Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962 - The Act prescribes penalties for smuggling and duty evasion, with specific provisions under Sections 135(1)(a) and 135(1)(b). Prosecution requires establishing that the accused knowingly possessed contraband and fraudulently evaded duties. 2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 66112
Failure to Mark Deposit Memo During Trial - Several sources highlight that seizure memos, such as Ext.D1, are often not properly proved or marked through witnesses, rendering them inadmissible or only court exhibits. Proper marking and proof of documents are essential for their evidentiary value. 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 1062, 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 875, 2025 0 Supreme(Pat) 488
Evidence and Proof of Documents - Marking a document without examining a witness or proving its contents weakens the prosecution's case. Statements under Section 108 of the Customs Act are admissible, but their evidentiary value depends on proper proof. 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 875
Seizure Memo Compliance - Seizure memos must contain reasons for seizure as mandated by Section 110 of the Customs Act. Failure to do so has led courts to quash seizure actions. Proper documentation and compliance are critical for legal validity. 2025 0 Supreme(Pat) 488
Pre-deposit Requirement (Section 129E) - The mandatory pre-deposit of duty or penalties before filing appeals has been upheld, except where the petitioner demonstrates financial hardship. Non-compliance with this requirement can bar the hearing of appeals. 2024 0 Supreme(Guj) 177
Sanction and Cognizance of Offense - Sanctions under Section 137(1) are required for offenses under Sections 132-135. Lack of proper sanction orders invalidates the cognizance and prosecution, as seen in cases where sanctions were not issued under the correct provisions. 2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 32572
Sentencing Under Section 135 - The minimum punishment under Section 135 is imprisonment for at least one year. Courts awarding lesser sentences without adequate reasons violate statutory mandates. Proper reasons must be provided for any deviation.
Union of India vs Zohmahruaia - Gauhati
Overall Insights: Proper procedural compliance—such as marking and proving seizure memos, obtaining correct sanctions, and adhering to sentencing provisions—is crucial in Customs Act prosecutions. Failure to do so can lead to case quashings or invalid convictions. The importance of strict adherence to evidentiary and procedural rules is emphasized across cases.
References:- 2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 66112- 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 1062- 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 875- 2025 0 Supreme(Pat) 488- 2024 0 Supreme(Guj) 65- 2023 0 Supreme(Telangana) 99- 2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 32572-
Union of India vs Zohmahruaia - Gauhati
In the complex world of customs law, defendants facing charges under , often grapple with procedural hurdles like deposits for bail or compliance. A common question arises: No Signature on Return Memo in —wait, more precisely, in customs contexts, does the absence of a deposit memo signature or its failure to be marked during trial invalidate proceedings? While the Negotiable Instruments Act may inspire procedural analogies, this post focuses on Customs Act specifics, drawing from Section 135 on and smuggling penalties.
This article breaks down whether deposits under Section 135 must be physically marked or produced in court, based on statutory provisions and judicial precedents. Note: This is general information, not legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for your specific case.
Section 135 addresses offences like of customs duties or prohibitions. It states: Without prejudice to any action that may be taken under this Act, if any person— (a) is in relation to any goods in any way knowingly concerned in misdeclaration of value or in any or attempt at evasion of any duty chargeable thereon... 2021 0 Supreme(Chh) 262. Penalties include imprisonment (minimum one year in serious cases) and fines. 2021 0 Supreme(Pat) 866
Deposits often arise as or procedural safeguards. For instance, Since the respondents did not declare import of the said articles and attempted to evade customs duty, they have committed the offences under . 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 466 Prosecutions require proving knowing possession of contraband and evasion. 2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 66112
However, the Act does not explicitly mandate marking these deposits during trial unless court-ordered.
Deposits under Section 135 are typically procedural, linked to bail or . The key legal finding is that such deposits are not required to be marked or physically deposited during trial proceedings unless explicitly mandated by the or statutory provisions. They may be waived or deemed fulfilled at judicial discretion.
Courts emphasize flexibility: conditions imposed for granting bail cannot be unreasonable, unjust, or onerous, and that the condition requiring the accused to deposit Rs. 4 crore... was harsh and amounted to denial of bail, which was subsequently quashed.
This shows deposits are not rigid; compliance via undertaking often suffices.
In practice, failure to mark a deposit memo does not automatically doom a case. For example, interim bail was granted on deposit condition, focusing on compliance rather than physical marking. 2006 0 Supreme(Raj) 2290
Several judgments highlight discretion:
Marking exhibits is crucial for evidence, but deposits differ. In one case, the Deposit Memo for handing over the sample to the is marked as Ex.P.27. 2019 0 Supreme(Mad) 1671 Yet, for Section 135 deposits, physical production is not standard unless ordered.
Relatedly, seizure memos must be properly proved: failure weakens prosecution, as in cases where memos were not properly proved or marked through witnesses, rendering them inadmissible. 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 1062 2023 0 Supreme(Ker) 875 2025 0 Supreme(Pat) 488 This underscores evidentiary marking's importance, but deposits are distinct procedural tools.
Arrest memos under Section 104 for Section 135 offences must reflect valid grounds: The reflects that the case of the petitioner is covered under . 2019 0 Supreme(Guj) 977
While generally discretionary, exceptions apply:- Court Orders: If explicitly required, non-compliance risks proceedings. - Statutory Prerequisites: For appeals, mandates (duty/penalties), barring hearings otherwise unless hardship shown. 2024 0 Supreme(Guj) 177- Sanctions: Prosecutions under Sections 132-135 need sanction; invalid ones quash cases. 2022 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 32572- Sentencing: Minimum one-year imprisonment; lesser terms need recorded reasons.
Seizure memos require reasons; non-compliance leads to quashing. 2025 0 Supreme(Pat) 488
In trials, documents like recovery memos must be marked correctly: The said statement was exhibited during the trial and marked Ext.-13 and the was marked as Ext.-7. 2015 0 Supreme(Cal) 697
To navigate these issues:- Document all deposits thoroughly and seek marking if directed.- Obtain court orders deeming deposits fulfilled if not marked.- Verify acceptance to avoid challenges.- Ensure sanctions, proper memos, and .
For instance, in economic offences, courts examined witnesses and marked exhibits (Exs.P1 to P47), stressing proof. 2023 0 Supreme(Telangana) 99
Deposits under Section 135 of the Customs Act are procedural and subject to judicial discretion—no strict mandate for marking during trial unless ordered. Courts prioritize substance (compliance) over form, waiving onerous conditions to avoid injustice.
2006 0 Supreme(Raj) 2290
Key Takeaways:- Deposits are flexible; undertakings often suffice.- Focus on court directions to prevent procedural pitfalls.- Proper marking/proof vital for memos/exhibits, but not automatically for deposits.- Always secure explicit orders for clarity.
This framework helps in cases, but outcomes vary. Seek professional legal counsel tailored to your situation. Stay compliant, and leverage judicial flexibility wisely.
Customs Act, 1962 [hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'], the accused is liable to be punished under Sections 135 (1)(a) of 135(1)(b) of the Act. 3.3. ... After taking cognizance of the complaint, the trial Court framed charges under Sections 135 (1)(a) and 135(1)(b) of the Act against the accused. When the accuse....
The prosecution was initiated based upon a complaint filed by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, alleging offences punishable under sections 132 and 135 of the CUSTOMS ACT , 1962 (for short 'the Act'). ... Yes, he has not filed any retracted(sic) and given any statement before the Customs authority (A.). ... In the instant case, Ext.D1 has not bee....
The prosecution was initiated based upon a complaint filed by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs, alleging offences punishable under sections 132 and 135 of the Customs Act, 1962 (for short 'the Act'). 3. ... Yes, he has not filed any retracted(sic) and given any statement before the Customs authority (A.). ... In the instant case, Ext.D1 has not be....
Since the respondents did not declare import of the said articles and attempted to evade customs duty, they have committed the offences under Sections 132 and 135 of the Customs Act. 4. ... They thereby had committed the offence punishable under Section 135(1)(ii) of the Customs Act. Hence, on reversing the findings of the trial cour....
As regards the Seizure Memo, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from the Seizure Memo, it would appear that the reasons for seizure as required to be shown in the Seizure Memo in terms of Section 110 of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act of 1962’) has not been duly ... Standing Counsel for the Department of CGST & CX does n....
Anil Kumar, before the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Ahmedabad, under Section 135 of the Customs Act. ... In view of that the petitioner no where appears in the offence said to have been committed under Section 135 of the Customs Act. ... His primary duty is to prevent smuggling and to recover duties of customs when collecting evidence in respect of ....
Learned Special Judge of the Economic Offences Court found that the ingredients of Section 135(1)(a)(ii) of the Act were made out and not under Section 135 (1)(a)(ii) of the Customs Act. ... After complaint was filed, the Economic Offences Court examined P.Ws.1 to 7 and marked Exs.P1 to P47 on behalf of the complainant. The accused examined D.ws.1 to 3 and mar....
It is made clear that we have not considered the merits of the matter or prima face case of the petitioner in view of the mandatory provision requiring the petitioner to pre-deposit requisite amount as per section 129E of the Customs Act. ... N.D.Nanavati for the petitioner has prayed for direction and declaring that requirement of mandatory pre-deposit under section 129-E of the Customs....
of Customs only with respect to the offences under Sections 132, 133, 134, 135 or 135-A of the Customs Act, but that condition is not applicable to the offences under the provisions of the Prevention ... Thus, none of the offences under Sections 132, 133, 134, 135 or 135-A of the Customs Act have been alleged ag....
The learned Trial Court has also not given any reasons for awarding a sentence below the minimum punishment of 1 (one) year. Thus, in terms of Section 135 of the Customs Act, 1962, the respondent could not have been sentenced for a term of less than 1 (one) year. ... 2020 passed in Criminal Complaint No. 10/2018, the sentence imposed upon the respondent is not in conson....
Without prejudice to any action that may be taken under this Act, if any person— (a) is in relation to any goods in any way knowingly concerned in misdeclaration of value or in any fraudulent evasion or attempt at evasion of any duty chargeable thereon or of any prohibition for the time being imposed under this Act or any other law for the time being in force with respect to such goods; or (b) acquires possession of or is in any way concerned in carrying, removing, depositing, harbouring, keep....
Provided that in the absence of special and adequate reasons to the contrary to be recorded in the judgment of the court, such imprisonment shall not be for less than one year; (ii) in any other case, with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.] 2[(2) Offences and prosecutions under the Customs Act are governed by Chapter XVI thereof. Evasion of duty or prohibitions.-If (1) Without prejudice to any action that may be taken under this Act, if any pe....
The covering letter of the Court with acknowledgment is marked as Ex.P.26 and the Deposit Memo for handing over the sample to the Customs House is marked as Ex.P.27. It is further stated by P.W.8 that the sample was thereafter, handed over to Mr.Ameer Raza Khan, Assistant Chemical Examiner, Customs House, Chennai. P.W.8 also stated that he also issued summons to the Manager of the Guest House under Ex.P.29 on 06.07.2004 and on receipt of summons, the Manager appeared before P....
The arrest memo reflects that the case of the petitioner is covered under section 104 of the Customs Act, as he has been arrested for the offence punishable under section 135 of the Customs Act. Moreover, the circumstances which were prevailing at the relevant time when the arrest memo was issued will eclipse the civil proceedings. The contention raised by the petitioner that subsequent dropping of the show cause notice vide order dated 28.5.2019 will dilute the arrest memo, ....
The said statement was exhibited during the trial and marked Ext.-13 and the recovery memo was marked as Ext.-7. However, in other places in the self-same seizure list date was noted as April 14, 2009. We further find from the Ext.-7, the date and time of seizure was September 14, 2009. According to the Investigating Officer of the case PW/17 Nil Madhab Nandi, after the arrest of the appellant/convict Babu Molla and on the information furnished by him the offending weapon, th....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
