SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Del) 1175

PRATHIBA M. SINGH
A. S. Rawat – Appellant
Versus
Dawa Tashi – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ms. Jyoti Dutt Sharma, Mr CK Bhatt and Mr Ayush Bhatt, Advocates, for the Petitioner.
None, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The RTI Applicant, Mr. Dawa Tashi, who was a Postgraduate Teacher (Tibetan) at the Central School for Tibetans, Darjeeling, at the time, filed an RTI application on 10th July, 2014 to the Public Information Officer (`PIO'), Central Tibetan Schools Administration (hereinafter `CTSA'). He sought the following information:

    "1. When will I be receiving confirmation letter i.e. substantive capacity letter as the employee of CTSA? If no, why?

    2. When will I be receiving Children Education Allowance (CEA) as per rule as the employee of CTSA? If no, why?

    3. When will I be given All India LTC benefit as the employee of CTSA? It no, why?

    4. Is CTSA agreeing with the Election Commission of India letter no. 30/ID/2010-ERS dated 7th Feb. 2014 where CEOs of all states and UT were instructed to not to deny voting rights to Tibetans like me, who were born between 26th January, 1950 and before 1st July, 1987. The letter also states "As per Section 3(1) (a) of the Citizenship Act, 1955, the children born to Tibetan Refugees in India shall be treated as Indian Citizens based on their birth in India, on or after 26th January

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top