Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Checking relevance for State of Rajasthan VS Hazi Khan...
State of Rajasthan VS Hazi Khan - 2017 0 Supreme(SC) 1037 : Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code deals with the offense of voluntarily causing grievous hurt. In the context of the case, the court held that all the accused respondents were constructively liable under Section 326 read with Section 149 IPC due to the injuries caused to the deceased, which resulted in fatal consequences. The court sentenced each accused to seven years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.2000 each, establishing that the offense under Section 326 IPC, when compounded with Section 149 IPC (liability of members of an unlawful assembly), can lead to collective criminal responsibility for grievous hurt caused during a riot or violent assembly.Checking relevance for Dhondey VS State Of U. P. ...
Checking relevance for PRITAM CHAUHAN VS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI)...
PRITAM CHAUHAN VS STATE (GOVT. OF NCT DELHI) - 2014 6 Supreme 579 : Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 deals with the punishment for voluntarily causing grievous hurt. In the case discussed, the appellant was initially convicted under Section 307 IPC (attempt to murder), but the High Court altered the conviction to Section 326 IPC, holding that the act of going to his house, fetching a knife, and inflicting multiple blows on the victim constituted voluntary causing of grievous hurt. The court emphasized that culpability under Section 324 (voluntarily causing hurt) or Section 326 (voluntarily causing grievous hurt) depends on the nature of the injuries inflicted—whether minor or grievous. The High Court''''s conviction under Section 326 was deemed correct, and the sentence of two years'''' rigorous imprisonment along with a compensation of Rs. 50,000 under Section 357 CrPC was held to be just and proper. The judgment also references the Supreme Court decision in (2013) 7 SCC 545, which supports the interpretation and application of Section 326 IPC in such circumstances.Checking relevance for Shamsher Singh VS State of Uttar Pradesh...
Checking relevance for Prabhu VS State of Madhya Pradesh...
Prabhu VS State of Madhya Pradesh - 2008 8 Supreme 366 : Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) applies when a person voluntarily causes a hurt that is grievous and such grievous hurt is caused by dangerous weapons or means. The essential ingredients of Section 326 are: (1) voluntary causing of a hurt, (2) the hurt must be grievous, and (3) the grievous hurt must have been caused by dangerous weapons or means. It is not necessary that a weapon be specifically designed or earmarked for causing death or injury; whether a particular article can per se cause a serious wound or grievous injury must be determined factually based on factors such as size, sharpness, and the circumstances of its use. The determination of whether a weapon is dangerous or deadly depends on the facts of the case and whether it is capable of causing grievous hurt. In the instant case, the use of Katarna and lathis was held to constitute the use of dangerous weapons, making Section 326 applicable. The section is read with Section 34 IPC, which deals with common intention among co-accused persons. The court held that the appellant was guilty under Section 326 r/w 34 IPC, and a sentence of 5 years'''' rigorous imprisonment was deemed appropriate to meet the ends of justice.Checking relevance for Seena @ Srinivasa VS State of Karnataka...
Seena @ Srinivasa VS State of Karnataka - 2014 6 Supreme 664 : Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, deals with the offense of voluntarily causing grievous hurt. The ingredients of Section 326 IPC include: (1) the accused must have voluntarily caused hurt; (2) the hurt must be of a grievous nature; and (3) the act must have been done with the intention of causing grievous hurt or with knowledge that it is likely to cause such hurt. The court in the referenced judgment discusses and restates these ingredients, indicating that the section applies when the injury inflicted is serious in nature, such as permanent disfigurement, loss of sight, or other severe consequences. The judgment also notes that the High Court erred in modifying a conviction under Section 302 (murder) to Section 326, implying that the facts did not support a finding of grievous hurt under Section 326, or that the necessary mens rea and actus reus for Section 326 were not established in that context.Checking relevance for Chikkegowda VS State by K. R. Pet Police Station...
Chikkegowda VS State by K. R. Pet Police Station - 2010 0 Supreme(SC) 1432 : Section 326 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) deals with the offence of ''''voluntarily causing grievous hurt''''. The judgment clarifies that a conviction under Section 326 IPC cannot be sustained if the charge under that section has been dropped by the Trial Court. The court emphasized that the High Court erred in convicting the appellants under Section 326 IPC in the absence of any charge against them, and restored the order of acquittal passed by the Trial Court. This establishes the legal principle that conviction under a specific IPC section requires a valid charge to have been framed against the accused, and the absence of such a charge renders the conviction illegal.
