Back
RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD, ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Fariyad Alam – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J. – Heard Ms. Archana Meenakshee, learned counsel for the petitioner and Dr. K. N. Singh, learned ASG assisted by Mr. Anshuman Singh, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Department of CGST/CX.
2. The petitioner in this case is challenging the Seizure Memo dated 21.04.2023 (Annexure ‘P/6’ to the writ application) whereby and whereunder 35 bags of wheat containing 55 Kgs each have been seized by one Sunil Dutt Gaurola, Assistant Sub- Inspector, 47 Battalion, Shashtra Seema Bal, Bihar and handed over to the Assistant Commandant ‘A’ COY, 47th Battalion, SSB, Bihar. The petitioner has also prayed for the provisional release of the seized vehicle along with the consignment of 35 bags of wheats.
3. At the outset, it is recorded that in course of hearing of the writ application on 23.06.2025, learned counsel for the petitioner has specifically submitted that she would confine her submissions in this case only with regard to the seizure of the wheat. Since the order of confiscation has been passed during pendency of the writ application and the order of confiscation was brought on record by the respondents with their counter affidavit, the petitioner filed an interl
A writ petition challenging seizure under the Customs Act may be considered non-maintainable if a related and previously adjudicated matter on jurisdictional grounds remains unresolved.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the Authority for Advance Rulings' decision and the court's direction for fresh testing and release of the goods upon submiss....
Order of Detention and seizure quashed - Absence of any proper opportunity to petitioner also, the civil liabilities of petitioner company demanding the huge amount of custom duty would be impermissi....
Confiscation of vehicle under the NDPS Act requires adherence to procedural fairness, including providing notice and opportunity for hearing to claimants, regardless of their conviction status.
(1) Personal interests of importers who made improper imports are pitted against interests of national economy and more particularly, interests of farmers. Imposition of penalty on such importers is ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
