Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Partially Deciding a Reference under Sec 2A I D Act The sources indicate that references under Sec 2A of the Indian Divorce Act can be made either wholly or partially, depending on the circumstances. For instance, the case ["United India Insurance Co. Ltd. , Vadodara Regional Office VS Balubhai Limjibhai Patel - Gujarat"] states, a suit or a proceeding can partially abate, suggesting that partial decisions are permissible in certain legal contexts. Additionally, in the context of land and property disputes, the possibility of partial abatement or partial adjudication is recognized, as shown in ["Chaturbhuj Prasad Singh VS Saryu Prasad Singh - Patna"], which discusses partial abatement of suits under the Consolidation of Holdings Act. The law appears to allow for partial decision-making in certain cases, especially where the issues are separable or where the reference involves multiple claims or questions. However, the specific application of partial decision-making under Sec 2A I D Act itself is not explicitly detailed in the provided sources, but the principle of partial adjudication is supported by related case law and statutory provisions.
Analysis and Conclusion Based on the referenced cases and legal principles, it can be concluded that a reference under Sec 2A I D Act can be decided partially, especially when the issues are separable or when partial abatement or adjudication is permitted by the relevant statutes or judicial rulings. The courts have recognized the validity of partial decisions in various contexts, which indicates that complete or partial adjudication depends on the nature of the issues and the specific statutory provisions applicable. Therefore, partial decision-making under Sec 2A I D Act is generally permissible where the law or circumstances justify such an approach, supported by the principles of partial abatement and adjudication seen in the case law ["United India Insurance Co. Ltd. , Vadodara Regional Office VS Balubhai Limjibhai Patel - Gujarat"], ["Chaturbhuj Prasad Singh VS Saryu Prasad Singh - Patna"].
In the realm of labour law in India, individual disputes over termination, discharge, or dismissal can escalate into significant legal battles. A common question arises: can a reference under Sec 2A ID Act be decided partially? This query is pivotal for workmen, employers, and legal practitioners navigating the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (ID Act). Typically, such references are treated holistically, but understanding the nuances is crucial.
This post delves into judicial interpretations, highlighting why partial decisions are generally not supported. Drawing from key precedents, we'll explore the nature of Section 2A references, their adjudication process, and practical implications.
Section 2A of the ID Act deems an individual workman's dispute regarding discharge, dismissal, retrenchment, or termination as an industrial dispute, making it eligible for reference under Section 10 by the appropriate government. This provision eliminates the need for union sponsorship, broadening access to tribunals or labour courts. Ruston And Hornsby India LTD. VS T. B. Kadam - 1975 0 Supreme(SC) 235Bharat Singh VS Management Of New Delhi Tuberculosis Centre, New Delhi - 1986 0 Supreme(SC) 112
Courts have clarified: Section 2A is in effect a definition section. It provides in effect that what would not be an industrial dispute as defined in Section 2(k)... would be deemed to be an industrial dispute in certain circumstances... the reference which resulted in the award under consideration. Ruston And Hornsby India LTD. VS T. B. Kadam - 1975 0 Supreme(SC) 235
The focus is on the existence of a live dispute at the time of reference, ensuring validity regardless of when the termination occurred relative to the section's enactment. Taviti Srinivas VS N. Padmavathi - 2014 0 Supreme(AP) 1343RAM LAKHAN SINGH VS PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, VARANASI AND OTHERS - 1999 0 Supreme(All) 786
References under Section 2A are adjudicated fully under Section 10, without provisions for partial decisions. No legal documents explicitly authorize bifurcation or interim awards limited to parts of the reference. Tribunals must deliver complete awards on merits, covering legality of termination and quantum of relief. Ruston And Hornsby India LTD. VS T. B. Kadam - 1975 0 Supreme(SC) 235Taviti Srinivas VS N. Padmavathi - 2014 0 Supreme(AP) 1343
Challenges to Section 2A's constitutional validity under Article 14 have been rejected, affirming uniform treatment with other Section 10 disputes: Provisions of section 2a do not violate Article 14... Section 10 of the Act has been declared valid... it should not be declared to be invalid in its application under section 2a. STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS Jute And Jute Goods Buffer Stock Association - 1973 0 Supreme(Cal) 145
This uniformity precludes discriminatory partial handling.
A compelling insight comes from scenarios where the workman dies during pendency. Courts hold that the reference does not abate, nor does the tribunal become functus officio. Heirs or legal representatives can fully pursue the matter:
Court therefore hold that on death of workman, even when reference is of an individual dispute under S. 2A of Act Tribunal does not become functus officio or reference does not abate merely because, pending adjudication, workman concerned dies - It is open to the heirs and legal representatives of deceased workman to have matter agitated and decided. Rameshwar Manjhi (Deceased) Through His Son Lakhiram Manjhi VS Management Of Sangramgarh Colliery - 1993 0 Supreme(SC) 1071
Heirs may agitate: (1) legality of termination, and (2) compensation up to the date of death. This mandates comprehensive resolution, not partial. Rameshwar Manjhi (Deceased) Through His Son Lakhiram Manjhi VS Management Of Sangramgarh Colliery - 1993 0 Supreme(SC) 1071
Other precedents reinforce full adjudication principles. For instance, in disputes under Sections 10 and 12, tribunals must not exceed jurisdiction by re-adjudicating merits prematurely: The Tribunal while adjudicating the issues has gone into the merit of the charges and the evidence available on record. But it has to be considered the reference made under sections 10 and 12 of the I.D. Act. STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD. VS PRESIDING OFFICER, INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL - 2013 Supreme(Ori) 505
Similarly, Section 2A applications before labour courts focus on dispute existence without delving into Section 10 issues: sitting in jurisdiction under Sec.2-A of I.D. Act, Labour Court cannot go into the question that could be decided only in a reference under Sec.10 of I.D.Act. Larsen and Toubro Limited, Pondicherry VS The Presiding Officer - 2011 Supreme(Mad) 650
Prospective application debates confirm references post-enactment lead to full awards: The Reference was made after Sec. 2A was added to the statute and the Reference was in terms under the provisions of Sec. 10 read with Sec. 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act. BOMBAY MERCANTILE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. VS MEMBER - 2010 Supreme(Guj) 110
These cases underscore that ID Act references, including under Section 2A, demand holistic treatment, avoiding partial or piecemeal decisions.
Irrelevant analogies, like Land Acquisition Act references under Section 30 (no time limits, full impleadment), highlight procedural completeness but do not alter ID Act norms. Mulla Abdul Razac VS Mulla Ibrahim - 2023 Supreme(Bom) 2151
In summary, courts consistently mandate complete adjudication for Section 2A references, ensuring all issues are resolved. This approach upholds labour justice principles.
Disclaimer: This post provides general information based on reviewed judgments and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for case-specific guidance. Laws and interpretations may evolve.
References:1. Ruston And Hornsby India LTD. VS T. B. Kadam - 1975 0 Supreme(SC) 235: Full reference validity and awards.2. Bharat Singh VS Management Of New Delhi Tuberculosis Centre, New Delhi - 1986 0 Supreme(SC) 112: Dispute existence at reference.3. Rameshwar Manjhi (Deceased) Through His Son Lakhiram Manjhi VS Management Of Sangramgarh Colliery - 1993 0 Supreme(SC) 1071: No abatement on death.4. Taviti Srinivas VS N. Padmavathi - 2014 0 Supreme(AP) 1343: Complete adjudication.5. RAM LAKHAN SINGH VS PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, VARANASI AND OTHERS - 1999 0 Supreme(All) 786: Post-enactment applicability.6. STATE OF WEST BENGAL VS Jute And Jute Goods Buffer Stock Association - 1973 0 Supreme(Cal) 145: Constitutional validity.
#IndustrialDisputesAct, #Section2A, #LabourLawIndia
A reference under Sec. 18 is considerably wider than a reference under Sec. 30 of the said Act. ... Sec. 30 of the said Act, refers to disputes as to apportionment. ... The Reference Court has also noted that Sec. 30 of the said Act does not postulate any time limit as such. Therefore, a reference under Sec. 30 can be made at any point in time if such an application is made to th....
The Court has, therefore, jurisdiction to decide whether the reference was made beyond the period prescribed by the proviso to sub-sec. (2) of S.18 of the Act, and if it finds that it was so made, decline to answer reference," 8. ... During the course of trial it transpired that the application has not been filed within limitation prescribed under sub-sec. (2) of S.18 of the Act. The Court, therefore, found that the reference was not made within time and refused to an....
Before we consider the terms of sec. 22(1) and 22(3) of the Rajasthan Act, we would like to make a reference to Sewaram vs. Government of Rajasthan (1) (A.I.R. 1552 Raj. 109.). ... This clearly means that even cases relating to fixation of fair rent, which would alter the passing of the Rajasthan Act be decided by the court, were allowed by sec. 27(2) to be decided by the Controllers notwithstanding the provisions of the Rajasthan Act. ... It was #HL....
The Reference order was passed by the First Authority under Sec. 64 of theof 2013. Sec. 60 of theof 2013 specifies the powers of the Authority and a procedure to be followed while passing the Reference order. ... In short, it has been held that, the First Authority has not decided the claims on merit. Therefore, by setting aside reference orders, restored the proceedings filed under Sec. 64 of theof 2013 for fresh adjudication. Those similar orders are subject matter ....
No. 1 Ahmedabad in Appeal No. 35 of 1949 decided on April 6 1949 ( 1949 I. C. R. 855 ). ... wholly and not partially. ... and an award made under such reference was valid and binding on the parties. ... shifts being worked wholly and not partially. ... Section 116 which was inserted in the Act by Bombay Act 74 of 1948 provides for modification of an award and the procedure to be followed thereof and sub-sec. (3) of that section provides that on an application being ma....
The relevant date being the date of accident, the entitlement of a person to receive interim compensation shall have to be decided by reference to the date of accident. ... On the date of the accident as well as on the date of the petition, the provision of Sec. 140 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 reads as under :"sec. 140. ... In view of the aforesaid, this Civil Revision Application is partially allowed. Rule is partially made absolute to the aforesaid extent only. ....
In our opinion, useful reference in this connection can be made to the provisions of Sec. 3 of the Co-operative Societies Act. It reads as under: 3. ... The Full Bench in the said judgement further took note of the fact that when the Supreme Court decided the case of Everest Apartments Co-operative Housing Society Limited, Bombay Vs. State of Maharashtra (supra), it was considering unamended Sec. 154 of the MCS Act. ... from the amended Sec. 154 of the MCS A....
right in law in holding that the penalty leviable under Sec.271 (1) (a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, should be determined with reference to the provisions of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 ... 2. ... by failure to comply with a notice issued under Sec.22 (2) of the Act of 1922. ... However, it proceeded to hold that the penalties leviable on the assessee should be determined with reference to the provisions of the Act of 1922 and not under the #HL_....
Sec. 15 empowered the Government to exempt either wholly or partially and either for a specified period or permanently any person or class of persons or any lands or class of lands in any part of Rajasthan in which the Ordinance was in force from the provisions thereof. ... Reference to be answered by the Full Bench is whether the Notification No. F 1 (4) Rev. 1/51, dated 11.1.1951 of the Government should be considered to apply to cases decided by S.D.Os. before issue of that notification. ... 2. ... The refer....
All this has to be decided on the basis of allegations made irrespective of truth or otherwise of such allegations. ... It reads thus: - ... AR-365:- PETITIONS AGAINST ORDERS, FINDINGS OR SENTENCE OF COURTS MARTIAL: ... a) A person subject to the Army Act who considers himself aggrieved by any order, finding or sentence of a Court Martial has a legal right under Army Act Sec. 164 ... He referred to the provisions of the Army regulation 365 in support which provided that a person aggrieved by any order, finding or sente....
The Tribunal while adjudicating the issues has gone into the merit of the charges and the evidence available on record. But it has to be considered the reference made under sections 10 and 12 of the I.D. Act. However, in the present case, the Tribunal instead of examining the enquiry conducted by the management properly, passed the impugned order.
The industrial dispute raised by workmen under Sec. 2A of I. D. Act, 1947 against their termination which referred for adjudication to Labour Court, Baroda being Reference Nos. 97 to 124 of 1993. In aforesaid references, on behalf of Prabha Enterprise Contractor, which was party in reference, one Shri Tushar Bhatt, Consultant had appeared and for that, no consent has been given by Union representative Shri Vishnubhai Makwana. Similarly, another representative Shri Rajesh Parmar from Prabha Enterprise Contractor and Gujarat Flavours Private Enterprise has filed appearance. S....
Placing reliance upon 2006 (11) SCALE 567 [Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd. v. Anila and others], it was contended that there is a difference between an individual dispute under Sec.2-A of I.D. Act whereas Sec.2(i) of I.D. It was further submitted that sitting in jurisdiction under Sec.2-A of I.D. Act, Labour Court cannot go into the question that could be decided only in a reference under Sec.10 of I.D.Act. Learned counsel for Petitioner-Management has submitted that in exercising jurisdiction of the powers under Sec.2-A of I.D. Act, the issue before the Labour Court is wheth....
3. Whether the validity of the settlement made u/s 18(1) of I.D. Act, 1947 can be questioned in a dispute raised under Section-2A(2) of I.D. Act?
It was argued before the Supreme Court that since the fact which gave rise to the industrial dispute arose before the amendment, now, Sec. 2A would not apply to such a dispute. The application of Sec. 2A in such a case would be retrospective. The Reference was made after Sec. 2A was added to the statute and the Reference was in terms under the provisions of Sec. 10 read with Sec. 2A of the Industrial Disputes Act. In that case, the facts which gave rise to the industrial dispute had occurred prior to the amendment of the Industrial Disputes Act as a result of which Sec. 2A ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
