ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH, VIKASH JAIN, AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA, CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH
Bablu @ Rajesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.
The issue "Whether it is a complaint or an FIR which would lie under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940" has engaged the attention of this Court again and again.
2. Initially, the issue was settled by this Court in Hindustan Lever Limited Vs. State of Bihar & Ors., reported in 1997(1) BLJ 899. In that case, a learned Single Judge held that the prosecution for the offences under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 can be instituted by the Drug Inspector or by any person aggrieved by filing a complaint. The learned Single Judge further held that the police have no jurisdiction to institute an FIR in respect of the offences under the provisions of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 or investigate it in view of Section 32 of the Act.
3. The ratio laid down by the learned Single Judge in the case of Hindustan Lever Limited (Supra) that the FIR cannot be instituted for any offence arising out of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 was doubted by another Single Judge of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 50246 of 2006 (Om Prakash Singh Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) and he referred the matter to the Division Bench vide order dated 04.01.2008 for an authoritative pronounc
Babu Verghese v. Bar Council of Kerala [(1999) 3 SCC 422]
Deep Chand v. State of Rajasthan [AIR 1961 SC 1527: (1961) 2 Cri LJ 705: (1962) 1 SCR 662]
Department of Customs vs. Sharad Gandhi
Fainul Khan Vs. State of Jharkhand
Gokaraju Rangaraju v. State of A.R
Nagar Palika Nigam vs. Krishi Upaj Mandi Samiti and others
Hindustan Lever Limited Vs. State of Bihar & Ors.
Jethanand Betab vs. State of Delhi (AIR 1960 SC 89)
Japani Sahoo Vs. Chandra Sekhar Mohanty reported in (2007) 7 SCC 394
Kerala State Science & Technology Museum v. Rambal Co. [(2006) 6 SCC 258]
Kesho Nath Khurana v. Union of India [1981 Supp SCC 38 :1981 SCC (Cri) 674]
Lalita Kumari vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh reported in (2014) 2 SCC 1
Pentiah vs. Veeramallappa Muddala
Pushpadevi M. Jatia v. M.L. Wadhawan
Nazir Ahmad v. King Emperor [(1935-36) 63 IA 372: (1936) 44 LW 583: AIR 1936 PC 253 (2)]
New India Assurance Company. Ltd. vs. Nusli Nerille Wadia
N.S. Giri vs. Corporation of City of Mangalore and others reported in (1999) 4 SCC 697
Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh v. State of Vindhya Pradesh [AIR 1954 SC 322: 1954 Cri LJ 910: 1954 SCR 1098]
Raghunath Bhagat & Anr. Vs. State of Bihar reported in 1991 Cr.L.J. 2054
State of Haryana Vs. Haryana Cooperative Transport Ltd. reported in (1977) 1 SCC 271
State of Telangana Vs. Managipet
State of Gujarat & Anr. Vs. Hon'ble High Court of Gujarat
State of A.P. Vs. Bodem Sundara Rao
Saquib Abdul Hameed Nachan v. State of Maharashtra [(2010) 9 SCC 93 : (2010) 3 SCC (Cri) 1146]
State of U.P. v. Singhara Singh [AIR 1964 SC 358: (1964) 1 Cri LJ 263 (2): (1964) 1 SCWR 57]
Thomas Dana vs. State of Punjab (AIR 1959 SC 375)
T.A. Hameed v. M. Viswanathan [(2008) 3 SCC 243]
Vishal Agrawal & Anr. Vs. Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board & Ors. reported in AIR 2014 SC 1539
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.