails to satisfy the mandate of Section 19 of the RTI Act and the prescribed appellate procedure, since it neither records reasons nor arrives at any finding regarding illegality or non-furnishing of information by ... Instead, the Commission issued a blanket direction to re-examine the entire RTI application and furnish information free of cost. ... P1 RTI application on 24.12.2018 seeking information regar....
Dinesh Kumar had also appeared with the informant for the test of ADA. He had also obtained the information under the Right to Information Act and had filed a false complaint against the informant to pressurize him. ... The informant sought the information under the Right to Information Act and found that the record was obtained by Rishi Bhardwaj and he had made a false complaint against the informant at the instance of Dinesh Kumar. ... Further, the....
referred to as the RTI Act) inter alia to set aside the order issued by the Right to Information Commission (hereinafter referred to as the RTI Commission) on 19.08.2019 and to order the issuance of information sought by the appellant-petitioner (hereinafter referred to as the appellant). ... The instant order by this Court is one of prominence as it deliberates the legality and veracity of solely naming the RTI Commission as a party to an appeal for a request of information under the ....
Various categories of information are protected under Section 8 of the Act. The protection is not absolute as disclosure is permitted if the procedure, as set out under Section 11 is followed qua disclosure of third party information. ... This Writ Petition has been filed by the Central Public Information Officer of this Court challenging an order passed by the Central Information Commission/R1 in relation to a complaint filed under the provisions of the Right to Information Act, 2005....
the procedure under Section 19. ... The nature of the power under Section 18 is supervisory in character whereas the procedure under Section 19 is an appellate procedure and a person who is aggrieved by refusal in receiving the information which he has sought for can only seek redress in the manner provided in the statute, namely, by following ... The case of the petitioner, in brief, is as follows: a) The 2nd respondent made an application to the Public Information Officer, High Court, under ....
The contents of information sought in the instant RTI applications itself shows that disclosure of such information would apparently impede the process of investigation in terms of (1)(h) of RTI Act. ... So, withholding of the required information is not bona fide and not authorized by any law or procedure. Section 8 (1)(h) is not applicable. ... under which, the information sought by the applicant can be withheld, one of the. exemptions being 8(1)(h) of the #HL_S....
It has been observed that the State Information Commissions decide on matters and issues pertaining to the right to information and are required to act in a fair and just manner while following the procedure laid down in Sections 18, 19 and 20 of the RTI Act. 23. ... As the term, ‘any person’ appearing in Section 18 is without any limitation, the same would include also an applicant who approaches the Commission after having exhausted the procedure outlined in Section 6, Section 19 [1] and Section 19 [3....
Section 6 also prescribes the procedure for persons who desire to obtain any information under the RTI Act or who make a request in writing or through electronic means in such application process. ... In Section 4(2), the endeavor of public authorities has to be to take steps to ensure maximum availability of information to the public so that the public has minimum resort to the use of the procedure under the RTI Act to obtain information. ... Section 5 requires the C....
the procedure under Section 19. ... It observed that the State Information Commission had abdicated its Power and Obligation under the RTI Act to furnish information which was demanded by the petitioner and to adjudicate whether the information that was supplied was incomplete or misleading or false. ... So out of the two procedures, between Section 18 and Section 19, the one under Section 19 is more beneficial to a person who has been denied access to information.” “49. There is anoth....
Applicant filed various applications under RTI, calling for the information which is the reason for filing false complaint against him by Informant. Learned Senior Counsel then submitted that except Section 353 of IPC, other Sections of IPC such as Sections 323, 504, 506 of IPC are all non-cognizable offences and therefore, there was no question of registering FIR against the Applicant and to conduct investigation, if any. 7. Learned Senior Counsel then urged that ingredients of Section 353 of IPC are not at all made out in the present matter and said provision has been pre....
Learned counsel further argues that RTI Act, 2005 provides a detailed procedure with respect to the appointment of Public Information Officer, request for obtaining information, filing of first appeal and the same is to be followed strictly and the impugned order passed in appeal under the RTI Act is not sustainable in the eyes of law and warrants interference by this Court. Learned counsel further submits that the impugned order has been passed mechanically and as such, the same is fit to be quashed and set aside. Learned counsel further argues that as per Section 5 of the....
In cases where Personal information sought also qualifies as Third Party Information, the procedure under section 11 of the RTI Act is to be mandatorily followed. The procedure under Section 11 of the RTI Act is that when an application is filed for disclosure of the details of the Third Party Information, the Public Information Officer must issue notice to such third party within five days from the date of the application for information inviting response as against the disclosure of such information. If the third party responds to such notice within 10 days of receiving t....
Section 5 requires every public authority to designate concerned CPIO or SPIO, as the case may be for providing information to those who seeks the same. 14. Section 6 of the RTI Act provides for procedure required to be followed by a person who desires to obtain information under the RTI Act. The RTI Act does not contain any restrictions on the end-use of the information disclosed under its provisions. The information disclosed by an Information Officer of the State pursuant to a right to information application may subsequently be widely disseminated. For our purposes Sect....
4. The public authority can gather the required information from a society on which he has "supervisory or administrative control under the Cooperative Societies Act." 5. The information to be provided by the public authority must be subject to the limitations provided under Section 8 of the Act. 2. The Registrar or any other public authority is statutorily enjoined to comply with "the obligations under the RTI Act and furnish information to a citizen under the RTI Act." 3. The information the public authority can provide to an applicant under RTI Act is the information enumerated ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
