Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Scope of Section 11 SARFAESI Section 11 of the SARFAESI Act primarily deals with disputes between a secured creditor (such as a bank or financial institution) and a borrower concerning the enforcement of security interest. It also extends to inter-se disputes between financial institutions, including NBFCs and banks, which can be arbitrable under Section 11, effectively functioning as a statutory arbitration mechanism. Several judgments affirm that disputes involving financial institutions under Section 11 are amenable to arbitration, especially when both parties are 'financial institutions' as defined under the Act 2022 0 Supreme(Del) 1756, 2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 1626.
Arbitration and Dispute Resolution The Act permits disputes to be resolved through arbitration or conciliation, as seen in cases where parties invoke Section 11 to settle inter-creditor or borrower disputes. Courts have recognized that Section 11 can serve as a statutory arbitration agreement, facilitating resolution without resorting to traditional court proceedings 2022 0 Supreme(Del) 1756, 2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 1626, DELHI 2022 DHC.
Priority of Claims and Overriding Provisions The SARFAESI Act’s Section 26E establishes the priority of secured creditors’ claims over other debts, including statutory dues such as those under the Employees Provident Fund (EPF) Act. Courts have held that Section 26E overrides conflicting provisions of other laws like the EPF Act, giving secured creditors priority over statutory claims, including those invoked under Section 11(2) of the EPF Act 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2211.
Overriding Effect Over Other Laws Several judgments emphasize that Section 26E of SARFAESI prevails over other laws, including SEBI regulations and the EPF Act, especially regarding recoveries and priority of debts. The provisions of SARFAESI, particularly Section 26E, are given overriding effect under Section 35, ensuring that secured creditors’ rights take precedence 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 1020, 2024 Supreme(Online)(SEBI) 38, 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2211.
Legal Hierarchy and Compatibility The Act’s provisions, including Sections 11, 11-A, 11-B, and 28-A, are designed to work in harmony with other laws, with SARFAESI’s priority rules prevailing in case of conflict. The courts have clarified that disputes under Section 11 are primarily about the rights of secured creditors, and such disputes are generally arbitrable, provided they fall within the scope of the Act 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 1020, 2022 0 Supreme(Del) 1756.
Special Cases and Limitations Certain disputes, such as eviction under Section 11(7) or sale of property, are subject to specific procedural requirements and may not be arbitrable. The Act also provides for measures like attachment and sale of property, which are distinct from arbitration proceedings 2022 0 Supreme(Ker) 1127.
Section 11 of SARFAESI is a crucial provision that facilitates dispute resolution between financial institutions and borrowers or among financial institutions themselves through arbitration, acting as a statutory arbitration mechanism. Its provisions are designed to streamline enforcement processes and prioritize secured creditors’ rights, with Section 26E establishing the supremacy of these rights over other statutory claims, including those under the EPF Act or SEBI regulations. Courts have consistently upheld the overriding effect of SARFAESI’s provisions, especially Section 26E, affirming that SARFAESI’s framework takes precedence, ensuring the efficacy of secured creditor rights and dispute resolution through arbitration under Section 11.
References:- 2022 0 Supreme(Del) 1756, 2023 0 Supreme(Bom) 1626, 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 1020, 2025 0 Supreme(Ker) 2211, 2024 Supreme(Online)(SEBI) 38, 2024 Supreme(Online)(SEBI) 18, 2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 42423, DELHI 2022 DHC 004654, 2022 0 Supreme(Ker) 1127
In the complex world of and in India, the plays a pivotal role. One provision that often raises questions among , , and is Section 11 SARFAESI. What exactly does Section 11 entail? Does it cover disputes with borrowers, or is it limited to specific parties?
This blog post delves into the nuances of Section 11, providing clarity on its scope, application, judicial interpretations, and practical implications. Whether you're a secured creditor navigating or a legal professional advising on recovery proceedings, understanding this section is crucial to avoid delays and . Note: This is general information and not specific legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your situation.
establishes a for resolving disputes related to securitisation, reconstruction, or non-payment of dues amongst specified parties—namely, , FIs, ARCs, or —through or 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 902. Importantly, it does not extend to disputes involving borrowers or third parties unless those parties have expressly consented in writing to 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 902.
As highlighted in legal discourse, Learned counsel for petitioner referring to Section 11 of the SARFAESI Act submits that the said provision mandates settlement of dispute regarding non-payment of amount due including interest by way of or in terms of procedure provided under 2024 0 Supreme(MP) 33. This underscores the provision's focus on efficient, out-of-court resolution.
Here are the core elements:
The primary objective of Section 11 is to streamline resolutions exclusively between parties in securitisation or reconstruction, such as and ARCs, ensuring SARFAESI's recovery processes remain unimpeded 2025 0 Supreme(SC) 902. It promotes speed by deeming consent to , avoiding protracted litigation.
Further, disputes that would be covered by section 11 of the SARFAESI Act are those which deal with the rights of secured creditors inter-se, since the SARFAESI Act proceeds on the basis that the liability
. This inter-se focus is key, distinguishing it from borrower challenges under Section 17.
Indian courts have consistently narrowed Section 11's ambit:
These rulings reinforce that disputes between secured creditors over priority or are to be resolved via under Section 11 2023 0 Supreme(SC) 440.
To invoke Section 11:
Disputes on enforcement against borrowers remain outside, typically handled via DRTs under Section 17 2017 0 Supreme(SC) 1805.
Additionally, while Section 26E prioritizes secured creditors over other claims (e.g., EPF dues), it complements rather than expands Section 11 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 1015.
For secured creditors:
The SARFAESI framework, bolstered by its overriding effect under Section 35, ensures creditor efficiency: Section 35 stipulates that the provisions of the SARFAESI have effect notwithstanding inconsistencies elsewhere 2015 0 Supreme(Bom) 2326.
Section 11 SARFAESI is a powerful tool for inter-creditor dispute resolution via , promoting swift recoveries while excluding borrowers and third parties. Judicial clarity limits its scope, ensuring focused application. Key takeaways:
By leveraging Section 11 judiciously, secured creditors can minimize delays. Stay informed on evolving case law, as SARFAESI continues shaping India's landscape. For tailored advice, engage legal experts.
, 2017 0 Supreme(SC) 1805, 2015 0 Supreme(Bom) 2326, 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 1015, 2017 0 Supreme(Del) 4571.
The question of law is about the overriding effect of Section 26E of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI Act), 2002 over the provisions of Section 11, 11-A, 11-B and Section 28-A(3) of the Securities Exchange Board of India Act ... Section 11 of Chapter IV of the....
Learned counsel for petitioner Shri Pushpendra Dubey referring to Section 11 of the SARFAESI Act submits that the said provision mandates settlement of dispute regarding non-payment of amount due including interest by way of conciliation or arbitration in terms of procedure provided under Arbitration ... Meaning thereby that the overriding effect of the SARFAESI Act mandated in Section 35 of the #HL_START....
Issues: The main issue was whether the disputes were arbitrable under section 11 of the SARFAESI Act, despite being subject ... 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 for disputes arising from Rupee Facility Agreement. ... Interest Act, 2002 - 11 of SARFAESI Act Fact of the Case: The petitioners sought appointment of an arbitrator under section ... borrower, in that event the inter-se disputes between such lender....
... ... Issues: Whether the charge of the EPFO under Section 11(2) of the EPF Act has priority over the rights of a secured creditor ... 11(2) - Priority of debts - A registered security interest under Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act has priority over all other debts ... Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) - Section 26E and Section 35 - Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Act, 1952 (EPF Act) - Section ... The EPFO ar....
11 in light of the petitioner being a 'financial institution' under the SARFAESI Act. ... 11, considering the petitioner's status as a 'financial institution' under the SARFAESI Act. ... considered the jurisdiction of the court to entertain petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act and an application under Section ... 9 of the Arbitration Act and it was contended that since arbitration had been invoked, this Court may also allow the ....
11(7) and that it cannot invoke said provision for sale of building - As noted Section 11(7) enables a public institution to apply ... sale for realising its dues - Argument is that if only institution needs building to be used by it for its purpose can it invoke Section ... The Rent Control Court rejected the claim of the landlord under Section 11(3) and ordered eviction of the tenants ....
The question of law is about the overriding effect of Section 26E of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI Act), 2002 over the provisions of Section 11, 11-A, 11-B and Section 28-A(3) of the Securities Exchange Board of India Act ... Section 11 of Chapter IV of the....
The question of law is about the overriding effect of Section 26E of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act ( SARFAESI Act), 2002 over the provisions of Section 11, 11-A, 11-B and Section 28-A(3) of the Securities Exchange Board of India Act ... Section 11 of Chapter IV of th....
Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act. This contention arises in the context of a claim made by the SEBI that the amount due to SEBI recoverable under Section 11 -B of the SEBI Act does not come under a href="./..
11 of the SARFAESI Act. ... Accordingly, disputes that would be covered by section 11 of the SARFAESI Act are those which deal with the rights of secured creditors inter-se, since the SARFAESI Act proceeds on the basis that the liability ... That peculiar circumstance is this: while the petitioner asserts that there is an arbitration agreement with the respondent created by #HL....
Considering provisions of section 26E of the SARFAESI Act brought on statute later in point of time, the language of Section 11(2) of EPF Act is found to be more emphatic and the same would be indicative of the intention of the legislature to the effect that the EPF Acts shall prevail over the other statutes to secure the outstanding dues of the workers.
Thus, only if possession of the secured asset is required to be taken under the provisions of the SARFAESI Act, the secured creditor can move the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or the District Magistrate for assistance to take possession of the secured asset. Act make it clear that where the possession of any secured assets is required to be taken by the secured creditor or if any of the secured asset is required to be sold or transferred by the secured creditor "under the provisions of the Act....
[Application against measures to recover secured debts].-(1) Any person (including borrower), aggrieved by any of the measures referred to in sub-section (4) of section 13 taken by the secured creditor or his authorised officer under this Chapter, [may make an application alongwith such fee, as may be prescribed,] to the Debts Recovery Tribunal having jurisdiction in the matter within forty-five days from the date on which such measure had been taken: 11. Section 17 (1) to (4) of SAR....
-No civil court shall have jurisdiction to entertain any suit or proceeding in respect of any matter which a Debts Recovery Tribunal or the Appellate Tribunal is empowered by or under this Act to determine and no injunction shall be granted by any court or other authority in respect of any action taken or to be taken in pursuance of any power conferred by or under this Act or under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993(51 of 1993)” 7. Section 34 of t....
Act shall have effect, notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law for the time being in force or any instrument having effect by virtue of any such law. Section 35 stipulates that the provisions of the SARFAESI Section 37 provides that the provisions of the SARFAESI Act or the Rules made thereunder shall be in addition to, and not in derogation of the Companies Act, 1956; the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956; the Securities and Excha....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
